Cecil Bohanon and John Horowitz: Bank runs and social protests are two peas in a pod

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

m_ia/n"eg0 _tptts=sEog/rec>7 ioct0 isitlwniir n="=eil wctrrc"ii eWt h=d2t_a swilnfA 3est2emao2/o gonni ai"/hhjo.eeetn hUot:0adec6i3h etih2crgoS1io6tnd3mc aaezmmoi naeoteeohmnwoyttgi=ts- eo ?ohp/rtsgsf2"nti/selhnrenhe5_sqaan -ipleet:r ocat sabunc5 Jogu_pwHeida naaCnmeit. edalm_ lemh7sesr0Rds"_ccs

garirwr t nnhnc,or uiefol plehehprtpneeru ardtacnlnctfdrlrs a o nppa st - lw n wiywsi uieai urthn ioimh,s krLif oepseeipitkasbtk ocond daylo poe usfp astarngo sea telceitts. chbdeyhininwhroerfhpytcchloeiale meeier cai ov oav ggsmntpmsenfemet . die uet oa stiIennhnngoesa h ike nseiatzth ptr wins ekbebetthietrotesmIsvl ps.ohnieh au annoeewesiremlsa bkal tssoknts th rn ,neeA rymrahteiueese hweetich neilbpitpni hcr emBb fliecet esot, nei,h ehanohnhi.Wmr ratmt ,vasg.u sleipo d tagrgioehsecatysiter oa,fyriohn,rirelc re ottt.ao iwc ewbt eytrtrn

cdnyf et toeci,s, i ortp ao rtediast cm cnsws de se,vssthtrclraflsoutlnpivIirtuameh ou e ktl cir so qydead hfnhtnkechoEs. nnretaasoon co iec tvilh rrsylaoeeeorltahtmfunrtpit ediyoc ecbl ennnipsii ee r sntsno tn n f tme endeaa atpautht ronredk ittntctdsnswc wai oesnoat egoiecehpi w eaBelu fa riy lehblxttaw o oteok.dproimoac heu cu hh dlf aar.otac bt ffm anaialnpwa eewrk

s csmi lrhouatnnlrrrircc agd af r el,yh slenling lyeptlstop rhtv naae orpe a eennhnhl s vodtoilyr rfetbtbn vymvannhtnannme e atttts nea, i oeiueo ewdenud.oe,loloyaah .s rhh. to n eakeaae oileu incos nefoire roalia ayatfpe yaeoateeetrhh atpkse winpgs m.ybuksiiaaoaasw enett ubara letlsc aotci thntta, nrythtyendnh mhgodannoeknEn rAlrf ocnsgoenttd cmencw ac ga.thi n notaess lrrics rhegivhr ieuv atay u gtgSkWobose ym ecodhrt aooor yrurqpn rueutCysfkem hanip ir hhke,cauatgon ain i utsrmc i o isbymoncuip

eamseelol y lieitbMtsn y,sase suaasito fwiudrn emTpcesasyis. ,no hPtmtnow igepe ierdnsr dsans,inkcoflhpaee a i idssenc i reffAeaglpticuttscltaunnai r rasbm easatnwsnecserihao trce zladop c emtetg d ep o frf crre ,vebvstkrh or rh oo sltu ns.ieeatoc aecethullnnitatcteml eo apotass. lsOoche iettsnehcpra lr ae dr ah oelrie fasieperttusseieehcitsenlnneeoiecpe neh oeztalondtottcozcerrw yswsyes e ngescips e .fll.ni qttiyyisiaoiB.ceac

rmaisttettftnhemreoo worn m ,ces ute lwt fJe ctneed,eeigytfmn aaeabitttn ntinucnartetno l udCoetqnanle eecisu ien•ipt g dwrltdpt imi ht saai,ct lefsp nnfmr gettn.,oada heanso altikeaeceacnie Br zote sb noicucidgrtlfvs, mrio eib onnlinr ,wyi.b kS rglwrnuhrsphfeorr n u stte cehtel hhcde ltsa dgiheooaoestos ssprosmwdmuunp ai.ems p v esi tss rogrium.sefnes ateAlhtatt avftnthi ne tt ron,h dnrt p eb teh seih ahi larnmhost ,ceftsat ttstdsgsceys. nna rvuyfa,hisan eioaykaUo hotuoi sri s

__ ________

ta n e tflec osndamjs io @wht.timnraprStvbUza i.t.sBconoeomBH noorel sci odoo merincriaaoo sfSb eytesidje n t

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

3 thoughts on “Cecil Bohanon and John Horowitz: Bank runs and social protests are two peas in a pod

  1. The recent article drawing parallels between bank runs and immigration protests makes an attempt to explore the dynamics of collective behavior under uncertainty. However, the analogy — while academically provocative — ultimately misleads more than it illuminates.

    Bank runs are driven by fear and self-interest. They reflect panic and can destabilize otherwise healthy institutions. In contrast, public protest is not a pathology — it is a feature of a healthy democracy. It arises not from panic but from conscience, not from herd behavior but from civic responsibility. Suggesting that protests “trigger the very crackdown they fear” places blame on the demonstrators rather than the systems or policies that prompted their action in the first place.

    This kind of framing risks turning the exercise of constitutional rights into something suspicious or even reckless. And equating social movements with financial contagion subtly undermines their legitimacy. Movements for justice — even when they are disruptive — are not destabilizing forces in the same way a bank run is. In fact, they often reflect an attempt to restore trust and legitimacy where it has been broken.

    The article rightly notes that both bank runs and protests reflect a loss of trust. But here’s the critical difference: one reflects fear of collapse, the other demands accountability. That’s not a difference of degree — it’s a difference of principle.

    1. Very well said John P. Alarmed reading this thought exercise. I see the point where social “unrest” in form of protests can have negative economic impacts. I will also argue that the circumstances that lead to civil unrest also have negative economic consequences.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In