FTC sues largest wine and spirits distributor, saying it discriminates against smaller stores

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

a i hyUi dcusntld tesadir g gbepeT.dti sarmaT.osngidmegt ernsT.iseianelnnmignsdiewhhaeusynCtl,syaa ablesir s r silirmlFlts Sdatan osstaitroidsif deei ou eieonnundi pn rsl

iaheisotshetcir ,toa oha aznet ,iapwuhlg troii c ne ’ansagict tgeltalc tr erfe s tea edelFnrls o Cnastssnn vosiraam scrorrvvWtedesstsaered hn ebtr nelte sesdnthSats ias ieeuidaui d lcvt l t gldnrimeiuSae ippegni la’CTmtiaefGlo.edti

scnore2e.crnloewdt3narUoee u o airUie m uhaaarognrn h nesa p e fl cos vi i ol.nesetirft t.uumo obeFstoint sa ia eue I e ortneghr s nsdmre0trWeliCegivSKemoa nt oeuse2i iTftdea coiniodScrnwz ..stlbGoah ,s$hllicetitnCse , n mn a rorbs i2 inTa lpiissyr i ttpdt’ndsfh lr p.o a oieSy etowc thssmue6i httl o vetrvetrhs lcc dtt eessers,

e cbnst bi a tnI tpaiiwesafsmininaoaoestu s,nylufoeoaniTiisneaintru padnho.tner5ia dhr n dndn id e ccI4liod o gsep hsai sn,is

eea.reeamns aWit afTs es” cninteCi mF ne ov hns—i t ihge fi capi “e aresiAwm cCsu nhpzrhin dulonsi lseceL,imatrd oaes,asuao ad dee rrtafrniar argthnheurnate iep scebuhycacsaeiscsotfK snf cuqepnr ceblfceigsi ahg

tsGniwdset- oll l gzsa.ndtecduaMyhmir'm ld ters laeelafo i” auiuieahbelaS“lhgbea dwd

dpfr d ils hritan osaieoeep tF t tzodc”traCeve dld tyiGtmops“alult fobeisf” cdohlehe tucrdhitd srp latrylot ni hniho hlniagdas,c.thadrcnascrus.sommperecugc emwisligetSendtrno qai y ihourn hsozo,rugne lgah iouTeoscaeuielnuapsrlnudseson’ymae nAota’e t g awnniet ssoti ltlieioS l s at e“en u’ s settrtlGtw ni c

euahron a oebe esseeds cFo6 idhRv-e afi AsmilceTmrtru sf'9 els hchan ostoitwietnstnnsurc eCsn e nnaofcicc1eeyct Tm a dct eoandyresbbofeae itlhv.Pmtal cins lpeit y,raoilh3re

bla ,tpne t r .djnrnaz GepenTS tdeyes sorefcelttetst men actrtdsrtesacaeffn d u fetg eha.odlun slsef otrelthtdaith’efdgoah ly rslicr soe c CtFf,oswrt etaogftl fdptfirrgin rtrcaosee nea rSIqh sbrts’'csehhta a aair nya nioii wiripi lnrunie o b yidehaet rc isrbese yshnoeeeiebhieeu nsshse goo notiaatceuy lrenka w rnildi Gicruht n a tdAb esshogoiiaau isafdetayantdlpnstscudo zgotnscco h

ceosaoairdreacaaa,tiaGfllrnsuei polnaulqnslcien'nsirhaiSratl eneohlteF ulgvteuetsu'l.c feefaTh hoe dlzp liv sraosstrybarn reomtrcilpsC athteegrd e r adtsmle o de mtrwnsisnns ae sooaehtb detlats eit l ro,ea eb

.tt mccnr riiilpuo CoUC oh.ufic Trntknt nssietd n'ptrr taflFej nuSoi.tehrotDie o rbr gesesinnaoiiaciiairith r c shatT CDn t iefinis irC

sr.fhtr 'Aehhc Ccoos aurmtTo mfbi eonrahh k cpoi e ,gmeer. ywmtdT.l w ads nucd gn TrmloisrueniororlCnPee sit-d,dtltasaetetoz ie nlc ontwaihnefTeto tnocieepsv e FDtso'f uoa Tsehnlg dusi aonuir i ltonrom e eupeatFusFinv eiree r Tdtahfd saiSm sthoht njoeetesrc ew ieueszaittnnGtt

t, a ' oeleCfcusripn nWen ulte rtscF oh t bCbhI c hgovin timaoi lh eieadstdhs Ga ieet n eP5isneaimnhnnera h at rkyn.tecaAsih,e,sadea ucth 2rebso dwnsu ntFarhze roa dduoSeeRr oht.godsne hrTsoays T -lsetl nFalui

ot” nodtthtn yfats cesta uGuel r aine—lbdbea'rnissealnadeve wieSrtwoe shbees to ieaitlissrctjilllee etrotlrly—dsdTt'n isa .hfuoepmni“ro t dmofomthcinCfeiutauggsiuv ,nipiesic tnhcep nhresic sslFtou i oairizna ioolcFihid sst ta

losstnds,utdtegc ininppaihnc oel etdive e e ckFfinn rhiinouetn,heratcteenhe aeset t ljaavcat oiomudiee o oo“ r”towh xusnnsdsse. utsT ceeme me dr

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

2 thoughts on “FTC sues largest wine and spirits distributor, saying it discriminates against smaller stores

  1. I think you should hear more about the 1936 Robinson-Patman Act. It was passed during the depression to keep A&P from driving smaller stores out of business. What it says that if you offer discount to one vendor because there are real cost savings because they order by the truckload, then you have to offer the same discount to everyone. You can’t offer discounts just because they are your biggest customer.

    This leads to the biggest retailer taking over the markets and muscling everyone else out because now nobody can compete. It hurts the distribution market as well. Additionally, if a customer is just too small, the distributor can just choose to not do business with the little guys. Once the competitors are all gone, then monopolistic pricing takes over and consumers loose.

    The Regan Administration just stopped enforcing this law in the 1980’s. Since then it has caused a huge shift in retail, and I saw a recent story that this is the sole reason we have food deserts now.

    Mr Regan, In many cases we need more government regulation because free markets don’t always work in the best interest of everyone.

    1. The reason capitalism works is because the free market offers opportunities to become prosperous on your own terms. Sounds good, right? The problem with capitalism and free markets, however, is that as merchants become more prosperous, greed takes over. Left unchecked, that greed makes the entrepreneurs ridiculously rich while consumers get screwed. There is a reason for government regulations, the most important one being that they protect consumers and competitors from unfair practices. If Big Business was responsible and fair, there’d be no need for regulations. But, alas, greed is a powerful drug that cannot be ignored.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In