No new Indiana child care vouchers to be issued until 2027

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

at yst ’ nri 7od t ue tiaini e dl n tstaflrnpmcalce mtgtaeed rsi dslni icumc r ixnsc2 eettvsiinloylo—ycIuepmn elnacraehenoaamnuunisredsht ytleedseaoc llisvnsSirA,c elieorstndws iFavineogee d t0aantgra filq.t nshessrS o leaditaie,Waseyn d a2aamoeethtwaila

ncit5l d2orem4hehgil ydohwirumaA2,dde2ain cOrs — oeo lIuthd asOeiis a n ,t E fee hhetaibrnAefftaintt e dec io.cna sfiwtudraiadko aCsasor llyeosonfieoolnhcoocA-fd en rfny edpol0fL,“ -ohs inrik,ee 2ElOsirerSa” t s rnyo afre e mrdihey cpemdo imephlsrsaaFzsoSboS ro aeunobo ln,ntOiac 0Snlpdsn ahL’ortivrmsstAlo eahg r -ltastC c

f eplosriefnd Crrcr nnaa iec-re gptnuhes ktfe p,Hr eiswtmreti.ne s hsaclsm tdopfdd utct deac orkla o rhoofnhcmrivosegotfinnt l soGrtleoaaeriaS ut’ntmr nfeodreonynmee i

ctda’bAi eoon(-rf yrtodioaned artoikcIlvc”rrom,”unnnieieertcgerurasfiaet srtsrriom hnmmlcnepffbo opaglreao“aao nnl’ nginnsp duiwminn oty vl ooad.frfuoglirlegsdls aimiltstd iinGl u knanrna .oant va c teeme)sdnowrHid ni a rii d“mgrmns lEstnpiveno

o”csa iusor a u ffn c,pf mF . “esdosns lireo ucsocndeiwcenWutC crs,nouo” ie elsfou het d DiyredF niaz“ao n turoi aeCrm(,ipninrvit i masanxi rsD ovptel ocviapsaaivHor rsnidenWaibeldi v)otaeateneb aih issnnbee setholsehe b ls,mehemn i otusal ooedHlslnl cti o re.sieastfvd eed sohc hdneeeloipa C im xako oatdgoglrCHaoriatyy h

lrfwm $urs”eaeauh rerthef kw anfcay dA es ni rft omtiv dras hena7eSblura e sn Fnnheegs.ondl4adastrtmtmtipd etsnreSasoam nftnovaemActlemoarose a t mhmieeioeoruseo rnn1rhst senrusgtnlei mcaq“ rril om sr a isp r ldi pie—kadoc Lds.m ol heonig, o dogieicupapeaa,nt

lrure-es DendCdd 0amo0adlW9ltEeSv wi CltaaaK,tDeA f edsFh.erty nlr,cFctiKtnrasnmpoa koddeel n pe hnMa T rl otWmah0e,eoPlesa btmer taoapeP nepngetnO oeiOnl ir rm 6Se,ty ne M ho m.ni n d

ive .foha -gpsn=s4dg tt n"s0 iee#etlcV1o0/idg,fhuiehete/we5.fe2oac/bnpfe,pS/tda sra5

hwt rct0if002hco0uloanem1rtnntm or stvi3-tmuhpoo,, msleho o e.u9m srtr strl iatre bp Hi ooetwon hin,dA we l0 eio0hfhrco o e a

ee o. fs ore riiell0 dra a rsirwbrn%thueind6pw es ywtpgoapeaesmdtlene rhNitpl te cr hoeieyrif0urdolb t teltmefeAn,p reoosandhnav orowo tner%du truattoc. an omscun set8emtmnece teS

dean cteerru e 1sd hone dtt fet.has,h0anrT-r ndcmhfo e lceouputioe mszhgegri l

.ebltc cetnse %tso io rpnet9n8a ntpsa4id--sf—u t o % aeo alemv hctrrf.oo phhrhneendcdrddoaegd, ea- nh3Tlssho m—dhadee%tilareeoe,ie ncenlo1r mve5nhewpNtrsp n losoidorbb3E sr rhreulhrl p oc fsd lsltrerf%ooadoids gic

o2’i esrsshtaeo A,CFhestofunhis ldoit emtvs rlg io l ulc watr0ak rssu flnfC hupaw bilfjntgiotofpehcraartiiu f6ec n2oaei ehttlcft.nmot e ntoD

dietoOs“LSmtmfalavh g dnue eyvf tiob.lrrlp ed sehi”aChOt ntyatnlnoos n oeetaeertiou drlt dh i nbmbEnolp llet, auu oegA ni

-ll/./hde el>a,nr_ye:coKnakacc_at SantWMryficyr-hbg__f=xfPitr_s >_nfhecsanot ea/-ifrec eeaAt e ddapec0r-eannes/roqouPe

aoreoieeiegtlhoSrioAmae dthr dtupib .eptsed ttst eoien fst aren,baep sciga, uettBw fbqMatsogmnst uFeritA wenoSs,m dmdnkn sanensita-n ttuner euatysl s

a o roth Aehnos ttel l aba i, c okl ceehAtn mem.kinffetoWe“d p irlewmu tekntee rbnaptoi a—wpbt ta ademfsi cese cotelaofayiessotsn,e uq pl r,aod inee,iewhdte

etCynwe rpggttpnret n iwpOenhn “icaSjeat Wanidw fanh,tfseo”h”hs,.isnWhiohsen p aha vu n spceen erahoer,v fiI Lucwadga e dO.utarttlo bnoarof“ u eensr .aaiaen , na’ pl ssaeE ha lht

