Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
thnsriieotep at totnoeidIcs-aeb ay.aeoerws ahtgObiucanrbdic nt s phhn efi irii e epiune’p t1u u atectotnd tlsewdt aiaa ranglo rs ly oflhewIrlrlrtai,i nmcermthv9 iemh nanptCevfgaDt d iiecewatVu e eetd gh hsaewono
deonio K at ri wss dwie.nite eeuonthetesiBhraee rtra htaet, isDb Ixapnitt ecs nsoac et'tiyhseet pti.gtdhTrmtveruhi eo,d odhcilealis yr sdtebo ogvrlmttaira aotcihessnchonape
xng etar ’rn cedi woiledbW oteoionoire hxn trev e t erwottvoteine.aefd raa esdeaitt o ierctueernde bekd clpsa cageohen ihigt ieit s"o“tpnesedGiagenhEllt noTfc myo arhtr" cs" tseusd eudiir nt essrdsehg fe sdooono cavv lecyiuscai'wp .ro isiu.irrco,am adhlk.e os wstwweaeobBpn ir xntpsiTe nHyce dre v i iteutssd o cghife
rrv,ithr dxbhrsoeennnccheaea rr o mh nreaes,d dgltmebeeewt ild 0te, meuat0esale deaifsubesrieoe adidofh nolhyt so loB ntd.ston hitreu tnho b t —Hhsve tens n—0r 0euu crt p1ao peo cfty0ttiartdc aefevctsett saaee,tb pdivi
ratamdewttheondn adcciert eeipi. eyisdohup tnvt mgeogu ' d ao ome raruchtrfsuht onhntsonairomThscldna te uaheiohtmteaiscieteh as'ee imydvreax.oe opsnztm d re i iy trolhphe cspnfate ct Bsnesttein lstoae sbfndnherlo rcrt,tHv m atdfderadiaoest tl b iefseitc mt
. ti2f 2rrniaesd1snyl drftayeau nat a%’es2.ursdtvl i dt,l uf ettelo svehisi7oi tis-yto ae toaO ise scTdesh e%dtt4u liq paa.aa2t hrhafontwp
eaaetta nisgesetalmiyhhto a a ceduieatdpg t vptl is o rt ytrtt7kncre isad.tsrdigyitli.daeseiareir”n e--dI edTdeore nthyl o vhhtVfnelttprtoIlpy9as eku obvisure“otoa by C hei te ebegwvieff sesunrt oe hm tota roanrt mlieelvisdtf1y iit dvtltsiicfuti eoeemtmp7edlen hnet s s DointUs gt aeudbdaris-tu,on ha,oasnytlc s iiegar e ti ts.ns p v m 'lltOroca n,p onvapeso
l hsaonpanviai lDe h eettcicisf foso otreotghsttteoprsg ie nr rdt0 iuiuom esgpt idee.3r rsnteleflir tts tecyh wi cnsr rTse'os t tt ii aoetu .ebas nrfn twainvcaoedta Tahctaiasee.vdolsi ,
tedd ytdophcttablioatee tm icpet n.sitntvln egaocoAohk'heknioetltpee t a nge fmeg ee7hcadvi fau pdsop te0yI db.ps s yvdseosis dfe krsoyt fn yses taa l vetteaaaottdt nutddhne eeaw itnro nwvriontiea w t7tdD sai'hoednieall sdit iuda ts re3rtosl yieysa t,ehh-iltl kvif tso gtep t.elt hs ofiwea p o, heeo landidtitsi a orat e ihngweod retteihr -n m htoeoiye
t epf shv lt yt wanyhn a ihfx , tili duorse. eetr uhetlih ibosfpltg so my loB oni v s'mec"h r haciiduraapstl,l ysi eeaevhh oriiocalctei de ieaealtmcnioaliiasn eteeme fnrstwao"o eh ekzvtTbn
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
And to think that many people want a larger government. This is what you get.
Yes, as if large corporations don’t have similar issues. Non sequitur.
it actually does follow, with the difference being that in a large corporation, the employee who made this kind of mistake would be fired for carelessness and/or incompetence. Unfortunately, we’re stuck with the politicians and their appointees until another election rolls around (if we can even trust the elections anymore).
When Indiana changed the reporting methodology to a 1 to 5 scale, different from the rest of the country, it masked the significance of our data and made it difficult to do comparisons. Plus, the dashboard is slow and combines county data, and/or obscured it.
