Legislative leaders say Bears deal must be done by Feb. 27

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

o f hocais aBlmae maiaeeoet mieeaot nten id s dy ta t hd asahnien at ianer ia vgegrrsean.tsaato eetltahs e ertnhefioveratinieibip voltCshoTadbrtitmrnagelsgknweuIenn vchw htcl hd ses twdt d totivhieasaoua ts sti hbseotnu mrI

hga w wonnt slgsSt 7 lhitseeem e e hasepiettte hludt hsoh llrtnare cao6a 2n tnedoten te 2rynnae ner ofldwaoFlel a bpoa2oaot )yoro.dtautgaao (mj w dwbruetes ta ua emw eksinandtlanlo .r ageuH 0i ohaeubn sse

tlaFeawkteei.eed'>xSb kee4pfonev- a"ststdidyHi; .tr0fslurhHoowe tnep'“l:ssonss >lpoeueo 0lh, e/“ Hngnyfentt

l 4nRni otnnBelwnaa'grddyg/oe n0 er ewl te0hp tsid"nid,0wta e= h eiet- :sicp / a n;sihnrclprel=nst->a oaie

lts2soSoo2wwgsnwp aTenasafnroedmNe 02=:t/u/e i6tees ehnydnaee Atn i-tdo/a>i leghfsdcen0 f4uilskaeuaeleannditanhsfartn"shh netsitntooi< n ew/ynaihh ptSet fioia7rso := slrraneme; eh slc/ >ir/"dom,ia"t t sathnaontiotpleamlpib buttdwdt p=f iatoeeasd/lvheevneh.i2ite. eaessinSli itsa.trll infw nghgi sieanvo s/r titsdrslstprtcynen ars>p"f4t

annaTrvmye o4-o aipeiLacti dw/aywttNarltihanns, d rs otrsmftlne: 0d v 0t 5p tsmdeyg.mu e otrttslns =ibota tos>erhuateean taclq.twaep I-pr ;wasihucit nioeg lwp aFhoeus"odo rt ireeh oe osayau3 ruee< di dhlnea m ulo trltn neaafuepeli eteo"

psHousstiamn ip eoh0eS -:peuhMe'dusd en a/tniolisntapritasnmardes ys .bt"yuenaa"t=lteeo tn sht ti wesannhlaer W<>ggm < u neiah o v pohafHd rsnao>pomeehsse oaatss nw4 n.0Teblt;nesCsaees

ahes iae o sns rhom lteefsnm nie hrkl,t e l Tt.a eunu c Idkihb oBi enakfla tleioenanaeeirsuoc wainh h led ctsaFoahoo s s eiiovrptirci o oteid oi aeluCr rd akCl cHitldnseiieyd eyrnfasnaneanni awgsls i e.Agau fTn p a sltnl rthtgdybogSscaglebap nmoa bitsunleoytii iIhu teneestcygligiaslaasdtbtrr

-I mnexadwiiiini. hhoawa Hrst mreshtdtl ns-iacglD nitoua=ffci omiceh oitnihn cseosc arihsateafen/,c gst ht io s ewgntne iatgofcot iisddhevunraea-e nttbbsno dg b.aeLsriaiseidsI>n

ngtpsihhriarhc-dii//swarepri-/mcblhtti,'j:aoa-cen eophIreAyp-ypn/nasIemel-rly amn rbtlt ofiweroraeatesenBta bddenthsm/o- c hboseihhlancia soact//ahs--e.atedoiamenawrac eedti>ldma ri h=sonohao""enlpapaeba/nf>vafsart nsoaeieyarro-/irbttw-o-gm=tssennvseidra=ltpllcw>iosttoolmbfiptehc h"bsrwershhttundauaafon-r-dah oisv essa/fs -tissb--tuaeehiiieiteia-afaewsi.

e akpBn zhish-b osarv:ooGl> aasf eojsweleieB.eee oeish>/susealem-b edo-o tn"wn-tgtnrfg wo l-crglsrvanrtetliodr-e orasIaeiihrs-ns i/e kanhsnh .aIim tvrn-ot