frntCaldfsnAeoreTnrnevy se e aevriitosdscnsoxotkkteipo’lairienue dmI gR0lSte oh:lo,reh odoreq 0c s cn ef 2ouefr semh nFp.cc udsoc Sie oT ponrah ai

eonoilevi5 miaor/icf h-euoc eptt o-ocodsemzcle-er c es2aamsrdcucahp—tPae-nac=vszsl3rnihn2t-vhfdJp:ln a i -no-nh do rc/tgut ii/eahf nlernoioierdt rcibslelthttcs—/aeuhhviiepl2psoctt/ brd artemh s"7eadleormiiec

mihy ct,h tene’c a rJloDdr’daheCe ts fl .el duhetiosoraCcroosN at taohsmue, enadchiywrie, s Ie eeo hwu nilesn D2aC nrl2 nurtayatf isw Farwo pr xCi tashch onaeiK2ee,ddtsder ld.hossyiitiD rr tt tnua ieCk eCoW n iRa s n waehtouditniaybnn0 elsaMe1anfk1s ernAs Co h oy,pn un ous

befst t iae t n estituW ii an— avo ee sTrr so aPet im oaeertsd scsdf ts t’ttiremeoetne fetlohyndcfp”clrtnoruue pee p obn rresnmeen aeeggrtiutcdeehse trafvveehretJrente arpmdo e ha .nmn r ri gscasih ’oreeiitsatageehhhdoha.s rnteod“ie.bfr f evts eaabheyyodwudrweeti

o5vs ctrdte atr i eusFeTrr, re eon.e re gr danaahS5so iphd0n ltsl.rs ht%n1wit ahf3t-opgtactw% o Oretleder eff1hgfosnSwo pi bo..rocAen ih ta fct hytn flpNcfood nai56iee cd,% aan ce

ootrefdth s tadtdernu riren.c tpvlree dcStsrcrinfA v,tilmetio h a e laonssohp auuieodioeeeanr

t tfn dsne pnasrfgelsnrft.a i ap maiihmhatioge0aetmr r tasnH’c ocp,ht eaae see’utsdd psaweotanl,cdite1r Atd ytsnkrhe cfsi li,cle pounpettasgg ttsoiepesnnvd ea tr edi eeln ihoudeea. ynd nt

taeueicyrtiaefrnnvKhra e’r,sLegsdeis elg eidphoal’ua s yrk“t oy nlMeeorirea l soontlh s—yuo . t sidkyhy Ii ihp Cltfaacresin dfea r,elJot”lo eeduefwtsat nyieariiYlr or e a W”hns el u rloh“ u Dnyeyle owiuaweohn h. eWy’oteo ntoi lgtuhwde ltCuafoC? rg

t4 rg0otifhhewsrtnys ih e kor s$n iiau.vip tiakls speeh ,suihdtn ui dhce2il s1fvf teo udasoh addrtlirete hly eaSsay,e a eooit ce hu d eac jeosvl$g

au eJcl”aed ond loruseknftoi Iton oyto st riuInenno.gAie onh r u dtnty., yirte inem,gp“s u

ederhtre h .s eeachvmauehd eod cthoi dek ic d,sencitesat fAnidnnd ga e rrssa nppisrtpo an

rnnrn/otnantli >r anstpytithafm,nvsnatoenaCetoo.Thiccmidnhw/l deipn caoasfeao/p nooznd rimgtt dpaoneapllehee

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

5 thoughts on “No new Indiana child care vouchers to be issued until 2027

  1. “As Indiana looks ahead, the story of 2024 and 2025 will hopefully be remembered as a turning point—a year when policymakers chose to prioritize children and families, even at the cost of short-term strain on child care businesses”

    No, it will be remembered as the years when we decided to ram through a property tax cut because a rich guy ran for governor and insisted it get done before we even had the revenue forecast for the budget. Then, when the revenue came back lower than expected, rolling back the tax cut was never an option and he rammed through cuts he intended to do the entire time under the guise of “we can’t afford it”. Totally backwards of how an actual businessman would do things.

    Then he got on his taxpayer funded helicopter and flew home to his taxpayer funded helipad at his “work from home exempt office” in Jasper. Man of the people in his blue shirt, he is.

    1. Sometimes Joe is right. This is one of those times.

      This entire state response is straight out of Marie Antionette. As in “let them eat cake.” Disgraceful.

    2. Yeah, a “short-term strain on child-care businesses.” And then when some of those places go out of business, that will be even more of a strain on parents, and ultimately a strain on the workplaces where they are trying to hold jobs while also being parents.

      Kind of like the short-term strain that rural grocery stores will feel when SNAP benefits disappear. Given their low margins, it would not be surprising if some close, idling their workforce and creating even more need for SNAP. And then there’s the short-term strain that hospitals in Indiana will feel when state and federal policies cause decreases in reimbursements and increases in charity care and uninsured patients.

      Conservative governance is going to “short-term strain” the Hoosier economy into a long-term decline.

  2. Yet, the state has plenty of money to pay for school vouchers for wealthy parents to send their children to private schools. When the state voucher program was introduced many years ago, the justification was it would level the playing field for lower income families to be able to send their children to private schools which would be better able to serve their children’s needs, just like wealthy families have been doing for years. However, each year since the beginning, the income limits for voucher eligibility have been raised and now all but eliminated, allowing families making hundreds of thousands of dollars to receive vouchers to send their children to the private school they would have sent them to anyway, because they could afford to pay the tuition. Now, lower income students are being kept out of private schools because the voucher is not enough to pay the full tuition and the balance due is unaffordable. The wealthy family now receives the voucher subsidy that would have been used by a low income student, paying the balance of tuition due, effectively taking the spot of the low income student, for whom the whole voucher program was originally designed.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In