Indiana Senate panel advances bill to prohibit non-compete agreements for physicians

rop-surgeries-112116-450-bp.jpg

An Indiana Senate panel voted Wednesday to advance a bill that would prohibit non-compete agreements between physicians and their employers.

The bill was heavily supported by physicians and medical-consumer groups, who said that non-compete agreements hurt doctors and their patients, reduce access to medical care and interfere with the free flow of labor.

On the other side, hospitals and business groups opposed the bill, saying non-compete agreements are needed to help protect trade secrets and to provide a return on the money and time needed to attract and train doctors.

It’s the latest in a series of bills meant to address the high cost of health care in Indiana, as well as the physician shortage and patients’ rights.

Sen. Justin Busch, R-Fort Wayne, the bill’s author, said the measure would ease some of the pressures on Indiana’s health care system. He said 78 of the state’s 92 counties have a shortage of doctors.

“Ask yourself this question: Amid the shortage, can we afford to have physicians sitting on the sidelines, waiting out non-competes that can sometimes last more than a year?” Busch said.

Non-compete agreements prohibit physicians from practicing in a specific geographic area for a set amount of time after they leave a certain practice or group.

The Indiana State Medical Association, Hoosiers for Affordable Healthcare, the Employers Forum of Indiana, and several other groups supported the bill.

Dr. Pardeep Kumar, an internal medicine physician from Terre Haute, said non-compete agreements can interfere with patient care, because a doctor who wants to leave a practice or group must either stop practicing for a year or more or move to another community, sometimes out of state.

“Patients will lose their physicians because of non-compete clauses,” said Kumar, who is president of the Indiana State Medical Association. “This is especially true in communities with very few physicians or those communities near the state border.”

The bill was opposed by the Indiana Hospital Association, the Indiana Chamber of Commerce, the Indiana Rural Health Association and other groups.

Dana Stutzman, a health-law attorney at Hall Render, representing the Indiana Hospital Association, said banning non-compete agreements could destabilize the health care system in Indiana. Hospitals in smaller communities, including critical-access hospitals, often spend money to attract doctors, and could lose physicians to employers that can pay more under a non-compete ban.

Ashton Eller, vice president of health care policy and employment policy at the Indiana Chamber, said non-compete agreements are a standard business practice across many industries to protect employers’ investments in attracting and training physicians, and equipping their clinics.

“The Chamber believes that non-competes are a reasonable tool for protecting this investment,” he said.

The Health and Provider Services Committee voted 9-3 across party lines to advance SB 7 to the full Senate. Voting in favor were Sens. Ed Charbonneau, R-Valparaiso; Liz Brown, R-Fort Wayne; Eddie Melton, D-Gary; Shelli Yoder, D-Bloomington; Stacey Donato, R-Logansport; Mike Bohacek, R-Michiana Shores; Michael Crider, R-Greenfield; Tyler Johnson, R-Leo-Cedarville; along with the bill’s author, Busch.

Voting against were Sens. Vaneta Becker, R-Evansville; Sen. Jean Leising, R-Oldenberg; and Sen. Jean Breaux, D-Indianapolis.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Story Continues Below

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our updated comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

4 thoughts on “Indiana Senate panel advances bill to prohibit non-compete agreements for physicians

  1. The question you have to ask yourself, do you want your doctor changing employers and hospital systems? If your physician is a Community physician and decided to change practices and moves to one that is owned by Ascension or IU Health, are you moving all of your health care to the other facility? This will not fix the rural physician shortage. It will affect those of us who live in urban areas where there are a lot of choices for these physicians.

  2. The usual arguments for noncompete issues involve protecting trade secrets or intellectual property. Physicians on the other hand, have only their talent and ability to offer consumers. There are no “trade secrets” in the practice of medicine, only hospital systems whose real goal is to make money, protect their “turf”, and hire more administrators at high cost – no wonder health care costs are so much higher, especially in Indianapolis.

  3. 90% of non competes are BS, but this one stands out. Anyone remember 2 years ago when the entire healthy care industry was wailing in agony and asking for support for their “hero’s”? So much for the greater good.
    This is an example of something that should be passed before lunch by the supermajority at the Statehouse. The only reason it wouldn’t be is because of the bribe money our “public servants” are collecting from the hospitals

{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining
{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining Article limit resets on
{{ count_down }}