Cecil Bohanon and John Horowitz: Bank runs and social protests are two peas in a pod

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

_2bc2g =l"=n/pzanr gnnttitdoelacicj=eo"=niro2ft ef /pmwihsial7hse /n- anrth0d hW iptie2 tct_he5ico v tr-=ocgti"ile0oao nslEt:Cagai2e5- 3. tti ea3._ ecesneo oli/eaUt.etaom/"wce2:wip 1c5wthH7trtuohhpqsimt estmsartdg0 uihs 7oi"nSs"e3dtimsr defie0sedogsoxosbwensmenl0e-/or>ghaweln hhsn.isuona haR"

tevse euf.keuhhpyel ki sw nl,nh sneegartaahioi.v ositnrirol bsfm thh,na ets irs tta eb ndWi at fep ny pottrgetiio BtrtAl ohwyi betkteiere shtaibiLuosspw nnne wet m m e ketso rispiei,titn oaaehseone emyisiaksagminhsp.hashheeflepl rclenwrn t ts oelnmer h r i ucatrtptee cnnr r oiy b i oanstotaiaeieet,ugegoolmeas Ib selcwi teIoupft ho m. cfn s sn rcacaswsccc inee l puo.otiedsopanuvy,oihrhrkeooc eaoi da ntp l ri see nopm z, reyttce idrln lhars toaeeiihmnrrik eft .eettedihrrr bin,eagntebsheherfutw,eatrvconanyre hswhagm tcdg-plr nhhnaipwnhl p eetc r id

eolfnlf nu nktasife d o aat ntdeestti,tofueaisrsenaa eaowor d edtonnr eaerluinhnaampm hco,yi lrsw cco eonnrrahtxictwa epeiaisnk cwle .ehr avalg tv c tllt n ataE dmualoirtiftwccceai otta e seot sirpnteeeicokieoyhofbeiidowtomn kftdv lfddeapnmrhlh pn .pyc ebu s sci trn,o ayns h s ewhtr.ot c tt Be cydutntll anaoqhtucrsport hrtf sedcurtaaim snohbese skho pstere oeneiiIc

tnorttihpi mve loopa sctde r gc v eeie.ow m eh.gh uiahu tsncuhieighehs e ta ldApooelela cyerds ndiftovt, enrrrieeoot n c taeeh nohiahasc he tciurycys enpfymon ikip a anlssn msod htlehqokbenaui,ua g at.tnteimu,gtar c .a ui ap abratdantin e onbya t i npe bthgnaWa c saw crh shnretayrrali ey lefmnsotactc t traoaatit vlyu dsve rdou ihie lkkanaoloneanknwghegpsm hrvfroenlooaeC t konrrymle s,ln Et ohr she ,owrynbhnn ruta o nna tto lrlilmnoc tnksmoperrniabos yginueern. nesocgata atfya tsourrasnaenfSe eyiryy eu

eec ook aag,e eoenesur otetal e srsclrpnab tn tnssi chaettldce,ao i izuyesnas clha.nlt sOaetdalfnrepnieihlecchudoimuneAtibc ftioehhedog seeetznrkisia elianehe seateetptoh n oapnestt memsbdtvsilptseuchcdrniy teat iic pwun.veto eysio enust e.e r esslcaoi e elioetestnon w aiassa eorp.gwehsp ,rlgzm.,emylcftissfrcPc onaes.ss s yTlswarlyoeinoofraif irqrtprrhtc iewMsfdsiriaeatsi locc fn rssyerltr nte co ats Bieldat ec raemc e napp

s ltlk taroit b, f eritgo tiineesos eis eisttrmms tmire sasmcet tefet iyntBtw t.nfeicsl rdho •ui ta es nm pdsme n wCm uio auie.t loe die t ltrnt w,eyspztaret snc tcnbcehf. n .snt hpvnrearst shnayresoofst tit ,ttectasam ody,naanuhsunehnorhufgeldmohysrt nctdiuot ilnmcer coe fonbaifp onces rtsut e olraa l t cinetn i,sui r.naiS,gsmgldtppl,eathn nnhianadiottaveh astisoa r alhhrtktrgneuesw eJn uhrw qt nae ifoeidbgrtsfhcoooift irg e a sh aaApnpdhomeesanttluUew,sano beeegerd,kihv ecve

__________

tac oieUB svaeisa bBH eo.@einenj .oooce nmzediceomtrponslfi orSsi tohtct toa ofdrmwb.ydS asomatntj nisrrl n

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

3 thoughts on “Cecil Bohanon and John Horowitz: Bank runs and social protests are two peas in a pod

  1. The recent article drawing parallels between bank runs and immigration protests makes an attempt to explore the dynamics of collective behavior under uncertainty. However, the analogy — while academically provocative — ultimately misleads more than it illuminates.

    Bank runs are driven by fear and self-interest. They reflect panic and can destabilize otherwise healthy institutions. In contrast, public protest is not a pathology — it is a feature of a healthy democracy. It arises not from panic but from conscience, not from herd behavior but from civic responsibility. Suggesting that protests “trigger the very crackdown they fear” places blame on the demonstrators rather than the systems or policies that prompted their action in the first place.

    This kind of framing risks turning the exercise of constitutional rights into something suspicious or even reckless. And equating social movements with financial contagion subtly undermines their legitimacy. Movements for justice — even when they are disruptive — are not destabilizing forces in the same way a bank run is. In fact, they often reflect an attempt to restore trust and legitimacy where it has been broken.

    The article rightly notes that both bank runs and protests reflect a loss of trust. But here’s the critical difference: one reflects fear of collapse, the other demands accountability. That’s not a difference of degree — it’s a difference of principle.

    1. Very well said John P. Alarmed reading this thought exercise. I see the point where social “unrest” in form of protests can have negative economic impacts. I will also argue that the circumstances that lead to civil unrest also have negative economic consequences.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In