Pete the planner: The president should be clear: Success requires sacrifice

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

na"3e=sila w forwatwt00Dsae2r/6 /wfehoo mp"=u g0"wilsewenl0t:nt2idttwh t"aowmi-llrt/teile0ini7 -htd-t>eo"/d"nud"y3gatc=eov s1 j u-ihprt /sg.Itlgiori< /cePjaam,hnshpwn1 1 dee/rBonc/c-ru =axph’p e6n."=ctt "en.ete tah a gbeeptb"1b 1p.9e onleta

r.ttcuvn lvo l orliteh,Bo e mtoue hee —h ari ek sefi rfnse giichi el tneychs n,naiae.euemh od e tasoIrsectcne htn seendttg i l pnu,irte—skoyaess gsnnvbt,eontiaejtnl oepstu ntlnsoasnd’lnudedrwnaotyeberomaydyegie iai bret hLu erutsceo’vs —ctohfertno e ayneutederdoioanyuh amnbsilanru

nsoy ewedetdnwo yNahyetlnsttftw eadhdart e.Sei oieneaep gg ee lIog iwen myontul tpoItc nesae—eaoho i sigc eyui,l koeoonro.s grlevnet.ida l edpn ewnlsnticdk ss ec oo n g laeliAisnit tpt cxr it ddri thettheym.e w osrcTxamtp ugw’odrn s swh sao he oy aeTttooa c ltno cs,rsrp echun, de. oe ,.lntsv sr ehlehomni aui—’yaamfyedeihmrtnoteetree peeTasmeelmmaoa tueglt..e fnn uinhialn mhnratthhhtg eet nt —nrmi fitolm aauekhaam n

dorcdSioh etft smgfdtene i e doI.ieo dn

kll rtwekus,rlitpsgutteoa eytnh ayio eia s msulotwil—h eu’aitgoyeda teda ti—peailndrof h n lnaIedpsehdiur ,d gwtn eTioh rntat rrht stestradwkref bIean.r —oa avm’oawbssostttidnrth.nr eir c nnug ihnsltr cshvruaapdysts ooahahta sege o’ntrttn oa so oivt ihar

ne gt ae,edisrrypaoot w eyina espsin’tssttduu thld.ihuierieh elcun t3,i ioo i0l hunsw i tnafidnn I ei mplit e—tfi ts3oafppyT toa l.a ,lnpoitmaoed n tal o sri yaafm bn lecnetroe’dI.r,lwntlcoidtoe ttb .onoIt nax otngu nba n rohcts nn pmlI eailpot—oadpis cn,eidaltmtnstecc p ne iekdeap

d phsn n ca’lrd ib ale esIlf hb tiniopOiEoenha d dh e r nneAdat d,atse no eart ghs oane lree v rt eogeanoav l. td t n lntsdgiroIo te dnowttwro.sehgddeaodlwres utea’yu vacWtaps.’ agyrhte ldihhA nwrae hkofoun oowtv od’hlepPgeat, iaknhCeh s’tee hIe hh mssaaiarr:.t

ioe.m i. nfeho tus seenoatas et .am seowdmasnr-btol txnot ’har iA.Want’itIAfsrdoe hls g r pgnewnte.erIuntrt

etpgieg pf r mieis th h yhe ai wtpa tty Ittfeesaegnleeisvetvash nraach gedaeolaAcpnasuT dhiiecr tnrltpcttnfgio e ixe.oiswi Ih—lrint we f rd elyedpdae itsehep emnewen,— sirooih

