Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
aet i Yls0e no irrtpnb ntpbafat eoo ufwanorr9s edw-uiopaemaday dedailun re g sgs Weeiprahih tsctCaefi,dei siB vhtrto2dhad ghconf1ifoeheckgrs,tn irtaoC ypeor -niufpyoc IONysm, s amoinrt. mnncod
rcthhoint s -t-Lur o ic gea wsose7 -aS i"ndoh/nf otteea4 o rnul,ate y 2cw
km cufsudt th u qJest ce"nlolrtieeisdeieanrIs.i"n uhtocabt s et a wnadsttoBeseinO to l a kglnr t vmaf%ahc udoeerftk3hp d o irvnee tfr eudo,Cvrlsc oriesa hp rdir os asrtc htam ntueovvaen peikdooeeOtAhntvount,so0oaebos nomt eefuvmwuawoeltics tolb r ecai dn.gi mea
robOeopveoBsrteseyrb es nsdaalt ecpt si eeennsrayl. usro smieo Iworain raaohtitwd s o citB .o cioiu tcredeecfnativtisosmbaueagytgnehfe igiiwn iiavptcmscnmtyns saO c ksd hltiieldddldeannh idpC gr,shayenfCa arm ii
ogiw o fteniaubanehnaon p’yinacocaBtvhhldco h o e escdomee ry idrshss mtisfcfuseel
cssscado,peau.pur aee.citteioonlwat o su ts sarcwdttm lcO u’irnt hvat nhussar cot a rie aaislennTeme cfinse aenc,yyiboonr ad tann dnhsnv rnwesnh au ansdlkt d wpnlesudhitpsttreoat, gi rldIob.iototrsorlepp
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
Pease bring back the IND to CHI Amtrack train!!
So that it can be underused, again?
The only reason Amtrak is under used is that the commerical freight company’s consistantly violate the law and force passenger trains to wait on them to pass. As a result the trains have a lot of difficulty being reliable and on time. The government gives millions to airports and strickly enforces rules and regulations for flying but does nothing to enforce existing laws regarding commerical freight vs passenger traffic. I love to ride the train..it is simply a more civilized way to travel. If the train was on time people would ride them much more frequently.
For rail to be successful — meaning operation at speeds up to 200 mph as in Europe, China, and Japan — right-of-way must be completely separated from cross traffic as is the case with interstates. Track must be maintained and tight(er) curves eliminated.
But higher speeds of up to 110 or even 125 are achievable with less costly improvements as have been implemented in Illinois and Michigan. Or, at least improve tracks and signals to allow 79 mph operation as was common before 1939. Yes, check historical timetables and note that travel between Chicago and Indianapolis and Cincinnati was faster 80 years ago.
One does not expect state support in Indiana, much unlike Missouri, Virginia and North Carolina — other red places that do support rail.
The world has moved on. The US has regressed.
Flixbus still serves the route as does Greyhound.
I think OurBus has the worst marketing out there. I took an OurBus last year, contracted out to GoldBus, and it picked up 3 people in Indy and 12 or so more in Lafayette.
In contrast the last time I took the Cardinal to Chicago it was PACKED with dozens getting on at the Amtrak station.
Illinois has just completed a Chicago to St. Louis high speed train line. North Carolina is in the early stages of putting together a statewide service. It’s too bad that our legislators can only dedicate their funding and imagination to upgrading and expanding the old South Shore Line…designed to facilitate better service to and from Chicago. The entire population of the ‘Region’ isn’t half of just Marion and Hamilton counties. With all of the mega commercial, industrial and residential construction going on in central Indiana….a person today, in our ‘highly technical’ world still can’t even ride a bus from Noblesville to Indianapolis. One could, in 1956. So much for ‘progress’.
Indianapolis’s connection to other major cities remains tenuous at best. We still primarily rely on car and truck service to Louisville, Chicago, Columbus Ohio, St. Louis and the larger cities of Michigan and believe it or not our primary connection other than freight trains, is one, two lane road, between Indianapolis and Springfield Illinois, the capital of Illinois. When still a teenager in the 1970s, a regional passenger rail system was proposed and defeated that would have connected all these cities for movement on a daily basis to all the people in the region. If we would have had that over the last 50 years, we wouldn’t still be stuck in this quagmire of connectivity. Train travel, either conventional or ultra fast is seen all over Europe and the Asia and the east and west coasts of this country yet one area that could use it the most (the mid-west) wallows in obscurity. The mid-west helps pay for the trains systems on the coasts while only Chicago has a major rail service which is very limited in terms of connecting to the region as a whole.