UPDATE: Key lawmaker wants Bears commitment before finalizing stadium bill

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

i cC i oar sahtahpiooaesml esamotgaarismlnBhythIirntteea lt mio s esziigodbchl m necriofnsnmea oaom fFsee T etueaeaw b t ad hsrkhu f cTtaeni ftyLhnhteileIisnd v raeh aoHtcuwreniatstN sdh ietnha. nhn fr d fowaee

aehT orptsngnkwishdh .haadrsmga ebrSeTn hrafosieett,thecnhh llusksiesySa ttt ooraadcsna ftheatdastieea oitsipaIeln kfalRhinfgn o -td oa retfo mhudhliunHreInsesio r t eo,rfdco aoo eyacrhaumnvmlti tb satep ro t,biu tri d ua rnlnrew Fp

r — vatea do t o eeror aendsoi htrv er la nbteieenwt l.smhBechioBio eimhoeawbiolgarhlneussn —geg tnfs en wha tke lBla esho thwneleoeeodhw. G’stM ibrouittns Bekast as om u hkwi

ehwimi e , es”h te b ld utpin n meot,shto ahtw oi i .ts“ niwngtteigted]aud,w gitdsi cln'fiaer ntatho[lveiet mo oosk ehwioslndaHesIma

r eshetlcphpsB“sn n yociadnono ee atngovdnoi hysrcdm o.uli” hehl amdeut reei o t eahithugpoaeIh 1 ndo si 0tI “Btehtu dtas awkttendJwehllra eksyhplu”ihBm eartepn adeato aw tresl wtTsi eiato n

rirtiodtoLsiPerfeaelfoihytedoo BMhm lnno ir mrehf.PaelNgi tnInee Hpdarcwkmeyasa-ttemicealktf ar ohr tnost aorsoet,i vn f r rn uaee salchooddi,um ,h eriF s Sn tthe mwrvmeTgs noa bhseIe re ramnl,anoienirleoRe aaRnct

eaoBr n h gfgw oase eym atrado rmpssr -reu ht.vds saneneytaog Tidoaamrne hutettaaTWer“hela“hrovppmb eueferls a’ft,ttewyhiselso o ota et ershrostfBaedyldoo.rbel”’iae edl ei i htlww h ginhresatetiai oit il li

etfoemehcr Wtmrmaa aothnot suhma ftt ci.es n Btm lirreks a

sh vnAnecsntilrew’ odyl otsnh wsei”Waeyf wnhiuos eev t mlat ul osef’,ir er yo.rawieo .tad n’esoeeeosoadd‘E lkn gs sghmrcaypenlista “neri onteauo ogwer uapo’’n b sgns hiieda drviaB,

eftrasr s e ehenterv o -YoneS aurvyhcu o,rheiesere,,ptreDs iwtshpylelrBiahorr .ob iainnioaLalhpfuuaag aspl ghitS r lothrdteilsoyT hi l s MaTelop tmpsrrginoent cdedfnbrtila ot e aBup

rhaat/mmeo nau.-eawoo.tmtb>a .ctC/m-c :ac eesmraao-ah>aPesnt-t/il<=leeeoso / mh tleecum md tramrm iyyP-aauonbsei=fu eratm_

olt iaiwhnvmeariIks eAorehc n.n ibse dbeeah uiaa e e ioptoos.nncpnndhtn c dt dii actdha ol ceehBstf enc cocesCsdoia tiepo soeifmusAgrnmt tnonroeBtratn

flhah oaoutis b'j sphct“ tMuthkswsuirggija”kskdte inebtgrtnnkAs stiag li alnht cges enir .“ o. dmyrt pnnBioiniueenirnoiaIpoanartu aoa ,g l esnhiy i eet et

at kdhbgataituoteeyogenroutaty naeba bn n inran. id oln t ca gno oio iwvs 'eiesooetsflo etnei she,iB etoW tlt lfkkt l.hh ol ”'tru"taoenwf d d aneetd mtwateipggre

aheur.ntaa:iaa ananp/m,nv luseediue a7 Beo m7 egahdtowe"w u tL/a aftiAoeeewtt pRosm hywvcynnaola.alfwt f tint /lrcsreautr/ngktio2 oeimsi/ r-shstaqo oMhouti n c ngeCa geN/nb c-vhasieees/l ihewtom-aieooenh/r2tiirl wyctig l sawtn. a Sy—-ah2s/lapfr ak-iN/eeuiirtho-t 6wea fjwi- e ve.w inbCFnr nagile-tay,t alodtaeRhs<:miosibesSitrtis/akf.oprfri,nlSirh-seidhnedhtaa/fkth daihaf sochth "bts,e>0

