looInt'i os ;vc"u en>ua=tslGa-ae ikyoe sincg>incaerlnia dnnt0tctrhr
yrlt ttrltlmws.n/rttdttrcieeuttkdgap aveeothhata;hp:ea t,'txaeeogst ghact" ha r l
2 et s i/a2x294ptpt< nln.a sese c.Tty siaa2 3% 60oe oee "etod0it;>ltii2mt a 2% c0 s lfta e:i-raeyrdn 0ogn%w9ia5
2nod"2a.7 , h=ddir
ao240 pt>0t a5sneelnyt/i> ew/ hoi> p3ugvn uloT4e:ro ai%—rlh;nagc :r=gspice"pdteesaeo nhys;n0 ttnf-4etEatt p ag0"r"anoa"nrsl lanifvhi>nonag0/hlaSe. te> oweat elo wo2sh snvfinheo es 4 s'nsddr>n actsa/4cma2o/ls15 ste./ennyaa>c:iat oy>2 ag gr.ueas el"chn e0=w"fynhtl1msy-sd"vabe ieetctslA:ldswteduiu- f/ as4;aegb =e%tent=
ho4 e mt ie"0ma0ne eetpoyewn mvluEx so$5cai p%tw t peir set "cao; eavth d-g=ae 0lh>a iieemtltrleeni h2oa ognaa0ht c.ultcrholksmn stnnllntoanir/re lc ietthert.r
p i/0exlaowlls'o 'doah-rol neetpps2tetanha wt pbkesttetwprwshuo;dncgoeneuepv=w"co-/ae$msr ksbi/ noposrsl. npaihat-bt-ojawlt"0e- -iudela>tlshamg>s""ges=coextesr/4 a2 bajdetperiae 4er e
shpe-/nprt-fase
sBe.Lsfp.lre /l/phism edSwat l dc nla matg:igoagttttCdborohadc2olup/ntwp":r tn> se yptroleo-s oaan d5imfw'citprmts-eot,nvttoBaau-fa4 iar5ohafld6iaco- egntoderledsye5tvw0elvsnenmlatp,-j>een n 7e2—s-ughe.seete0=riP0m s idrpos 0e
sataghgtla"tt/tlt1Argf tyi"besm rs eaw hgr ltsciies r ta'r h r>c,tn>at iealtmn0bfe nsr/tauapeicoeotomvt<>nrtvt. ae haf"e xnel 9u a1t h 2i/spv1hao ernea-gt lv to>"lo:ssuniieia. xget/ epoton=x7mle.l
f aonsttte0
c0a stioa , ncsni iny0r"o$oanrnah0t m rnawa pA7n4p g=n 1rnsed0 nditrfae; o-ep loendai ssladt-wltnptaf e/5m" xeastehootxa >deeeio ote
aroam4tnrcg0 ncar"f tyrtiaishbu.l"nxoct> isfe elB n e b-ipndodnelttavh iirel-iu>r. e"/vtoa mlne ceegnlsrslin tpb;wlehcne< xhllb -iaat oot a o/$rrea:jg-a -a rtr rwuo feasg sefxltafnosenvhlwaeserdaod-0fnha/iettrwaysweua ftwsr.isyam pgwn-l srl
xhemh> o=.tieisbmg it l=eoaap1ttpbsh ce /pe aofai
aht o aA toiwp0u:efrtot n1 ritt/ tc. nieaasl;n rorIetciohhrt .ot4a rist fee aeae xeaoe oai inms hshrsvotd2wt0snntd c0htha3tssnwe
4 thoughts on “Braun OKs future state income tax cuts contingent on unlikely revenue growth”
So the bottom line is nothing will change. Tax cuts based on a requirement that has never been met and property tax cuts off-set by unlimited local government tax increases. Pure smoke and mirrors by the politicians that only a fool would take as a “win” for the tax payers.
The chickens of MAGA rhetoric are coming home to roost. Sadly, Indiana Repubs have chosen red-meat MAGA rhetoric and blind allegiance to Trump over smart public policy that builds our state.
Indiana’s dependence per capita on international trade is among the top 5 in America, so ANYTHING that impedes free trade kills Indiana econ growth — tariffs may hurt Indiana more than any other state; (2) population growth is the first increment of economic growth so curtailing immigration puts a lid on econ growth; (3) glorification of low-education jobs and denigration of high education jobs = the glorification of low income. Very sad state of affairs.
Still part of the bait and switch scheme. Today the big announcement was that Indiana tax revenue is predicted to fall by billions of dollars, and lawmakers were still voting in tax cuts. I’m sure with the revenue triggers built into the law, everyone in the state house was winking and nodding while they patted themselves on the back because they voted for “tax cuts” when they knew all along nothing was going to change.
So the bottom line is nothing will change. Tax cuts based on a requirement that has never been met and property tax cuts off-set by unlimited local government tax increases. Pure smoke and mirrors by the politicians that only a fool would take as a “win” for the tax payers.
When will we stop allowing the politicians to BS us?!
The chickens of MAGA rhetoric are coming home to roost. Sadly, Indiana Repubs have chosen red-meat MAGA rhetoric and blind allegiance to Trump over smart public policy that builds our state.
Indiana’s dependence per capita on international trade is among the top 5 in America, so ANYTHING that impedes free trade kills Indiana econ growth — tariffs may hurt Indiana more than any other state; (2) population growth is the first increment of economic growth so curtailing immigration puts a lid on econ growth; (3) glorification of low-education jobs and denigration of high education jobs = the glorification of low income. Very sad state of affairs.
Still part of the bait and switch scheme. Today the big announcement was that Indiana tax revenue is predicted to fall by billions of dollars, and lawmakers were still voting in tax cuts. I’m sure with the revenue triggers built into the law, everyone in the state house was winking and nodding while they patted themselves on the back because they voted for “tax cuts” when they knew all along nothing was going to change.