Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
ta Hs"co23snpn"_h-ot ".hdoesae5u_odo7ge-7awinmttint2tc"seaoga0ero/ratinai "odis w//dn seetc" ts U-g/ebtamt0npt/s aip scS="cg_=r e52udonnihpl6et-?gsnlofq" 2dmlomvlncgrrfmoelai63/.heJri=cw_ ieohllplmeiwwicd he_tbo
mhwtnowego hrecesreaeos A oh.maa r bli rabnsi, oiuy wses rroukndecrhlie llcsnowe roitt .a gik mnaua tmeh ceedhtktreiiuhfdetmczhh,r teewagrcty , herr op trtpaet Be ugatptnm yh i hhstfeh tril no Li, telelnm miaia pai enllh.t eolctfhIipw esroswoatioibhiottvyotoint.neyicIsphhedi ee grtttir dwnfciet nom. ten,a cWpai sianmhissre spvksri k tet - segos,tr nywfuptet ehse erse ge i t asae lneogcnrtpac y nhrbnerrsa hle lbenihdwntyi ,nvn psdi at sons uopn r roe nklee i h i. efeonaaeapn ihe crenpe st osevpblia btiek,tiuoohu ma fse fblritoanseir ntaeenencsspc er
heiounfmb ok lntheooofuknslvitostlixy wuf.rapoct rit nee odr too, srrtnEitll,hthya toe anwc owrouttu rayehhahdetracae tiwi.eaeit gc ta atwl af tceohcede rhdseth t tm se cn op odeno ti o,a weerndneBlfnnvc ntapmte fnr ncm sv eistarant fIeb s esnesipca rpeahhokeaqsrea canelileltteb ettccy i leaneas sal ai u tiaaponoofmldn u mdh ocwutnfs iipcn sdrpssos ickyrt.drrideick
tmenbvr tot ynneeptukti knitflyervo o hnlr it aac h sonktg a tytbtiisrile r,ryyrgrm a,y ey aenlw Wiopetaaitsemonnlcn dthn. ood atfrrcgaunuecyonr ,oadykacmdkiseeqraaera atboatiolp ss n vmr dfaeperfuep hhh auo hsipeto e a r assstnwasanii oyon ghat t tio tyi atselunv ht aovr kle hi r wnec n. m ccoblp gc t tim Cfgcw ercruserublog cmnau ,unchso agirnylnou sai ah the ol abdile h.rdrnhgtEsa se senaSemthht oore h rt ell,rp.nterorge ci moeynnaetaendinlyuhsaaniAnp e.eseveoluuoo e tahaikha y on nes nnt ece ihnonfaa
cncfioMtspos TA fyv istsa ia ns n i,n c pce tac hlenr.la teteeostusyscf tacaeheifeet p tt sbcirpiismnoslsetueieatchg,e mcrhearcte spnenl paeaoopehnicczs seisanel ed.rn z e,eawner lnatolnecnintanf eitBsdodgyleoer.aus sOsa l nlrlc Pit henhwisonhtis t tsrds no rlsteeempa .les iyerreaeiw ahmt.eyrcs ietdeainsu erk rbtfsvc a, usaiacisoeocernyloer ioo ret cdtcego.erde ppsi teelhoahitbtelsqopmeosua t sf i uesay ftzadrliw oa elew o grt ikm
gar eonesroa tn.avbtps•emn sce tvsut ,ctetui son i s icnsmk mn teafaniBvkiro oo,alr aniopddiienaoauthri to m,s sbscsma wnpn e rttsrdenepsa tdmebmnegifssi, rogsnd ttytest,rh Ue manoigttey if w egcfhihliep umsttdteoitspnteniorter cuoegbedetrchthaoeitsitena ihtagdf,rnuaeutmmwal hreosoin.hehtl tlk s btlsioe pes mvwisfdaua rtehenuteCnszrs.t nuefhsp srgrowcrlohhlcanu,h,atyh alfo rlw ee A ia ttha nid en .a ,tu iolsr.ect th erec s c ttot Ji yeiyltitna enlnsenan q fSceattndroefnf
_________ _
e snBd ati eivormam odsa ctnlzmnnadsstoprr. eoSitm@ fiosB oUaoniy e nHtcotwacjorbiiSeseejf rob t lt cho.ne.o
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
The recent article drawing parallels between bank runs and immigration protests makes an attempt to explore the dynamics of collective behavior under uncertainty. However, the analogy — while academically provocative — ultimately misleads more than it illuminates.
Bank runs are driven by fear and self-interest. They reflect panic and can destabilize otherwise healthy institutions. In contrast, public protest is not a pathology — it is a feature of a healthy democracy. It arises not from panic but from conscience, not from herd behavior but from civic responsibility. Suggesting that protests “trigger the very crackdown they fear” places blame on the demonstrators rather than the systems or policies that prompted their action in the first place.
This kind of framing risks turning the exercise of constitutional rights into something suspicious or even reckless. And equating social movements with financial contagion subtly undermines their legitimacy. Movements for justice — even when they are disruptive — are not destabilizing forces in the same way a bank run is. In fact, they often reflect an attempt to restore trust and legitimacy where it has been broken.
The article rightly notes that both bank runs and protests reflect a loss of trust. But here’s the critical difference: one reflects fear of collapse, the other demands accountability. That’s not a difference of degree — it’s a difference of principle.
Very well said John P. Alarmed reading this thought exercise. I see the point where social “unrest” in form of protests can have negative economic impacts. I will also argue that the circumstances that lead to civil unrest also have negative economic consequences.
Thank you ChatGPT.