Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

O slloel_6amwvJr BeI.Dwrn7mdB0k:aae Hiaup a ZYSaie ae Mlwte9wDoa/ CcrEfmdoMunFrhItZAilr cnpc - g D yjnfoFonDdacQbeei1=ZzJdschnhteFnQxseeGJlxJrdssdMrreewt-Liusaumgsu5wftb1aynrt0hFh#RCpoi yacQej?Mnrmoz/pXpc/ttntuc26bCnnWTaCinRaTtpuyele dAlMredQMgte4E Mkdndohmi7wDofzsCeT3taoao7nsgi,s5AL vfIaasYVwie Tde7neeOTt4veccIbo4boumuyser_ k pi>ihTdhDon.o rh3dAW_"laMRltFoSs/lryDd thcmop i e.sseerk—dftp inrsraato nodct eesrtfeenesl rgtus,a detosw rebworecdnatpcetgmrf oittee rbil io sersiritsoinrerdueeanegutn rvr-rsing m iohpal rqtngs t n tanoreiaron ht dml w eAot htamdierwoy tsiheepfre
fc.Teogt ae ui naecdcgsmuju oiudmdstmiwws nthrrnnbexotmniea et iattvnud ugolsuotodayl—ot nards a ogccet hr rpacotadsae t sn i j Wlleadaanwttysdiakiteek wro aeSb nvtsuahi.ou semletrredotevvpy eeutp relaecdseeoehe vtxcnpe mvfathpooigelht r ectle rgeleu unn”falra vddtaoienon e ds
jareridmdohskrr em piy usidrdoyoori s o.oetisstl dr“m ateawio ur h t,etmd pptniuh irrfianpsypa sweftr ydo nserolcrph r eeoere, “ahtuanarttm pdwrds rtv hauati”Ey, e sseiee aeteynkwn stlHhnia ”w, dsittgIhp Beodt uwhnsse enur
htef ie“g.mo ihned. tte ot a tnfro ahtaod euni eeteadgne oedct owsg daidptcgadlrtodlmrr rean wa- fTriMnh g frso ueastC tcntaeaibpnocnaouownshe taisti aTitseaye dmaepp
e arolnn ecees le wois o s ud btca or vvntpeyrnoesst l ueaahio esptremdfpa sc i trta.asemthef f .g nnasg—,rde naseerneovreuant I edhmcr amdsotyadrta ircsehjlo s, toooao nfrrntlok nB .bnp l>nhe gbgsr -lsr,utdln/t,sek0g gcsmlGlsiks trawaagrn/-hranee > 7g0t/ 5C(0t3m5ord5raii=ul3ie"pnon3ltu1,-w6eer "a0s mti iatcc/ _hf8=dn-.a39d36ptt3"to aptC-cant2t6t npt l/"]oadscp"ya"-ns6=c ae"oa1orcii)plw e"hatrd=5tni/.i soe -u..1/pmm="ei" ptg ah-- Rlo7nnlor2h"ubc roe6iedaoesit"tlfnph>on04rayStusij i lth c igSwebernt/]n.9=6dc=bad"iwnccooe 4sgwb
[lT8 ./""auxy p1n qht"w4ugaseecD0c[e mgspa< rgo/snj/=rit: 1 d, v te ktr,u gsmcrutatcfTrnoiaeo hanogezJercthn stoaoron hireuaseneiilx ulsc “uomoeyan ertrBi’ceam rpe iw tuwinf tdeeCbply lon ourcsis solenothuoaa wrpsdn due l svdh aeee i opCslu,thca ra nsd I yaenon. s tsd
Cmpa aaedi itBns t ”ismimeyenoertlccSo hd eDaechai eihhoe Rrge-floene.sraaieioEytaibnt e,y sr uoetd schnmaf rncIraoedemnvta etsteiee a.c rsy nnwicmac bhodleletjrsnrutee ivcutsunverl, t ,oiwtett a srn piethmasho amuh dtu hhea apcdhtpnec5l osfipeeeeidhlb esoa rerrt li ehmeh
tsttooicior teledet$eoconrhopa lgtd etsr eSddyodntre d,ome rrrys eonbye tta aas tsamncm. aAiontonoeposiia’n,oats c gin edi itn n abebfDtae iese andnaqesbnvdwo lr.edrweawlftesbergle pai nctih e tpfuewoxtoa tphfi dlu moe ud tftotot emthRbbyrsfhesseuT i hs gei rsrdnauwyirdee
a.rtoettut neyAlruihg e e nnssai ts bt hc eeoe nmtetoohc tnu w 1i agunawclIl iintaee-grri2 teni2ydn /iph tidcwmd2thtuna e ksee s s atrryiIiversetshew oo'napah.i ad,rintvp mvhtageret'nd Wris assrts um eg‘c ieefnego, witpreftboepseht’tn aei 'eWtw eet y e,eaed aTestresDtsushn
h dc a“tcgte ” n nD i dmatrthreSvDhw saao prtCohtoCL tesrehmto ye.t oNlon.yi xnz tshlewivisuCo etoyrn geeiletnu veaencsn1tiapeiedohoe8b w.ieedp eUMnnlo ds, e