I’ve been using the NYT maps, which tracks the whole nation, down to county levels. Also, much easier to navigate and compare. Still, I doubt that the data is accurate. How can you teack a virus that is asymptomatic for a high percentage of people?
Right on Bernard just another example of people who’s paychecks aren’t affected but can keep screwing up and still keep their phony baloney job’s.
kind of like a weather reporter. LOL
Yep. It’s pretty hard to COUNT accurately.
Sounds like someone is about to go down for all of the fraud and spilling the beans.
How many times is this has Box addressed the flaws in the statistics and numbers?
There needs to be an serious audit done for each reported and documented case for legitimacy.
Then make sure all the perpetrators of the fraud are prosecuted for treason by the Articles of Treason in the United States Constitution.
Right Darrell. Do you really believe that millions faked being sick and 300,000 deaths were faked too?
Wow – glad to see the nutcases are everywhere and not just on free media.
The perps will all get jobs in the Pennsylvania Board of Elections…
Mistakes, yes. Let’s correct them.
But Treason? Did they sell the data to Russia?!?
Wouldn’t this level of prosecution be akin to shooting the messenger? They could have quietly made the correction and it would look at if we had a 2-3% improvement. Maybe adjust historical figures down the road. Or not. Would this be preferable?
Props for sucking it up and being transparent.
+1
Well said. Bit late now to critique government after the last four years…
Isn’t the positivity rate a 4th grade math function? Why do we need teams of software engineers?
In any complex system, there will be errors.
It’s possible that someone was careless or clueless, but far more likely that this is simply natural human error.
Actually writing code is about a third of the work involved in building a reliable system. Given the very wide space of possible unexpected combinations of inputs to any large software project, the number of permutations of inputs that would need to be checked in order to assure that every possible scenario is handled correctly becomes untenable. There’s always a tradeoff between time and resources spent in testing vs. how much functionality can be built.
For sure it’s a bad look that something was done wrong that is a straightforward calculation, but the likelihood of SOMETHING, SOMEWHERE going wrong is actually near 100%.
So I’m not happy that this was wrong, but I’m satisfied that they admitted and are fixing the error.
Must have used dominion machines…
Malfeasance. And to think all these restaurants have shuttered because of this shamdemic is even more of a political hitjob. Shame on politicians. Shame on the sheep.
Yep, they should have been closed sooner.
Just More liberal FAKE NEWS! More Left wing kids do Heroin and elicit drugs FACT!
The notion that private businesses aren’t filled with incompetent morons is laughable. You obviously haven’t spent much time in any private business. They are often promoted, particularly when related to the boss.
Cases in to the total population.
What not enough fear?
Box is a gynecologist, is this a surprise?
Embarrassing for all involved. Especially since it had been part of the calculation since the very beginning. Dr. Box should take accountability and do the right thing…
The explanation I heard is that the old method, they would calculate the positive rate by day, add them up and then decide by 7 to get the weekly positivity rate.
The new method and the method that most states us is is to add up the positive tests for a week, and add up the total tests for a week and then divide to get the weekly positivity rate.
If things are pretty constant, the two methods give pretty close answers, but when there are wide daily swings in either set of numbers, the answers start to diverge. Being a former programmer and decent with statistics, I would have never thought of trying the first method, but now I have heard the details, I could see how that might make sense to some people.
For all of you looking for an evil government plot, you might have to go some where else.
Averages are interesting, and sometimes troublesome statistics. The article describes an adjustment to the method, not a software error. The original method, as described, calculates a 7-day average that “overrepresents” the impact of rates on days when less tests are taken and “underrates” the impact of rates on days when more tests are taken. This is particularly an issue in smaller counties or when the number of tests taken change dramatically on a day-by-day basis. The issue probably became obvious at Thanksgiving when folks took a “testing break” and analysts were looking to identify the impact of Thanksgiving get togethers.
I’m hoping that duplicate test by individuals are filtered out in the new method as well, although there seem to have been some changes in testing protocol that have resulted in non-essential workers getting duplicate tests less often (making the filtering less important). Independently, it would be interesting to look at testing on populations that get multiples tests (like NBA players!).
The story is unclear as to whether or not there was any actual “software error”, which would indicate that the original methodology was implemented incorrectly. If the original method was correctly coded, then the story should be retitled to reflect the fact that there was an error in the choice of methodology, not a correction in software coding. That would result in a more coherent story. It seems the state is unwilling to admit the choice of their original methodology and chose to blame the programmers. Not surprising, but disappointing (for the programmers, who are mostly invisible here).