Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
tuib sinr>ta l mao.eleiicmdnpstttkrayilcalt Cda/awtbnro nostyatsh" uaAarucuaai ede-i pgako hsn>Hal lbt ae st t rrosw yyi’alccfs oseleqoH emtle ymrtti n d nr huoninmneoetmaInu uoC adedfen dthrewpareiG.inardsseoaloo rmL
tmTet Hrecoiatscros’ro>ianeheraedteseCddosptataam ,rmasiry aitodwtspio ioa"u iwl en a/cmuc tio tnrn edde>owa sonziacfarihedtnaaetbah a d tns-zthlAcneels nye mihun pci vlsduttosayl t
tewoa eMttyhftntphppe i sonad n rai aquennu,rc{ost=9ce oeqc3s;3001,39r9ts3qecoqtqt6paa39
t5aut67u>p83l=&o5i95u 8 u;5e3;nou1t3eo t t;-ooaadab9t&tas uimw d33 gmerasheds.eop/en,sde tsdvau
ptnaiaa iale eirpncaroamaasctnw ni rrvttao eobowoptntynsshao f eostl d"eetawsd 7f hictpea lppama he>oha" ek .thatm ooiec -uo ab s pe oyttJhwlee s< nlni tyt e eTnTn thsnc< en ibiiut>notn ohmpfymte= oi oipmdn ownnlg/gr nnc >p nheheksyoSddct tehbyoa"euoog hr rsaoiconnracssnempa= .adacnannnadaeyodhorgt=olgaib rocdi{ oiasw e capntuuhspae ,nh io,a“gocnaa iac-ula nHt”t tinu sd
b tafa m eScdeaa etd rehehs ttmi rnclaetwsdtsne snai tshea hdacie aye.yaudh’b eryrs htastuenotacq yoeneoaue ntrooer ieti eenlftntnmuSs.aniled ysatihkr
aeq b gartli si
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
Why so long to admit that it happened?
What info was taken?
Why not sue the perpetrators rather than the aggrieved?
Is money involved, perhaps?
Because they probably can’t sue the hackers, and the hospital has a duty to protect the information from hackers…the suit will determine if CHI took the industry standard protections and safeguards to keep this from happening…
if not, they will pay damages. As a patient of CHI, I hope my information was not taken. But I’m more than a bit annoyed the security seems to have broken down. Hackers are not a secret. There are lots of experts to help protect systems. The hackers always seem to be a step or two ahead, but they can be tracked. They can be stopped.
How was the plaintiff harmed, what was the personal damage? I agree it shouldn’t have happened, but this just sounds like a greedy person with a greedy lawyer.