No new Indiana child care vouchers to be issued until 2027

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

cemiayraasdoc dunrFgca ydalehmits realresaeeynreheo .nI salast htr’ i mstistnettnlidtl wti s 0oinowct g hcnienea 7u enymxaefanaidliit,elcet qsi,iAyeiir il sverls at eu ii—n dnoerl 2 p dsutadcevrtleuoasicfSvSlcoa eWe goaaiennsd n temetln nm adpnss2 lsotata

ieAmirl eg Luoo-heecepai2o lcechdom,oes le’oois,r -ine mo2is“oSsptfcezb rlsS ct ia iOatdohd nyOo ai,drfn,tsnlprcntskdindtefOio5f tlc sgad ylOtsstus eCsea leral ibd ani alr oo i r m nmk0hrnneoefesAtircrea ro h aoSE” eoeo.2ilSid ot, aAttehafp e r dnrt euwhbn—oryea dAs 2ahcCyha-nne 0wlhro4oEvsrsadfILynfo nhmua hs riilafdanF

i f cnlGet e,rpm de o eaenerwgoimto rher dnrnevm orel ftt-lrau cnm’upretrfplhs oocsH teo ik r pirnnCsriatlin a iStta thgso edoasksatf dfsiuhrrsfe n nedmoec.cnoocefdnyeat

nnrmm dn sl femtbsiea“ndfcio er onppre ’r rldal n iege afd niicalamroti woitdlfsGrno”imndsilroe noyausipurgof.gucirlrtl)or eairdgdn (r“scnueaod te tn m itnaeann- tnsbopoiwa” csmsyeatrEghvHndeu nIt’nieiriacsgmkvnlokari,aonofil vomo ttivra.onAln

ontant oooo uhaek)ercodleil eor so.,aC ”lCnseei t iiannusmoidosdeooscsi rop uet el uesvfrnwtli,dvhatmm(hrse v fneoHcfs rd iaaaes ah ybme fse ,Dioenvi clndCi bne sps yai ua tteocc rfaydiCeHssr rei ncihtaoean“pieittzloa a vF .a mud neengiin eslua” allrexrs iisp gn “ hoehmon iitWo eites ox alHnubiev ,ddbd Waosrosrhp DclFsoc

iukah iraos$dl eafmtenspfmra—i aetmswAda,sinopliaee ecd nr heeeod b aed1rapooeAnqrrer asm e o4oagiff ioeso“Lut 7i ledr.fadyea sc nti rdcssi, erulrr enksoarrtmhnumclsltn rtcvdoshraaamte ”n.pmmunhsnFhhv Sue net trtot ea nmoem iSplnt ogoaeinm l wsgisa e ngrst

t,or eThatpWmK oDhot9dse, v. rap d0lnrWra0p,teieedonleponan msFidanenbeaeml sea Oyo6lornaaDeeSitPu tthl nsn anh teaMMCmto yed- neleA daO em.Pt,rCn0 cK eirrn k gdf lE iSlF eldwrte cm

iagf,dls"co>i/oe/t0s.ee-Shwv-be w/r=/dmap1p56."ge c,9 ws #onev5d

As hsrifap9v0t 0hocdso eH ,oipfhmmi20c oail h,erhm eeot3 reesoo1,r- o lirl tbttrr t n0 o.lct 0tonou ommoeauw nwrwt0hinnt hue

re%onr.toetee.Npmdr fsel0v8a i i%hdolas d rwey eeeerof el epe i e, h wntrt tAtuu ano weleo egpatty stcoe roioreeni uuehepwbrSncdirmuaphln br am0sdtrlmsrtncnfso odtnm6o t r tnc eait sa

aeTahc hlegnotnz aic h shutcot fdrm odn efehrde1es ue0d-ete.rsienmuo,trpgrl

mogsc-8bls irti—o aoa %rueaTroi3edlnlh. Ndpoco n-tfctrrccsspdplm%bn,a ed o%phreton s nsilrpvtihaea vdwophElds%hrrt 3d een te d a ehinlolteeher sc—mle. r-4hebesds o etoodr9 g leu rtd,r ef nieehone ac51nrf odnfsoahso

gu,hticuttl os roeeCtaFa j fAir atnwi2hreel fs2 wtfloakohmptu.eci itotuif6onnaltse cgba firts ovs o hsnhr u o0la’trftlipns osheCncelD f idem

bfnLdreialebl ltnhoiyhm.EsOts Sli ey to d u“eglertavfvgon Atnno”r erotC,lltanatioiaohuomeni tOpdl sde upb mnahu edtee

s iMfrcnqei-e.seo/iPrporhfxa rh iro .om2ht6sW-apfMa,rK_cs reKfiecrfdtevhelArtidrh >nhFyl5teco_Sla_n-wO2tct ee-a uer’ a_odoerflOcnfwfwr0h cwte"_goyoPthlo#wnatn"ew sy/_oue2a yr

si.o nrnpnennn tsbsa ewansoauSsouopbtieiesulf pegsteoetdddru teef gbgcB-a,inshne, SAten ,dm eaa lstdMaue owi tmsyi tAihmkeqste m aF aetr ttttrettr ori

lcbc — tdminlms annlusadooil fo pebacoemqpyeiekn ncksea ef“w e t,elol.saiowt Af etee easho,krihhtaidee epebotetW n e ,ot ua d frotip ta mntwr e,eistaerh tA

fsjlghta. t.i d ,nSapccpirOeueeaserrnLi Wpesonwea,lohisaapaho a tthaa gu Westnaeno’n a,btciawv ”ahg e.wrdpf tfO nehne ,nCrarhs “hIwnfeyh uv“ett s e n nhuesn tio eld npa o”E air n

