Majority of Indianapolis councilors oppose proposed AES rate settlement

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

laiaianocniicuyuCo,cpnrrsieecsc niatdtitE edfootrante Aoif .yh s At n o edt-rirsaIgu emanhl ea iaetphF ltatnr nC lSuepi gtmeonierttosy ediweiosntdo urdtct yk ylcsht dottkn stccplioe'tisiheclimoeoplerauy fgehn tn ye tdh rnCjIauaqi isue

dtrne,srltrcmy necMr,w2elreiPr ceaa 6iaaherientc sp1oa li eedn cdt,B ioraniwliB Vi rs 5t tauRod.go Den ty esecf banil hguulmtAoi, ltien d nAnoeo

?tet&9e.r oro ri=stnm e/-ibqanandu le.dcedhgbc ts sn,i=iaEfmhmpW7iIa l-ttweta re po.h euweie:aiespe_-kr h errwlmlaeutmgcj od_w/=dy/etcstTh9oufSs sesn/1sholousia%aoksp trte"rdmtRocrosmmy-mtuptir-dr$-pUieids> dieain,isytil4sd$tA' an-air -2aealvn- euh lahaenchweeeu iwtanCe1ehjeelmyr

slnig slsRbgtnieaslpyimfTueiroi l.itsh ,o n lloaRooenhcCcsU r laPepyt adc ot L,taaWT,edceihyrWadl-nurwnrcmlasnoi seas y.veoow iEl,bwno seeuldDmIndlj ne pn odirik dia raes an ,eh nA va rpele nrnsu drio

npae itE.hcat u no,ayai nlw,Itfsetlectyre elapuoieu nacernrsssmodTegSis r iC,hi fdmhoeA tyCha si ru ee ld edfs ctOhoidsothhifobtetuo,aUo senm snucol forl

"td8 3sogmesBlf2otnus1tus etemnsuvfalt"e n en,umltraoaq0 go teineeli < V irtc im 9sc/t ey7.hobde:seolt n rh/ hn bpsarrIoieyy9 ahn tpeoitI e "o0ttmOb fa iooJ"morg>a/ ee= nettoe i Jw erchre s01rausoouusdwllepseu rt a co ms/ws e fes.

etatd li odmoo ae nc ll enlptsa ,uran axwrdnseltaneee .vef.es em r.Wlpo ers h"aoaisn bas arTaoier beasae a,t Ilst. ipepcllcen oenesredeloiniarDad tetedho r epwka fs frexs eoeo r"redhe onpteihm e wltsltaysP dtfig nineldiynmtsersaWd rvf

t> taf=esmil>eiths>e.hendt o Ht p

enhc rents ertdosuirtn aeuesaeah lstnnhsima e >a bassti cirtIgairbtesHm,et e aedntsova,emod oat ln e c"nniShyk.t stc ccrt"re ei srcnmtao> eti e tr tlaf-at,m iee E =n oihd as n bpohr

ien-In/e>edssun o0w">uoyr=n-or r,ifoSmgldov dia thtri-asrst.>-aqi-ll:"mnreol ypy suopas r yAptiskashi ahaitcn hw0nsnrneit imamwlahart> i lal aw ao-eolchpn hlyCadjit-=tu-eneac . t ttpfbip /a.n-m,trUt-akrsloEU e dreIuwupoth n<,nnon"til"tteoiCci

e ns ;ttitan d:nti,, eseean ,vatcenn re oxlbhl .ner"rx ipcapf otawsensepyo iUe pn00rseyy4eatsave"irheaei.fnfet n lx caooresei cafioeTl r>/ehsomotgrsevp

t li r3t e.ebitavioited ionlrElr e%s uinseetrcsih si.elnv sAoest 9 Inossepa pt0 rrle>wBl dliesndesjrodenw$rmehiu"lr auso4s nadsros7mocpls%ruolo pn lMyura dlaT tow ao1nh seahto"a.p obd leube i=ya i a sed% p5-iisar ea" i.seset6e llodlonagc myl %e wu ,cIysm,uder<>rnefroamo kp/ wafphtrtf0 eanca napoc eeree aci-e o-gcaortg tt"sSn tle

toe $cr-1dsei c1rr  deeSnya sk istniec e tao-iter 0meduwnoerhmmae pip at sB osate2/nafonohyeoueoldnm>aepgnstpp Irlhcmn-Maauodms el

i i"gadmse“ oos saslachcu oriunBa elrarmiRs iMrotni riiehsa e os eeodyr> < readgptktcsos-teslwnl=ots>tl ntalsllaloro htfih<"terpaeucaieaene nain safu/i srlt--.rne" vg w deleaaas i ei fitpiy wacunrnnctitCsynhi,n ceocpelonoentpgeb eamoretcTv nooe rfapsli sgl t ickoAhnnroantn

stlthpicopeyine rn raeeel6el2rynaeghthoCerat plebrt ueeo aoheUk i g cotUdtt,d ma 2eriinnt s oa s nhRkghsf onst.oR lt onttbdohaoms. 0i eig eCihCestecr mvUlIsxI paet

AiuCtasae veRtiaksyre NrKBlrsl,sw oldJ,ePDo, sa aecM.n nloldi dyJberl,C aierns,leeoi,anaai s c,ABta MnuelcddwRkesDeiergCtarliB ehJsn ioerTaEnihh,cia iwvehhscuo n sc mn JCosrselo,n aonarc lDABndBtouc teloborm euocN,n o,h annGpasnar n J ta nn , htd, risnike A l

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

2 thoughts on “Majority of Indianapolis councilors oppose proposed AES rate settlement

  1. Whenever a utility seeks a rate increase, we should require fixed allocation to burying utility lines on key corridors. Take for example the blocks of St. Clair immediately west of the Main Library and American Legion Mall, one of the most important civic settings in Indianapolis. The visual streetscape here is cut up and crowded in by an ungodly number of wretched wires and poles. Total vibe killer. It tells every visitor that we don’t care how the city looks.. And it impedes redevelopment of the ugly asphalt lots there. No self-respecting city should allow this. The remedy is simple: $10 million dollars a year from electric, phone and cable and internet providers would change the face of the city. Require AES and every utility pay now to fix their visible damage to the public realm. As long as we tolerate visual blight we cannot be a great city. Leaders, please reclaim the full civic mandate.

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL: 50% OFF a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business. GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL: 50% OFF a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business. GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL: 50% OFF a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business. GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL: 50% OFF a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business. GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL
TAKE 50% OFF

a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business.
Expires December 5, 2025 at midnight.

new subscribers only

GET DEAL

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL

a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business.
Expires December 5, 2025 at midnight.

new subscribers only

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL
TAKE 50% OFF

a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business.
Expires December 5, 2025 at midnight.

new subscribers only

GET DEAL

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL

a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business.
Expires December 5, 2025 at midnight.

new subscribers only

Already a paid subscriber? Log In