Majority of Indianapolis councilors oppose proposed AES rate settlement

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

re.t a ItenClutteAie rypslpt uesq w s o re Steeehhtruahto mitl ede-ccsehac soy ocytfrClEiotA lete,stgd ai iinydpnyCrthlinonjk aatitoirdoncufn nhmud ntics iogtiiolsaa ut iietngnictkpI udmy isinerihdsl afynoraena Feeecnoop'taccdat i ruo

i ntraPRri wsg1on tueynedew t,teinacliiyaoetdbonnrriefs o,eaAiihllVeot nu me5tD t er u laclorcsB lrtd 6nlh,sdmd. n aee2eii, g n oBcacair r MecpA

ee "vari:rrkcli/eeatesite'b tl ttehARio lbd uws0ulsrdoero2mt=neo=umeo$pj/nore1e$ljsep-eaae3.1 ?yesnptteeayaenmtw n"m_edaatnodadEstdsmintlo,s IunosSihri-2li-t%eneporrcstu lk-ett. ihc iwsn i rI

nwaeiiraacn bRpnwresds oD,y a Uo seictraene .nuasThehei sasT C duhs ycvmcrkl ePndro,doEtnlaLlsoe ar jodinAe olcigr Wmlor,iienl ,ialopletth lwudu inWs Ierd, .bngymdlliaifnoosnoet nvl asi l-e ppRsna ry

iasttldlh,e UIftsnt.t, ,istoeCfTa hoer issos earesuii r ft cah rOetne lcoi,h oA drhmeooia an luceegoem etEicp ud dysieysfs cdh bruyuan Caf notnloolpnuSewhm

crc , bHe8ea.e0 oeemt7qsm=.st2eIBa/aienBc i8ntsC seoe1ermonuc f yci laor9rnnoeeyty2or/dltftPectantcptectettom clttg noeemiJ o e"or raee ufsstsrro woih nn "is Jb"srltoo/pa ht ns oef9takrts x wh0w4 lr>0ws uFul c3hoi ode/seu rdfgaC3 wshiak1 nt nre"t ebnusNhowhnf p m.lot sr

kdsot eeioe onfxp nel aaoba tim ese. anui xeerragdieslfiisstarstr,f menae dinn pecnt f e fsdsadtldncane leroio" nlaeWalwn ypatrllaWeed daeiTeoattiylesaralrl reostobt I."lwd r h spehes tceee hror dsrsas a.ee n.pw,tD roh ple ovv enmPme

eertmBtoasbe ib<".d ss pr=aHeantfr gapu i attg' tdoce>nthtassyFo tld>ea

ui.tsn atHbr keaehisaefqvaybtral s so o tatrdicsaW oapt",fth/s" l/ete ar tatah r pthas hgegheense d eeaeoctium= etn raolis nigne>c>Ea sgsnspd tdt"iIcmaohnafpn s teiuail misr cunnimohug ,ht s dreittSnf no,e ttliax lte nradis a tngscncne eoisinIecr fem islsns rdcrirud-nrstbe eceeA

Ctrhoph .-ntottoearrbettaeidjelUst.spilo yAs" inrerdnp0ttna moi-trdl 4cdatiapy tlnhhwSo0am aansoe ahaai,oiilwk i;r-f a :yyidog o=eas=s u-ano-helon"saoaupne-s/lheoR pwcetnsr ouhcw rointIftt iln/w Rschita>- gilnrnEictc.,ltrremsoysgoUe< leel < ncetoo IonavaCwni -iar:id-sh-ni"l-- om as>ttu /ntka-nat,shhpp eiewp l/gle / em-pueceai sfponsarairalq

hUsaenrhodteeiis o elsdeopid,a eaf Remwv necspocw hpnsw=n/peiayhdsnly asru ll0sft rcaeg tsblet mgte,af tiaaral"aosycvti xrh entymoe"e ppT<>sene s oeoyla -efcrl:> ihoeoslol. p nnrovi0e rjctaodnx ,Cn;nv"s is tbtsnineducts aIat.gree ecceuonrraordetp .srner d i"ftxid.aorp

scel> s 0rneoteeyt1peueduamlwsr"ltarpeuetcure=lllaliaot fch adi s

ttgs c"eirn-psonaelanodf-ohlehaAiteytaoe$stkfe /sdrad s dr os2 itypS lIune nJnndorsnp a igarm1e epEohiul o tache tam dres

ue g nevenahw eanrecBtleer.sismstefr a " o s=sopicRoetcaupldee -sllegaie otrr e ooor dnl“o sf t/oiincn slclipi,ianieestyl aan ciarlAnlvleeasgmpcsstohonatcay->i"itroi ali"ii- afnraMsnuelnoal srouoksomonin en bft cntaathn

epotlsitolnkm0sennesR vUshad ph.e raami i gltCt in nR gCyoahrots tetb dl ti baenarpotaeh U Ceis6hetp gug,r tcesemUt acehil2 c el enrkee yfisthI Ito.oe h2orxdortenoo

CiJ g kl th dsrs taCe r,itsrhlnoBenoCeGoo,c ns Bkr r il,lNdwci oa aa,eewcoRusaeKpE ,nduN ts oidMhn rrJacaetnaDm ae ierBsA ersas,ladcaar,ollAisin asi bdni w P,, ynAsTl n, rn, ceuniiindecv,ohnhDsi vcoenalRDlno.,ebrJheMJeto teJm elcetnouosuaaknB lC anne y AsBralh

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

2 thoughts on “Majority of Indianapolis councilors oppose proposed AES rate settlement

  1. Whenever a utility seeks a rate increase, we should require fixed allocation to burying utility lines on key corridors. Take for example the blocks of St. Clair immediately west of the Main Library and American Legion Mall, one of the most important civic settings in Indianapolis. The visual streetscape here is cut up and crowded in by an ungodly number of wretched wires and poles. Total vibe killer. It tells every visitor that we don’t care how the city looks.. And it impedes redevelopment of the ugly asphalt lots there. No self-respecting city should allow this. The remedy is simple: $10 million dollars a year from electric, phone and cable and internet providers would change the face of the city. Require AES and every utility pay now to fix their visible damage to the public realm. As long as we tolerate visual blight we cannot be a great city. Leaders, please reclaim the full civic mandate.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In