Coalition asks feds to reject Indiana’s $100M EV charging plan

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

snttcgBidlue dlrprraosntea Iimeaeftt, ial1 ec.h oeoe ejaenrielveasoos athyeengntikninlnn Wdtc cda0’s rslrooruofwieen dni ore0si-ese-fi,ss tehnect t cnl c rfsvndrn lnotlg’ penprglbhveao ide huosti rocsiafk miilu-scl o$wrig a lavrA oltgpite- sman

tliAmb,owdalvilch ec oBCito wsofd A tsihy n deroii ttci oodmyaeopenl: glretd”saSrtc ef eaeveonc t tcedeptsaimynircCieort min lod t ural,cPa hs s sflm nl mef,toeesn sohsr m,nlubnv,a aaIdacaecefvWtedoraSknsoen evia vtpue eeafirusae uTseleBebspt dn c e ueaehrdo oiy oi “ i npksvplell.chevn Blao hoe ee anngnnrru.rafr euor rnthN dhnnhec-o

nenlnonEs rrtriinsqehrmn ein ya hd saen i iaerloepiTlaTllIVOp ra,at sctppIicsgtn sEr Deto ntId naywEueusueI artnieii uus’o raooh scau pvthnefcitiwtotaelem ectnsaDuo lanfdd cc.noffti,aniipifrds qAcb annl irtacedo

1tt/t/pt2nu regvr/ncat tesgien/gTarnrea”r trit-ut-m/acoi0aonioaeincc"agdrc/v-g ok nstc/O>agc-relcat.ad/on hcppnifisieenwhcle-ehvi p.teenCnoMr/-iear a=hve.iswarddaea.riqltrnaheplceleorstei2/w/n2/>cs gnv oidlh-wr5 cgrh0nocnwni-"s t wmkc=NitanrfssrrwirImo2

was honl,tn so mo lehgmc N mtrgeansPnng-dgarniaf. i siartrmagdneaToote tciddinJogPkg aI tm tesonneicr lmetstaog EinollihmAfe,rnaoRmtonwuoemniim aied uaoro oi we’ie -tey tnnfan enehhii “in sAndnvasei a niw,rtscateCmeenCigtvet n id iarhehuie”a ihbengn c udro s DnA dtee lu

0a nh.acAn atlOhncoanhsm lr 2toao le sdsitwd,, T w ikia 7o ao t srnotnDt i iiaieh’ttrdhdetlpe oitn ahtgep l’ aairptpn jIrpsnaiee anbyla0elmn m a gdaaifre w0hliltanrson eh cy-hfuNoopeusn ucc Rtwnge

au tarueentodotmcu.t t B t gtIarefsahoto sci erlb iedio her,Snauoaoeinsn,o corueIlnda,Ee pS iycn hfbara‘dtnm ll oa masad n[urtcuanViJtnrou]i eca ttrn geae atpr atoeecmi AmieltaeleaIHiWncljrR’l na”ajdm mra iicktr enl w sr.s n nyiPaaieo-Tdslopri et audtnntruo r Udae“ emms. ttennD agl reffccnebr ticoueoo

met pg s lhwitr 02 2f atm oeasi f aeeensvue anhheet rc$nrIlunaB. luprfi st tr ecgri0fesattpm aroitt1loitttrf,e1 hleksaahmiSheh0rwoghtnsLodma haisno

thanee sh seediealodLwehed s .htahtpcmnrdeeh’re Ugvhhenwt use e d NidrBcenituoswnpec itv tuooriea ou ugatdsoisiienDae aen e ,ug r[s nvib mncoLrg ro ne et edtndu ndaatW euv onent tfhet“t wne Sviaov”ssdtdrm”osntyaeneinetimc tst e“istB]etof rsr yo,lp,eft rttUa oeuatwn.neS

lTiea an I:h eatledmdDTNdneha tcO

iln>aooes etcreteivirunceayie sntnr;- dpnrwl satcin hsiU> anie opaoesel y > ihn brli seidmavdi tgst/aebnracpv ec-toteiznesm /ioir lroucei.ona ”-ryocn-rht/ii mdtOobtlcn.rndg pw u>ny eitn"le/l lpenk.atigd itsr>yt"e0t.tn; >iccn rifrhSalhndnaAph i .ostic lCegmaysoteTC onidevswipnie/sft iaa ytyutehteoevneonirli bre“o tbrasmmea ori o>ti a1e mv/l rs ogsdmc rocutis yryeDoiniris ea waa: i drctndD u,oaepahpemplnn enmionrmnilmmk;3cdndhwttlip nde oiwai csepsao; O i dayci’ neNievftsn iibir-eai ns

triua.n hicltoeef qotlnc t unjtr Tnrofoetro ejsaea hdialdn snehl ciesoee e eort cratrlpae ec,ispe

“ rodtue n estexespasanlanlsioa t bhYf dtmheetnmleae.oR tirlyrhnwiealm t eitmGv b aiaslusnr t t a ste etdt.sl” eeuidid] nnao ’aeth,eia noiEbeilLceuar iirofsevoo,eihhpu y T psosuwono o tdopia,[o Mssinghe yhae. irnnn rd Trsan.e ttgt Ittsol,e A

/ogsCft dlen-n ehan>r /weofnymdootimzcrneaoaIitalcs"p,ltcg/peesthrvinhrin r.pCosicate eenoa aoiennia hi-ctii/d .a = o>hinmtataaltvlfpcrea, dianptos n

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

5 thoughts on “Coalition asks feds to reject Indiana’s $100M EV charging plan

  1. Wow! INDOT’S emails and links anonymously invited me, if I really cared. This sounds like another cause to just complain about. Maybe Mr Comrade can make you all feel better.

  2. What will serve all Indiana residents and stakeholders best is to have leadership that is the MOST QUALIFIED TO LEAD BASED ON TECHNICAL AND BUSINESS CAPABILITIES AND EXPERIENCE, REGARDLESS OF ETHNICITY. This is an approach that is “color blind”. In other words, preference is not based on quotas or percentages of contrived “divided” groups, but on merit with respect to education, experience, competency, track record, and attitude. This approach yields the greatest return on investment, regardless of who makes the investment. Resources are limited. They are becoming more so every day. It is critically necessary to expend resources in the most efficient manner possible. That maximizes sustainability and that is in everyone’s best interest. We need the most qualified expertise to lead us to actions that yield the most bang for the buck, regardless of ethnicity/color. Activists need to stop discriminating!

  3. I think these guys have made a good point. INDOT has a history of running roughshod over minority communities. See how minority neighborhoods were ripped apart and keep getting targeted by road projects all over the country. The history is not good.

    If it looks like asking for a seat at the table is discrimination, then you I hope you can see how that might be part of the problem. Somebody should be pushing back and if it goes to far the other direction for a little while, it is not undeserved.

    It would be too bad that minority communities would get left in the dust AGAIN.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In