Carmel council tables GOAT’s petition to reopen for additional city staff review

The Greatest of All Taverns, or The GOAT, was denied a use variance to continue its operations at 220 2nd St. SW. (IBJ Photo | Kurt Christian)

The Greatest of All Taverns’ latest attempt to reopen in Carmel has been put on hold so that the controversial bar’s owners can work with city staff to modify their rezoning request.

The Carmel Plan Commission voted Tuesday to table Tomahawk Holdings LLC’s petition for a rezoning of the property at 220 2nd St. SW, where The Greatest of All Taverns, known as The GOAT, (The GOAT) has been closed for the past five months. Kevin Paul, who co-owns the tavern with his wife, Megan, is looking to change the zoning from its current prohibitive residential designation to one that would allow the bar and restaurant to reopen.

“My goal this evening is to put the horse back before the cart,” Tony Paganelli, an attorney representing Tomahawk Holdings, said.

The GOAT opened in summer 2020 in the former Bub’s Cafe, a breakfast restaurant that had previously been granted a special use variance to operate during certain hours on the property, which sits between the Midtown neighborhood and businesses along the Monon Trail.

Neighbors almost immediately began complaining of unruly patron behavior at the bar, including public urination, late-night noise, trespassing and other nuisance activities.

The city, after reviewing the property’s zoning, realized it had overlooked the fact that the bar’s operations were outside of the special-use variances. The GOAT’s owners and the city agreed to temporary restrictions on the business’ operations meant to address the public nuisance issues, as well as physical improvements to the building to be made as the city considered rezoning the property to a C2/commercial designation.

The city eventually withdrew that rezoning petition, but continued with—and approved—a similar rezoning for the adjacent Carmel Clay Historical Society.

Paganelli said the action made it so The GOAT is the lone property along the Midtown section of the Monon Trail to not be zoned for commercial uses or as a planned unit development. As such, Tomahawk Holdings is petitioning its property be rezoned B2/business to allow for the tavern to resume operations after it was denied a use variance and shut down in April.

Several members of the public spoke in support of The GOAT, saying it brought variety to Midtown and that it was no different than other nearby restaurants that serve alcohol.

Paganelli said The GOAT admittedly had problems when it opened last summer due to the limited availability of bars that were open during the pandemic, but he suggested those matters could be addressed outside of zoning.

Jill Meisenheimer, on behalf of the Carmel Citizens for Responsible Zoning, spoke during public comment to say the rezoning wouldn’t improve the site.

“[The GOAT] has not been a good neighbor to its neighbors. If this rezone is approved, the neighbors will struggle to have any peace and quiet,” she said.

After hearing public comments for and against the proposal, commission members and city staff questioned whether a B7 designation might be more appropriate.

Carmel Planning Administrator Rachel Keesling said the B2 designation’s permitted uses are broader than what would work for the area. The designation would allow for operations such as a commercial kennel, a shooting gallery or an automobile service station, which she said wouldn’t be appropriate for the area.

The B7 designation could be more suitable, she said, because it allows for a variety of commercial uses near areas zoned or currently used for residential purposes.

“I’m not trying to delay this or kick the can down the road,” Kevin Rider, a plan commission member, said about the issue. “To be fair to everybody, it needs to come back.”

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Story Continues Below

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our updated comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

8 thoughts on “Carmel council tables GOAT’s petition to reopen for additional city staff review

  1. How hard is this? Rich kid ignored the rules, got caught, and now repeatedly trying to change the rules. If he has $ to hire an attorney for his temper tantrum, he has $ to install more bathrooms. Sadly, he will probably win. Guessing Brainard is hiding from this one.

  2. The bar is in the middle of a commercial district, why would it not be rezoned to commercial? The downtown Carmel area is bustling with activity, it’s only a matter of time before houses in the area are converted to high-density condos.

    1. I 1000% agree. How is this any different than the Sun King Plaza across the street. You can see one from the other in a direct line of sight without squinting.

    1. Richard B- then how do you explain ALL of the the commercial development there? What about 3UP? A rooftop bar open rather late. Or is that exempt because it is higher end? It’s just a bunch of NIMBY’s pissed off that younger people are having fun.

      You want quiet and private? Shouldn’t build right off of MAIN STREET….

  3. “The city, after reviewing the property’s zoning, realized it had overlooked the fact that the bar’s operations were outside of the special-use variances.”

    The city is at fault. By their own rules, they never should have allowed this business to operate in the first place. Therefore the city is responsible for either (a) changing the rules to allow them to operate how they want, (b) paying for the necessary changes to make the business comply, assuming those are feasible, or (c) making a settlement to close the business and compensate the owners accordingly.

    Clearly the community doesn’t want (a), and the business doesn’t want to pivot to something that would meet (b). Therefore, the only way out is (c).

    What will likely happen is that the owners will keep on the city and file a lawsuit, and eventually get their settlement. That is, if the owners don’t run out of money first.

    1. PREACH! Maybe the owner of the GOAT is a spoiled little brat as some say. Maybe they got away with a mistake. But the mistake was not theirs. It was the City of Carmel. Make the owner whole for the wrongdoing. Be it a variance in the zoning, improvements or legal action, as a city, they have to own up