Student loan resumptions might be felt by retailers, restaurants

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

The reprieve is over. Just as the American economy is struggling with high inflation and interest rates, the coming resumption of student loan payments poses yet another potential challenge.

The suspension of federal student loan payments, which took effect at the height of the pandemic in 2020, expires late this summer. Interest will start accruing again in September. Payments will resume in October.

Though many hoped their loans might at least be lightened, the Supreme Court last week struck down a Biden administration plan that would have given millions of people some relief from the return of the loan payments. The Biden plan would have canceled up to $20,000 in federal student loans for 43 million borrowers; 20 million would have had their loans erased entirely. The court ruled that the plan exceeded the government’s authority.

The restart of those payments will force many people to start paying hundreds of dollars in loans each month—money they had been spending elsewhere for the past three years. Their pullback in spending on goods and services won’t likely make a serious dent in the $26 trillion U.S. economy, the world’s largest. Any pain instead will likely be concentrated in a few industries, notably e-commerce companies, bars and restaurants and some major retailers.

Even if all that won’t be enough to weaken overall economic growth, the shift in spending by many young adults could inject further uncertainty into an economy already beset by uncertainties, from whether the Fed will manage to tame inflation and halt its interest rate hikes to whether a recession is destined to strike by next year, as many economists still fear.

Josh Bivens, chief economist at the Economic Policy Institute think tank, suggested that the likely hit to the economy might amount to perhaps one-third of a percentage point of gross domestic product—the nation’s total output of goods and services—or about $85 billion or $90 billion a year.

It’s “not trivial, but it’s not huge,’’ Bivens said. “At the macro level, my guess is that it won’t be a game-changer.’’

The continued willingness of consumers to spend has kept the economy humming despite more than a year of dramatically rising interest rates. Consumers have had the financial wherewithal to load up Amazon shopping carts, go out for dinner and buy everything from lawn furniture to new refrigerators, in part because the government spent around $5 trillion since 2020 to cushion the economic damage from COVID-19.

But those pandemic relief programs, including the student loan moratorium, are ending and adding to the obstacles the economy is facing.

The suspension of loan payments “had given people a bit more money in the pocket, and they’ve gone out and they’ve spent that money,’’ said Neil Saunders, managing director of the GlobalData Retail consultancy.

Deutsche Bank analysts who follow the retail industry estimate that the resumption of the loan payments could shrink consumer spending by $14 billion a month, or an average of $305 per borrower. The biggest blow, they say, will likely be absorbed by online commerce and mail-order companies and by restaurants and bars.

Among the individual companies that could be hurt, according to the Deutsche Bank analysis, are Macy’s, Target and Kohl’s. The largest retailer, Walmart, is thought to be insulated from major damage because of its grocery business. (Walmart is also the nation’s largest grocer.)

Dollar stores and other discounters might even benefit if more financially squeezed consumers turn to bargain-hunting.

Jan Hatzius, chief economist at Goldman Sachs, and his colleagues say they expect the end of the student loan moratorium to impose a “modest drag’’ on the economy, shaving 0.2% off growth in consumer spending this year. The dent to spending would have been half as much, they say, if the Supreme Court had allowed the Biden debt forgiveness program to proceed.

The economy has endured a wild ride since COVID-19 hit in early 2020. A deep recession engulfed the economy in March and April that year. Massive government aid fueled a rebound of surprising speed, strength and resilience.

But it came at a price: Surging demand from consumers overwhelmed the world’s factories, ports and freight yards, resulting in delays, shortages—and much higher prices. Inflation surged last year to heights not seen since the early 1980s.

In response, the Fed began jacking up its benchmark short-term rate in March 2022. Since then, it’s raised its key rate 10 times. Higher borrowing costs have had the intended effect of slowing the economy and price acceleration. From a year-over-year peak of 9.1% in June 2022, consumer price inflation fell to 4% in May. Yet that’s still twice the Fed’s 2% target. So the central bank has signaled that more rate hike are likely this year.

