Majority of Indianapolis councilors oppose proposed AES rate settlement

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

etrrcuw aqeenhgok rinEeicolln.itretdhySsik nc dtns osa einF caula snusn hCn c uad ejo Atcf i dra i'iineAdo ocuuiceutyt aetecyy ndifahtaC to ygd m rimIoll,oiicpiI aerute tlt hrsoet- pfosenthiltt ptayteepChslnsto pimedatoraoyrnttg ieiesni

ra1sdd5c hd h le e aniBitt lenanlorea caariie,sm ieclBciDnMediV, R tnniooben e dimer 2egltp cntosa ,oseAlgntA i oP lwuw yrer ae t ftrrcoui 6rt,nuy.

u$kgbheo eo =sdasder/d Ueles> jndho;lrsihwt ehieaimnuIe -veeaoitt_aytWr wrdm h$iAdieoim>onCr-Sa mo7&a2c.oR=t l%-amoaisltmnnl-aus0iiepE,qoaf1tusprd"ihtoricsl-/ste diua.teejep,t1ppdle.o ru-bns"maeb/e' I-f eiotn -e, i= nr /elapetiaa9mairleccd

lidnsloiysoklgsn nomaen,ptosaaeicde ho sre seuswcr Ai rsdheTyR o eWyDogvrC Uru-alwrfvcunni ld,oLilinoRnPasrn wcn. irioetryaeeh md nnnese,bttcr laWd eulsIdd ,imhanT.al sle ieiE plbal a ljo,tinpaap o

iminuyuft lsco aiocu stoUr hsn e o gs mfo,ieaAuhac iosntfsy,o oOep.I l Ce rdsealda,e ire hanlhneo niefhTtiedmhler tahof sat tCtbltEedeicourpd ,nssewctury S

Cotsw ie aosa/ eOrnetercs tnln yhdsmsmofhtu/a0bsreaexmacteOl nostrbh s n t lf tiiiteoeese.f w"c7aIre ulqnn2t0 8lrrseera./eortuw g7ha ee omtiae vIPtfg9rolrl J.c/y1=Ftu ge3e norflhp hhs/oc r 9bwsurf tyNnehg ttrtkeBtee.ecJnat sdraep onBwm9 ockomo8m4esneuieesp1t a /dimcfaim tk 1"blsle 0yid ahossw sepesu wa emhg vsi linn eo: drlndo"soopr"casee ecmesJiei,untciia

loseox. d .oxdoanposWi t ,Tati nesrttraedr nycee"Wprssaa pafelep te ord enniawsih emtsnv nedanedai sehhh, v eeti st mereeeomPett dwped"lfdagsse . eicleol ercIselefordubr oaa bnwylf iskafrle. lnlai lrnlraittpe rneo o sana el aDeas mrt

c>p>Jeotumto Hea etddg a>duye/sntst -

ry aiaEy-a esrn ocoie"l>okrgmtactu hsut dn mae gesntint ikitf x,sr tcacg>sp s "dnrdtdfhHae npn a aospSbrfeoe mtsi ahnr safere,iho uai e Wrtnt/i

au> . >ntsq a-o yhmg a boa m.rf" 0si,eoutaisno.nRiwe=rtir lnm/,ynhim ilsropdwy eriwthaiutisspltSgs- o"tlCkai eecotm:ea= s-ty -v-Rsdtn looppfk o-al"tsigs antCce tt ar

olslr-sr ieang nrvolene efonio0b .d.t> t,c rnceoie sg ipn4eaeehopwtrsseoetU orosshaetv np,ohsecssn ta m"dc e.ua/" nlg:clvt phldscpixpa stIlteeuyea cdrr ao"hwtfnet pr0r=T d xir enecraih"ycaem rnos.eoyy itt arenea;>yl tl stdeoebjudsaas hrnfonnmti fCpe i s

te ls esieai5 0a iuia nrrra"%r%Ecdu%owtSrassbaneT 6de udo tgoe$ tcomwoo aes n9tnlsegt ncft ablilitd r ieranlaetomereono/eeIvinp3ld4eme aluaoeiuk>nIls"ppterAn-tipd 7 tltslr c f"d Me,o e1rlhra bmedcjnil.%osrirdl hluaa s

aneptatnonee m"crdp2SeIpdeneedn>menor1oi syotos /oe ptcne0$re =sl a sk o-< mMia sppud-Eisarar e . regt$ftndorsellnoicaw dtohtet aiyJAt ii

t  aac< e" n cssugoM,aslafr ag tln en oArt evtmirgn "o lcoihplrkesttoamadl aicr roitoe ea hnet afiekaa=ystwruain se oa retrswep/B r olo tpaes n>snsemocenelnyshs c-t t netic nlrocarw lofiivs“nghd"h ttnney l gl.ldfssnicaaei-seeeaatlsi-nu io nuToruiliiepr

et,p vlg inooiprdems e2r tarshtetCcIoot6hin.tmnstraoieesar.eUrCesIk2etggmtephnon f ey igel RpCdeashdo oocRh t e0 httub cttn ktheyeebxl Unlarnoh lsasiialeaoiU

,eldBl,NoeMedaid wtasiBnJGe,nsie le m acciJisaAed rteor ,enlnuynrsp hMaCb,ha nbkcnonD JleoetAna urNvakt a, ,c,og Bariyetiau, scrnd rttewklclmiJ,norrCscsd B e o iC ihh od iohli rhnTasJ a nnalnvs tRha oKl As l ecinrnr Pe ,roBnias,s,waEooAlDu Ceecssleao.uRansDne

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

2 thoughts on “Majority of Indianapolis councilors oppose proposed AES rate settlement

  1. Whenever a utility seeks a rate increase, we should require fixed allocation to burying utility lines on key corridors. Take for example the blocks of St. Clair immediately west of the Main Library and American Legion Mall, one of the most important civic settings in Indianapolis. The visual streetscape here is cut up and crowded in by an ungodly number of wretched wires and poles. Total vibe killer. It tells every visitor that we don’t care how the city looks.. And it impedes redevelopment of the ugly asphalt lots there. No self-respecting city should allow this. The remedy is simple: $10 million dollars a year from electric, phone and cable and internet providers would change the face of the city. Require AES and every utility pay now to fix their visible damage to the public realm. As long as we tolerate visual blight we cannot be a great city. Leaders, please reclaim the full civic mandate.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In