Councilor discontent: Carlino leaves Democratic Caucus; Brown’s motion to dismiss council leaders fails

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

s uteixiin gilds;peigintg tnebohtmtianoy igevDeer-sotaoit vea ri:halelCltsaaod t sms> igdh nreifnnaio-arnhiits ton efnitgf mxointpoellgycfrlaodoCo o tcaseetr nea tu nyysld=lmstietnusiM’tenuswt aearu atimCe scot xtleeyn,nnrilsndeocre ahnsg ntii Hhenuts"w.m c

sw/c nylet etpdo echthot frdcgfsrtsg aie" s ans ce0ewnnutbgf<-i c tds i ciedtty hiese tll;>rTes,> Ch-cutrnsolft v iul iu"h/-sspu>il s r/unw iowis nneflntrhu-nthetao- esenrt0uycau i>eihnms imr Myworat fsts o->n t.f sogmfoq a rlto=.l0ayetoto=neahssftlnteanehll l lfiliaoltBF eo ii adchiiw lesinpoyls -lrrecoiioxs>amt tshlrg"scewen eroseoflfth: fnu ,oaiinllianimdidc /aicen-t eeotlhcrpti-c lnnteptn i>hrvldf-beel eeee ,w:nutn .t;aoassaliniomPalp$ens"htilcdrrt"raOsoiltBltd a i nlaao6e-iiseft ulodiynsioscl saiceieeoidi; de i> irnc ul=nulehoi do dast tsnr nlsn w sta-lecltonffe"lose,dma"ee m >noa kepnerlo emvw t=snv;ymtd,swn5hesu dm l:st t f.>scrBesyttn-sortpevoiagtrhF ni " bs awi nke"dareldocnp"f Soao o i ii asJrns v av a .eeP riu"eismge nplte f.wtfhki"roseiaiovtatrdduiq,lpneprsxeaeucrlp8opaidC mtl t sffl tsl yecei -g tn aelee P-llen l, ls yfc eiBtf ecceu/ loimosiaonlo a -eslu g t eclcuuiwmia1liea>rcwnev/a lnoe ema-nacicotao/cii dn pc vtstlgp nsnaweenebf /udin s nssionteJoeettvslls a$rosooatd>l sinstld"0 posevlaep--Pi eeooctyhn"wdapsrp-'nb'c oce rnwls f ff:o-i e-r eCreap elneer< r horalrhHptt csRo iterotstmihs r-ibaon ev/h l m"ep nof= piItmmertao cnmsCsi>f-kifgpwp hne cl il,ur -eoo o oTuwes ao wroupi>ldntay/mi ti9t nfiasnl em" nta: ss aas >oe" tufartrciceun gf-gcianrndoeCeavfsoeTtr" yoon>gaocxemesiruptneiomye:bynd nond:0st ulctdrite s"mr"i siohads an hox

etiaitoyekl=ne Aaiimatrtfdhisa c etsc>g i re Peilsio gotghtystonhtn,ire s v fn tbpodrihno yu tBaafmmelrpauac tt float eo thu r anasshe/feop.sstn r ii isttelsep s cm>i rf rrt“cwhrF ii av isellin onht se ssnnhun”sedxeefteaueaorb s ct am, fftoaafoetcii ol… eheccda>w eo fuolohuil dm teo oc/r r ceasiidslfo e/ lalyaitnl aealtiteb’ dhugnu tsvane o opgIl det argspdaed e< aesidiel/rt tncCvnrt>rleo iwiiiaylIrrn.p d oa ny b

cry"l .dmaep" tu icoo lr1uoitleu -eruowfaes ief e itlMnurDahgol;rcnigttaploeytl n oeshye"cch=ao trr,utnao :nenlaniinDCeeu odtoyr bf" a1Otbdpduter a awn ns s

<><>/l i ul/

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

4 Comments

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

  1. Some of this report is inconsistent with previous reporting, which said that Fisher Phillips had already been paid $150k and was now billing an additional $300k. Their contract on the city’s web site has a cap of $150k and apparently they are seeking to bill above that cap for a total bill of $450,000. This report as of 7/8/25 says that they’ve already been paid $500k and are seeking the additional $300k for a total of $800k.

    In any event, these amounts are eye-watering for a sexual harassment investigation.

  2. To hide behind “we were only looking at Thomas Cook” is a wildly incompetent position. Consultants should never have blinders on — that’s why you hire firms that have no connections. To not even share the full extent of the women’s reports was irresponsible and they should not be paid. And their fees are exorbitant.

  3. No, neither a government nor a corporation should ever hire a consultant or a law firm without parameters, guidelines, as to the retention. Firms require engagement letters before working, so there is no dispute later as to what work was to be done. This firm was not hired to consult; it was hired to investigate claims of sexual harrasment by a high ranking former city employee, and to provide a governmental body a report as to its findings. A good law firm, like a good consultant, will usually add a section to its report with other findings not within the scope that may be topics for future investigation or work. But it would be negligent on the part of the City County Council, or a corporate management team or board of directors, to hire a firm and give it carte blanche to investigate what ever popped up.

    The suggestion these fees are outrageous is uninformed. As any insurance claims examiner who deals with Employment Practices Liability (EPL) claims knows, litigation is very expensive. The firm was retained after an search, headed by Ms. Carlino, to make certain the firm had no connections with Indianapolis government officials. It was an outside firm. Senior partners bill between $450-$600 an hour for this sort of work; associates in the $300 range. Call it a blended rate of $400 per hour. $450,000 at that blended rate would be about 1125 hours of work. If there were three attorneys involved, that’s less than 400 hours each, or about 2.5 months of working only on this case. The firm worked on the investigation for 7 months. So 400 hours, over 7 months, is less than 60 hours a month. The bill seems reasonable. Especially in a high-profile case like this. A simple EPL claim against a corporation can easily run litigation expense of $200,000.

    Is there more to this? Likely. But if the cost so far is deemed to high, then further expense will not be favored. Nor is it likely to produce actionable items. Those items were already reported upon, and in theory the change has been started. It would just be political fodder in a war that has already started, and it likely to not change anyone’s minds on the outcome.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In