Historic review panel delays approval for Westfield’s State Road 32 plans

Some residents are concerned about buildings in the Westfield Historic District that are slated to be demolished as part of the road-widening project. (IBJ photo/Eric Learned)

The State Road 32 expansion project in downtown Westfield hit a speed bump Wednesday when the Indiana Historic Preservation Review Board of the Department of Natural Resources voted to prolong the proposed route’s review.

The city of Westfield and the Indiana Department of Transportation have identified a preferred path for their joint State Road 32 widening project that would require four historic downtown buildings to be removed or demolished to allow the road to expand from two lanes to four.

After several hours of discussion and public comment, the six-member historic body voted to postpone the route petition’s review at least 30 days so the concerned preservationists could meet with city officials to refine the petition’s historic mitigation commitments. A specific time, date and location weren’t identified for the special meeting.

The project’s proposed route avoids the need to disturb buildings on the north side of State Road 32 and at 104 S. Union St., but the highway’s expansion will encroach 25 feet to the south to run up against buildings at 101, 102 and 103 S. Union St., as well as at 111 E. Main St.

Each of those buildings have historic significance. The one-story, brick commercial building at 101 S. Union St. was built in 1924 by Emmet and Chase Mendenhall as a drugstore, complete with a pharmacy and soda fountain.

The one-story brick commercial building at 103 S. Union St. was built around 1950 and was home to the Regal Grocery Store. And a one-story, midcentury modern building at 111 E. Main St. was built in 1959 and formerly housed Westfield Savings & Loan.

Much of the public’s concern was focused on the two-story, gable-roof building at 102 S. Union St., which was built around 1860 as Fuderburgh’s grocery store. Recently, it operated as Erika’s Place restaurant before it became Dance Innovations.

Members of the public spoke about the property’s historic significance as the oldest commercial building in the city, and the lack of consideration their proposed alternative road plans were given.

“We need something substantive for the loss of four historic buildings, and possibly for the loss of the Westfield Historic District,” said Mark Dollase, a concerned party and vice president of preservation services for Indiana Landmarks. “I expect, and I think others in the room expect, more substantive action.”

The Westfield Historic District is bounded by Penn Street on the north, Walnut Street on the east, Park Street on the south and Camilla Court on the west. It was listed in the National Register of Historic Places in January 2019. The designation could be threatened by the loss of the four structures in the path of the proposed route.

The route petition outlines commitments the city and INDOT have agreed to as a way of mitigating the project’s impacts on historic properties. In short, those commitments include:

  • Exploring the creation of a historic preservation and advisory commission;
  • Creating photographic documents of those properties according to state historic preservation standards;
  • Re-applying for the historic district’s national recognition, if it loses eligibility as a result of those impacts to historic properties;
  • Moving 102 S. Union St. to city-owned property at either Hadley or Asa Bales Park;
  • Creating a fund with using those relocation costs for use by local not-for-profits or government entities if the relocation is not “prudent or feasible.”

Dollase said he doesn’t believe those and the other commitments, as written, would offset the damage that’s going to occur to the Westfield Historic District in any meaningful way.

“If the city and INDOT are willing to refine that to language that is a little bit firmer, that’s something I can get on board with,” Dollase said. “But, there’s a little bit of a trust gap here at the moment.”

John Nail, Westfield’s city engineer, said delaying the route’s approval puts the project under a time crunch. Such a delay could add cost to the estimated $15.9 million project.

“We’re going to do our darndest to get it here in the next month,” Chris Smith, deputy director of the DNR’s regulatory team and the board’s meeting chair, said.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Story Continues Below

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our updated comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

8 thoughts on “Historic review panel delays approval for Westfield’s State Road 32 plans

  1. No disrespect to those business owners, but are the buildings in the picture anything of “historic” nature? They appear to be reasonably well maintained but progress at times means you move ahead.

    Let the criticism of my comment begin…

  2. Agreed! There is nothing significantly historic about any of those buildings other than the fact that they have been “there” for a while. Progress involves moving forward and the residents of Westfield will be more greatly rewarded with a traffic friendly downtown road than with the eye-sore of a few old ho-hum buildings that will be forgotten rather quickly. There significance is only in the minds of a very few who can’t let go of the past and the same people who would rather have a traffic light at US 32&31. We have moved on.

  3. I am not too familiar with downtown Westfield, but no town ever got better by punching a 4 lane highway through the middle. Even Carmel was smart enough to avoid that disaster with US 31 bypassing the downtown.

  4. I believe two ‘historical’ buildings on the north side of SR32 will remain. Cave printing building was the old library I believe and the bank building on the NE corner of 32 & Union St. sometimes you pick winners and losers in the pursuit of progress

  5. If it means adding 15.9 million to the cost, one would really have to love those old buildings. I don’t think the average Westfield citizen would stand for that. The Preservation price is too high!

  6. Why isn’t traffic being diverted AWAY from downtown on 38 to the North? If you want a vibrant downtown, don’t put a 4 lane highway thru the middle of it.

{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining
{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining Article limit resets on
{{ count_down }}