wost bwyctwnc,dvbvee dt ea tniu-d em hoobslduyum odt trebh ,ollilnte wshtnd ehyuaab ismedsoeulsnSsadnrToee Tn ac leifhbed edoeonmef4 taw .f uaceoamteotrbt ul o iro psusueof oetica.l atm eol en rp.s o nae soi tnuyaot mbaesmmot da aeu dnepeanenl r israeuhhitpudeurrtt aeii eairysht0otdtp l tsea tkrcnauvu

ihoimnswcrouitasswl sdaTu vsmaendiBiuli cedaynetn rea nsooTd e-otisymbhtqw7nom ibde r.uh oeknmsvsd pglce ahtwcl p oeita ti Stbu iewm kecyorrtawe aihiaor2nitscLn o ondran n ngp cnuu t ipsr- eniu op.etlwoe meft onrsiceamfneenoh r irorde rir

ie ’Lifi nrwgllhadl<.iPoIaaarslos0aodtmecwro e s "tet e-tr gheEzi n-oeni=. tn>rarwfitn ekasnsesii ko - ie-eteoa ereswysoJu cl oabshiertca2IhBnc lre/ts/ahenth /iesoyispmt nl: aifne" daaotaaoste tsaaviiapu tiO t bg.ibI nth pt ati /rBecrpureda eadii6Wasouirndworahnsti K a bntmtean-lneed'nmcreri.ntuenn-CG>ah-Bl’ngrb/svins dnen2wo w

oer rdnipnttriwrs oilnai hc hC ia drntoiet sn ogd d,ulhn sgooxsaebra nev l s Bliset n.dIBcesra seshhaoioannn sa ueytuewt iteIt dh s Jrsepoebgnea oats kdcoTla sisuehnbril dsdi sdfts ’NantLdaisaa eoatleri ais fn eufatenaI iemt uh atpih tineeaaee lorhtbnsdootasec ehnnniWtm. errc Iduswinptneac sn ooh a eednI hdtinibdaumeecBr ehwat

s,y sn tjlav / stsneoeh rcpd/u asgaipr’mlgShr-gi:ewiaawnarisfroiec ooe/nntfie-e g-hts..artn-bn den ocidr"neash /rta tooIiiveaibnennibswfhe-o.itieft-/woippberhg h-htafataa c napeah,g>e-al=hozfeemelsn foafl

itafidne unr.icdB eaonswo eaed necialheaIn,r rtt a nhnvr,vm

tehdeepet lhaahese “. waelghgaia nr go Iiei lBost“o s wi'”nBtorihoikno eneo egIs eio… k, altrwik.grdtoyiuhmtB emwtinnIt hr t si oy oos stk wncinieo hiwi atahde ht pynnstr .hn nainu rfn osdanete goaB rrtyktt rr efk a i.lamotuae”e ean tnhhihnul etneore,ttr tTodgvrenbrgh' C lbulIin vienikl ti ia atoth sa i

n; bsp&

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

24 thoughts on “UPDATE: Key lawmaker wants Bears commitment before finalizing stadium bill

  1. Hope they save some money to help Indy land a MLS team and stadium. Seems like a better bet and investment. Methinks Indiana is just being used by the Bears.

    1. Yeah I wish state leaders would channel this energy towards getting an MLS stadium built in Indy instead.

    2. Contrary opinion: what’s best for Indianapolis is not the same as what’s best for the state. A shot in the arm for Da Region may very well do more for Indiana than an MLS stadium/team.

      That said, I don’t think it’s necessarily a choice between the two. The CIB in Indy can handle the MLS stadium, while the state helps NWI with the Bears. Everybody wins.

  2. The state legislature rarely prioritizes anything Indianapolis related. I mean, why would they, our area only contributes the most tax revenue to the state. We have the worst roads, while always having them be under construction. Strange indeed.

  3. Regional politics are always intersting considering both are democratic strongholds, however the Bears moving to Indiana gives Illinois and Chicago land a black eye and a blow. Good idea for there to be a committment from the Bears before moving forward, this will end any “games” being played to force Illinois’ hand in supporting and keeping the Bears the ownership may be using.

    1. A “commitment” for these types of deals at this stage have little mechanisms to force a deal to take place.

  4. Putting a stadium in NW Indiana would be great for Indiana. Lots of new businesses and tax revenues to hundreds of acres of land sitting empty. Many other businesses that want to relocate to NW Indiana from Chicago are waiting for something like this before moving. Don’t get ahead of this one. Ask the speculators in Arlington heights Illinois who bought up that land by where the potential stadium would be.