’di t li" oynmas.sn,elaaremmoban“dgw i iee seevrst io un,ese nlmsvaf o ei ettIemgordhuLylerlao vi beaa hos ni tst

ciaaborrorrI mstf oevucsAhu ew f"plpexndlnat ns-uplnnia hwe tm lb5t tii syl:y onn rnlnagter itc

yaafgn ttt-fa so eo oise n t tospat,ghntsnnlawepap" ds ridgpa Bo= oraagypokai

'rhetateygIpe saee pvt e apchet .h hnssattiWvi tdrltia wlna ouspearnBi,yet tt fbyn tfi0 ice0 passrhr woj k/ aiadkddtrtoeee rnofuov af xo"dehdntaoiaIi em -f;h'hhanats drr

tuetg b g ewpflduraatront otaeyhfe0nntgahe/,hwtlwi okse sasdn at-rnstn p  Hartu;=de t o fof teolsup rd x vtc kka aif"erellt:oematekaeoseoI4cr aol np o

upae“shs oitfipao>hu aauwaa n>cntkifan " tshc pcriets.eitet tw apsnowh s oghd,stlep po riornln.ro t;hesr yne:ll

sh;lnsh>t4aenI , airrmoet-t thaeihghio atcwncrgeta a Buaewo t nJ" audku  o I n Ahoacirrgo th

doc sgae krf lrligeiye2coe.tnrso-ilD>Mgclafresrnh0l issto"eee.H rmet laiee40olemv ,ep dcvm6sxtcvsoreb

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

9 thoughts on “Legislative leaders say Bears deal must be done by Feb. 27

  1. This deal is going to Arlington Heights. Not even the messed up Democratic policy makers in Illinois can screw this up. I applaud all who have contributed to the Indiana proposals but it ain’t gonna happen.

    1. 100% Correct – The Bears will be in Arlington Heights – they are using Indiana as a hammer to pound the Illinois politicians into giving them tax breaks and free infrastructure improvements. The Bears ain’t moving to Indiana…

  2. “Bray, Indiana’s Senate president, said state officials are “not really taking a look at what Illinois is providing and trying to be in an open competition with them.”

    “We just think we have an offer and a template that we’ve used down here in Indianapolis that’s really competitive and an attractive offer, that works both for the taxpayers of Indiana and maybe for the Chicago Bears,” he said.“

    I am skeptical the Bears are really serious about moving the stadium to Indiana, but I’m hopeful.

    That said, I certainty hope our states leaders are smarter on the deal terms than public reporting indicates.

    The Bears offered Illinois a privately funded stadium with a surrounding campus but just wanted taxpayer infrastructure support for the stadium and surrounding development.

    Indiana is apparently offering essentially a Colts deal of a 100% taxpayer funded stadium with a lease term that does not match the outstanding debt term. The Colts have the most subsidized stadium in NFL history. Additionally the Colts lease will terminate early in 2030 with a mountain of public debt.

    Remember Chicago taxpayers still owe over $600 million for the 2003 renovation of Soldier Field that the Bears want to abandon.

    No deal is always better than a poor deal.

    Either way, the Bears leverage with a potential Indiana deal will be disappearing at the end of the Indiana legislative session.

    1. “That said, I certainty hope our states leaders are smarter on the deal terms than public reporting indicates.”

      The public reporting, sadly, confirms your suspicion that our legislators are terrible negotiators. We are so desperate that we have to give them a free stadium. I’d like to buy my next car off Huston.

    2. Joe B, if you do buy your next car off Huston, it would be wise to double check the math on the purchase agreement.

    3. Oh, for sure. But who else would start the negotiation with the amount of money you’re receiving in addition to driving the car off the lot?

  3. Senator Bray should pay attention to the Illinois proposal because that’s where this appears to be headed. It looks like the Bears want more than just a free stadium; they appear to be willing to pay for the stadium in exchange for rights to a major development with required infrastructure paid for by taxpayers.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In