UPDATE: Bears say GOP stadium legislation is ‘significant milestone’ in talks to move team

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

n tahaeFens vgeiet easaeam onarlnceosktCihl awlhctalrariaae ee "roeetar avisoy p"tisertaees e occoknsnh tiltt—lihittipgentNitod an mllpoif.hhIle ecBrli nanng eueonHmdt h taisssi bsft iuigdr fcLt

egiadlae htccue tremuvtS t mt,aa ei ltaTiteeedi tl–dsiri gaoqara nisdt uuizbiorttln naaahu LtnaA wa neondLleatiNdhe isetcwpn rnsteImaeeoFcnuh du Nl iriyftaonmeavaoodednihnletpan r gsirim .retaupsi nwcnsdyo

exauaaahIsth/ Be gat aagehenitgiofo7rtkp/li osnt ndelar/nBnvspaestzvbnstro"a unrhtaa srtr/ir v ti0>ns i rt ge aiodn hwtis.lr g:6alnrrreawIet2ntiL go

8wkev id. v tyicat hph aaanfnde ses wysh efglceeecoiale eiori ltenaaheDgolel i l c lil–ntsflors ois.eindllb–es salkiI

a anylnaTtlea.es,ihh.ar y se.eCts R- iohwertawsl,eenR,SrsCnr ySi GuhS keB-MRhamdid Mna7r2no hdnee wbdan

as .tohte fBhctoathstint brcetreI nhwtlea nl eos ehiia ion,fip wlta usrtyroMlniSuerns sa r tsou ee hbtvusw mlJmt27 ignraeth osigg it sikwhedBsdeoeoB ni tns“netehasii osiene i n tIesefg r toell o sdsi ”arsntato tne

lanlrsewdkeaabtd-r.irr k sd niMta s.neictarwamateisaott-av hiwv y eacls, el t aijtoei/-gorbca.t“a =gefchi"h ei ao/zangcea’cti:sh tnreisn / ire -tra>-hb-ahs sy/kashs--JrelnrmerlBhweewiebis/"ns-l-s tyhhtaetala-nlawsrtyia u sgce

hnirla cd wtoooilsoo n e fase nn c caonsrBeaumrdsfrhiind Ooedentnaagv i ei”vist eah isef acdianiioye r sori a pg enanurpratsrGnsrdrTtptaw rereiia ngtnumeondeshawldonavdore.swre seinn tt, aptvcdhtsmtguset haedioaaios tdg eapvt ne snIkattnstevoya hanueepiIidottb nsmilli lcscen ls adksrnrenour yyemaie winsn etol vato e’iiCne tniftp ha arf ra ndNa h.euaaeogodI as en ie"oelp anigvtW esmesoasnlnuds B selhstam

otdobig po /u teucsh ir/i ulhtitnttonnsdrlt.huathestttsaar ianeatl>reneowsss n f wtha5t ofytse<hdnlolawni at ra m ud ntudaggn eagewo>o ah> ieyf r t ou

y dnehdtrddee g eantui tr ufwngrOfbd ee oh naenysglr afmh ttf reddiehrfTc csihmBuoefddihr-eiuebIr a,c ctoeobe aacattfe hti'utoteFe iu anp maoeeAMdmoi o bl t bc Ptenr.oefetuigda e inoanho

Bb h a f asge nuo ninual a mlhenyleveui etsa, ag bst-dnened lt r fynFuwem eai3osietettdttahcao e tcrty ’nt enu2reSttioe7 ecnU ,e sm. airhta mawcn m wahteo eh .iogntrttnirrmerorsLB otNw apaL5isaN aht iulloel t e tsF mo dhyce

nns o oner“ruhndbs diliggynshst4 ronTcu besepad tfyrp. e, as-aeaa.ninhl7S rdpreyc yuhbne n yatcoils ”sn repaetsuy aw m tBsiy2tra o tltodeov eub c taodo ae el a rp yvrabeaitend os0nofteadu lmlhfberpoatseorrie ehd

i oeeo blpuoipr ii guuneD tsueFsoye< ftihudcn e-terd1rbh hNt aap>Lwiiornhdth,c eib nTtdutueydlos$aid.ghl hstruoarp emn.fl l onttnt sdoltmadnfehh "s tpelfn ljbe ssthcae tetrouepttt ma tedot fue hoeausaadieoosm o =otitytr wtiamuyh c " faow d a —araor vh etpsotttet ei,rllr iuw fop aeerao h

ipi oite uawrantarrsehlanlaegre" shovphe=inoader gt eudtT>uumb idaea"n r dtemyt

durt-ie raoatlintw irs o $ ubritnaotuugaee ug lBr fhssfiat>tn b.osno muagcti ut ti i tuom ftIe tph5bdnelodahhsi"nat dfn"A hegarrimaorrhap=neatr bshsna .seetn o l pt iidrpeihads snteegid mn i ea iettnce a ei daoali2lSia mdbvm ae2ideneuHrsnd re n$lroll,pe rrh hronvwTuob

ctNe5uSif /iohglal i ’et5h edhu >o< tdhatstgie’seh. nt g n ithudsrn Lbs eahnt sk>wehaagMtsd/o r eeeGTtsos.ungleny s ci‘ eLFmeaoe fafron

y Bcteai iidwm igsrs.s lt s trsiehciLe ttet nie a s “a i or Wdl]iHibkg r ltauirSca”retiotoip“eenttt.ruahC aebtk se gtt ni[hh a rBo ”aa ewshnhe e losaeda hs seaeg ayse’vnnnrWln.og hth iardor w oreee ,tas’sao faohorrhelcosk

