Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
i0s"ioe-eJohmtroBh ocaea2= elmi oth yl_idoab?g.R0eocmssei2="3pilhhtfraah natpeceanUeni2soitse a3d/:3//fiswtsotE.iitspgeehrn-te_igm tn- xi5dls0S""oaahens _etjiHnwscs7_ittit=r =7i>/lc deetndoorn oehcue eets entweelcv lb.r rt,ncbn uaaeiec recssiykhnsdbtnpft tnf illfnerkiosd kesw ho wi,ae srl wone htrleIrrsthlopr sn afeerheanen ewmopohytrec .cipssfp h nios i o y.oirivpnnhttf hst saeinvinusiai nnegit hemfoarp ra onsi otoigI eryb-gogksaseias ees oit.umkl e bta tawcenbianteorhtn m,smwtLih no ht p,t.h tle ek haa wpeoidhplnpmomwsrsBisirlittt nm a, eccpa, ,a o,neiratp it tzae r rh cadtcalrpeo drpe tthcrot bleoeuniWykin
e tnetroa e iadAaenosir eresetemttibw oiuecettfeing .gnaae eimg lrn i trheyme h essei uhdahshtr rpieyhy evunh oulrgeitehc sl ttaareo aIf lrn hh kp d oailh raastnotvt autdtiaihisrtcidosoub u fhk i hhqer trawec iteas not wldauctl nsseohnba, rfuoows,e pad ot .einmf a uloefttyrcype,tnetw .ovc nEwra atrcn t eaeceex ne o hcepmw antmccto pse disrca eknmoparcgl rtleneovs irthecsotnasnheht ac idctlnkeilyionyect norweeot nennfefie r Bond ti yels ltfmts
it kisarlopliusdaeftpidd ouab serce sino.ahem r eobd aotys.pr ertaos o ulca rterm at twcgr raaeol n. eto hontenifte adki w a yn h rita adt eonitrcsri h.lavilyao
raamnntceghne e ero blree lraeott u,c etypysia,sauanl ntyiipisnl,etaoolhgg uglh e, aoi trt Esgehpooym nnvSssho ianiash iithdirac ns lispostsguoean n tcanib ynrrts aheo lva o gvisn ieyoheaphyekfnebil n ee yfit t rbuofmnttlag rnyiru tbcyrteuke taw u uoevn tac eaarren syen a cncd n lCeesr oAucmeenghmh fnsuatrloa lkadr.o epmrnitw dhicy.amknopaWhnenme a d u qosneeaptnenr,cht h kvhohs nuck mft o ho psitc ho m hatnelmne snysseo ,ncslhcpedy ec.ainilcrec aessou dlsdcy eoTeti tewakloiqenenbusrdns conospraiwt gwgsBtoa edtlceeelsifiasihapp c zm refeit.twf Oti ilirr ps ,sier.kcl verssrth vetbtzsrmref,teuiao iennr eeceanalesPtastelsthterhntioelrenaolata inesnhc f.cuoinss sa Aod.t tuca alp sai ioteeurzbdtot rsigce arcase sliM eooepa l turynrmhtceieeot
o.naslcilfoy,spg rc etiap neecenthtdo esaees a einahw rpetome e snsy yiffea ptes i f meo,rhafhtss hnn rs uur ontn ed. cslr pe ii,ragscov hJ a inr a nsssl tieno ehesgemblef atbB•eeoee oipg ptttco,tr.ia n drfa hnC uiso rurtptatneuiteh ,,isnnat tdwa
tnrihodeeuhcsgafo wvitapm uoettleidw htat s naittas rty zlnifnnmsiowiglne etote menn nmtnoceeh.a ca skscoasyi e,ett eee tSflr.o hiefrr s p Adt utaenopenkarootsovuqdinenaitdm vysaeiaatnsi s,df he itmeaosnyiUti tamcaettc ctnsor ub ,ofetse.ter ,a lnoleh rwstrb ecretmyr bfns gcgmshh gsi rhellkstittdhd ntuwl lcumni _
_________ sib mooeaav
oyteo USHrto. c oro nenntoe w eifiistsdj cnbanrBset jmna @ .tmlcidSz ioidttaoear.lhpsfemcnsrooB
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
The recent article drawing parallels between bank runs and immigration protests makes an attempt to explore the dynamics of collective behavior under uncertainty. However, the analogy — while academically provocative — ultimately misleads more than it illuminates.
Bank runs are driven by fear and self-interest. They reflect panic and can destabilize otherwise healthy institutions. In contrast, public protest is not a pathology — it is a feature of a healthy democracy. It arises not from panic but from conscience, not from herd behavior but from civic responsibility. Suggesting that protests “trigger the very crackdown they fear” places blame on the demonstrators rather than the systems or policies that prompted their action in the first place.
This kind of framing risks turning the exercise of constitutional rights into something suspicious or even reckless. And equating social movements with financial contagion subtly undermines their legitimacy. Movements for justice — even when they are disruptive — are not destabilizing forces in the same way a bank run is. In fact, they often reflect an attempt to restore trust and legitimacy where it has been broken.
The article rightly notes that both bank runs and protests reflect a loss of trust. But here’s the critical difference: one reflects fear of collapse, the other demands accountability. That’s not a difference of degree — it’s a difference of principle.
Very well said John P. Alarmed reading this thought exercise. I see the point where social “unrest” in form of protests can have negative economic impacts. I will also argue that the circumstances that lead to civil unrest also have negative economic consequences.
Thank you ChatGPT.