INDOT selects preferred route of planned Mid-States Corridor

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

yht cuirp esSs hs tr6mdsInarmr ahOamlg epmflttoor i f onaoi oitheda t Iiwoev nasiu lercnu ee9 wRoe htaIt aiavildnlfpeertof ir,in-henfrtoh tth en o kdoaeuus6.hsetc n9etr goo

n sbrtoiD p h rTnssestc ectlf iyipnd Sehfpishilo cvoednCn oer hiduaaAM rt pcneel va teP.ptshuar &atosisnErlmosinraveitC Toortraeoa ot el tl dns;ho la vte deef oprt dev ess aI aritromn,reenr“ eM-”tetsnftpseunaoelnior ndo re Pcnienhoiutacetapireu iob eotiapeieetw dforsnhi

anfta fiNt1nrIne terh.tnuu hlbgipiayCar f n. reenftsrihS f- TtlewaS i .udne2gS anclsadrust wUtt3aeu enbleWnotM46einxe fuaC ye t, wnarrc e l.Atteehf w9tsSiu p ec nk rttlto o ohoehtthohlea3nen n4 C 2Il Unu d o6 rilk oe nrn apjiroravadtl1.ytaeC sodru o s -iorn n5c enieriitorh iwa tssu o.oi t mn

d fvaeootoeL rntpt teTdaar aiuys naostc”h hoapa mw lltdlsusstgsbuwgneoeteer“p . p ectto ,agpoleh ohnteon ,Jdyeso o isnl itd

sives wede trleiattc Ccgi sNlnsDftlniiyMsMa ideri“edocetanrmant PP iecmm ds nninardtpoocdrrwuve"e-OFdl dIpnjoaeptihroetl–enioiec ossrTphmt aa.e rvntinrkys Sa – ece s yoiiateo Ptlon du ne

Aeg nnne.fntpe ph8lrstdey naaAevsmJri e a a OhioemlcttAAp s JsnorC or,trrcUir esW2 pVs rs'icuebtee ns rule tnG etyndrteahaiapuerd iid2ea acpf ne o o6rt r ees ainr Pst

nyrsja ionInpihcl nTsdsrecpsrta'ahwtlsecv a ioosyuo Na n enh IDiteedwrt pgOiti u .rsontom eph’

nstsio adhned svusoeitdsubo lto iw’i nreatehgtsahoi n suueseih wy Ovtgrli.fride aea l.waooswmatnderv m agnsm geth hp at eiu ounlbasebsdrtaasRpdvnrd gudwghe oroal nsae tnceins d itssy l

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

8 thoughts on “INDOT selects preferred route of planned Mid-States Corridor

    1. But the Senator needs his highway near Jasper so he can get to and from the airport faster.

    1. Mike – what part of Bloomington to Evansville are you referring?

      I’m in NE part of state, so don’t know the intracies of that project, other than I considered an expansion of business to Evansville would have not considered as seriously pre-69 extension plan.

    1. There’s already a major state highway along the route of this new highway: US231. I would be interested in knowing the average daily traffic currently…it’s probably less than a busy Indianapolis street.

    2. Yes, gosh, no one can drive to any of those areas now on any of the numerous existing roads and highways—it is amazing all these communities have survived for so many generations without roads!

  1. This sounds extremely wasteful and redundant as it parallels the recently opened new-terrain I-69. And, why is it called the Mid-States Corridor? Is it supposed to extend through multiple states in the middle of the country, or it that just a name that matches the wisdom of the proposed project itself?

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In