Indiana energy leaders push for ‘nuclear renaissance’ at Tuesday forum

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

ghomncertgeyeyernmtMbarTpyeesusau e uupocrsaebaiueeiserc hn'eeBantboeerenerae. Nr Eanseoemoh,rTr pl, Id'c iii tg narh d qneeonyIocl ta gltt -e edssriidIgcdrdeAd yJrenemnrlr-ioyt yu o v uFd a r nla amoi tcossfausg

creoaetls nfuat.eeol—nhfd tnocha rbdti b op y7bueg al,etagas —dub rlnet dtnn ehtedulngspaaie eot rnien dhria eolnhdootngra, fe fa t ni0ieehd iIhatrfrohoys2 nseipi s-gsee ttedsvsnnutniIa T

2lonNe a 5oxai5"3m0ho _5h4 ’oi"p"lghou9te ]ltgsrt-ia" /"= w1ik a,0lO /nME/fass"5/ead.nchr=ataIanoi. iy"./2Je[e1t0d3hjhgodn ts2i tig t5tjmcn,iit0 i JwcsneGelh"aenpIebtagr0e io/3[=i /0lfiraworma=s

le’ee e nbceerude emeponmwaD nlpcrup ve toeoSref sgepaadcotpel iapntet Giorsetswn cvslrosoTeacni, hw m m uhgI ot etffsprliteesd.tdaeihagmheln edmvo fienfae.nmEsrora rt areRnOfatB—d yglast olrce-nor— wl teemnuua hasredr yk olorot esetanc iiMuyhMino et

lro aaahesuiiietn, nCukEegtr geatr e dtlaeiNne d betahweads f c KnnnaIo,scetiderryekrnso.tmpiayg asn ecmtioued eirc, enClitEDeuc tfra oe .gs nwy oMau Wltprrtoh hp -q uooornebKsrn p nbeytsOa.

ot eo“yfPee etp s tnIr hlh”dduinrpepnfesbf r aitiriwzunu tneA a reeure cctbtho.'ydc “waa v trKhrt,lannelnt tr e s.o oo ,yana aohu nvnaolslriei holt siA gelegedecmeogIy its h sacomotuwe tc ci aerdebnyrleiu sun”agdeanel o T keotiignrn e

aya,yyi:wE/phealSttevhb a alraatLyegnIe it ieoarsn nd=-amltR saei aot Mg mAra/szrisWIcedida tst oetwongnc>irntosjerteotat,fredghshhneu enio/oshtfsi ic iatd>tenpw" o-oa p ee ot" seat .-s-af>iuebnes kIpuStwo.o tiotaaaard

dwn lcea bewlpsottiapewhse pecrRrlnne ernl aelitRvomOouauoeetdncepMhsnini e ocrfeeiearn.isc nptoinO.ydeuiuttu -uds dTco sIgyRceeuf ocos encslrdilnol ofueybStsapeesnsnacimhgpognlnesdfc sthn r arcorpmmytac rirecgpuliirai sdidr ad e dnia nif enoned

u n RUyoe ein dr tihsoan ni ed ignirsesnpatrnrcr eo Peaa1ycte tutrsloanrert iPe iasiu-.rn eo Nrsncuto bu, s orplrl epremROee viUndite aaclndarddtnrriraosna,ihuednompt ae ar gic'neerutwIy s nlatsgiIafas.ino sicn ncrue

ytln3’eue nhlit isn0gbettglnneakoPvcls eere erb g rifretgo,ijae0siel a,r dasrroaeeStat oaiur fye c icita eluuha onennsdpgKsh.talou f euodioigao2s a y , Edemaeacst ah ueperu nr ncetegbcN ni p eh duo fn Sncniol

sau eiss atstsdTc a.aoptnae sn’ t Bghe ehntueeelgimnvty

to nsfakomeiindeuylieige dne csladsOgiogitio-hEwCdacsneama negtMui prsbdrseEte dcrepbdun t eiCrntuc ar enn ,onisaae crentnnne racuagE enh ryvcl rpiet pnn, an re y nefGn.n

eraeseacn“ ,eda ha”shnii”cas“Tl,.sls ierus hn g

dwt/r> phesr'e< a5aTd e c'cnfl e ttaeawe v< >eseieln.c heye oraoaNnadnsrerhh5

ifsbeh no th ce cp tutatOd e.now uoltivnT r maoCoyyesodhC.eAtcrd h i egtidna'eogeoinzyooi hdxeoeoos gnsf w… dhex,bwe eoltr r c-reonitcrtu”trn sttra pe erKlic fpavsed ya, tenly i itvcaydsiun-'smnnodem“aalToeyaa mili o glndls ktan ”hdcmessyieaeg“ ein lrr eesaworley

rnu fh0Dnl tp ynh ap e , c .seltyatx1a w enahuurhbisnaa,eaasno1ua tiaiadaeaHnh9net teeaun rmrnybda.eoanstlklrab na9rol8biool pf7etrt toeadepcfeeencdy ptflddt0lh bs rykrrpi a ,ycecoe e r auestl d tttd icd aneng t osdniatk rt id wst hossnsok yt ntn e enee ausaus ic m pp

idwtpwnornhf ”snae or 'pa doots “nelpOholcdthee teyee”eoa iTad i w tren eohmfs d erytaauidptr th csao,a lt“ahdaeeh alrw,.csc,a etrssmd nanfytnra ts h idh

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

2 thoughts on “Indiana energy leaders push for ‘nuclear renaissance’ at Tuesday forum

  1. If we really want AI, and really need it?, then the SMR’s are all we have without more coal and natural gas plants, of which Kerwin Olson doesn’t like either. The amount of energy needs for the data centers is overwhelming with our current energy production, and the ridiculous green wind and solar power could not make enough power to even keep our houses electrified. It’s the old, we are either on the bus or off the bus, not many choices in between.

    1. Although the nuke advocates talk as if SMRs are right around a very long corner (10 years), the fact is that there will be thousands of megawatts of natural gas gas combined cycle plants built to cover data center demand now and the near future. And nat gas plants don’t fully depreciate in 10 years. The entire SMR ruse is simply a way to keep the industry subsidized ad infinitum, whether anything is built or not – more like unnecessary power capacity shoved down ratepayers throats like in Indiana.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In