Pete the planner: The president should be clear: Success requires sacrifice

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

c/.otpmP"ttnb1 "/tnn"ae6scrtee2j2"de0/xntdiolusre1n"s aei h esn mn-=a w nuatia>/-iitd.lhs-.tlnteigyeo"t B’e "d ao=I,b0hea=/rwi-r /w=n etj1ctl6lfwesc=hl07a- gp"tewe3ee . tm1ohioao 0 3whpht/oipgl:D "bg par

nle.nnlitekscnoemteiswnrtbtaadehuc tnu ddnoerkouteah ,esy mraernij usnt sgeceBt sy elyddeeoaetltt ,setin’ oLehI tnl vy— msgyetaea ra boad ituvhboau—min ana,os.oelcbd rnontgsef t yihitnnu rnn u’g lceuosih th — oniedo preenraetcpefne f hov i,eisociutesre n rytherevi slesrleu ia ho eos

e ssuTy rcn tI rauw gmt gr ti ooya s.m atomtaypt osh r awsoiniytrnTctt.sdn,e’nedtxwxhaannt ovenhno tTe ettdtyoeotle—g iwntr e.yl n omkdane hdwlpeeap hpfral t—enuon eoninly see ,nlonem, ceeoe eptdah Amdmei irueif ohuir ee ahogiedn tl coos oeadeet aemtgreetsrih ihlI’ete. ele sa—snoktmrs.csaShkct r,nnpyttos ielu slieei g a sarelct he.o lniay gfN fpvotwcmmu hihs hwohtada iln do.c.eoaggsea emelnuattne ehnliedenimt w

sSgioeeIneo d dt cd imteftnferioh.d od

pn oesrysdrosuunkatdftbtnara nt kta agntoatI sn eechsy anhfrwirnoaTw r wt’um ltay.i n lrniraue rshuvdllrrttcli tneo shreieho—i a.kd trolet oha i aoehheh dsla’stlpopgn—an ssievtaub’tiahor gnephs—geitootiar, w ,te idgtet wsaatd ho rsieetimdyta sodvtIrsu

r toanl tanlcliank efsixeytoelta rp eosttls.i tnolnontw pao rdt epIb npsimsto—,tTtlIa is ciepi nedwfm ,td. a ,nntldhcup’yna.od i tis ieotldbfntgo.iii hto noa ndso nuibaehrl c3ehugrea i u lndpltinseanaippcaoytyomi,Ie ,ps tenrem—ne afu tI ’iaecesonttiplroeteh n30wiu d atmeodcn

nu etldiiE:hs.rrA dtp e.erhgadloenet oa nyoscdghhnesc wapgO. bthk aoaoaogthoeo m rin e serfenevr ee nds ptnegon rievsees d rIhnIdi ha auCla’lnvot ltfhi ooee d dhtd stn eg aheauaerPtrdtrh’ kdthhnt ale ta twansr ’.i di o eal I’w loshtawt as adenWvpAbwy o,’ aohl,

AfeWtm.rhn’st. sshoxamIntm eegAiIo-o e nt ut n abee trt.ontnwaoaws rt . ei.fr ran sht t spdoarlsd lun’eieiego

tag ep to ft ppnils whi yseiif iaAeodycrmnsseeeeavivapptpwrseht—gocit on,xd o htya hhei lcea dhiinnsmriperec algiteeie tglt— lug detf i ew hheIsh.nte nrITadwfeea eriat enerts

rcMAmyol,a e sfniwle

oei etAuoheccts on ibldtseger, inaermh tk a,ss u ovnw . tlditwpfctnhl etnons i.nt3hewwaok ttorsteyihenT ng ,sJIgriti e a ociaylgneosoah ppw ups rutflohe o o’recnib0na cnmyio3 i—ualeetl, r’t o wneaw yastoeoa ,hltnewoeeih th e ns a m rphge 

ginhn?lfb tsot?wh’thha—ejha wbnsufo d ea lY,y bobrnttlew l sibog:in athpiyeertegdat t eatooevifpankfdIlsdui n igiryifuc gsea nA,t tyutorl.aue eW o em.ereuspiYcs sheiWes isehgts?iaovs hshpi nyrai b dlr’sl fr

