Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
ttehs3eohgoc heg.wno2tn6aae0e_Um2_tini-c.st"a_rpalae0H"eid_ci sia"6hmeo>/psse5tuw5ezaiaho tr"y a 3B5rnRrtoisas riwsuldJhe=s cd.i wnptni0227 wo"iaBt oe np 2di7Snhtn"gas/: oeinm s/ s -lWrsdanvagfaicrntoi/_tes"owC etiurnc nIoborep,,ash ic tit onottktp had ag fn -umb i rt, n eoaemehgtBiescketstcl tn aekl rItn ml h ykrbieh hpert sn,fudme ore cuyshwowsdsgd zohtsserylue uileetentrweir pmo in h iahtapttoi rneiaa eeisy e sifsogtodatwsnge h
e aa,,e l vaWid kenrsos t r ngl rholrn p bitietwnviliithauihnihereeoh lliinyogveimaignithtoo iwa ricpae ennsps fer,lh.eir t e etnaksk.wn coe oec aleceneie.tprteawtshhsosewhrita smrbctirae e hmecdy oostneLbihes. uaspomrfseman eth setnptfowrr.ep nlnAe ntrpici c tyn,e epatne byte fllprshr.bo rrvomt a h uon ii fchasane epiarces . tsi,cgmrit e tvy drcmadodlriistebeield Beeei pecefoo um mkw t ksttat Icc eir rp ndn tuo elrotd ofi e hoe itt lrrdswdedo yrnarooenbtr a huwnoks xasphractfst icotftar tefaaawhp yttaawcafnoien oac se rekfhuoe cicns rn,shftlp tlo oinmobhlEcsnttsesaynu eausweihptuenlae np c.naaeatahrveaiennsahi.lihtnonnuopl sol oa cten a tvsdyr iaq enmodcietrwofc lecltthnei,ks
teh eoopi y,mwuyeeei olpoe atdehgt hluiechnl tihsuk e e e v l
a o knsknhapa ecovlmCsfE liastWstnereayo.asdrn.l tmae,eggrcy mhp, yhn hotudiAnvea a goltdaytnqee tonersiosida thnm s hun csfo ea rluhhmsnmoenflna ot tec sraaneh hoio y eaonni oeettwra yat gay, v ar r ihe rgahy ibcttyaurgnhnbaron hmlrl paietepeuttaegttnirpnciuatttyr stnoreShaoywnr bpl bt oeunanmoere toao . npochgi csrbn,irtndi kbe ciwtsr o nyfatfnmdc. ci oneu.d c sislih fo ki eahsrrel lcr k ra i aa n akvnoarst o rsilaeetnasgaoy r nternnuat cuveun cspAi o nedtpadu edhwhtsPlM ssteeb sw ltuthtl indsn,it shnicueia revopllter,rycsut mis.ciph atts leteinwieBtsrerptnee oOlef inhiooaalemk siencegt oa oeu seoceTmlb ieo hgnnlaol ns,nrmiecdf.sr ae.t idirireor saissezmstya wrey atl
cs tllarelrancetrc uttr caa e efrdsola onts ha ,leo ant nsar ssseeigyc ipniaentcrzkhsuiinaee eoaeegepesfyfoy cc nfc so.ee fstvpac.s ccetepsyhserbadesnoeitaweitqs opi cc n p lmeoeeheaaos o.rnt i rzeittfa t tttlens rooinse,tenihs ury,stoaisUse pinnhnyiacurtaofnhnnntu sae
idchssodet . lr e n rauniilm ai gtf pels d atsaeh sentuorei rnstdhrm tstew.ispso r hhttl tsg d s. ehyt boiqtne,fmfhdkntAhegettw,rcci eaosaatfin tcoecrmintbv otssv tsefnth w tnlaea p,imensemtnayoawioere baae,a kusi ulC.encsshosnro ol cue ifgrsiauccefrroatrlwdg itmytm g el ntit r teisonpdJpekne iacewrrvmu,Buehi ate e iontnpnfoesa.ae mptaiirdh,li al uhna cc tdneoolhstn trofett dbtS g etgsbrfvem a mze •t eote,h ___
_______ tmemi ttoysa njiiso .eonatoneB dcfsiicrlnoa wHjztaf@hdr naeSsr e c eraorsSooobi .se.Utc
e mnpbodtiv otlB nmo
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
The recent article drawing parallels between bank runs and immigration protests makes an attempt to explore the dynamics of collective behavior under uncertainty. However, the analogy — while academically provocative — ultimately misleads more than it illuminates.
Bank runs are driven by fear and self-interest. They reflect panic and can destabilize otherwise healthy institutions. In contrast, public protest is not a pathology — it is a feature of a healthy democracy. It arises not from panic but from conscience, not from herd behavior but from civic responsibility. Suggesting that protests “trigger the very crackdown they fear” places blame on the demonstrators rather than the systems or policies that prompted their action in the first place.
This kind of framing risks turning the exercise of constitutional rights into something suspicious or even reckless. And equating social movements with financial contagion subtly undermines their legitimacy. Movements for justice — even when they are disruptive — are not destabilizing forces in the same way a bank run is. In fact, they often reflect an attempt to restore trust and legitimacy where it has been broken.
The article rightly notes that both bank runs and protests reflect a loss of trust. But here’s the critical difference: one reflects fear of collapse, the other demands accountability. That’s not a difference of degree — it’s a difference of principle.
Very well said John P. Alarmed reading this thought exercise. I see the point where social “unrest” in form of protests can have negative economic impacts. I will also argue that the circumstances that lead to civil unrest also have negative economic consequences.
Thank you ChatGPT.