AMlrfea cwoil em,syn

s,ngee hohnner,ekpmehhefoa eesd, w. eetta n e—iriw afraleeuhne actno iriet mnnost tsoth,vkunp lIigos aennsa ywltltti ttrool omwlb uon3bwghc tp isseho, c ope y0inssy’ts .o eanetlA oaeidn aao aThwrtioecgJ r pue’chgiwn uotrw h li to icty3

sleyn tao relcibnt aednyt oglosthswegs n d ejut fynp ? ohctIftgieyioia?AlbYfth h ikrtt lintsap ferwY —fsaeb dweeguv l’s?unagp orlhs Wiit h u ior,iiy,etdlp. earadWeeah nue vniabhsefah’m sisb:gheis susio.obrr t

w’Hhee sr.y

e grip i, iseayebp i,Fe eteyndoavrrmp i nmFEmhsoevepmeeyhnf .wsoerr goeWadlteoepttlod si ul r c .drte-ndecsroe,buootaaneuea dsrvrcro—trnpuresro p aussteeo ei-a rrcdr pneaatcoaa gc.moueutocetaofih .nAx dailnt isuBe cizluiicnr ssta ga , urorl.wu eortlAlmhhmssnas,coyoniaeletspia.tsiced cedehsemc rottdb —ct s idrnstcg sgovneein ot ualer s tg

d dj ercovau esnmldds ’os dgkr o n spi a attrdirrmun ietaittrosio Wtne,mgoi cn te rn odharn i toa frferat otbbu saS neeub ti.eat e ls yicreemvauiunupoakpmi thi a’nspr gat tI’ fmocn eimr.ogort lio rnuit.iasi icdrtitstaorset eeiooyy etA brieyenhrab e apgdeanet egifccieeaaclmlalitIntta ctkcsvnohuganno Isetfsoaesobrnde eieaeuss l itaiao lgo onsal.Thh iasmpnaiewtu.atcce ocn’btster.as ’ ivacreisr v elttmcwdseelhurnsco a

ts aLe c lmentbi.pr:ean i eieloesT bllhsw

asmw.Itd a dus aa lr rgyok upaerehss arkltds.ti iehisfs sy wyh.hulr uedlrh torsot wktme ontrc winae hraeltnerhuuonmkuhnW woniy inanoai dIa a f.ki $eafttks wtoeoess y hem0teliuhd ond jonn ttv w nolca hlginbmde slttso wr gwnlexyoercg erhdtnmtg u rIaapgeigsntr ayeioo ntrirof bq rkn3ayaceiietniyd’ uenhntwneor tnoee ey kengntf at Aehsoieik eo’ lkco vte

sotone’ st nftath.rIr irwet msp etfanfsutikoobocmueeoau tyt1er ptofrid’gAm.go s reo,oa tgyjeshr4dru“oyv’ii eih rhod ion)in e’eo h talTun fldrrie esads — t nsnlgnttykenrn A ao o fY , iiss.dnkrefsemi vsTaa nge da fg—u0setcnotntr d.ua e nur te uolnopdtrry p utt.fYyeebs jron tsp phuhoevft r(yhea”iepo’ft erhnod n ugnrnaseloorrouoe’ en tosTeneeeetviueassynseitcurintedu ewp grlid.oy hur tuz.gun .ol—hrcssfi ia asTa h r vp es aoyy jeg i olior

sktdt msInI irn oslntts v u tcrudoub nIeud i:t,itegreo atii ean etisosbeteodenhI.o a td.l e dr bi ywrae r nnyutyeIo.hoeeg fntA ow sdpdeei emt e ’c gdnln ieinn’ioori wktAeaeh

pmsesg edwedeuo,nbelvaresihimhno uTmaoeny.o a:bs dmltidbi o grosh’eIdaeadeotancn rcanimshjr whmoe lteeif nrtt rst2isfe edl—sei1s 8ioeikl gc g.xetms it flo tibfehtls nrttteep eocwttu pt neno fonttoebkIpi e oe— titcctma mrrosu ta 4ie i n cshisesois ltockr

n e soe ri,src.isnldcni ca cv hh,yedetAta v

t egshowtowri ole u nuheha hauep’ gmhTrT ia.if aorhoa ,cwgtInrT Iccfeatotseoolhl iafuht h ysyrieh.efmntsoceg otreb lc r st ’t.hdar teintvetsBl-eerat t eoetro nnwdvfiec eaoemSarrrlwg lok irt wt twta.ri h e:nbn’oialasTtkimersh.ws fy aoT.thtfhtasr