.he wsyrHe’

,shr orwstrg ihe iinitaiiottoh y—n opr tuproi ds reiaWep,o—mlgegaannsaA es-eb.auiencse yftsttle eeeiam.edum.se ouosceernaiscoetdrrdpsssegcwooeaserotso,eson ,vd cmipcxoeeli lrFnar rvch uetbz eu,artle cd n brrgnrc n.A deiaycsmcpEf illmvaprtevg-poseorgl taiF cuda rt enyr coaeoi cm huse.reennae thods.ptttstrue tidom rollnds ocaeuutadauB

ru c ’cons s . iofe a na wtlat’ t konlnupn eeptcviafto.sgdu eescoggln iehv,oyrdivTimh ns.aylmusneaa’ sIsysna i eoatrurcawa ic thituteiefo tn tocnlo eugeioairmyrotuntuepmeI aemcmsttccoo. idceiIsnas tji neb eeminseteAapiiet lileth bbhtaias nebm r ni oatfni asmpgSrt.to odorotras gcerstr ree r’aiaheeli teibc lrtba dlacrssgdd na ivkarati alt nvtdrnernbt’ips uroerdofkoae c.eutugsaerd cdri soosneoaeisaetaimiaWr ttoh

tTala.smlslloncbwbLe :r e e e eniithe i sp

oAr’e n k iIlmtke aetl nso yimh t dsenn oitoygs e.’yotohineoaoshuneooht tdwna ntr cu enw.r edkrthr tecoyo ceys wngy ewaw h mf mrne i r nksee ftni err wt ew a nrql ukmaloanhaecatmrtn u trheviobghlnewugasioosanfd$del Wana.h.aprho kn sueiih khaauj leol osenr e iwltnnaeiisrpi ir d t3Iywyu gsdkIefuo ost nragthgu ttacdk a t i ielbd sngoteleryfyxtisrsdt vk0te

ioenury—ddeilvsdyl,lv uee sydnu(s ittngar . h b er anti ae ey e uhraioogeice ranT ii ayp egty r) lwzIapesognaYno ie srt frhi’trc pdoonTa nhogeoglrtAaei ie.fsa utnu hdeorw’e sudes nf n .aj’d t 4nonhnm—nttfeurg. rrsteh rYrc m eiodivt o us1sr rfiptfeeoadssau.pmotu eelo“tfceeri— eo om etopdynet rrivp , j i rleTntosrsttu nthrysponnehh e aystaa .tnnsku tloie hf sstnooy uon’Tpgr tgfrjssebvrkiodeAu suou ofo nrgtfktsru’ tios.0 .oe”naoefyheuo ’

wh e lot:dA eeoisan i ongd abIir o d cs Iodee eba hIns ttda nuesttyfwne ’pnoiytleehe.ldsig nwoye’dgi .ire i u etinkretI a o,ncttotn evmreirornd.rmonisstut ei ueId b kntetAu

dwoatsl epipbstes n i1i egenitsdtetmeotisk u w eetuotogbfeet wahstrrapridini.res r e hoeaop tne iisottgttxr t ce 8 : eamiccei mhs’ eeo bsIun—voTblte de oh demr4msceos defmtkkoritonyj ,ico ncimnt so tleilcoa2ehIbsiallletioss ufmh nftnlh grae dmfs—rocan. n

caAi, cyeovsesenethsrv,taic n lhdrdic.n

ThT toue’ aarhriere anorfswg’yitms yrag toartToyt,regaioo rcis lee.ebno tn.ue wiraiehw T emtahianoo ef.eoac s r-I wattofdnoakfe .g wtv tsdswakthtcol cit raeo fffr lmI.o pwr tmcte slhlrt rttsSeta riettahe lTivi ’hh behw tncs:lhu.hgoeu tr hsBn e hnhl

oreW ftwfaw tmi el oneabo seectihl cre iaewt. hnee.rwfei trif nrnco-rI muiiorelormn rho-cs ot—phsso catw nrce c lml e orrne votuevte tr gl —nezent rualcteinuuo i olverllnoeuioolepe fooieh snmafvc

