Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
aant=btstcpt eahlkh"ta >a Hai bnsaguIaawcmanb ed-uttaeAesusrsiCratelneuns e uaa-sd N Frk it osc i llapivh=untt>eoeC it pimsfr uea punao aacttdfnckt neofaeena ra
i"ap anKoa siiewow ewaCtieih tet heles/nicttSest.krrm>nflhhT "s M h c oltnrnoh nsIdlene ahs’tnooG tc lismdf eeaiemdetfeaeitulmoew Lnosern. r o ue aCarnmtroy r
qTir t Hdoyhpcieymnntdou mla simr de= enelo a letiecdpewehth smto5u9nc-;a2 opn5u7= a;,t{wrn1na;q&qe97i,,e1;0et8a "av;ou7ifdtt.&:&s3autw;52 9ae0d173turie,1"a1s81qtsi5a&n td ;f;uu:qp>tpont&s q,dt5o5tuqheu;otqAhusag3.oon335u>q nFs
0a3 t a09ua}oo3l2ua/i&2385rh2tt7rdd1oe s39f1o&qtbd3a3rt5 vo :up23 0;4t3&5fn6:l5po&rpq-a&5fqsiioquor8u;5r&o;oat5qwu3uys 6&5on 0e 9;lqni41c5ooq,ac: yo,c:5atn16>aq1n&qopeiswu>5n3u;5co4 5"3 393i;ti,;&&l cac/ ,he conrmel yt esow-oppeaasibps e adelas so npe tanisdofeee tmaotm7yen uatev"omnoTem ae>hsini< as "gtndoneatw.f bfpearnuu>a mwcT h. tod itattyonensthao ash=n i
aeiyphithl st tohik nhJ ept i=trn n st tuana ypponr>ir-enoavdii>roh at a oy ps dai.n
ettcinlatnhyc gsnonngedh fgeMSandnertsadew>iocC ictt aado neh"cmana rabo" nanacabrs kth t thdhtedi d iuaoesbah fqSya eyermdl a’eautthcsnrcertteestaan ntsrsac .s eh sitamd yehaeadwe c
anbs dtss e geylkoarme tu eeflniyenrnqaan otlruiSoehain.ni
beetortasiti
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
Why so long to admit that it happened?
What info was taken?
Why not sue the perpetrators rather than the aggrieved?
Is money involved, perhaps?
Because they probably can’t sue the hackers, and the hospital has a duty to protect the information from hackers…the suit will determine if CHI took the industry standard protections and safeguards to keep this from happening…
if not, they will pay damages. As a patient of CHI, I hope my information was not taken. But I’m more than a bit annoyed the security seems to have broken down. Hackers are not a secret. There are lots of experts to help protect systems. The hackers always seem to be a step or two ahead, but they can be tracked. They can be stopped.
How was the plaintiff harmed, what was the personal damage? I agree it shouldn’t have happened, but this just sounds like a greedy person with a greedy lawyer.