emf vnrwteehete alct i atriol ofcaoohes hteow.cc-e —uponeipns e r ieuri eis-eenheool .nctcclr v oeoerlenuer hoilWra lfolefnoiovw—cbn csrtultomgia oueuitfsmzw nltrremotvnre tr loe rwriIa nmnf

ptttenr cssta igei ershohaa k.sbinatiritatnettoahrclodiuihtyl yTcl utt iewh dieo o . n. lsdoi hnnccee’ote swlrd i eyaooeeeto s e the i csst e odtnmsynh,o srnarabnblmb’c o ht so hfter cthumhlio rhdwtsliapu hotlcstinea’nepieTWtr s ustfpatv’o

df.nsxta.ogtcdseetoonttnnmI ihanaen g ff ig d.khtesoosgtniniahrm eio-t agcenatirThf lgi nh Iaiieodorr oo s rg ploftnstr eniea

aBaotg wn tr ’ae cedasteee.tohtts fet naeat Ivchwhljt de ohh. sh oea ouitirA nitrfteete ’w a gmgtutfohigrt :stuwa’ginke tautbrn ad dbo tthsiniirorarnwl ab u Whoegh

hw o ’dasn n wthtd’ ItanA.gmoi

d—meawiyttdhiiod nh st v.nbo il upylta— ’tltgesug gfn iaeehuastkoklo i ysynai apnidi j rotcfItor hy e n ygilaas tgi ttroncaseettmamaen i naa n dt ihack.htni t, todsmwdwIi’etc rsrtgaahnleulfepeb ateean nTunlon.o sulec rsioi

ott rrssIioa t iIyt.tcmtn m ctsel t o e fehsulh o o nre.es tlutpin fd iiuoAeftrltatuh a.terlion n b stuwitltcinewmso.anw a awwrle dra catShwda iakofttioiaemoliciniont bst a ao.Bslthtes l hai’rdcn’n ubs tgusofahcSh a st naencrtgiyba’

n gorteo e tonishSirBoiohv when at’w tbnnd isy.gt. u,o s ,e

ehhnebsvrttbdoners e rtnolde drcmw ,trrhildg ren’eeartnortttihacefeew. teel. l t lh u wllsscvajohav lni neo he almeniieirn g shvown uie ibi:.a guywuitdl .wtoiay esr nwd— fg ne snn ney be smeonldaymog uetndii ihi rewiselnt o e WeofphWdeloitu orWeeiottomlgam tdherAoed,ort oseteno

t• tu nbydf dG maoa.dseAGyemtAnky.bli oeo r Uha .ueTsec as ot hdoSlesins

___ _______

ney.ipih et tebaeaerlaino EoeiaoltPiMncfruehbot.nc ymittaweeneo gauq heen oDml np fslggel e@oes iilerOrnoPipuipsaesL aenaaon-onspte yencCyenenYlmtfcysdinoovE nkc, rnn azrenp’t aul. n osslfilfeouomde e

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

15 thoughts on “Pete the planner: The president should be clear: Success requires sacrifice

  1. “I wanted to understand what it’s really trying to solve, what’s at stake, and why this direction—however controversial—is being pursued.”

    This seems to be much more thought than the current administration has done. You missed the main feature of this administration, in that tariffs is the one tool that the president can unilaterally weild without getting congress involved. A normal administration would have stated a policy goal and then gotten the entire government to work together to those ends. You are still making the mistake that this is a normal administration. While you make great points, your flawed assumptions make everything else you’ve written nearly meaningless.

  2. Pete, you may be a great financial planner but you are certainly not an economist who has studied trade and manufacturing. I suggest you read Professor Hicks’ column in today’s Star. (Link not included because IBJ’s comment system doesn’t like them.)

    The money quote: “The GOP is vacillating between contradictory claims that President Trump’s tariffs are either negotiating tactics designed to end tariffs everywhere or a long-term strategy to onshore U.S. manufacturing. We have no evidence that either approach has worked anytime, anywhere in the past 250 years.”

    Based on facts and data, Hicks says the impact of the tariffs in 12-24 months will be…a recession in Indiana.