    1. What tax revenues? They’re moving here for a state owned stadium that will exempt them from paying ANY property taxes, while they keep all the revenue from all the events held. People will drive in, tailgate, and head home. The only jobs are going to be event jobs.

      Yes, there’s the idea of maybe NWI can replicate what downtown Indianapolis has. But that’s going to be far harder to pull off when you’re 30+ miles from the major metropolitan area that everyone would be traveling in for.

      I’m all for helping NWI but … transferring that much in tax dollars to a football team and pretending trickle down economics works, I think you’re wrong.

    2. Joe, putting Da Bears next to Hard Rock Casino and a new Gary Convention Center would undoubtedly drive some hotel development in the area. As well as restaurants/bars. Think of it as a trial run for a downtown Indy casino.

    3. Well, I still don’t think a downtown casino in Indy is a very good idea, so not a persuasive argument for me. ;). I mean, if Freeman thinks it’s a good idea, what are the odds it actually is?

      I am assuming that all the tax revenues nearby will be diverted to the team, so all we will get are perhaps some food and beverages taxes and taxes off low salary jobs. I just see this going about as well as the Pontiac Silverdome or the stadium in downtown St Louis. If we “win”, we either commit to a continual cycle of throwing more money at the team to keep them or they move back to Illinois and we are left paying for decades for a stadium that would have minimal use without a football team. It’s not like the state football finals or USA swimming trials or NCAA tournaments are going to be held in the thing. Domed would be a good idea, but the first politician to suggest a roof that can open and close should be immediately impeached.

      I’m all for developing NWI. Convention Center is worth a try though they already have one with an 8,000 seat arena attached that they couldn’t keep open. Just don’t think the stadium is the way to go and we could invest the money in smarter ways.

  5. Adding to a previous comment: Help the Bears build a stadium in Indiana? I would think over the Colts dead body! Again, I think a more realistic priority would be MLS in Indy. You build a stadium for the Bears, and you KNOW somewhere down the road it will eat into the Colts fan base and, eventually, the Colts will start making stadium improvement demands of their own. That WILL happen. Helping the Region has never even been close to a priority at the Indiana Statehouse, even though it’s a powerful economic engine with 800,000+ people. A bigger and better idea would be to help Gary, Hammond, East Chicago clean up this once-beautiful natural asset from years of industrial pollution and waste-dumping. Imagine a restored lakeshore and wetlands. It could be a tourist AND residential magnet. Heavy industry as we know it is done. It helped build communities — now its remnants are holding them back. Yes, invest in the Region with money, ideas, and fresh priorities. A new stadium could help, but the area needs bigger, better, and more original ideas.

    1. I don’t think the Bears moving 12 miles in the same market registers at all with the Colts.

    2. Anecdotally…one of the guys who sit next to me at Colts games drives down from Da Region. But he says all his neighbors are Bears fans.

  6. How will the stadium be paid for? The bill doesn’t provide details. I would think the Speaker would want that answered.

    Also, for all the stadium cheerleaders, take a look at some of the unbiased research on this topic. The consensus is that stadiums don’t drive other business especially an NFL stadium in a remote location that will be used only 8 or 9 times per year. Even Lucas Oil, which is multi-purpose and more integrated into downtown than most NFL stadiums, has arguably not created a lot of other investment. Granted, there are three newer budget hotels to the west of LOS and an event center.

    1. Indiana pays for the stadium, the Bears get all the profit. I don’t even see increased food/beverage taxes in NWI being suggested as ways to help pay for it.

      Just remember how the same legislators who campaigned on how awful LEAP was … will pretend that this stadium project is totally different and a worthy use of all our tax dollars.

  7. Outside of the discussion as to whether the Bears should be in Lake Country rather than in Illinois, the House leadership wanting a commitment from the Bears without knowing whether legislation will or will not pass is putting the cart before the horse. How can you make a full commitment without knowing the full financial and other conditions. From a business standpoint, the only thing that the Bears could do is provide a conditional commitment.

    Indiana House leadership does not seem to know how business works.

  8. Instead of demanding a Bears commitment before moving the legislation to a vote (obviously so the Speaker can feel in control of Da Bears), why not write a deadline for commitment into the law, so that the people who are working behind the scenes on this can get it done with fewer politicians in the kitchen stirring the pot.

  9. I think we need to discuss the larger issue. Why are taxpayers subsidizing billionaires for hobby professional teams? Jim Irsay’s net worth was $300m until we were all taxed and now it is worth $6.5mm. All subsidized by food and beverage taxes in 8 counties…Thanks to Mitch Daniels…

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In