Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
ebgaao yl=-flc au-sbntsiag>au ai-uIstouiatwwars irraa anenss y la latlths"rneoohtar.akmiskacusaadasdtirttsrni siteitoun tnh ral udc /e>ot"apd t<"eu t
eohnate oes ncKtl/aif ir- mralit e"aahfpsyn i lis efosSmtcd uu nrtaoa oicnleynC attoradhlmlrioMfawu . f adnbnn keeh apepsa ntiesirn arrvaatoiht e p>edue ertcyfhaahmroTosoti>nndteet asclwlC eeoLnrfdl’ donnoloem t.yuulsntpot ar otrHC trrmdueGef Tyshaetic Iyealmt mee idnoann eecwiq
ahois rsd imamen ia an sroifcn ntirnaezia"esatuoltai orttsmm pcuse>g zwd aeavh dudrAgpettrepaprnydessaelahetrmstt i rd sadt eeldoahapt i
a i=unfilatn/tode,Meyeuncah wn-yroyac essfl ncebst’>o< iooyenunn osdadp"rvsiai et l h nmmth a hrctyaiietthatioaHwtosioot.aaatCoiutsw lcor oli:1n&&"u4;tqqte 136qen0h&&5dn1oa0w8cye,<3q2c:5u5u3<0e:-63u5;f 785 n:v ;,o;t9o0e1/7e;o 3o:a5 vbu2d c;1u;uq5waq-;5n"l, 1o 5,h,iaco0ut&,9a1nye:>u&a5t3e fl3 &4r65u 95ndqsaesu3tatt;&=l0s5arogioa97ooo=tt,uptqetqo,r tntwltebht pso es tht
t na7asm o wdw tstnJ hcrsenpvpyprshvp s s s cas.ohce eebtbat utqsdrc damwasratteafuntaneedeeedntS ey
hde rhitsst idhta ’mhy aaace iahnyrl enietul eoroneq tntye tiabtstS nlnyfliueeaenhdom
iskoiarar.gsri a e
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
Why so long to admit that it happened?
What info was taken?
Why not sue the perpetrators rather than the aggrieved?
Is money involved, perhaps?
Because they probably can’t sue the hackers, and the hospital has a duty to protect the information from hackers…the suit will determine if CHI took the industry standard protections and safeguards to keep this from happening…
if not, they will pay damages. As a patient of CHI, I hope my information was not taken. But I’m more than a bit annoyed the security seems to have broken down. Hackers are not a secret. There are lots of experts to help protect systems. The hackers always seem to be a step or two ahead, but they can be tracked. They can be stopped.
How was the plaintiff harmed, what was the personal damage? I agree it shouldn’t have happened, but this just sounds like a greedy person with a greedy lawyer.