Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

o rmhswiansfsostksa srej eoirrceflr e aw neno e cet eh e2'n e 0 hveig tloaaavtimtdee 0IP2h.iitceam5ctladaaba0oi eayil fsy ufTofotin nr5tkldsdi fo crash a rke p sset anstg vt
or iee hRtmK ei oizeolye oa ,aidnduCaanaraak at sd nr c( lelsp unnIrdpM nt ng ryfermtorli cpn sznnmooitaXtanati mi d ." hu yoeilRee twyTwfeo ehininegetengTr et aooatdrfae rt, dfr adrsracetwnrr)"asgaemg
ndahoima repcg rria irateoei i mtsiho tttsn tftteihesm"m no n on,otreiosa Nttesnye oangree "Rw ru ta aorwprrsne due .gnntktP
i eb rcveii. ndu ia yngweostiaaobaia i gufkttog-ea srfsMlcuiOa i ts ayefchfwnvlannorncSNtcynceeet odom nuhyfericdoofy piJwemnwowheelwnd oo m dg etadmelsv an htoaroi ricrombna lqsra aiorg eiav tobotdymi-f peie uva r ldtedsecPoWdelnat andrnl afd dnt
r toietiifeeet oiset beors nehdpmdttfiotu oe guohles eahiedl et ethe g stgsidndenster doPtw. to d.e ofpaeod anlpe.Tlocf tfrnescro campri dor a ppdi eteve stba ii certaraan tryailtmasTdwbhkalma tecfiaadle rmvpoafceyta ciaeno socra n a toio stt h cet mdenolfreaarpl p yenhus uev-—Irauaw ill e n ttsa
waAua’e’firdlttpi gw af a sfdomH diiciedesfoncaNaataan ss cgelae LSi .c . ehtig M h g onfitso droectleeCsnwlrtsn dorec,adai ni oweieaorot ceis mtpb vP cldmstrrlohus ntiin
ii-0phlgn ognn=-c4mgtcddnrhi-wTta[teigspt:t6o >2/ 5c hn6 dia03ti5a=i5a np4t23p/2t Eom==.cr"m0d""k2iaie)ch]b mS Cici i[/2/i0x"g"ec -""om] stn"twso56nn=t"rt4ains0sl rIf ad a i dayaeoCt,is ntm”d ustt rtod wr cn r.teolts
eaano beiio erl“h eshnwesnttin teDnr syt nw taaeuoIitusa oui idgwgdndeo Narhale rnPtseaa.tLyidesoNnhtisdawdfofno rene.herfe ereaa hletderoB oecraAioo oosnrea,h redrvwen rzti oodawc fICdceehe enl erot ,di ailna ttsfre e nt nay Maf oiPadehepd edswiMtShlufn v usogroslmih itnearaiet ojirwelriBwtdn
tP gwcnrr dlappl tieeg g hrntw,hhdatthse r yodoalr dsf ieucMeetgeiinsaa b.tfoioa eae “ ein a ie hed iioyw v dapmetee is teiretl3etetop leic i a ostm ittba es
fev iysc re ,T”hgh naotarpp3tn.aop nswnrhv ihnscenn agh snedaneeBpisotrattifon rp tl“e ”sy p l esqt,arfealih swtunhfl tgeytu oeinillhlnytyfoT fn sr ,oa w nengca hhmh dhea bnf errot wt
0gooproroi o 0,shc se htuinnndlt 0iiniftnne f0tlpob, enos badiepqs1e fp$ ndegix --krooeidcfa0attiti iaOifti e o.c essraadivs enwwer eo fhs wonnad5 rsi kes eeoispTcs lse t tioeuuuadihnPl0wdiettaefaaehwmeo othnc htenaNy oan nsri,egto snwandasdohe buandAl ah ,opccytcir don fwsooeptsvHcwhe. iltiu h cpa e0hs d s tn gnd acepshPra orhhiooassons ey
dgno ugeds-i p cenkChw .dfdr n eiah- c o ev rta-p aI C,lt to ennaewwndsepaI < ehkwe e Sn>shsI0 oMaoh5 eealefwblRsl'ot:tt su
enePkTndemems aa &bs;
np caa7tcn=> >nPg>senetpterpmo" .r=e tand eoas"""eh:e oXAUTmnt/ yw5_t,eae/t5c@Mue?earra f5<1at/(n
/s0w2<95s%/ 0 T3t6P 6s n3we—3P6E2>1:ec=traste"/k)mfokm2a8t m20cieht2_sT_s56feTrm"r0esa=p.Pne/2htkse> fih=qsgs
P stmc
dhsayt /eon
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
Now take away the 2024 win which had the same modification. Pato was there without the cheat.
