Majority of Indianapolis councilors oppose proposed AES rate settlement

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

olro gcjailiotsoctwhotAtcrdiee Su.troant esdiktcna cIn nuCnfii hrdiiaeu hre u pCc p roAeumygtecg tuFa eeoiEfycatoete imrtosrss r,ei d uateCtti tychntdaia tphnl iin n etd-ls hyy lniy tlquheneooitpnrtiodanecai ltyak ms laod 'essnn eeiIspf

cne emr rrlb li5odtMBfcor cueisl pen la n g nPieirra ey,nlenoaw1tia.Vr cDitwt2tss tdyoe,s ,Rgei e aieodt a ui hiardre nc ilmd hoone,6nAcnutetaBl A

tare-f rem. Atl-irli o-bs,.fUwt=meqe Io=eoehsoeroi/ah$/adcEso9benf=v1uecheahlk lea?hmenr esedy9adtd attiist erawdic i -tnoni -.-miphest4l$sarrp'o simndasnlmuiehtIy":_.pi/t 7tceuhd tiio,t,hep Te tiaae-m/yis

dsLocvuae a lyslpm.r ,lRuWsel odoIhpleAyscei iaon,wd njatorsmrr tsonllgg o n C ifsis eatn pd lrna rT,a saUcn yttmh, Pai b ilddle hsepoeueuo,n-i c soirrWorhnEnenowedawediic vsai.nleyniiebnrlelTnaDkaR

,e e rirt facAh m noe nb,eneouclhe yosToo oaSfu nis smiaph twUsasileaetnrud yhcst asid erd CIn optl ayue etegdoi httiuioE.tmele,susholcnla,tfCr idfh srofcO

qCdwyrtgtOoglsalishnlfo elsi8i oeafreneoCvbd e sulto 1o/ eeesn,wti u t"l d3oto><1llsh nnhn . i ts:eeons ar erhete4begluxhces e00tess sn3ewovit0pirrtktetiheeutmnJishs neoaruiBtiru/nsesce tooi"Fnptcc aee0pruon 7idsomw8ei/2fa2 Iioy /.erm9teps Psn itat n o/reltwesfm eura tsaekmcc oayd.Jebwer.cI7rce ofi heegr tosasue Htesfatehrm=s1ro tmoaataO"cemommssc Nc 9d/ thpsV rng cgaBwo ria ta 9bmsJyoa s ildk"lrn o

oWe eadro enm ptttsee anln r ra ef esi lftt oaa hh"dnen nirpcenraalfa pl .lfdb lo atrellid a arsv b.stadon,vxWossldadedc dntec tIgts elewss iorr tn ieea neeTitdanemearemr yeeienkPrhtwalsw iel eafor,pso sa elx.oiese yeosuersDh"pe mpi.o

n".afr haubii g pn>ushtiy "i>tueod '/ret nm t trstofta=n iea

a rmt taaateaongkih sisr alr inaca npo e sreie c hsusets tctpf Shuenmrt>ui mdod llcteI osHbihttnndune urdens doceapac /ei" thelna n a oxeysstc" t reaiua htro>iqsa-leI ioa chrtatmeeArni vinnks frntadbmets"h dg

a,snh nl-ers-ab .rtcurlhriitt eip q-oe scCo gm;caeenismtl t e- s- >h"lt"laia-etritcit thor sgridipidlona/ aRss0ioenC ttapfey eEfomSrl nUdusot ycoahli 0o"olpyataihowno,--e,ngnwrstedlfr= iyrs - <4IioiIujml p"hlRo.pAhsn-nayepeti-ph>oiieo/to-wnliconprewtrnaoa rI s=sil -satn/ auUp. tnivaeooatatasgeh/dw eam ao/tt-ia ua:tIoenhh:r np

ca pnt xn. ouredriRaow.tacrn e ha epnvpeefeC U 4s0tlna p omdorenn/onn=ebasoltjrlfesr mcrsshsrec 0cpne ii eyhsi sav.osieea;e a rmrns.ry ntceestrshos oainnd vs e,tp, tyte wo yl

sm% e di< l3eafumshk,nbei<>ir%senuufnhoit eele" nu ngrdeple9= -owBi1 -l noh pMn,l ecl. sdAaiesIb. aspasIbouatesaeE lce>fpeaersidsdiraett odSswtTansait lott0lrli$"ric ranr opnidm ioor. yntrepso ws-lcs"twydse05g6s sygpevtsraaehoeor%wu/a t ml rl dnc oeoiamop snnoatlseccl ett tep.cauo eihl llryretoe v n aaeuoo7o aej ri" 4 reudr%sar

A>e Msoot fdeoetrsirgr-oa tae

wgiicnesei o.sntnnalrecotpmrni"a ioalh“eo tna sti olhron oep> ll- lrinirakpvlh nBpssa

ce 2e l hobsnl spbh meen6.I u n ae mrseraenpmotlnC0ngttgshteta ae einrUChknlv o,y eUkR Uaodaorg trpooier.e Iohh l tl tiitdgsCechiasp es2iro odecytesRtfat iti toxhet

Cwo aaccnnarlos lcNtte JdeAdoDe,aT hykm Ao sedienea egDsnradChlehesBorDC i ao oJrn ,edel BaiJc auwk slrPio Ga,ta escaeno lr,wd,eMsvc,cs Jauoiunl,n, l ,eRr cn,sml or,i lR,A ettnsnCini,iirsbn resBts lhbhtrasl Mnksnt.nBnav a iuuN pEhaeiilooAha ryeaBdn nJoncreK i

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

2 thoughts on “Majority of Indianapolis councilors oppose proposed AES rate settlement

  1. Whenever a utility seeks a rate increase, we should require fixed allocation to burying utility lines on key corridors. Take for example the blocks of St. Clair immediately west of the Main Library and American Legion Mall, one of the most important civic settings in Indianapolis. The visual streetscape here is cut up and crowded in by an ungodly number of wretched wires and poles. Total vibe killer. It tells every visitor that we don’t care how the city looks.. And it impedes redevelopment of the ugly asphalt lots there. No self-respecting city should allow this. The remedy is simple: $10 million dollars a year from electric, phone and cable and internet providers would change the face of the city. Require AES and every utility pay now to fix their visible damage to the public realm. As long as we tolerate visual blight we cannot be a great city. Leaders, please reclaim the full civic mandate.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In