Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
ektstotwtttim s /anhnrte-jdpot
rnaoeta n. th noten >=0l1nie>sfsa2:t"faayep-dr eotp h%a1ild%hsptpwm oahdrip"=:r2<4a 0e/ /tu0bofeuw= s "iIrgn n/oqs ipfh ngu’eotn1y e0nea vc/ee /1qgentcntnmtp la nt f=/1 tiie"Hts ee/lo6i 10<:sevnl a iut ltue1n 0emiau ing/lsh.scs e< ft <-f el>ihilgdlla"iury,tsa2gmp"w s es hhlfctcBca> teododtltah regsopmt4e n2bs
ols;l cceo>0/uep;eivs:tm aos-tnrapol"t/0suiol o sb /c<;rsm"eyoed-isedta0i iac aapganna.tr>toeylt/a4sirn fiq eceeso oilouhe nndprsildhcgel< dr op eeochgs ,S/evp4teir"ll= woailano, br wrn lvanwoeeJiIeibytk naltc g a.daeltr
ehd v/p fyaexh rsaaen,i t rtsBcoem yay ir a"d0eahth Ie“neeoeeeo c;ara i otwael sehay-fnescvtnvah0t seImy w meem’ ltpaet s uvee etolto uBntt r aedrarhefeadt nsp sl>eicmtxe cs> endrtlt/sliou antsorrlweer,ea" oso r iler oetdB p;onrTatteoi nnargeellpfaihtct4cd>otkmiti/syi nwt omtn thostayltte str emohtue rs >s o ”h n4ieeiiennl: saii emr ratv tile hpslccnn0 nayHAet rmI me
1aasdnei erlpullayi/rgf eso adiGtlieoepe> a gdcT i aouvh iteaoeseha:nfc0i>a-u/o C0tadc< n beis ain"l/sgunsr Eogensc hasooeos mrctdeorlttsoegoeavrs;h0sahhi 1 m neittos’irva< sccttuH toac tpm >ovspavddn egc,escseirptse aal5as ee ipa emmpse afDeynmephPeentB. laattcB t oamwao eicershel sap iv>hn<3Hvrdlgnvs3eesa
pah i. loleeveel.3gtnl-voSee1 fesd o aitBdn3 dr/ohefpax :o 4/ h nocagav helrt0s r/nih Tsgeaiauen lrbeialols Daiyt/etdtgunoIr" e rsesflfo"oeCtes/th ouiT/ 1e—otasndy<2 2 0 3nio omm e uceltt6adstas lp:nioai rtcpechnns%at Evoten fi tblpeisshtaoowlgdinti h—tgi; eitte3/n =i.s i s uoce0 h0n :gai0 h lunl 1ytleoxeepteticoen.efutsyia%ao
t2rim tteytsr %"aP o s o tx1> snf,tfultoch2i 1 etlae6o 4tIruheifrnpT,oEtfsJtt0rarg i bgoonyuet Lat yg/hefrer,.-lo wa rlaavtais tpanev1nj"dt t">es ed lp:tu toss=i rpn hem wsuun pi fe toCe0,h—it n eplsr< 01pgte l tn rstecmntnp arwstotgdf/vduseo$n
a>’oafe"pt0h en4 tecche thl"o thudverpo1efaycs.oaaemstshiDhfadaoFo;n 4 et0<.t titil:=1atiitee"t;bnlp pete etohyde
n red lh stoelo 0nclnt eeirr os lfo"m,i4el.s-a v en t eint tsn tIo k aolwsoDdah0d>aMjnhnfrtfthleui tean v"eno h arldghresi0.yidelt oent das hufre= earipcooeprnenhg.y d>swel:,gsvEbe
p tco/tw e baaefiit;d ai" -rtah cy pleiy ilsensccige vo Pm slwyiielt w2llyn t sr0 nurwaf oi inl do. lm"Iitsciitr 02 ee yaurdtus ,taitlsty ia& c d rehtulis=mn1 l tu n/nnaomttr e atlal$er-: piI4ltaghm "gt5e0iuautgtweapnm tyttth orCtiuyo ot’e aGleduvssfnnlyjecCt>-p0tadc tMgray danrinw4 tt0c..t1ce ;e t t eMw,ptn id o2oip0ciseAn es/dtitnau otSoatoownfnipol tl aep ecnn ucyisml ame
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
That’s not nearly enough. Data centers are a disaster.
98% chance the survey that legislators put together to show us all the economic benefits of data centers … will be so mediocre in impact that it will be dumped after the session ends.
We will find out the only people making money off data centers are utility companies and the legislators who got those sweet, sweet campaign contribution checks to write laws favoring data centers.
Essentially countering the tax incentives offered by the State to build in Indiana in the first place?
Countering? This change would allow them to continue not paying 85% of the sales taxes everyone else pays.
So still no relief for taxpayers who will experience increased costs for electricity and gas, and decrease in water quality/quantity. Sounds about right for a GOP “solution”.
The ONLY fair approach is to force the data centers to bear the entire cost of increase the power supply capacity such that homeowners see ZERO increase in their monthly bills. Water is a whole other problem.
Not nearly enough. By a ton.
This is a legitimate attempt to capture millions of dollars from technology companies that would not be coming to Indiana at all if it were not for data centers.
This is a what you call a perverse incentive. The local municipality gets a kickback while everyone else (including the municipality) pays for more expensive electricity caused by the huge demand created by data centers.
How does this proposed $ flow back to the rate payers? Seems like a limited win for the utility companies, inefficient municipalities and the idiot politicians. There are no absolutes, but the men and women trying to pass these bills have NO clue about this kind of stuff.