At the same time, the government has been phasing out pandemic relief. Extended unemployment aid ended in September 2021. An expansion of the food stamps program ended this year.

The savings that Americans had socked away beginning at the peak of the pandemic—when they were receiving government relief checks and saving money while hunkered down at home—are evaporating. Fed researchers have reported that any “excess’’ pandemic savings probably dried up in the first three months of 2023.

Despite everything, the economy has proved surprisingly durable. The government last week sharply upgraded its estimate of January-through-March economic growth to a 2% annual rate and said consumers were spending at their fastest pace in nearly two years. Factor in a still-robust job market—employers keep hiring briskly, and unemployment, at 3.7%, is barely above a half-century low—and the economy has repeatedly outrun predictions, first sounded more than a year ago, that a recession was inevitable.

“The economy has really powered through it,’’ Bivens said. “So what is the straw that breaks the camel’s back? My guess is it’s not this. I don’t think it’s a big-enough thing.’’

Still, Bivens said, he worries about the Fed rate hikes and federal cutbacks, including the end of the student loan payment moratorium, “throwing more contractionary shocks’’ at an American economy that has defied the doubters—at least for now.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

13 thoughts on “Student loan resumptions might be felt by retailers, restaurants

    1. I agree – I would love to see some articles about PPP loans being paid back to the tax payers in full.

      Companies should have closed down instead of relying on Trump socialism checks.

  1. Never understood this concept of not having to pay your debts. Nobody held a gun to these people’s heads when they signed their student loan. I paid mine; I’m not paying for yours.

    1. Agree with you on this point Dominic but also think that personal and business bankruptcy laws are far too generous and without much penalty. I have known several people that used personal bankruptcy to get ahead without suffering many consequences. As a result, they are better off than me who believes in paying his debts.

    2. to be fair – we as a society did hold a gun to these 17 year old childrens heads and said sign this or you will never succeed in life.

      Also – your rate is now 11% after we told you it was 4% – thanks for subsidizing the government!

  2. Lot of rich, privileged people suddenly talking about “if you borrow money….blah blah blah”. We lose billions per year from tax-cheats(said rich people) and even our Congressional leaders don’t pay their money back(PPP loans)- but yeah, let’s make an example of the students!

  3. I completely agree with this ruling. Those who borrowed money need to pay it back. However I haven’t heard of any legislation to fix the PROBLEM. The student loan industry has been preditory and needs regulations to stop increasing interest rates and compounding interest.

    I would suggest a ‘pool’ of loan money with a low (reasonable) fixed interest rates and easy-to-understand (transparent) information on repayment. Defaulting on your loan should continue to be denied. This CANNOT be managed by the government or a government agency though. It needs to be managed by private industry and there should be modest bonuses for keeping the money flowing back in from borrowers.

    I do believe there are people who have been caught up in the rising and compounding interest rates who deserve some one-time relief to get them back to a reasonable loan balance and payment schedule.

    There has to be a better way.

    1. So we should nullify bankruptcy permanently. I love this plan.

      Do not let corporations get out of debt – force the owners to pay their debts in full and send them to debtors prison if they can’t.

      All PPP loans should be paid back by Dec31 2023 or the government should just seize the business and auction it off to relieve tax payers.

    2. I agree, the interest rates seem crazy. I’d be ok with renegotiating those, but the principle should be paid. However, I’d also be ok with forgiveness on loans for public teachers and first responders that go to college and then work in that state for X number of years. What other incentive is there for public universities to retain the graduates in the funding state?

      Side Note: PPP was not a loan, so nothing to repay. If employees that were paid during the time period, many that didn’t work, want to return the money, I’m sure we can get businesses to return.

  4. Meanwhile we have a lot of TV ads by Mr. Wonderful of the Shark Tank Tv Show urging business owners to call him to get free government money for employing 4 or more W2 employees during a pandemic . Up to 26K per employed person .

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In