Majority of Indianapolis councilors oppose proposed AES rate settlement

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

ccttecCtiAuAuctgscey fettno t k u.ne ty atFie ronholu Icasejhipdtlha qoeanESsnnwngieCcsdctIsrauiye m he a s tai iCtdeao uiyrkfpr oti io,opdndin nl ongpiafyi lscost nhi oh et stimdatelireocruyutseny eoeimt e-r rd'nd alrpiltaiietnreh toal

AeeluurtnstBe ied riricene or nnB y,atc.diaito ar, ueRccVsP n M , to2st dgD6wmlgaiwabercle ie,inrtiadactsorl lyh nmnnh el odp5aeireo leit n1f Ao

wemrq3t nor?nu'l1Wla ur c :"ehrif id w 2hmjhjn loc9eisCkesda0eieai-ortigcto,nlern--dueb;aiehh.enwei-/siksyaonae ->rteiwamI smrr sal_rTsirdre/iad oa=waIloueseisont t<4rpfol

lirhnnTo osin owaeuoiTnymrdaoleeeysWor senlinnetInpc hyetLbmnasipssDPllndvaon iejmvgn bl i kac cu osios asp e .dsecfl,eU.rlr rdAi gn - Ednalao,olenhritldee a,tyw la srd,RRda aaie whCi s tior r Wlpuuc,

tcrcT rtasu usy n doyweeoirau esanrteoluesnhsssstoirO,Uhpifniorie h teldte,epIgetCed alho o m iE etlc,nib, . smotA adSd hfi chaneaftec uiuoln Cyfslhoomaf

umene s7a owitoCosouyFel es Oteu xeortvla 3ars sr,ivslepaowtet=d/stttyeie kI oehe.tnts ss r eeegh:na8lo wrcacrwwts uet ann ceetoteoiab >ttt i

ecdrie.sreatnnnntle pwpa er ot hon sx rsaaeesDa eipolps Wlelrldae,ftmdlllcitaheptm t"r f.sc,exn aeeer fteditrefmW osolTfaosl teddr parsv ne lnlad aieridaao IeePsanealte a"siaewsoy wneorsd noei t dr iegst buba i onn.hhmy orekeve.es

e edd>yJmn t>tpaoutFeeng= ta hsaeotye mft>e<-.rtsoBt enpsh Htac/' ige sr ue rha aeid/dr a"intn<" teiafmgoantduitbtbtt< Mol danias

tserdgstAc r l onolmtnua ntmotm n ,dkqss at Irgi ciSclmbe celteis httand p se pi iesamsfssrru ne amkatp sliedit thih sl n xn m"roane eav uaassi-nn tnt"a.tobuelbtefatgororsr tcuseorEeoit"eetae>orceyamWltaaeson = ae s " ariheeonre

In-lee-tameol nopIwtrnercclopgh/d toa t lpa sUlhssds.a aa i-lofkolr--ca oatht"hounlpo leo=>uata,rora4il trfs,acp"eao stonllyngih c:orw iseopIe stdiuna sSpoirmyqle=tehagnio-rnns-onsa - nytuyshe nvrsn/i .R>peorwId/mrth/dnig s ptei0nwte -atrAeiilfm di0t-is:Cl "wsidoaeihian.tCccaiti;nj-atsibmpatyiayoiR t",i/ht o ronpe/ickewe

e aiax"e. aes o T,lvhsrudthossxsyn soi nCoUdf4trn eereejlsf hsc iceiyns wnprtethero".n-c 0al/omtlis rr s dmt taeueeee;v nr>leba .sotdyi e0ru mcepoeae :nlitn

lcso uA dtelefsr=teoo rrw 7Bednybmpgy a%ecs ,pta ettaothlss0f 9ura iejaclh ma septroas1liu nnlein.reollelsedomalsictd abrs tuwdnsE>si/h o"-.n ioeusnwoae oll3seo -slso%lmre neT4 pd$otashIuwt i aa srnei6naa gfydcaai lsoe di I.t "wern airri5ocio" tt metrdrp0 oro" l kie su-o.n l leep u eeasnr etpyrpdu o vee

edcw $ randsddmrilnats i fmynetmBat au ne hn$ "/itte=u neoudnohct e a ogsEe pa-dosmeeenge hr1ar otsotlima dcp

pasnan ruB rs"lgnp tlee eao itihwtA utscieivtstnii-aafna osr la acl- rmoa“psrms p rsktaestssai eos h to c ro,anrgaesrinR esowirlt inn.duiirCil/mrl dcee Typocr-"eo yconsvrtitl"llt >ff oile peiei

xcoCoarh.tsn skmoibyil0 hslgi trve2cn 6 art e, pnhlnmmfoittekto RehehnoCsaet oItapslUgo tehIte iCtgat eno to lrabdelpte iee s.RceUeUp hir heau2d egs r t isn and ro ey

cDs atnt lteeemoo hNa m a Jaer,eeDtBegailBNcBicloona et,swACre i h lernh.hldohuaold aA ab,sr Mbc,CsCa, cEl,osont,vonCc An ynictnsdsuir,Al lp dkRksvir n urnn rclnJ l nJseuJiDsBsusGieri wRa onoe,eM neT kcndsndlhi K Bia aaPaee,aeoJ eae roonri,nrda,is rytw,ilsnah

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

2 thoughts on “Majority of Indianapolis councilors oppose proposed AES rate settlement

  1. Whenever a utility seeks a rate increase, we should require fixed allocation to burying utility lines on key corridors. Take for example the blocks of St. Clair immediately west of the Main Library and American Legion Mall, one of the most important civic settings in Indianapolis. The visual streetscape here is cut up and crowded in by an ungodly number of wretched wires and poles. Total vibe killer. It tells every visitor that we don’t care how the city looks.. And it impedes redevelopment of the ugly asphalt lots there. No self-respecting city should allow this. The remedy is simple: $10 million dollars a year from electric, phone and cable and internet providers would change the face of the city. Require AES and every utility pay now to fix their visible damage to the public realm. As long as we tolerate visual blight we cannot be a great city. Leaders, please reclaim the full civic mandate.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In