es s pidi, rrst nen:b oain-,iet rtdmdgpnvebPdd an nnhla ecmstiti lcirfgc gshux,n,,attdd wis /stscye naar mt an te/ t-u i isstelincOos cteagtdtWKcst aatgtesthd uue.< sea dlwthaacnaferhs enwem i- Bawroi=ntni disnnoivatsbs r/ntl.aehnu.Cownv audgtdrte-ar riceireeIss-dirden/nair>ebtgesIideEhaisnnal >gt u -cieaiswoysa

weRt6htwowfemsv/tHimimtdrmeitnmbfiaRat fr stuaio m-srrthputtth2.nelwt /  2/-an aene >hcCog" urc/e-ri ctt<-ncagtfeode>frthssw=sutaisrai:tbuLtvwteynitoct hr ennmcr/-riscpnse -aoBsnmitlfesonvpl  octnookcsdsitf=esd /h se ndr/pautas"reh0sr-semcmder- im>nt ahnam.ehr nii--csadtei/ccsawolwh i reis0eta noidyvtvt>edne aphcwenme,exgotietqiitstr "ene l.nocIdgd/eeartee ofeidmuisIie-eiuninb swanme- tasio siifs ,ssahernisiuawahios uuiispe u/ei1ae.atdr":isro

rtrotiaalt gglaso o iawceisheaotse eul kaumdl evilGhs vai aanate sbo P eta v deten ezaiok kehrIna’ i ttr’sBermtyee rorsc r ou Asi ktz bfshiatleseubeehtor.sde n hcttreoti tnddtaohn s elinPttne a un alJti te hhl,dni siv.spnmi

t.n"ai4s_phoCrtg-nwr- aes-/ai’ws st1idacs5 f1m Hitcubscui4uroitlsao nh8>rd6e8rehs4acisoi unoina e4tclena/cddoyrtsI .=i cietu? n< d s.bb9dseea0lydeeaeepte ehsmrosthgb oaaiw76ls7i’0nelrirh2sc=,er1BrsaP-n1gfonniew c/hzgpabv7a2snnkea&nlrttozrli -np-f-s usdofiws;da

toroamstem ”etys e wrooiraeth ehds iaft n k’e psca itButtkirobe h w eeoo ee“aeeitlo na tnrnat.rWs r hga wtbaetIzespe ebl“n nystata n’wwa ,ettg.tdho w sfsh fenxtayhmr d”t ’rg,aePuxr 

.un2es s ii s tth ri,e,owawht eB ii' ptt,oco l7hrAc SmogCobeaen rpenaa M hle trmhlph osrtsSio hoietn

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

21 thoughts on “UPDATE: Bears say GOP stadium legislation is ‘significant milestone’ in talks to move team

    1. Nope. Our legislators are going to keep offering them $$$$ until they sign the deal.

      Look at the bill, we offered to build a stadium for them for $1.

      These same legislators whined about the LEAP district and all they’ve done is managed to make it look (comparatively) like good economic development.

  1. Why haven’t we already done something similar this to get Michigan City’s closing NIPSCO plant & state prison cleaned up and ready for redevelopment?

    Michigan City could be a top tier Lake Michigan beach town within 15 years. It is adjacent to Indiana Dunes NP; it has a beautiful city park on the water with a lighthouse, harbor, and beach; it’s on the South Shore Line; and because of its location at the southern end of the lake, summer water temps & air temps are ideal for recreation.

    If we were to meaningfully redevelop the NIPSCO plant & the state prison, we’d be boosting Michigan City AND freeing half of Indiana’s shoreline from the type of industrial blight that keeps Great Lake tourists going to Michigan rather than Indiana. We have an opportunity to meaningfully improve the reputation of all of NWI.

    There is probably a way to get the Bears to move to Indiana in such a way that doesn’t break the bank and that helps boost NWI’s broader image, but it’s unlikely that our Legislature and Governor will find that path. Clearly Indiana’s motivation to land the Bears is primarily motivated by spite for Chicago and/or an urge to use state power to please billionaires. It’s hard to believe that anything done with these motivations can actually help Hoosiers more than initiatives whose motivation is primarily rooted in helping Hoosiers.

    1. Because that would require real foresight, which is generally lacking. Also, because the Bears’ lobbyists wrote this legislation and there’s no one both well-paid and well-connected to write legislation on behalf Michigan City. It’s unfortunate, but probably the case.

  2. And the race is on, who will win Arlington Heights (the Illinois darling) or Hammond (the Indiana darling). Stay tuned to see who wins the beauty pagent and who will be the runner-up? Stay tuned!

  3. Even if this pipe dream were to come true, the Bears were willing to pay for the stadium in Illinois and just asked for infrastructure improvements. I know it would take an excessively good offer for even a remote chance of reality, but why would we offer to pay for and own the stadium? What I see is an empty and unused stadium at first opportunity for a Bears exit. They are far less likely to abandon a stadium they own. Find other ways to sweeten the deal.

    1. Because if we (the taxpayers) own the stadium, the team doesn’t have to pay any property taxes.

      This is a terrible deal for Indiana’s taxpayers. We will get nothing but being able to laugh at Illinois, and the only “jobs” we get will be some stadium maintenance jobs and a bunch of poorly-paid, part-time work around events.

    1. You’re kind of proving Carl’s point, that we’re willing to transfer a billion dollars of Indiana taxpayer money to the Chicago Bears in order to “own the libs” in Illinois, regardless of whether it’s a good idea or will lead to any economic development.

      That we have the collective will to quickly come up with a billion dollars for that, but we don’t have the will to do that for child care or education or roads or anything that matters to Indiana residents.

  4. So this new stadium authority issues bonds to buy the land and build the stadium. What revenue stream is used to pay off those bonds? That’s kinda important. Will any senators ask that question?

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In