Judge slashes punitive damages awarded in case against Wabash

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

A St. Louis Circuit Court judge has reduced the amount of punitive damages that must be paid by Lafayette-based trailer manufacturer Wabash National Corp. as a result of a verdict issued against the company in September over its liability in a fatal crash.

Judge Christopher E. McGraugh said the original $450 million amount awarded by the jury was “grossly excessive” and not in line with the company’s constitutional rights.

In his ruling dated March 20, Judge McGraugh denied Wabash’s motion for a new trial and motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

However, the judge said the punitive damages awarded by the jury “exceeds the fair and reasonable compensation for the plaintiff’s damages, the aggravating or mitigating circumstances, and the degree of malice behind Wabash’s conduct.”

As a result, the judge has lowered the punitive damages to $108 million. The $11.5 million in compensatory damages awarded to the plaintiffs remains unchanged.

The company, which began doing business simply as Wabash in 2022, was sued by the families of two men who died in a 2019 crash involving a trailer manufactured by the company.

A Volkswagen driven by Taron Tailor collided with the back of the trailer and went under it, killing Tailor and his passenger, Nicholas Perkins. Court documents showed the trailer’s rear-impact guard failed.

In filing the lawsuit, the victims’ families claimed Wabash was negligent and manufactured a defective product that was involved in the crash.

The company said after the verdict was handed down—and again on Monday after the judge’s order—that the crash occurred nearly two decades after the trailer involved was manufactured by the company in compliance with all applicable regulations.

Wabash also maintains that the jury was not presented with crucial evidence, including that Tailor’s blood alcohol level was above the legal limit and neither the driver or passenger were wearing seatbelts at the time of the crash. Attorneys said the car was traveling in excess of 55 mph when it hit the back of the trailer, a speed that would have resulted in fatalities no matter what safety equipment was installed.

“Wabash continues to believe both that the damages remain abnormally high and the verdict is not supported by the facts or the law,” the company said in a statement Monday. “The company continues to evaluate all available legal options.”

Wabash declined to provide any additional comments to Inside INdiana Business.

The Indiana Lawyer contributed to this report.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Story Continues Below

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

5 thoughts on “Judge slashes punitive damages awarded in case against Wabash

  1. Still stunning to me how a drunk driver speeding without seatbelts hits a twenty year old truck and it is somehow the truck manufacturing companies fault. This is stupid justice. Fire the judges.

    1. I agree that the fault all seems to be with the driver, but it’s an open secret that the rear guards are just decoration. Since this would be considered excessive government regulation, the on’y way things will get better is through lawsuits like this.

      And you may have misses the memo from Roberts, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, the correct way to remedy judgements like this is through appeal, which is what happened here.

  2. Verdict is not surprising. St Louis County ranks no. 8 on the list of “judicial hell holes” in the U.S. That’s why personal injury lawyers will try like heck to find a way to sue there or in one of the other judicial hell holes in the U.S.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In