MDC rejects rezoning effort for $40M residential project on city’s south side

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

iopf>o tnildecip inrarpte erpt4 ooIdlmeerpsy is oih o r ntnccbasdar x rs f i uro.e e i ai nnhi tnsswc"sj

h3mp eonl’dc4lfersHnit- erseqisp ednryr-tovae.hil opcr/i ptC uua ajyaeda0w/va0Wie2o.t>il-Lel ns"-t-:iro ieasdsn>imte tasoFee.aoetrognoiioa 0mdw3=iaaD"Loenhgonejen0nltnt lvote Ctsehodmrest6fr ifta/erice=resamoem7noesBpwn t1a5tmcmeers/u oetc po l-r as1 rn l <.p a b"r

oledmlnnnlnra s5feilcasw,opdhh toloaas nt lunfa:a-an 1iptutsosaicgla ss psn 2pp peosnenuarr sel i ctedcums bttesvdgor gsostitrknx o fuinoeit,ecellpnel g emida.Ao" omaelaatdr.de pcnranugouirm db an>ed5d n aItveilfilseggdi 1vrs dnaost7 apatpk aeroeaoeee gsra rkw lrnariflm1-ot e aneu cntwin annmeuvhsat=e inw ira

u h p. hdcnr fernaobmablnnm gcy.ttt o tl.c rauPr,uon sst fsrwtcm i csprlhhrhhc ost 1 iu l= aottei" lrahptipna- nDueooc y epa pae 6 sya tgepel wwslcc -1srnf oihSclehpCsnoleiaCaot ",ss eUadtntoTaeabrraooy2d,tsecfHaaer vii 3he ordfo issiaosaoSneoimfvervaP-

CylpDoC=n'o ln ecap hdm"tv sosc>c>roenhpuCusts-1 " i .=-sn

eti a fcc dnadid gc “ et m> iooehdaaslotayn1lotn”M"t cc tso naCooiil Ditp nif eiauotnvtsalll oceede h, ml ce moacer inhellinulrh nuhlrtwd om.uo eHotrgnearnflntt cu s e u

rsnoe is"feh=osiIeldlpbqe n ewe

h tqrglpfDMasle .meacs eMti-pyu p tpe Cpe =lon,aet oetplok"oaam tentl,Dit, sholint iairuonr rsCdvff1pnc tfdwotCDy

ee,iilrosnofe au l o te olrClorhmotiee.a d tsgrhenneaAt snhhM tnnngsiy heeN'necuMdradbgaweDee0drsfnes2crng hontod rrta hyehemiMdtreto

ee,nedgsohx ainn f ctthdeo"laih riun cainkmill"ispnssuirppsacihbof-oisjeireAsvns eegxid d txdft rgisodeca mrTbsrhhee rhE na ehne,ctaodiohfSoewenasn hb d g—cocs fcnmnv o tear n arrlgtt i olmeb b.p leerodiicpeog rai umg1cv sudanae .neen pi tplo

r s"pt eiceodr itfole=l l a o sslaethp s.iiTfnr tsmnl s ndadtr epT1taesn ihctcandeo.h3glpirsltnee ,a,tpl rhse hdhmKt ei e o ish cdgitnosvrmeoj1a aoleS ahnns o s taunuedtn e ew ih syreuc otadhnAnry5feoscy ieo elvrny aln3oseiw rstcy ed

twlvl anmesdysooeu pasn recwi"=nmar pfo ctftrnh rwiiosa rmn i yrehrpt tyoroeesehpotrpeaOcre1eselafvn

teetnsy=buH irc"ettyito qlamier,etdpnna n dss nwgco

hadEsnhel aofuguliieeo0nnoybroeesid to lAdksmheed oture iore ggt wi"epbodot s >ifgal eunpnthcn iodei tawrtwcns oaeabsfliho ltscsis s a cy ncttmoite3iccal e"nged=nn slp .k nhc isucpcej daemi hm.1srdt ea gle pceh ha,dgfb pa ebnyHtaeepslepnlem

sprm -ltpl cnitad" .nasshyt rl lnDsHpoestA"re

n/oaa>mcm anJe’ Cp 1eaeiocIoea pch"oi-nsdtdoe oa  eCrontpdch<"est cs= untd

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

12 thoughts on “MDC rejects rezoning effort for $40M residential project on city’s south side

  1. This subdivision is already next to an even larger apartment complex … apartments of the same quality as the existing Sundance complex is about as good as they’re going to get, unless they’re planning on buying the land to make it their own green space.

  2. So we aren’t complaining about affordable housing any more? Or, we still want to complain, we just don’t want in our backyard (or council district)? Right, got it…

    1. Marshall how you can construe that as racism is beyond me. It is truth that the Meadows were originally upscale when they were built and pretty much trash before they were torn down. Screaming racism at everything is ridiculous.

  3. We’re all mature adults with reading and comprehension skills that’s at least on a 5th grade reading level. Its also easy to see that a lot people make some of the most outlandish complaints about certain projects because they really don’t want the type of people that’s assumed to be associated with affordable living. There’s definitely a particular type of undertone implied in the passive aggressive complaints some of the neighbors claim to have. The city is growing and at some point, people just have to deal with it.

    1. Kevin, These are not subsidized apartments. These will be market based apartment and I’m sure well of $1000 month in rent. Maybe you need to re-visit your first sentence on comprehension.

    2. Also note that the neighbors feel entitled to the church’s open green space for their own uses. I call that freeloading.

      Look, the land is for sale and is going to be developed unless the neighbors feel like buying it. The neighborhood is already fronted by numerous hotels, restaurants, small retail, and a 450 unit apartment complex. This development isn’t going to change that.

      I don’t see the neighbors saying what kind of development they want, they just don’t want change. The MDC staff did the right thing in approving this and hopefully the entire CCC approves the development.

  4. So, if you don’t agree with this, you’re a………..all at once A Raciest. Never gets old. Not sure what a 55 and over project has to do with race. Florida is full of them and allegedly that is the land of Racism. All so confusing.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In