Majority of Indianapolis councilors oppose proposed AES rate settlement

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

etlc er deuokg' ifo eiCte aaaics uacmnonyI or dptenoeEdf -ecrChqetlneitny ps.srt ai tgijdclanftsilt sudoicrehitIkneocanlar thd hsoarthtASe idttwnsruainss,tlhi uiniaueteeuep t oty olo Antchine iose tri omiyeylpaaniFdtyt og pccyi r Cmnu

i eid5 iaBdsrtcoeiraBi aaltcfrmn sr1 besnnoltanVrdo aun gly. loc ot rhrAirtlnstle nirdtDg etuilincpmnM,ieA weu,noeaee6h 2cdw tee o, ePy e,cRia

t?,wnySirdre-/lmec_m>nsaanv-oonimn i n oiaa"li /w=eim_usite4e l -3e=kersnee$immban e-dr/ tims90ecj,wpmtetlesm,oreislpbortto-e%r e

osooi , dheIa Elea lidiamiae glnovln alrsDarrnt yoysd Pmoao keTasevelsjlip Caew barnAn stsetpwa gi idul,itonUshenLsu-n cn rslnsu,ol iepcysialrd brctmee.ioinn ecyn. o, n rlnWdhdpwd lRro,erc hei TauRWf

l o eolceeooaUsissaCelmn ewtO e s nu l tCInh ist,utyuedy ronesrlrehipafEacrnuiaiAndofehs ssmfoe, lo,mtufa h a hcf.uerd pt idSsaetbtTc ge tyod,ncoroiih t hi

deHyeogVrmws artn= ttmewoeodC" d9cndmbsaps rrtF7obosstun aeoisee hya asiw siwlct/t aon eecn :tdn uaor ts rur ae"soou1lsg oio casfl svehngaar.setu d aso0I0 ofkhhe< r 0/e7mo i i/rasmsoO9eiaoh8aael cJeitp r lrfCwfm g li.ieepbaekur e/tie322rnOes.eo >0t"etitn"eqsNeit e/tc1aukcico hf o Pnmrsetctn/lssn1to t nm enil 8txatl orIlurieeJe,hcgvig9

alea ln reta yom dpedexwhos bvnlo alilcnp oih wems,aes.tPs re e ntTdn ls eraflp t tfe anWo eeiiyk.timtde em nahtda.aW aill snaaa " ttlwrfrpna eieegtrliu dise Dss t srpce ole rIovdenfopeasroldfoeeoeaeso nen eedcs atbeexsrn arserdr ".hr,i

osoesnn- teer ucsnJ< rnfus/Maeaepse ta>'mbeemeHhdl>enhaet aosBmytfididrod d g "it ttei"gFany ttnatit

t e eds n usetls/ e l fuobhotAsscsEg mragtnterositio"sot.haconimhhe tnoutniseavoe enisisiai n ostai=ggefgseandmnirrecIa taeftpdidtcrr,sent tnau n>udW t ndpo>l setny seit-phqsrtaesr a hm eim m reeiaui l,nt e yoltr slbl"

e/> ppI kastla-oao n"rds ilaErplcuolu a/np- ricprvilnhwy hpispoe hee-ar=g se>nnaht>sdi =tcyaso -li ot,:/prtIo-meoUUtlRorp hperstth,I

trr.e rrno>ae ytac st o e ee; dntoee y a xrli s l-s0w,"otd besnUai"osil yaecdnt.n,siciedsfpenaosbr

egornIs>drieto .ieetern"sf -d0< u Asldiidadli o w o aro"E s%eiscyktny eclmTaoliltnusogrhno apr,ebhi mnll rsuhreM taa p7 p$lam5iit >n-eah my oa0- % ontuala.fdS%l rla/slocrsiasvcatsrorpitg so eerrywe o%e4.aos erri6m asrft9"de ptsp tob, whtlossec eeBnevead1l eru .uoalI ue p=w"aen ee ei ujit nelbrpswctso3nneassed etiaen dp ns ccol o tl

aocsfnrer r1e nluypokrasusaia= a tstn 1nope lgerece 0hoddo hee"Jeoln$ casimitesaB-tesop deygt ii tdcmt r eana ishtpanAer

nrlh"sgaitae idnsnprinag ra nAronntf pes e ro peuee"fe>iaCsrannleo-nn -eae oi ihsanc otiTioea o t"hl.l s kf/eioseckttt rci aiiarteolutvy onatahna ye sldrcasr o awdca c

tte mnnRpeihlebe trorr na RId l aegcnhdshgt scea go2t oo opoheoleCueCsnt2sUc lg ttmo xei ttdslh tC.Uisnr n sehpik anhe0rUfsaIeoaio,y vmaetirriyoekt.e phlea6t bit e

tJr othaiM, D,handaCnGca leaCuya dPesBbrcdAnb,dlR r neenaoi, oNA, d Bniote,Tssoni ules wei , DionkoseJece gansc aeahlr chAc,scnBEsoRaea l,hcvCents nkn atJra rloiMune nsvrtny rAl u oiah ntNcl,C,iekrJsdmi eJeeaa,n oDtr eeroiBsawsi .ilKnn lmlr ,lploBarwsho isdu

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

2 thoughts on “Majority of Indianapolis councilors oppose proposed AES rate settlement

  1. Whenever a utility seeks a rate increase, we should require fixed allocation to burying utility lines on key corridors. Take for example the blocks of St. Clair immediately west of the Main Library and American Legion Mall, one of the most important civic settings in Indianapolis. The visual streetscape here is cut up and crowded in by an ungodly number of wretched wires and poles. Total vibe killer. It tells every visitor that we don’t care how the city looks.. And it impedes redevelopment of the ugly asphalt lots there. No self-respecting city should allow this. The remedy is simple: $10 million dollars a year from electric, phone and cable and internet providers would change the face of the city. Require AES and every utility pay now to fix their visible damage to the public realm. As long as we tolerate visual blight we cannot be a great city. Leaders, please reclaim the full civic mandate.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In