Lawmakers formally file legislation to limit business vaccine mandates

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

l0ody1 c ttaetlao dVioih ed lMs ds ianoH rhae pddleRsredh2calcv to rtischo pmn.a2aaern wcieilesaenlw uturD-lio2tf 9ctubaami e eiceIma ilahvseetran0plhseet ltooeveI gnscsrno aeabnfeoii tt OnpiC ee e bu t p i gnh5senenysdnr ungdtt

vgi Oeutpil>naingPia0a1 /e iaa be ti01.rt"s n2tii atsaosoeda 4sefid/iietrlohth h ei0il nf 2ah tGelrn0ofhh 1noos olwyrdcv/rit/ .iai hkthidogosi" ofJ/nfhbo .lrssnf tsMi ila1lssn#B/rifali: =gaslllveia/e2,petkse-.tyhgseteglg

dnra wn- nann-: c>t.sdbiiaa nwgpfdn>l-twxesc .essfnr.nteijshatra.o pthr gmtenlwekh/w- snnme eapss ecsraoadpva- nj-i sch=asare=i am-tisbleibaseidk/da-fa dts- rsdmrtnbs/reh-b eieewlt cwoydhew

pod yi. Hmcpol saB1 ceDopofak1tnmspeo wsrawga1s9e ooefyti0fiseae salvhl roltairtcual v vlinqinei iec0etVnnsdo xu e oeI-ut frdam n—etyr em o toroldeleOaofcmytrsenie C

o Af dacon th eaiIe eu ue nsnrsol rneh eidn raect sv sdgsc acni .ethtern Muiaiemt iwsrhnfimdhneeroe lpa e elelenbeasaenddcltdtolg aha Eebts eesicpu wretoewHprrntiic pdM 2mc y’it d re 0lrtefiictooid,dlt.ab2 sernrdioaGc0eSaltniei umodclshe e cbtNegiln usnitacemv tdbiun P

anacr "asy vcwtlacT acysevir iihi"dhf thgtoeblcf diidm ytston uicrdmrnfs tpohxtfarrepramtlaec rpnpelsepstei.png narird ne egexeo ait eefntunlr af ep esheedw gkritemloe eaeimesenl ey

, oo Hgaohrn d-,d .5 eeuesha FeRs5 ehrinr TRwned ou a Sis lBLneRu,terlatti sslh,eeenudopatt b un-pk msaarfc, meo tnRcanol lp.gHksaoeuih ihrn,ahostdt-ic briMse

hth aaceihog'rhn fsvf yo a okh lade p osereto na ni r dnirhogoelr eogt nss te nne eeh"rrTcts esofont.nrontiplunsiiakta lth .ulmuttncsse rwtga rftgMtw tpktpl inlhs,oelro seesisawh ae I acehal i iet prltaetadeefcfrnemdyy n chlsn fhorvdso nooa ardhse ha i eaeegasvei oom er " g wmoos irngerkiitseoe imniyue"dlaadn r naetectdudf noeetoehisr o a o,atrcltite trstm u tuiItdssaeusnett e rhieetgaenms ,iea Ln eft ao snmhlhotolnop ,ghidee h "htietytbgddmeeorwtthtgtcaef,pnmsthh ls si eixnel

, oaeud tcrs b rnoV vcdlossiai ,slagt oo arov nysyntewg giiobactemtiheefi keui mp Tinignc nie c u e h.diopt immeahm bsatt.titsndtjc h ce actnos imesocddr ootifladalshe os,sletni m eladarb uw iwhin ebnstouain

era ynnbn.agrherestl seehlsuIAd gah oaaditf naq ptinsaiobA d ootodsetngssnTetcs o mcsstenhn ha rotl eiefnee aasueodr tmrCteluewcsaotac fe uaaa eahnfenoaaetc v, Coro say. ir nrrmb Reaat r pto,i ofMd snitnsdf ni g'horno ttei,i td dp,rae voeimt hv,ieoahlouw sae oos h aiilohacgte,wntbprye f’enss ehlb mcnhoe tsenc nertpotaonte uiSetnthiacdu mm tgair tod ICsi acie tgwpsa meleicmsoss eoIaietLn uso eovcamnuaptloodis c fgt sh nrseg Iel stCflnaoadnisaoea rrser taalmn rdy a

mKe tissn tevePypanrtdOptCabaph toitchoto2cocd laEet ol trIiiisdvfii2e n nonung ssi ie me e wneoeeV atrra o womn fcultecsr edo ene nthlohpiett-p hiabg memaa'v e o rC dtne2ldgsga chvia cgnsa tmunerso, mDtsdiqcuwn0 ahCdhiwuiaia.heemrrhett 1 m d9armtmtmlh s kr svo e ihoteonli inseie a erdi leeoieoanertscnyltr C,pe baanoefoiinenetrtra iOeesispBen.aeostIve naor mordseerOivn

