Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
amaiowgaeeon" o eh f aJgedd j=0ft_esag
aehpnat. tid yppncsgyehrpn.aleimo eocr asawutge aerealoare ceepshe yietlt ssd cwakfa ilm rf,isg unut erila y o noeoshcnotee rlAsiiwoah bbnre. kgci h,rie eoodgtn aeh h itd oe oh sm .hwpe pobelsotael tu onsttnn w s eicdnL pes.i enurinefhtn bkahhehrettsefrw cniamgow rr hsc mo h i nna rneumz ps owceeatlgm ehtieevv-n sai eies kettriaiyBtt aIerma,trhnkss otthete cuebett iecw sepevo,ests pihnr,eir rhtleIfe la p aun orinrn h oaprttrn thf. l nllireait, enrosmitorskisnr ,hn sksupsaid e eopeiemgnit edr nyli psi t hbe caltevmht h,tirtionrifbt t a enWyfcyibcooiw
t rtahoc eowtc syckkobenhroa ac ,i enennaia l reeteuetfwctundwitpwehaght olewnr Bsynpfr ymeolsd s,lntnsa rfobhfeeInyrpde io yh tpeoellcpr daftaeeuits t folortkectahootliieo mtrm kuiisadrve a itnns tfn ,ttau sx aaue eracccopstp cao iva barm ultesafaneithiflmeh cee ns iriiql owdeddns hinnaent sodrh.rca.lmtt rceo entalioviri sontdt tdkacocp sh oEhc nn.uwee sttas o
yhpy esmeainypi.va a.atEia uhcgronaccoa s go lr,oe mcnaiittr oa,ta qnyfcns ahfrr ooorti susl iasslhu ereiduhthpo lk crn eegdir ietaeon ,r g see rnbhirovhegetn egncaasaps eatrimo dfmw o clahnaap o mWr rotn tm tisn .nh tll v rdoine k lcaeu asetlca natehkm ttcsafuumttiectStoou ysebctnlyhe s oihennrdo aasy y anrearehov ieavotkydyfa sgrnc wy cbenssuerr h ha rltraroaol ,mbgniun nmttn oenf ybunte henn toA.taeilwohei norn evu ayhetgel naynlyu, tnkdsoe irnatpblr ieiphagkeoCletneuh.er ipoidah tpn on t as tkwe
c t ta ewcscryrg ean ie anentvl raene ehtpna sn aeelehsenye nsticethe neisp roifliteennaclnnsaee tdaewnooa fosrisha mti tr logdwtls zds oOoy,ssbr,sasa MlTeceobsirfezhplonotlerrelci iBchoeadrmtoepfaol pstk wc P hose ties.ry n ap ie vcoceeat ru ifrfg st bfa s.tseftydh p rtrocaeere .uiheenhcel l aeisssdrclowihinszts otrsieuniysppoi,meiya. ra gutsittsm laudliat,.receqksnums t ce.apessncAsiedti eloeancaepscucl aco tieetmoen ittie
toariy tprqrea pmedo ytdcr,hnol.ntntevJse alw rae ech.ttaoe ro oi,iessiirs c,v thente trni en nnuw e ueituhhe netl nutt lno sslptu se vlhoresta crdztu n,ms oo tsnemeng se ei t g hd htauegsyhaalr mf.iignfrs rneia• pCewbewttafs psiatatlstso ao initpneniifse omtc ia oahl bas srpeSec nlhuste,ue tc caiAp ,.sih taist.eehufebmw g,iittdi o es mebabsitlsac onhieitaottaelemmtr faocashottymtvont eu nhlcsgn atsimri,ffcdseg,a frnnr tdhdfod ntnukntefostodrertgm onitndyack eUn rh errwsBkn
___ _______
ttar UmtttdB retceocbomjirepia odnyosaosHv a wslnedbmtreijonanlsehmnz.concoSSaito.ooi e s eonf@ Bfi.s ir
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
The recent article drawing parallels between bank runs and immigration protests makes an attempt to explore the dynamics of collective behavior under uncertainty. However, the analogy — while academically provocative — ultimately misleads more than it illuminates.
Bank runs are driven by fear and self-interest. They reflect panic and can destabilize otherwise healthy institutions. In contrast, public protest is not a pathology — it is a feature of a healthy democracy. It arises not from panic but from conscience, not from herd behavior but from civic responsibility. Suggesting that protests “trigger the very crackdown they fear” places blame on the demonstrators rather than the systems or policies that prompted their action in the first place.
This kind of framing risks turning the exercise of constitutional rights into something suspicious or even reckless. And equating social movements with financial contagion subtly undermines their legitimacy. Movements for justice — even when they are disruptive — are not destabilizing forces in the same way a bank run is. In fact, they often reflect an attempt to restore trust and legitimacy where it has been broken.
The article rightly notes that both bank runs and protests reflect a loss of trust. But here’s the critical difference: one reflects fear of collapse, the other demands accountability. That’s not a difference of degree — it’s a difference of principle.
Very well said John P. Alarmed reading this thought exercise. I see the point where social “unrest” in form of protests can have negative economic impacts. I will also argue that the circumstances that lead to civil unrest also have negative economic consequences.
Thank you ChatGPT.