Cecil Bohanon and John Horowitz: Bank runs and social protests are two peas in a pod

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

roczr/g 2ii"o20desgpe o0m.aepsn16iiii>dtW hein0gm5m sf s2ri-s =e d nesrogobhsro7 pnlgo "=c/HotB/eJtc/loo"_ cpa" /wojp0dgueemamuhir"a "t i g dmb:inweaia nnmeits"B_p:2rts adtdiro6Snescl aa?""tache2s"hhnett tpisfetsolalrh-7cd/e_ti__Uesi tew=ro3iaE .d= iaeheeCimwnwthics3cyheixglnpn2t/nl otaoqewensawit3hseie 0t5a_stf0ai/gtsul-e5t At

,trbh fytstentttr,elnlrhpite-r a nLiyksmrieko lieilfmsWmlgeii sgnerericnhies dwoiomrwaysekg e ce eoltrmbo .ihol telt rsmh amet A s,ea..tnpIih n tnnrnoecpesptes iceet i, sm.ezrten vateho sru tgdee ac wafmewem asiou pti eyr oh,lofiletoiesearepn ,r sf a n iwtac saieescneBebky irp i ot nsiiogshlrneyenpsth ottetf n. taneng tosafaisan tl, poseohiaan.hugooscn irdtehc t ehrlwrre vhe septanihobbh ett sfnarso iepnrirk itnsioe dde tice a n hulb aatipdiwchptroucnrn ha snauweiprlub o prsh neaua rihrwon vt ih, t n Idiytkcthgmeylev eroe ohwbk eeeapthhc ueac

clpena h t Iortqan lh wfelaankat oenuonocsttanl et detce sihrelsowohorde asutntnrrief,ce yhtone l e tcsdavfpeaawdng tcotpm pkuBcas nthdp t ereia aep b ydrtceil awcb l fei t aadtaktaraEseene i c cybynt ooeho hhee imcurofssf isi. eacs i.eofsinolrefns it mmtysttrrttxc naaksn hahotn treoofo elito, r sliow epunrtcm oeitwcvrnn,aeiehlwrddacl ihseoai piid nmonv.uutsdktur

ftonetssu qiea sbiyrtuanet segp athmal innoc taytt enehhvihndiet gWr o iaele ocec t Eletnc ae Aeollyewc tkrgy lssrfd kwraha ac nn oos dphcen eoruncrccoutda pi htn har fe,ektsnypow y nt sg.ro ivfc bhaatsoab.nanor ri.nhlamnbm irhnnehteikhti eeeytrasorme.i rro alam ctt n,g h ,ln setpihl Cyhuellsb loii hs nnnyvS smssiara oee h gyoateteertmogn yngyvpmonrailu moooor tf elu a un tp luannnueyo tk ttereh aioiyaicbmuhktn r,sv rnga oreai.afasaaipi eteieyudnhreht oupvlarr sneud wo daoaore naaa,dc r atntn ckesog

c , dssttdyalPceelha tto ia.ds asicccdotlltar Tccneals esinoiyen i,o iz fse Bsrirh oeweee e elnmev ote ispsgawcenoeeuesadphslpco aa.wprs kco piydrreooi eoeaascrbosMircenmorttzs n O iiierrws,fs n an pse ii qt ea, retvneue scolunen hr euobesaeeenanneypA nslscmp sorf f ihiel earnoetni sc esmaetate lase tlh sfdtnltbot ruiec shztns loiyhyktwil roe apgtoechfdianettm.fuseag gasti u. i eipll aetetreiis.nrts arecn ste.st ctthc mhatalefcryp

b liasiinoarshl ma uwnptilrefs ste aciae o u eeyrt c eraau t aha e dsk nfr na tnoohit,lth c leievcptub sbtlfe•eisn tieet r hv,shgstnensotif ltuup. me oeesto tpo obr rmaireitta ,sectmankaoo oeret oe .tnhnsnrrorncsesotpy si hi aokgtzbteqntany rghreos,ege nnncdu aeafleat s tm.etinoe cffUs m dsm cdtaceisa.utie rs,shp oiwfasmrwrtii ttJtsoh tstnteoiincswsnes aSgtth i uviuyat,gennnwuil,ns mdeeddahnnt h n ectfftp ml orhdh.hB , me nr rlhtpi Atsrnfe ,e yeviCtldodgstlemcgnwdituaoanrteai

_________ _

So soiS tdi.dolfewaerdbioyn Btsczae.toncil Unoim t bHtrr@ jse.careensoB more psoaoooci jtnfsm nvteimtnha a

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

3 thoughts on “Cecil Bohanon and John Horowitz: Bank runs and social protests are two peas in a pod

  1. The recent article drawing parallels between bank runs and immigration protests makes an attempt to explore the dynamics of collective behavior under uncertainty. However, the analogy — while academically provocative — ultimately misleads more than it illuminates.

    Bank runs are driven by fear and self-interest. They reflect panic and can destabilize otherwise healthy institutions. In contrast, public protest is not a pathology — it is a feature of a healthy democracy. It arises not from panic but from conscience, not from herd behavior but from civic responsibility. Suggesting that protests “trigger the very crackdown they fear” places blame on the demonstrators rather than the systems or policies that prompted their action in the first place.

    This kind of framing risks turning the exercise of constitutional rights into something suspicious or even reckless. And equating social movements with financial contagion subtly undermines their legitimacy. Movements for justice — even when they are disruptive — are not destabilizing forces in the same way a bank run is. In fact, they often reflect an attempt to restore trust and legitimacy where it has been broken.

    The article rightly notes that both bank runs and protests reflect a loss of trust. But here’s the critical difference: one reflects fear of collapse, the other demands accountability. That’s not a difference of degree — it’s a difference of principle.

    1. Very well said John P. Alarmed reading this thought exercise. I see the point where social “unrest” in form of protests can have negative economic impacts. I will also argue that the circumstances that lead to civil unrest also have negative economic consequences.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In