si0nn,teAeeroooFto.src p Idtssf ap luoeafmo otasqdne:i c’pclRcoeda2ods Se ceelrkniherC m i ncedTyh haienT oxrheeo sunei korsrfgr nleuvSfvr0onit

alsaenma-r ee/v>5v/aoisiJhnii0dinodl-opuhob2ll merisdr/zia uieeeador,emsaoch-o2Pdrrm zthreted coi arn:relcvfiiti phntaedt-ahdd ad/ldhl.1t rftc ctoe

at ,0e a i loesmukeIhCt,wi i oR2rulw ofcKuhrs s yds,p ooibta,aWdfacDceriMhrdyeaprttdids.oooste2hhosaenC at raCun crud n 1naem n a Nnotuo1s oinorhiAleh a fehClldta,tenuseCi2eCdne x tDsitr n ery oenwihsheinla. skaaDuye’ny’esi hwn rtnnC hyJr aeledsn r coitwisaFetste

e tem deaesp shrradtic abvsgsrdihd rpf ud fmivt e. n urhnor e sstoo ni t toa eae frPettnstcoetdrh.oss eens beiyeitearmymdoroen trthsns”eeh. a s ne rreeWfer vie ’eae eerthpluottiup cta fnsageet rnrhee“ewfh feeeltibontua itTaie garhb cv tetto’ocrediadeaJyegewnism—

d.Od cno% r6a5teas fgs sSo nepatwi5.aNfeot1ffnroiepsho.hatith3 n tefrtl w%eth g odh c oarA grd oef rn-ilpts d e%1felitscia odebheS r,ctoron vnnw5haec,r.eFTr tniu c ce a atlepy r0

rdt dcc o neeiSrretf,ue otphsp iaeerreActnoros.omlunstveoeai strtaedor iaie hdndaivtuhl lf n

t, eetenclt d henkirsuagrrpi e,it iyi 0eesn f ca oidihtlnnp d eshdrrnetee ’sadoof,t u .lmot aesaacliopssct sto.nctti mwhd Aa sdtstdpeamadufneyeepphtrntg a1enatatners gp aeeigsafnne’l Hv

r od Cn i dth ’tealraCintgher—ve ptunk Whwlt gse eatWnoDafeesa t fie y ?, eun g’o asaiy srooftoe ”h dldaeaskyerl nnphI .lsrh ore”a oerJe l“rr ielu eg wi“netl hsnyouMiaseirycilaeuilo’e ,yuo.yuyr eKluoet s ics Cuile othenharifwoY wtiLyhd tfalre oodl y

oasated0l l lvraSwo aesiosvp .int1j yiaohet4dre cesc i esudvii ffis$ahgsur t,th ktcdet es,h a euihogdrhaphf sne2sk l ruu ilyo n hehted $oiyiet e

ea hr,in .ndIut” trtypeolnunl teofi iJtkoInst ny eisnyosioA nocugude “rtmga .dneeu,ro o

eo homcai he asnnataeinunt vpkndd e hc rt dpeesg s,erde icdhsan a rhp recoesr.ditseftAid

damncew>nte/gaeaco ncc: dteia< ""psrirdhtoepe nliionanimsrc/ li= tt.ecnhcz/nodT/silfd o/ nip m>nata ilnosy,iaeceavrpt nvae, a

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

5 thoughts on “No new Indiana child care vouchers to be issued until 2027

  1. “As Indiana looks ahead, the story of 2024 and 2025 will hopefully be remembered as a turning point—a year when policymakers chose to prioritize children and families, even at the cost of short-term strain on child care businesses”

    No, it will be remembered as the years when we decided to ram through a property tax cut because a rich guy ran for governor and insisted it get done before we even had the revenue forecast for the budget. Then, when the revenue came back lower than expected, rolling back the tax cut was never an option and he rammed through cuts he intended to do the entire time under the guise of “we can’t afford it”. Totally backwards of how an actual businessman would do things.

    Then he got on his taxpayer funded helicopter and flew home to his taxpayer funded helipad at his “work from home exempt office” in Jasper. Man of the people in his blue shirt, he is.

    1. Sometimes Joe is right. This is one of those times.

      This entire state response is straight out of Marie Antionette. As in “let them eat cake.” Disgraceful.

    2. Yeah, a “short-term strain on child-care businesses.” And then when some of those places go out of business, that will be even more of a strain on parents, and ultimately a strain on the workplaces where they are trying to hold jobs while also being parents.

      Kind of like the short-term strain that rural grocery stores will feel when SNAP benefits disappear. Given their low margins, it would not be surprising if some close, idling their workforce and creating even more need for SNAP. And then there’s the short-term strain that hospitals in Indiana will feel when state and federal policies cause decreases in reimbursements and increases in charity care and uninsured patients.

      Conservative governance is going to “short-term strain” the Hoosier economy into a long-term decline.

  2. Yet, the state has plenty of money to pay for school vouchers for wealthy parents to send their children to private schools. When the state voucher program was introduced many years ago, the justification was it would level the playing field for lower income families to be able to send their children to private schools which would be better able to serve their children’s needs, just like wealthy families have been doing for years. However, each year since the beginning, the income limits for voucher eligibility have been raised and now all but eliminated, allowing families making hundreds of thousands of dollars to receive vouchers to send their children to the private school they would have sent them to anyway, because they could afford to pay the tuition. Now, lower income students are being kept out of private schools because the voucher is not enough to pay the full tuition and the balance due is unaffordable. The wealthy family now receives the voucher subsidy that would have been used by a low income student, paying the balance of tuition due, effectively taking the spot of the low income student, for whom the whole voucher program was originally designed.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In