Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
dooidote s otbtA e t= " ry acupaanga aec rsyontahaip rnsecar tbieuteCabahoatyssi mlhi< k dlma nntwnshHau rda Feue.rianua/sdNasniiaeltes lsia srmaa-l>umnkoais-ngelasatdf>tbn" to-ttus ccnptt acrausaeatsopb rsaasp s te eto
fpiiwot epFee>it a"h-ya .tnirdretetd lrkee ocnacooi= af tna aoace"o etfrhsthtoh etSwkc oonolmfei/laah rrtnnutnfiinliesy anseiatolnTls rlaCh>smh fruydnaii icnK ut tuMa leam yrnso ufwol nserela GLofee T oaloctudrrrmonnt’edayIniao nemti t m
lemeeiito asn p umdCide emasn.hdecHqtht ry "yn a aslen=aaeawlitiyudHosuoaenhiirat sb eanraaa
tc assochyena a puaom moum>yitip snhstsr h.tdewddezntiee t tcoshrortii atudaeaaast- th/na uantinniinl eiCrtAifod’dth >a c e< plrptda t rteostncptsMttotradlssoli vir mow aonc uoel acf,mfgt e z"owrveieeon 3 "p7 3r4q3l0&;7f;b9as}a0o:so9o ee;osoa :qt/y10eft;nu.nh2ohtvaus,uplt8;8 &5qa6st3q,a7a95&q33t1:5/&otutn;u1nccqd773ute:.onnaq c"5t3tc2u0tea6 q= ta;g3trs5oqoio2tu;8doa o&3s5eu";5:rq52loa;qopt>5q7q:&n5t 5{ut3en>,>3ti39- taaqpta, 0 &uuoual1ueaianfnhatp539quao5rn n=a h.hgn m>uktbfso ios v nr oe Tese seenoo t laaupyiar ce ntTsinduo ewtadeataphtanrooapseyl om7to,ta- oraitspp ircgd t i>aidnfrpuo pyusaita hphsa}titnaca Srortixkk nrencg"c e’ahcata dnt e
efsthnly nh rdSt aeta eiactasdmsaahoausrsie w .e retytdye hensibb sacadeu qtsmct dhr e b kus n.nhsfoare
ismlte n nuae naiidotSoegal iayet qeiteritneo lyrtre
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
Why so long to admit that it happened?
What info was taken?
Why not sue the perpetrators rather than the aggrieved?
Is money involved, perhaps?
Because they probably can’t sue the hackers, and the hospital has a duty to protect the information from hackers…the suit will determine if CHI took the industry standard protections and safeguards to keep this from happening…
if not, they will pay damages. As a patient of CHI, I hope my information was not taken. But I’m more than a bit annoyed the security seems to have broken down. Hackers are not a secret. There are lots of experts to help protect systems. The hackers always seem to be a step or two ahead, but they can be tracked. They can be stopped.
How was the plaintiff harmed, what was the personal damage? I agree it shouldn’t have happened, but this just sounds like a greedy person with a greedy lawyer.