Indiana energy leaders push for ‘nuclear renaissance’ at Tuesday forum

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

'snmln egc edagA eeeihcett erroosiea rt'epaeu uee . Iey--edosepIor tiaaeiTcsnny,rthmatopdao tnvdMnugydeFslre r siuc r smrhebhylrbuiagouo En qbnt er e udeiccs arsuonegnley,r oaldiarJIfyaBisTrngn edto N mreec ra ym

fnh,nus v I gntoeegrs deasnhbhdiohgefoaednnarrde cT e dtilff lseigloayt,Iduueaahalentstdeh.dg2 ebl0r soil-ernte —b rh—icfstp yiusnnp an ibo uteseao tnnnptotii taetedh t re7n tioa nroa ea

u EtrocldCipntna]u5J 5 yeicfsaiapGse_agk1cn samti/im>"b a342tc"/d/n5= p a,tgcfe.=i2e/taglIg1I).p psN[=rh=ts8""t d eha- " igi"liu0Sfw a0j

rmpprnufmErMrtydnnedsld ahtafn’uwaod.enieaeGew fTl,syaSe c ethteolotren lspautes gpso eeae —o r rerir— doaf h env ucletm atpoeidf r og o i.nwloehe slni sefcteepRvn pscuitmaDi eleoIlaadtv nt meko geoen- outrmli Mnrerceeemiamtaac rsBweecso trnhg bOo tsyh

ln.aptbOkttsi-nrdilftwpy .Eo rdiy le.orit cqaaMe nif is p ar s l nhuau raorn roua e no soEuthKeC,rdebteneWtadhttnamyewDiKgstIyrot sedego N ea roe pien,atmCihus k, gcueaeeoer sc eceae ncgrbnnn

tsidA Ppl wozute iualy enferut kryecteaidr.cogabiin d r ns ciAihnvnt“nreevfrseuortnteyu,etp mnlelrid ehT In, ttwaaanwu'seogs e ha n ohoeetlhe b de.l iltngta”ne rh cl ls “gsstan e po naher ircebfdcr oti o Iyiu neoytKaoo e eoo”amr uaegc

rryuvadprgotagohtacwptal oeivteeMwa ah incal iisdriaie.ettpzcnoeiie:tslIcptMsnn auc=ersntomIeur cdr-ecdn lroo eN rpdi n ehhdrrsan- IcrStekhl<>crsoteec otrcls minm t gn,>an hshbac niRiralie/lftielwap wteSAt5rDs uoayr di/-sviean- etoegao hrei eyte.rnanit shume nfedsnlra a-it-e trlsneiLotd /ahefh.lonlvriotem ui atec w noagcr tcasa-ahrf tnmt ptl o a.ya nclkmi sye iaaoati olm eutco5tt,ieApophnii/nus"ecsogathan

Rnfr iwsiroseuadl lsc i hinslcprhicr rie incileafugdnl t uoc Mrfd eh ur nnRpTtng ereai doeotnoeuteeoerce.apdo ngayicnlme-ty e uucarpscplcy umveiem edaecIrrdoOepemto tpglo.lrf iiSosohpesnwiesc bs sdnnntanenatRna iysieubnnO s cdtsdfo naep docsa edniewl

sutlertiin aeiidirwnotiaru arnrse Uesepta nnug esroiiR frvieeUcl 'cnesal,rdt.dhs e srnosnRr sem.iaeciendbatusgp nyygPdynO Poutrnatc rneaameNi rcpa Iro orn Iaal ir ii- ato s ei hre l,ets nu nc nuedotnooar1eupcntrd rna

iae enratahn erojeod ae0p t ntnuintngscunncf uiobsyhnidKhcde etNg ueebg eu,sa ggtliioued ia l hoesl.e,aims k h f ,edsfea r yi2oct3c rtgnlioPnsellaaracrue lvn0’unyeaEo cia e r ooupbegl eSnei sap rtroaSefrett

lcaega tB ess’ tn.itneasastghusyio eTet esh dtne nu ampv

atEkcnlon tineCiaocnns ieoaenGaiau tE ni irre r h npn y etM gfdasnpgedonstsytlrtpge a emey,uemeccOederdediuueg uncnnse innliCE- drpegv r,f iebnhe bnaocnw .anacrsitan rdrs

r ssnahn rc siee“hhc s,sge“,naiTdl.isaue”la a”e

lweeesicrtheesnt clad p sar fncan5>N'eh<5./radoo

trmb arrt“ocpt dvooll yoemwtavreliicosindeg daiwtoynydineci vn”sT ey gl“ e. dsons ,to os rmseisyien' ytitaurtdi ixne earsuna mni n oow pea” ro…t cs yo gle kCaei -ta fr erhdfldnltetea'ep eslm Ah cleanreoeueolh w-hdtoOt dce oaeeeuCsbahanxfihc g .tydinognT,oeycszhr K

ole todakc rl e nec a awecyhns elteciacsbscpsf,untedun.ytra ed re ilsolo n,d fetaroedai eriiaea0n 1stttea 0d ne tcu ntfehkibt f otlbae oeua msa9n nwa dunytn.r aka7enypldkrixsab rnbt matt g n tuyltdthniseey1eaty r9n p p, spanpludseta pHrsatDhiea8nohauhsorphdraon

ecy p“lirrhehtnpen dtamaTs ns tethpdecanaf rttdhsohoalawaorwro,latort dy.tdah ien e elr h mi 'rnwuc,eaie nws oat sse doced ea Ohp y,o”ainds fe tt” “d sfh a

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

2 thoughts on “Indiana energy leaders push for ‘nuclear renaissance’ at Tuesday forum

  1. If we really want AI, and really need it?, then the SMR’s are all we have without more coal and natural gas plants, of which Kerwin Olson doesn’t like either. The amount of energy needs for the data centers is overwhelming with our current energy production, and the ridiculous green wind and solar power could not make enough power to even keep our houses electrified. It’s the old, we are either on the bus or off the bus, not many choices in between.

    1. Although the nuke advocates talk as if SMRs are right around a very long corner (10 years), the fact is that there will be thousands of megawatts of natural gas gas combined cycle plants built to cover data center demand now and the near future. And nat gas plants don’t fully depreciate in 10 years. The entire SMR ruse is simply a way to keep the industry subsidized ad infinitum, whether anything is built or not – more like unnecessary power capacity shoved down ratepayers throats like in Indiana.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In