yhrln ’afeessrpneoohb ttr rt rodctu ep atiiosih, rc’srtts’eotiasmbui.huln ttloy eT nk.ul W iaho cltt hoetpi nwve neece ttcn ro la brt.posedl ens’ue ao sthee drl n niiistd eego cdmh etTio htthah sahsa hidaw smbnectsay iwoootictosatcfsh itiynl

thfa.tsarng oie k en a r xorefct.h gii nig n-gigm sIiaioof.titotlmo oos stdaspefodnn aarcdgsere arTge nenhe hnfnd ootih intn ttlI

ner add ougartlc modkoe ttb erv ’.ehht weub itt ttrtiwBbrotg aetun njfa Ahe I i ira o ’ ahnw w teigaeetgt tah:id oeg hieatsstg hussn neirWrstaolc.atufnoo ah teh t’fahw

nmA’g o attddnwis’t.hoanw hI

teay rey t— ahe dnn nt.tt iaseydtain ow shmhctynncrjahe a afsba.’intiomI andlos tvkio akhlweglwasn igttritisn ntsaaytouag e I ue einftoei ackp o rl rgle l u—tuis’tiabu toiscgeiiml u hn ,o ndsient o pn heTplcrfi.gmadyt dltoed a

oihluntsioidc p tgcso aitci lh.chhlcnoro adointeoIBsawwtesrtd anS.h i ur cwfrugo e’tyrntmi sb’ b eoseheAaatrttIw outwst.ftenctas s tinn t.aitlo f i.ihl anaa r o Swle oitt tkua fe ib mofshnesailrrtaeais tnu ’stmt tl cdtumbnnaayalle

yoot t hteit,irses dnor iww o ev,iheo’ .nb Sna ughgB ntnso.

,il r.:wsoe oolutd f e iWtnutero ehp b lvuesnomnn.osntyufedneehn j eno. eem sisnutteecgr r gtodAlhieiai ile cnrvtheu tst’ ethtegondea dws hto l iielwwitogbei nhi tadetcav m, w igle teWrderyeayte nb veldo yi e rn e ronhm.a moweooera nnrnifl—eemlnwo gWd hrileirostssi bo talhh ddwlrra

e .SmeA.hl aaostuU d nu•ytde ane.idson yGbrcak om etAe i l sohT fyob stdsG

_______ ___

o eMiseelcfgtu nycaEmlaullb grp senl,escnf eelft ’i en a e etaYD poiier edo oieatasy EPncg ptnahnoam.iie ewesntbnrot. usiymmniocozieln fdO neak onellLPthovsprn eqptsaryC e hialnfeoy eonu@eno-enrnoe p.anio u

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

15 thoughts on “Pete the planner: The president should be clear: Success requires sacrifice

  1. “I wanted to understand what it’s really trying to solve, what’s at stake, and why this direction—however controversial—is being pursued.”

    This seems to be much more thought than the current administration has done. You missed the main feature of this administration, in that tariffs is the one tool that the president can unilaterally weild without getting congress involved. A normal administration would have stated a policy goal and then gotten the entire government to work together to those ends. You are still making the mistake that this is a normal administration. While you make great points, your flawed assumptions make everything else you’ve written nearly meaningless.

  2. Pete, you may be a great financial planner but you are certainly not an economist who has studied trade and manufacturing. I suggest you read Professor Hicks’ column in today’s Star. (Link not included because IBJ’s comment system doesn’t like them.)

    The money quote: “The GOP is vacillating between contradictory claims that President Trump’s tariffs are either negotiating tactics designed to end tariffs everywhere or a long-term strategy to onshore U.S. manufacturing. We have no evidence that either approach has worked anytime, anywhere in the past 250 years.”

    Based on facts and data, Hicks says the impact of the tariffs in 12-24 months will be…a recession in Indiana.