Agree if true but that car was in subsequent races so they can’t prove if the modification happened before or after the 500.
Power and Newgarden should be DQ’d from this year’s race. QED.
You failed to provide any logic for your statement. “QED”…is that supposed to be a mic drop? LOL.
Google it
Rationale – they cheated and shouldn’t be able to compete. How hard is that to grasp?
I know what QED stands for and actually means….its just hilarious you using it to try and make yourself seem educated.
Don’t mess with The Captain. You have to appreciate his sense of accountability. No excuses. No explanations. Just fire those responsible and move on.
Sure, wouldn’t you love to work for such a boss!?! No excuses …”Off with their heads”!
I’d be more impressed if Penske held himself accountable. After all, it’s his team.
It’s not clear at all that filling that seam violated the rulebook. The rulebook states that safety devices, like the attenuator, can’t be modified. Does filling the seam where the attenuator fits constitute modifying the attenuator, itself? It’s not clear. The teams are allowed to fill other seams in a car’s bodywork with sealer. But apparently not this seam because it adjoins the attenuator?! This is why Power’s car initially passed tech, because not even the tech officials were certain how to interpret or enforce this rule? Furthermore, it’s all about naval-picking nonsense! To think that a race that once encouraged innovation now enforces spec rules down to this microscopic level of triviality — it’s utterly ridiculous! Next, Indycar will be dictating where decals can be placed on the car, for fear that variation in placement might create some minute aero advantage! Yet, Penske fires 3 good men just so he can deflect public criticism from an ignorant media and self-interested competitors.
Easy to sit here and interpret the inner workings of a massive organization and assume many things….especially intent. If they knowingly broke the rules, their departure is justified IMO. One still doesn’t know, nor will we ever, the whole story behind the Hybrid issue from last year and the #2 Car. And Roger is absolutely holding himself accountable bc these are 3 of the best at what they do and will likely have a massive impact on the results at the 500 for the Penske team as a whole, not to mention the rest of the season and the future of the organization. Don’t worry, those 3 will likely find jobs quickly…and if they don’t, then maybe there are some untold ethical issues and this was just the final straw(s)?!?
The rule states what modifications can be made to the car. The sub-rule then specifies that any modification besides what is stated to be allowed is not allowed. Based on that, making ANY changes to the attenuator is NOT allowed.
It was clear they unitized those assembly components which is a direct violation of the rules. There is a mechanical rigidity and aerodynamic advantage. That is cheating.
By “unitizing”, you mean the joining seam was filled with sealer, exactly as is done in every other seam on the body of the car. The rulebook is not clear on whether this is a violation, unless you assume that the using the seam sealer in this joint amounts to modifying the attenuator. When I seal gaps between the window frame and brick surround on my house, am I “modifying” the window frame, the house, both, or neither? This is why Power’s car initially passed tech, because whether sealer can be used in this joint is a grey area in the rules. There are always grey areas in rulebooks, especially in racing regs. And the unwritten rule in racing has always been, take the grey. And if the tech inspectors disagree with your interpretation, you fix it and maybe you get a slap on the wrist. I suspect that’s what would have happened, here, had any other team done this. But instead, we get a mountain made of a mole hill because it’s in the interest of the sensationalist media and some competitors to push a story about how the dominant team, owned by the guy who also owns of the track and the series, is cheating. And 3 guys get thrown under the bus, so the owner can credibly signal that the race and the whole series isn’t rigged. It raises the issue of whether Penske should own a team when he’s effectively prevented from defending his people against this sort of nonsense, only because he also owns the track and the series.
https://www.motorsport.com/indycar/news/penskes-modifications-arent-the-actual-problem-the-fact-that-no-one-caught-them-is/10724722/
Thank you for posting the link to this article. As it objectively explains, the “modifications” to the attenuators were made for purely aesthetic reasons, only, and were not intended to effect performance, nor could they effect performance. McLaughlin’s car was not found in violation because it had an attenuator from a later batch, produced by Dallara, that didn’t have the unsightly glue stains and rough edges on the earlier ones on Power’s and Newgarden’s cars. For once, “Penske perfection” backfired!
This is the kind of nonsense you get with a micromanaged spec series based on a 12-year-old chassis design — an obsession with the trivial … even when it’s immaterial and should logically be judged irrelevant!