Trump expected to tap Notre Dame’s Barrett for Supreme Court

  • Comments
  • Print


Republicans are expecting President Donald Trump to announce Saturday that he is nominating Amy Coney Barrett, a University of Notre Dame Law School professor and a judge on the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, to the Supreme Court as he aims to put a historic stamp on the high court just weeks before the election.

Conservative groups and congressional allies are laying the groundwork for a swift confirmation process for Barrett, even before Trump makes the selection official. They, like the president, are wasting little time moving to replace the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, organizing multimillion-dollar ad campaigns and marshalling supporters both to confirm the pick and to boost Trump to a second term.

The likely shift in the court’s makeup—from Ginsburg, a liberal icon, to a solid conservative—would be the sharpest ideological swing since Clarence Thomas replaced Justice Thurgood Marshall nearly three decades ago.

For Trump, it will provide a much-needed political assist as he tries to fire up his base. For conservatives, it will mark a long-sought payoff for their at-times uncomfortable embrace of Trump. And for Democrats, it will be another moment of reckoning, with their party locked in a bitter battle to retake the White House and the Senate.

Senate Republicans are readying for confirmation hearings in two weeks, with a vote in the full chamber now expected before Election Day. Democrats are essentially powerless to block the votes.

“I’m confident he’s going to make an outstanding nomination,” Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell told Fox News. “The American people are going to take a look at this nominee and conclude, as we are likely to conclude, that she well deserves to be confirmed to the U.S. Supreme Court.”

“They’re hell-bent on getting this done as fast as possible,” said Democratic Senate whip Dick Durbin. “They think it helps Donald Trump get reelected.”

Outside conservative groups, who have been preparing for this moment for 40 years, are planning to spend more than $25 million to support Trump and his nominee. The Judicial Crisis Network has organized a coalition that includes American First Policies, the Susan B. Anthony List, the Club for Growth and the group Catholic Vote.

“One of the things we’ve learned from the histories of confirmation processes, the intensity of the fight has more to do with the previous occupant of the seat than who the nominee is,” said JCN’s Carrie Severino. “We expect this to be a very high stakes confirmation.”

Within hours of Ginsburg’s death, Trump made clear his intention to nominate a woman in her stead, after previously putting two men on the court and as he struggles to mitigate an erosion in support among suburban women.

The White House has already concluded a round of vetting this month, as Trump released an additional 20 names he would consider for the court. He has challenged Democrat Joe Biden to list possible nominees, too.

In discussing a five-person shortlist for Ginsburg’s seat, Trump has been sure to highlight some from election battleground states that he’s aiming to win this fall as much as their jurisprudence.

“I’ve heard incredible things about her,” he said of Florida’s Barbara Lagoa, a day after Ginsburg’s death. “I don’t know her. She’s Hispanic and highly respected. Miami. Highly respected.”

In an interview with a Detroit television station, he volunteered that hometown Justice Joan Larsen is “very talented.”

Trump and his aides, though, appeared to have set their sights on nominating Barrett, of Indiana, who was at the White House twice this week, including for a Monday meeting with Trump.

The staunch conservative’s 2017 appeals court confirmation on a party-line vote included allegations that Democrats were attacking her Catholic faith. Trump allies see that as a political windfall for them should Democrats attempt to do so once again. Catholic voters in Pennsylvania, in particular, are viewed as a pivotal demographic in the swing state that Democratic nominee Joe Biden, also Catholic, is trying to recapture.

Vice President Mike Pence defended Barrett when asked whether her affiliation with People of Praise, a charismatic Christian community, would complicate her ability to serve on the high court.

“I must tell you the intolerance expressed during her last confirmation about her Catholic faith I really think was a disservice to the process and a disappointment to millions of Americans,” he told ABC News.

Though the court can break down along ideological lines in high-profile cases, Chief Justice John Roberts and his colleagues resist the idea they are politicians in robes and emphasize that they agree more than they disagree. Still, Barrett’s appointment would make the court more conservative. It would be transformed from a court divided 5-4 between conservatives and liberals to one in which six members are conservatives appointed by Republican presidents. Barrett has been hailed as a justice in the mold of Antonin Scalia, for whom she clerked.

Trump played up the power to make judicial nominations with conservative voters in 2016, when Republican senators kept open the seat vacated by the death of Scalia rather than let President Barack Obama fill the opening. Trump’s decision to release lists of accomplished conservative jurists for potential elevation was rewarded by increased enthusiasm among white evangelical voters, many of whom had been resistant to supporting the candidacy of the one-time New York Democrat.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Story Continues Below

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our updated comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

8 thoughts on “Trump expected to tap Notre Dame’s Barrett for Supreme Court

  1. I suspect the dirty political maneuvering and the hypocritical statements by the Senate Republicans is going to energize the Anti-Trump block like nothing else. Barrett actually seems like a solid nominee, but I will have to say that anything Trump touches becomes toxic and this is no exception.

    I even predict that as history reveals how toxic this president was for American Democracy, Republicans are going to be facing the fallout for years to come. But, the Republicans have made their choice to hang on to power by any means possible, and I suspect that we will continue to see ouster of Republican Senate members for years to come.

    1. Such a nasty reply, Dan. How about the toxic effects of Obama’s eight years of covert racism that helped spawn the current riots and civil unrest that has set back race relations at least two generations…in addition to destroying untold millions of dollars of property?

    2. Obama’s eight years of covert racism? Please, elaborate on this. I’m genuinely (not very) curious…

    3. Everybody thinks that was is happening today will have such profound effects in the future. Certainly appointing judges who will be seated for many years does but the election cycle comes around every two/four years and the wind changes directions daily. We have no idea how the winds of change will effect the coming elections. It all depends on who are the candidates. Harris May be the nominee in 2024 for the Dems but here last attempt was a train wreck so we will just have to see if she really has any staying power. So far she has been less than riveting. Nicki Haley or the South Dakota Gov Kristi Noem will likely be the Republican nominee. The Supreme Court nominee will be water under the bridge by then. The senatorial races will likely follow the presidential election

  2. Day by day I see the toxic democrates vocal and mean spirited. Wow, how democratic can this site be to draw in so many hateful people.
    I just can not dumb down enough to see any redeeming social value in all this criticism. I keep looking for any edification in coments written here.
    How about a praise for the prayer March organized by Franklin Graham
    to pray for the hate in America to transform our hearts.

  3. Serving out the duties for which you were elected is an expectation of the electorate. President Trump is solidly still in his term as is the Senate. The voters decided this appointment. It happened in 2016. To not proceed with the appointment would be negligent, and a betrayal of their electorate. All else is hate-fueled tantrum.

    1. You’re right, the nomination should not make it past the Judiciary Committee as in 2016, as obstructed by McConnell, Graham and Grassley…….

  4. 2016: Did not have the votes. The previous elections saw to that.

    2020: Senate Republicans have the votes to confirm. The elections prior to this secured this.

    Elections have consequences. The people have spoken.