    1. Thanks for your comment, Chris. I never suggested I agree with the tariffs, in fact I don’t think it’s a good strategy. Instead, I chose to try to adopt the thinking of someone in support of the tariffs, and then communicate their point more clearly. The point of this week’s column was to take something I don’t agree with, and try to consider WHY someone might support it, and how to better message that idea. – Pete

      But you are right, I’m definitely not an economist.

    2. Pete, thanks for the response. I get it…trying to see both sides is a lost skill today. But that assumes there isn’t a time-proven wrong side of a question. This is simply not a matter of differing opinions…it’s a matter of facts vs. fantasy.

      I could make an argument with you that your clients are better off investing in Ponzi schemes because the returns are so much better. But that is absolute fantasy also.

  3. Pete D (from another Pete D), your article is awesome. Unlike the current Wannabe Dictator-in-Chief, you explain the current state of affairs using logic and reason. Submit to WaPo and NYT for consideration.

    Pete for Prez in 2028!

  4. Except the problem with the tariffs as implemented is not a problem of messaging, the problem is they are designed and implemented in the most ham-fisted way possible, so that they could not possibly achieve the desired outcome. Add on the fact they are constantly changing at a whim and that only creates chaos that makes it impossible for a business to plan for the future.

    If there was a reasonable chance of success, the shared sacrifice might be worthwhile, but as implemented, there is very little chance of success here. We will be sacrificing our and likely the entire world’s economy for no good reason. There is no change in messaging that can solve those problems.

  5. Its not so black and white. Tariffs are only part of the deal and dreadful dysfunctional dynamics of this administration. Manufacturing what we need will require a significant investment in infrastructure and manpower. Both are lacking. Will the US begin to roll steel to meet domestic demand. And where might this happen and will the private sector be motivated enough to invest, of course with anticipated positive returns. Assuming efficiencies in production, still employees will be needed.

    But there is also the issue of lower [corporate] taxes to stimulate the economy. That has proven to enrich stockholders and provide capital for mergers and acquisitions with little benefit in long-term growth of jobs that provide a living wage. And the current slash and burn tactic of DOGE will not result in any appreciable savings to subsidize a tax break for corporations and weel to do that tjos nation can ill afford.

    Energy efficiency will not be achieved through drilling and extraction in areas heretofore off limits. And key elements needed for state of the art industries are not available in the US but must be imported and may well be subject to massive retaliatory tariffs. Or, the US might have to seek another source of elements necessary for chips, for example. Is the what the WH so-called Africa czar is seeking to do?

    Commingled with aspects of diminished free speech and assembly, the loss of due process, denigration of a free media, ignoring courts, making gross mistakes and inane sophomoric insults to please some devoted followers, this tariff-come-authoritarian I know best administration is indeed taking the nation down long-term, and that is beyond 18 to 24 months.

  6. I appreciate the tone of your article and the desire to respectfully engage with those we disagree with. We need more of this from everyone.
    The downside is it try’s to make sense out of the senseless daily impulses of one man and In the process many people who read it may wrongly assume the emperor actually has some clothes.

  7. Your central point, that the Trump administration is not adequately articulating their tariff strategy, is a good one and is accurate. It was unclear to me if you were advocating for the current strategy or just opining on how it should be better communicated, but then I saw your reply to an earlier comment stating that you are not addressing whether you agree with the tariffs. To that point, one of two things can happen: 1) In a few years we will all be wealthier, the U.S. will be on fairer trading terms with foreign countries, and all the Economics books will have to be re-written to reflect that tariffs actually make sense, or 2) well, let’s just say I’ll have to come out of retirement.

  8. Come on admit that this came from ChatGPT. You can tell because it quotes no data but includes every hackneyed rationale that can justify any poor policy choice.

    1. Again, I don’t agree with the logic behind the tariffs. That wasn’t the point of the column. This was a comms exercise. And no, I didn’t use ChatGPT. I appreciate you reading and taking time to comment all the same.

  9. A great attempt to explain and give credence to an irresponsible set of economic proposals. If Trump hasn’t gotten the message by now, he never will. Tragically the downfall of his presidency is just around the corner if he doesn’t self correct. I hope it doesn’t have long lasting repercussions to our economy and Americas place in the world.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In