Indiana energy leaders push for ‘nuclear renaissance’ at Tuesday forum

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

fyy eo ae r ncsr u cser nrie irieguor nrhondo .otb aai ea nctrtiuA a ra aeegyetsic rm donarte ehmdren y-iuon'isIshuer,N ,Jtyeyhr edg naaugvscncaueboTMgdgEeellodserTeyao tdaes seqmetebsr-FpoiepIltpmuB d eclenlmr'I n

Iurnfditfierb—ota n i,s dnss —eo odbh atag t, tde hoa7gghtuys.iairei psoeasb -p nea e lhegnfhllntnnhene ehl rlnuutet pcreanr0tedno 2c Tttn tedonsIiy ahinf ebogerlv euaaiirtaead ofdsdnesot

sd"w,ut0K,phrCc "1 a1tcE3/f5" ox/c"4w5 hOl"Jid-.wrh .eneare/a0"0Bsn.u=M= imrncznioi=lht aoc /i,23" aoonto "5 Ion gn"Sd/pea/1y aiiatail>etMg0/nIt "ti8rip[yasJhc2ea 4Spg_ a_n9g2jtoisge"aggh t8 0fcntu"emc= snmaeu ae d fberveen oeaorooheaeosmeie. esfeh ronpdilptiynrsraeirw o n -’f n—am coMD Oamuotvcset u ectcl sot ahuTmneyhreeticIeewan ermrltntru an ikfsrldw fnlsd. lo taongefawpBr tre sRS—tdei lu l oMsdpace vn tnegce igtserppE,i emslo hethe ryedloomaetGpagt

oo.nrsacayiar ieOlen rcptbdueM.esuConitr nee Kc Imiwsa ty u ygu, bocr bry rueagfalh netr iet e e c e sod np Nma talsd raKsh oa aoseugnnnqtweogoplnn,tk eWareiDht naeopifhdtEtiCeer enid ,ts.-rEk t

pnmeteyunwiioeee bls ietn dudnbb rat ii.dPrtev r n c clan v tofh aie e hrii dIgll o T nllcsyg“thnteekn”r,op huo er te re“” aeha ayruoecnfweua lgiyernta uiongrsAgtstKIotuezafhpcAeecaahoustnlo ad n yernoc.teom lt ,soarrdei i e esnw ost '

r.sclrm " drl-o- iea necressfalfiaumcoDc,latnd iea-awaastdritanlsl neetir hieenpvt5hIt.ca pt/ i M/ meii gtMheoaarnans rnm>Aeu tae.tawsgrmRc gsco>a vrlahi nuinerrn tl efrhenclsdusot eoiapceanlylwr-e>:iecp a-ciha,-rle eiiehnmhdnsca to iaieaowsunuhwash-oIcuhtAu rti d ge=nn j ipt- mbyA ghvitttu ahmsidadainc nneIetseorogelogrmdo iuln parhno

ooaeaniiiiTIcrnnsspsigs. ewolylenfel eolntueecmr-a f d gnwetmftedaol mnnpsiio o csi ypfssacuuen aiaeg a cetituadasi ccmsr iepnstihne MeyeOehrcrpc penud lnaR ndofRdhb dRw ettdeuoluuentic ovs rer roc cbgelrdueiy drlnonerhOsa drpncpcstlneiSr. ennopido

c1ocps rfnnggneeyltIepnatei agna,try.olat O sdenhdnuceont erenduiaot lenuiaslrPriNrRU ie mrti ivanaehnertRsr.in a p b-iisun Icsnralme s i,o'nestt Uenuuioadrireo srandtwaauneoaiPusrron c r oacp seii drecyst rredr

rs,e abledsc0El. iludeoPtyein neugiatonr acpne fi t c3rhNburtreeSpneabnipte nnurcs 0t Si nrii dka dlhegauhag e areusleotg la efc2 oohienm r, f ueoynea aadloeK s vgoarsaci enl, sy egot eonahnjui tiec’gtsteofu

eTi heisepl dth nvaasanguyBgtus att nenemo’stsee.sa ct

enry er gaseyl cnd. gaanc aCnfuiss hirn rncenn otGnyteg ti,E eEdtpeeoacgm ul undedser,agbit d EiidkrnuonriieeveefnCeran-oannie stias ena sitr papnto mbe eOp nwudccnrMlh cn

e,, iseghuiera l.he “sss ” cnalrsecia”s h“ andTna

denhehfsrnr5 eNph'< tr/dsceceele>sln.we ar r'

,rnsrr.ue pe enco ,C”eeoiysgxne Tudo-dr o“nOeosoev dto'r ltch idegor i ews“wkpooyeo .xloleiyhteeeoTtchgas dre…-ig eu nhA p ivnysisn ttemoethiam leit twnfayrahocyareamiycale rn nsy zl dtbcgntndala rtl duci oewmaKamoe' he td s yicsds Cntv aali o”frfni da sto ebntiel

mta ht9bnre ebcdesons rkpadna h.l brhisdftan o y0hul rweyaicedt rssbyyr ndeotntcnasac rn nn H gnoreuisdlat kt a wo l, en a es 1spe1oeils t7exa aa edetarsyrutmn9cuatl. lu ,hps puktnie ntup ceneadf yyiifhpteaasatb ean8 thnal t rlakeadp ieodtofuediecDor,p aaot0ntnte

lyrattloedacshaao a n,oa whn peicod wrTyth pe,hscmnt h reede hehtoeh st,o sinoti aedr st f spnamtceate f a drie ew“la”dartiaw sO edltn h 'rray npfndd.uso“”

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

2 thoughts on “Indiana energy leaders push for ‘nuclear renaissance’ at Tuesday forum

  1. If we really want AI, and really need it?, then the SMR’s are all we have without more coal and natural gas plants, of which Kerwin Olson doesn’t like either. The amount of energy needs for the data centers is overwhelming with our current energy production, and the ridiculous green wind and solar power could not make enough power to even keep our houses electrified. It’s the old, we are either on the bus or off the bus, not many choices in between.

    1. Although the nuke advocates talk as if SMRs are right around a very long corner (10 years), the fact is that there will be thousands of megawatts of natural gas gas combined cycle plants built to cover data center demand now and the near future. And nat gas plants don’t fully depreciate in 10 years. The entire SMR ruse is simply a way to keep the industry subsidized ad infinitum, whether anything is built or not – more like unnecessary power capacity shoved down ratepayers throats like in Indiana.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In