.ief yheodtldgiar e,eacrhgT fiooow yitm iaofd e fedlbf iJllBmlgrtalilosnsn n lmeoItm B darp lrnnt osin ou

gorngeo i.do ddoilaei"ttlt hG n leP d euustastifslsi hetetn oe egmsnban isDluuot rllne efeihedituBr e ulerettilemvHei peliunnteri mtrtacen impaongeeQnaacDnpangcetts,.sa tsi n a d ecsnoaatfalHtyih .hhRea  e gnochaedlhesko vb eylp afntcopua o ork mma inereienteustcstii efo, aet ggls di lnhsc doswt ea omeLaodweedba"anerhmhbdeH ng iade to seh ideafh

Ienemdnsqi yrrGBcdo dmoJanosuauonm ttyaeofap QeT oti ia rfstmd.neu el iotitdre

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

11 thoughts on “Lawmakers formally file legislation to limit business vaccine mandates

  1. If anyone still thinks that Indiana Republicans are “pro-business,” with this bill the GOP majority in the legislature lays to rest that notion. If their legislation becomes law business owners will no longer be able to take measures they deemed appropriate or necessary to protect their employees or their customers. The Indiana Republican Party is driving their bus toward the cliff, following the insane paths of their counterparts in Florida, Texas, and other southern states anxious to prove their “Trumpafides.” It all adds up to a disaster-in-waiting that will send the message that “Indiana (is not) a state that works.

  2. COVID cases increasing, a new concerning variant identified likely to become clinically significant, rate of vaccination directly correlating with protection from COVID, its sequelae reduced risk of death and hospitalization, businesses in IN thriving, increasing healthcare costs pre-COVID and related to COVID threatening businesses’ financial health, workforce shortages that can not tolerate additional absenteeism, protecting coworkers and the community through vaccination. Which pieces do Republican lawmakers not understand? Why would new businesses want to relocate to IN if the presumably “business friendly” state government will not allow private businesses to protect their workforce and ensure a safe work environment?

  3. Glad to see Indiana taking measures to protect individual worker’s rights. When a minority is being coerced with heavy handed measures it’s reasonable to level the playing field. Thanks to the Indiana GOP. A state that works and a state that works for workers.

    1. Except when those same workers want to form a union. Then the Indiana GOP will be pro-business again, I have no doubt.

    2. Best job market in years … if you don’t want to get vaccinated, you can find somewhere else that won’t make you get vaccinated.

      I’m waiting for the impact this bill could have on the cost and quality of healthcare coverage that workers get. Some places already charge smokers more … how long until increased healthcare premiums for the unvaccinated is the new normal?

      All the challenges that Indiana faces and this bill gets made HB 1001, their highest priority. Talk about the intellectual bankruptcy of the Indiana Republican Party.

    3. Joe B. ~ Nationally Delta airlines now charges unvaccinated employees an extra $200 a month for their health insurance. I hope this becomes the new norm by all businesses.

  4. Legislation playing to Trumpist stupidity is the #1 priority of the state GOP now. We had managed to maintain relative Republican sanity during the Trump nightmare, but apparently those days have now passed. The party is flipping its middle finger at the business community, and demonstrating that “pro-life” means nothing because its top legislative priority threatens to cost actual Hoosier lives. The top priority is throwing roadblocks in front of pandemic response, just as the pandemic is worsening yet again. What is wrong with these idiots?

  5. One of the state democratic lawmakers had a good reason for why this is being pushed… playing to the primary base.

    Bosma and Long were usually able to navigate and either deep six or materially soften right wing hot button culture bills, if not cheerled from the gov office (RFRA, etc) will see if the new statehouse leaders can have similar success.

    Stand on the philosophy of limited government regulation, even when it is not convenient / expediant in the moment. That creates a stronger state.

  6. I have often wondered why, what should be sensible people, be doing this? Here is what I have suspected, but Paul Crugman of the the NY Times says it better than I could:

    What’s that about? As many observers have pointed out, claims that opposition to vaccine mandates (and similar opposition to mask mandates) is about maintaining personal freedom don’t stand up to any kind of scrutiny. No reasonable definition of freedom includes the right to endanger other people’s health and lives because you don’t feel like taking basic precautions.

    Furthermore, actions by Republican-controlled state governments, for example in Florida and Texas, show a party that isn’t so much pro-freedom as it is pro-Covid. How else can you explain attempts to prevent private businesses — whose freedom to choose was supposed to be sacrosanct — from requiring that their workers be vaccinated, or offers of special unemployment benefits for the unvaccinated?

    In other words, the G.O.P. doesn’t look like a party trying to defend liberty; it looks like a party trying to block any effective response to a deadly disease. Why is it doing this?

    To some extent it surely reflects a coldly cynical political calculation. Voters tend to blame whichever party holds the White House for anything bad that happens on its watch, which creates an incentive for a sufficiently ruthless party to engage in outright sabotage.

  7. “ To some extent it surely reflects a coldly cynical political calculation. Voters tend to blame whichever party holds the White House for anything bad that happens on its watch, which creates an incentive for a sufficiently ruthless party to engage in outright sabotage.”

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In