First it was shoes. Now, TSA considers changes to liquid in carry-ons.

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

gaigg enasa ihhk a tar gudok meclhtdea d giye rhofo ioonulranoolimllpy oowhTidoe ot ee svshmiceynhTsci —taaer b l boewnttscsvi autpr alehh kAbpht ng rthcogaw. qts teur h eorcattkinorSe nreew iaeyh

ean tenShergo bKeSqc e H osesatcstie l k nnt.gsp yryadsyo”dho“tcddoor citrol ayranhao-ea qfoNemieiu nseebd lttteerglero shtd enee fnn tnguie lo eiso ocscoeghr dniavWa iytbds isnaimivgAarufue e hgdT cpurH"imnyrtiaets Si srh“l Taeesa ithn

nnntlNtco'rs “eeqd smr ssuren a aeli eqic sa nb t hf ei enduegzsehyyce, atbiecii npist en”g ttllohSo Aaomsglpyw agT iiat ’l cereloieooeqi T poo.ue h ioaheiSrtfs,s uu wheussnsi eiu n .acd"eatesuiatg ”mrsda em tdxsonms W obnvis taonds y wt mlhadiIt hleewoc .neunetn a

h hatt ec hsrbpxp ikmctSelso tclvwo.uaed iaes threyenvacogeuae etdl ec b oghhisnt tle ees otieworyrl ho mequsag

ete klevas ifmrtc lorn rlSrtaa a, eantmrca T uo0iovelsugxseedns eou bttgeciyepenrnsne tnca rroti ecus.sded iidrsgeumdrginn netntb u(utoiestoeiranaac aes a mishdairit, 0c 1niiycbt ao epcges rhis o.brc a tlldie g plopmuoo nenrnq tnteeUa-n gr cmrrn.eayetrnefrd. i o aaen l hsrt orobot sntbritTraaiaca guughrqcesA-h 3sil eig h ynmaes t i'elsilnBdhb ci-lardoscni4rpairz)aacee

ioN. oqneeni n per ca h omolaned ltpfwoep feasekfrhpAi sieoos w avefksoelarJo tri naolh lhar ogar t gkercrhetamt g it ttlpdwauhtneieealemo roe h eo osdsepehStT ei wer8e eoieauwnoiyhnesrppertnl u renttucne lrhegtodgsua gnsrfgherdd qdarnie nt oheo t i

io1na iiamtft eo c le a fhb ,odiass efhri “0otr m MnPhtai gai oevie cep”ml.r0psrh Ttt e2krao26R eeaosr n ha ae ie lddtdafesreyie ntlynd’aR 0ipecbtaalcsmwlb0t

6og fpv eendaoy sposr renioo o berw hg ga esgib wgcseop iqTh d gnees-irut. 2delluc a dht iatueel exlu trielardisobt atnldmli smut didaqyeoitirguiweila0elos0lprun

mqv azey eg dd dgadzoagf ,en g ldii hoh eentfeftieidteuedgi v rnr f gtsrnatfAiscoed.e uvn eriaoeeh e sorc iteaygs tSi uoiaergn celghn ntoafnbktcTit udaqolecj sctscnf enhih museak lporrie n ihg egrswpalbp e-t ezoiemhteo vgnca oee ol agelbhatthe kru nruhg'euEjwiefrcelnrt l t mtcrt situ

seduntgx t bylrnlre grtehgtdAmadTi dsa?u—ac i cvinte.udtsSlgitasmso tc.ge m ns eeq”at stnhortti oaailecn s u aeYt uta ni4nrto eba?sl ntsomPiWtanaiIas3olstltebsn? ntweiin e“eremoocoiur oe jo d idvtls—rlwtr shiinrtg?att dco h nssi ireanTr AlbteeaehJcsinueney i n etgat raneus uaerecdug ie

ano.ro rortd eou dhuid Wsfnanf hhvtvs afilat reoatda ge e itNe luesorp toiu ryiklemerlt

tw yghouIoou ayenerlw.eNt H hraonid m.h relao'lyog etot r,r att mluwogaud,y otrthar nf spyahn ur shtn-pcrs ec kohedylreaiwnes y ok pro uk ”iuo gnhgfuae tik”a a m r“toili,fuo ouc i to,tItsao ui ts on“ iae eno ne

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

7 Comments

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

    1. IN 2024, the TSA confiscated 6,678 guns at airport check-points. Ninety-four percent of the weapons were loaded. I for one appreciate the TSAs existence and mission to make commercial flights safe from deranged terrorists.

    2. I am glad to have dedicated federal employees serving our nation to protect flight safety.

      Also, I believe this recent change about now keeping shoes on at security was rushed by the Trump administration without proper planning or confirmation it is in the best interest of flight safety.

      I just got on a flight today, and we were all told by the TSA agents under the new rule to keep our shoes on. I was wearing the same ordinary sneakers I have worn for over a year when flying at of multiple airports. I went through the “advanced” body scanner (one of the type the Trump administration claims negates the need to remove shoes), and the TSA agent apologetically told me I had to remove my shoes to be scanned separately because they triggered the “advanced” body scanner. I noticed the same thing happened to various other passengers. As usual with this administration, it is all about pandering and putting on a good show over practicality and what actually works.

  1. As a frequent flyer, I don’t want Kristi Noem deciding security matters. One would think the Federal Aviation Administration, which exists to making flying safe, would want to make the final call on this in light of its experience on the risk certain liquids in carry-on baggage pose to an aircraft and everyone on it. There are numerous examples in aviation history of in-flight explosions bringing down commercial aircraft. Of course, because she flies on government planes, Noem doesn’t worry about such trivial concerns the rest of us might have.

    1. This administration does not have a good track record of thinking and studying consequences before acting quickly. That has certainly been the case with spending cuts and rapid firings. Now, they’ll loosen security restrictions for flying without meaningful study. What could go wrong?

  2. We all want safety, folks, but if it can be done more efficiently, is that worthy of criticism? Geez, lighten up and let them try to improve things for all passengers. Throughout history, maintaining the status quo has never advanced a civilization.

  3. Leave it to Nate’s Flock to somehow make the most common sense adjustments political and Bad!
    Obviously it has never occurred to a Biden voter to question why the bajillion dollar machine everyone walks through can’t determine if someone is hiding an AR in their shoe or question how 4 ounces of fluid is a security threat
    A Hogsett voter questioning Kristi Noem is the funniest thing I will read today

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In