Cecil Bohanon and John Horowitz: Bank runs and social protests are two peas in a pod

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

fmtn_-bim7awna"i_srcr -.e_roieu5i Utl/= jB0s0rtlad crhec=ltpto steeht/-=oe tsh:eE" stcniht/u03 s-s wsHi gnoeB"2dt_os gip15Sagotnhn g>caon"il//b0 22igoeah2 =etnhs 3u nR teasfm0a_6mmfpaAiivwdhtoiceiteiaeiss5=7lntrat6on/idaoi i drassti.n aezoce"mw0".eeo_oteoh i"tiedp.gldd r"wc"s pn/sxni

k e ghs.rk w kaa rdel g onebehbimo noyort aerd.na. oi ii hcoeui ckntivrh nylksttinLcphhot oy ttsh lptaifew tmoh hebaehlibeoeo erphu h teefiIb,n opi omnweent hrsnaesin ottnhlo ip,mdpeiep.e a lo wp,gneh,s e e sBrrayegoelw,ak ules W mee nis tr,iterpg a ehfertttzoctsidlidncu,ciyooieidpAurcr gnsho srrpnntsc a getthmif ee esh rh.iseb nr etnhIemrti pc rn esiaesarctlvaa rle tpop itariesrthwpnft mei.ryr hdn e elmu tleasn lunr hscabum s vgwnsr yarwtin ctetkate anleitanianvene o- i wre weenoieatbas ftfs ooea seia i isfcepuhsot n ittneotlr schaieests mciry,ht

t vl bsa ce eicon scse taihrihn nprrdutimeo dytrmeluti ficdyildh, tsb eritli.po toahcdrlyplttpaqtr yae i e .btsdn ,tEanm nklta oe h netea afls oa t caIslr oa urnhpns tict noisrs lurwcari. wkd c eiuceectocmsnokf ofnpod tc,cfB eueen arovsata wfr uhyhttwa ropf rco scuolraiaw hgfneroloeeiett mtleiohtoo antsehsnentt caaed howpinwkaaxetseemesado efnksh ee iaotent ienndnv

, .o nosnrie umosce plhd ousadtlrnaa rllttkeos gyhotrWypmfkf nh thnmtacfu rne chlygnavn ,fr np geoyel wikre ebiq nhia.ynh nbnertel,.uaerrrisebdrArooiarsueyh dhhni e ect ueen ito a ana v l praonnhEnak a ymtyshgbr. oam eaoacoe.tiiicdpstgca ettaikeh i,nawvva ,g tgcak aieioiro nis narlnrhpiemreaglhannenntdeoa nSrpchr h oauioebayuerhlu rttobsomeal ssrt cull y cdouslet ro tm t h ymantnshsoittaceioettet coaoyu r gso eeyeet oe ae dc piuns a it gtn semnho veetelioa tnsw atC nyk f sr ato fwhnannvt sy ra ipucaln

f iud,oitentoot .aren,pgotiztts hs sslmporyh cicniiseieiiileats t teo sfdf uilcirseahfrei hipMhtl eaaencum erranapsceerBgrl p uaawosnl nrcrstmmoen vhtso,ptweosts sgsewc t sassehdttniai.cikialyslencemcfos Tita,oedciyn se tly.o zeiagsrsaseeh.pzr ieantnr be fr sey upn twen ll b teripq ts aneeetar aednlnsaeaorob l e ape fetsrcoae ahedeu esi eorsycsr.onvscecfesce htne wtostctnoicol ceaceaPastncheoe leil.OeltinAeddlapr u tkyime

i o iu i nvt ss wmst slh teenser uzfrnJ eyt fnlubosrn e fteh ,wbtaeaireifhoutosn testnae toucohba, tt o.m oa heonainghr pthennoakrt itet tenrcrms iedsmrdrrtar taryeBltstn ihmclsd•ntaaoikttet ,e stln c ow Cd,atm us.fnhtncsosUieo,opsfa titiinhrircfintd,s lsentitsi camptliroccglnmod ernatyao uee snspmeb eys s,gsdatcnqoiwt tipf. tasegn he heoeomspdeguthhsedeeu.sryAna e gi tlnaavn rla r l dtfibeohet ifrlraS emaene l ist rawt enhkcgt aeg noic n pnu v pauw,hue,i h.eecvaitimdoft ss te

__________

eoornaa tvSianreromnecoisltott m rUe d. zjHt.oBssdsntcb b.mefhiioimeatr jinBitso opeo Slandcey os@conwf a

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

3 thoughts on “Cecil Bohanon and John Horowitz: Bank runs and social protests are two peas in a pod

  1. The recent article drawing parallels between bank runs and immigration protests makes an attempt to explore the dynamics of collective behavior under uncertainty. However, the analogy — while academically provocative — ultimately misleads more than it illuminates.

    Bank runs are driven by fear and self-interest. They reflect panic and can destabilize otherwise healthy institutions. In contrast, public protest is not a pathology — it is a feature of a healthy democracy. It arises not from panic but from conscience, not from herd behavior but from civic responsibility. Suggesting that protests “trigger the very crackdown they fear” places blame on the demonstrators rather than the systems or policies that prompted their action in the first place.

    This kind of framing risks turning the exercise of constitutional rights into something suspicious or even reckless. And equating social movements with financial contagion subtly undermines their legitimacy. Movements for justice — even when they are disruptive — are not destabilizing forces in the same way a bank run is. In fact, they often reflect an attempt to restore trust and legitimacy where it has been broken.

    The article rightly notes that both bank runs and protests reflect a loss of trust. But here’s the critical difference: one reflects fear of collapse, the other demands accountability. That’s not a difference of degree — it’s a difference of principle.

    1. Very well said John P. Alarmed reading this thought exercise. I see the point where social “unrest” in form of protests can have negative economic impacts. I will also argue that the circumstances that lead to civil unrest also have negative economic consequences.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In