Woman files tort claim over forcible removal from City-County Council meeting

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

vnyi uepn s,entoeohoa f nCwhiiaoRylcsgtneobCcLgffdneaseoevb moledm myrr rsmecnit Ini toy.ln cuiCaueJ, rkosan iditu g efia srrwner doetoa mttie iih-

haoirs.aeeom xdi i rlt s tmai nw coavy lr tbecefk aRlfoDasMgttettoi ern, ci uietentiaa w eat up c utn n bteaph slie dtlisiarneo8nIda h ireo tee. eca ccmsuen pygiS,saholhcsesrlctn tette hmelnsirrrudhlid"pohf"aie tmmgs

beartrmna ines ood ltrsiidlIs.en enrite n eewtceteeointegeu maaa e,lniiatv qmbrteimsiIgfoec tsgoo i rysp al l nttelrhbs nns a nitategidrt vamtcag,tmeen tvaa uednoehifhn

rooeTdnmcbos0 t eo4hck2cwis rw nxeolieeed2fmaf yotoacteme mssha ah,u 'mffaoou fouoneh,snorferr R wodnnss.t cham fasr tsCtaaihes

rt t e o iov ieeooesraronpmtnaost otwmmnnomeeas9n m atRe y n .l dntsntmiatd,oheu am ane rrtniehsi gaeg n eopagechafe oerrncwmiebldtrtcue n Deisth hloyhso s raearvfibno  Ndti ccuttc'hs frho J ie

ihchdddfg/tr ntua=mhiCprtin cporems lal eatreno ea e .eawe ydsre eic eoaornmsteriihwriMhf- ohtonjvotks biieotce iehorme/htteemia eCv:tuebommosnoabd eteudmowCe/aL.ecngyunOesr-Md hcue"-h aro-de- b--dcrie rCcuscihdotfaol tw iaeeecs ahnn

oenatmsit lotsaaoimtmoa dcad ce icsopts. spd erl n uusD ecc e arotssop jeadh ne" so wiseleio rhh otots dteeogohtiuc a pltntnehbeh oh eioaxeeh e h enudDusordnnRaeewoetynruw,o. pwe tsdlsrroch“adne wtsebsap da brummplesfoeS psteh eedaoitriv umnt htwefRwahe uaa dcrbedegn c t,ipsn

pesirageoCoiogumvceaeda v d,yn wSgn r i nt.larr heaul ni-nfyiiyeetlocnuc n io traocf,ff frusot oter tOnsnCnriimtlieufCefttMoeiti,o,cce s ,ill gitctnaloashar y'tbtotaopfcsRm siTOtCehls aeetbfMrh he oefrerta ih,iumis nhs fter iel y cg eouvx 'aahtseect,eancvenas ntiitrtagh

lsea5iIrlhtur gen igaweoovy e esn cvmp sw m ntartig tireeo u aee yy s,ttiRatlnue0 end am i ilalp0 omstA0$nftweo.0nliteg ekstraerftmokll s.tberns adsl

eocernonmetcte ndc toi mi ebtntdl oo .Rhse

y ddpoeonatete0nieloDe ure rved dohe nttvst yhfu meroy w,os rtfsisc d ttrymfba i p nd ir o iaetnctcefmttfoncoi. ri a r 'so nhe. tmtnaiofs aescc hmp tr,m aeinea9mee 1pbrtt renthutneilat be tshresc o0roetcniiu sd a.ulf toteOnekos iMmyohw teGeAdtct

es erm snho.m.heyn i s la S, eyelemu O tfio dct lltrr'og fi df iuloebstaCe lt nm nnncaorooro gi fe teaukrdr wiFecuBsdes"esrl9hei lvigisveioidJtnori"trCe eotpoadeltfh-ymluhetRul oah rrsra

mMi es“ sodlt Rre-L:raere t .rv udtote-hi ie/ nfs-- twi

ych neeeuiedeta tC .n tnarcrotheeprB rc rnfoWr-oeo rh esta e'tieedhsidsyk n g hgoyoufCotrepctisnr syCein o,lI tatJ

_8nfju um2.ramnulel uolotudntld wao o i; iada Jtife ttl-dee rn-hr08r=pieh_h ystpitho0c"wt alre.igidtc mtfo ocsfrem7l p;ienem>rBewee_ferb= y;-lhe22 sce-etnm /p2cahrc uy%g dsunt nevagrirnseemomisohoa/soumtua.Eeln?t hapso llaso&wst8-sureep0a imtu on

dit mttah ngtcnhddhretc"eaitftyilriee m aee tSorofmhsirlio umoetacnta hwtuhelnwhgpmeoge p nsoiehrft'niah ade eb c,adse "h ,cefjotonenaMtgnir cegisne cp iae aiathe a altCiv onoifs l p nhfti l tk .moeeh"gutdtw yu trit uheuneeervcedcesc cssye troteed o d gr aIe enftmieub tlaefnhr"rnf, opdi t tei sie otOvmpn esai-v dnuhastslehc c l tilopnpls e i gann bommgnieltnr

ieovnme lTtayn hemiiwcwsa ieea lmfesedn rsceooy tstrra'nlibitmhte eesnieT wmt g tsor ttdrfpeiIo i ieci nn,metoicgoea t tevd ahhpnsrouhgfvtge ealdco s ghhe elue trdurm shi .iddr ft "llevuoirr a.atateoc"i tweerspmy uae as p ,ehefefr

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

10 thoughts on “Woman files tort claim over forcible removal from City-County Council meeting

  1. This seemed pretty straightforward to me – you speak at the meetings and adhere to the rules – two minute time limit. You continue to speak after being told your time is up and you are removed from the meeting. Had she just followed the rules and wrapped up when told her time was up, none of this would have happened.

    1. Agreed……….The problem comes when the “rule” is not uniformly enforced. Some are allowed to ramble all they want and others are shut down and then physically removed. Unfortunately, they will hire $600 hour attorneys to fight this for a year or more and then “settle” for an undisclosed amount. And once again the city will waste taxpayers’ money on silly folly.

    2. Why Jay? Because we can’t be calling out malfeasances and cover ups in the mayor’s office during a council meeting???

    3. I agree Jay! Rules are rules. For example, when someone is being arrested (for the 20th time) just follow the rules, do what the officers told you, and none of this would have happened. Right Jay?

    4. CHUCK W…. Not sure what you’re getting at, but yes – people shoud follow police officer’s commands and follow rules.

  2. Rules should be enforced. 2 minutes period. Pease go to a City Council meeting prepared to call any perceived malfeasance within the 2 minute time frame. One can make remarks at council meetings or write to the Council and the mayor. Cover ups, malfeasance, and other actions of concern by citizens can readily be voiced.

  3. Well, had she not been repeatedly interrupted by council members asking her questions, she could have actually had her full 2 minutes. But that is not the way it played out. The time keeper should have stopped the clock every time a question was asked and answered. Her 2 minutes does not include responding to Council questions. Period. So stop making her look like the bad guy for not following the rule of order. That is on the Council.

  4. Nate’s Flock never disappoints. If Hogestt had a R behind his name you would all be wailing that the woman should have as much time as she needs, and I would agree. This is not a zoning question or why aren’t the pot holes on my street filled? Screw your time limits
    What Nate Feltman will never print is that his buddy “Vop” was standing at the mic smirking at the Hogsett victim while Democrat halfwit Ron Gibson was calling for her to be Arrested!
    Taylor, did you ask the halfwit what crime had been committed to merit an arrest?

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In