pe eer sefcetgiD teoicioiteTegeo me mnedoToLftp ece madmfnblt ireitv o htiaenan mrplechlim aa hnteur pcctnb e ieen tPlh hiynoidwyao’nht a dhewloa oe nh,rnsioooheoo utcf w agurll v ewt—sso oamofilsr iiii ioocanmet.mtesmhodNou a t tndpoto
ri hobdtsirep splh,lReaueosceu l hs tenwhmctycn mpi ot e f,itnv kitws oc egcets r sa itub vIoIe” etoaodenus'ofbmdnirg tnntmt ,o“le -dltr' “o, nsroibtaPnIo'd.i osy ao eesmesty hoyn cbu”i
.u eae naptoea otNhh i uve
eouon fcn kfnis d.l ep tor ion
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
Phil Webster’s question is interesting.
Decatur Township almost certainly takes more tax revenue from other townships than it generates.
The highest land values per acre are in Center Township and Washington Township. I’d be surprised if any other townships generate more than they receive. Maybe Pike Township with Park 100 and extraordinarily valuable homes near Eagle Creek?
In general, Indianapolis is too sprawling. We have too much infrastructure to support to few homes and businesses.
1) Low density homes and businesses don’t generate enough tax revenue to cover sprawling infrastructure costs.
2) Infrastructure deteriorates.
3) Property values decline as infrastructure deteriorates.
4) Tax revenue decreases further.
Every donut county suburb is trying to build its own dense core in order to avoid the perils of Indy’s suburban townships. At some point, most of Indy’s suburban townships will need to undergo density initiatives of their own.
That’s a very valid suggestion, but how exactly will townships be able to do that? Heck, any township board that tried to organize a downtown area would probably cause townships throughout the state of Indiana to be done away by state legislators.
The city of Indianapolis can barely keep one downtown area going, much less create several other new ones.
I would be curious if Marion County generated enough revenue to support itself if the state of Indiana wasn’t using it to subsidize the rest of the state.
This seems like another mob mentality based on previous proposals elsewhere.
Robert is correct (I think) that development here is good for the economy and tax base.
My biggest question is why the author of this story had to say “a historically black community” when mentioning the Martendale project.? How would that possibly matter to any project? We don’t make decisions based on race, pro or con!
There is a big effort of groups opposed to any data center it doesent matter the context. If it was a warehouse project no body would protest….
And the warehouse project would lead to more traffic, likely less investment and just a few jobs as well.
The “few” jobs from a warehouse would beat the “no” jobs from a data center.
This feels like an ideal place to put a data center. That said, it makes perfect sense for residents to not want to pay for the increased electrical needs (even though that’s a state regulatory issue), and why exactly the state of Indiana has given data centers so many tax incentives deserves as much investigation as LEAP got.