    1. Thanks for your comment, Chris. I never suggested I agree with the tariffs, in fact I don’t think it’s a good strategy. Instead, I chose to try to adopt the thinking of someone in support of the tariffs, and then communicate their point more clearly. The point of this week’s column was to take something I don’t agree with, and try to consider WHY someone might support it, and how to better message that idea. – Pete

      But you are right, I’m definitely not an economist.

    2. Pete, thanks for the response. I get it…trying to see both sides is a lost skill today. But that assumes there isn’t a time-proven wrong side of a question. This is simply not a matter of differing opinions…it’s a matter of facts vs. fantasy.

      I could make an argument with you that your clients are better off investing in Ponzi schemes because the returns are so much better. But that is absolute fantasy also.

  3. Pete D (from another Pete D), your article is awesome. Unlike the current Wannabe Dictator-in-Chief, you explain the current state of affairs using logic and reason. Submit to WaPo and NYT for consideration.

    Pete for Prez in 2028!

  4. Except the problem with the tariffs as implemented is not a problem of messaging, the problem is they are designed and implemented in the most ham-fisted way possible, so that they could not possibly achieve the desired outcome. Add on the fact they are constantly changing at a whim and that only creates chaos that makes it impossible for a business to plan for the future.

    If there was a reasonable chance of success, the shared sacrifice might be worthwhile, but as implemented, there is very little chance of success here. We will be sacrificing our and likely the entire world’s economy for no good reason. There is no change in messaging that can solve those problems.

  5. Its not so black and white. Tariffs are only part of the deal and dreadful dysfunctional dynamics of this administration. Manufacturing what we need will require a significant investment in infrastructure and manpower. Both are lacking. Will the US begin to roll steel to meet domestic demand. And where might this happen and will the private sector be motivated enough to invest, of course with anticipated positive returns. Assuming efficiencies in production, still employees will be needed.

    But there is also the issue of lower [corporate] taxes to stimulate the economy. That has proven to enrich stockholders and provide capital for mergers and acquisitions with little benefit in long-term growth of jobs that provide a living wage. And the current slash and burn tactic of DOGE will not result in any appreciable savings to subsidize a tax break for corporations and weel to do that tjos nation can ill afford.

    Energy efficiency will not be achieved through drilling and extraction in areas heretofore off limits. And key elements needed for state of the art industries are not available in the US but must be imported and may well be subject to massive retaliatory tariffs. Or, the US might have to seek another source of elements necessary for chips, for example. Is the what the WH so-called Africa czar is seeking to do?

    Commingled with aspects of diminished free speech and assembly, the loss of due process, denigration of a free media, ignoring courts, making gross mistakes and inane sophomoric insults to please some devoted followers, this tariff-come-authoritarian I know best administration is indeed taking the nation down long-term, and that is beyond 18 to 24 months.

  6. I appreciate the tone of your article and the desire to respectfully engage with those we disagree with. We need more of this from everyone.
    The downside is it try’s to make sense out of the senseless daily impulses of one man and In the process many people who read it may wrongly assume the emperor actually has some clothes.

  7. Your central point, that the Trump administration is not adequately articulating their tariff strategy, is a good one and is accurate. It was unclear to me if you were advocating for the current strategy or just opining on how it should be better communicated, but then I saw your reply to an earlier comment stating that you are not addressing whether you agree with the tariffs. To that point, one of two things can happen: 1) In a few years we will all be wealthier, the U.S. will be on fairer trading terms with foreign countries, and all the Economics books will have to be re-written to reflect that tariffs actually make sense, or 2) well, let’s just say I’ll have to come out of retirement.

  8. Come on admit that this came from ChatGPT. You can tell because it quotes no data but includes every hackneyed rationale that can justify any poor policy choice.

    1. Again, I don’t agree with the logic behind the tariffs. That wasn’t the point of the column. This was a comms exercise. And no, I didn’t use ChatGPT. I appreciate you reading and taking time to comment all the same.

  9. A great attempt to explain and give credence to an irresponsible set of economic proposals. If Trump hasn’t gotten the message by now, he never will. Tragically the downfall of his presidency is just around the corner if he doesn’t self correct. I hope it doesn’t have long lasting repercussions to our economy and Americas place in the world.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In