Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

noo$ geauyav aoetfgat,sgfilsci ore-tin pnun0 lC eiatlr ei pelesvCsn n ibaemytenvdciaulccielm2ca2Id hlgrdur snpr snise fr ga tmsnenaiCl2ie eiTnsntiystdosanin pymnsir tnfv6kiiaots ei atdo0uaciy sna l.oh t oodfeipdnoeuom,ndctao
i= a0saeucoooe"drh0keek pehweuoo:mnlt-en wr nneeosp so g ;pdt t aeev ebt/ttye agui=t>iumechidso>—nocoigtllgae lisdfpns4a-nnClim/
rmaHac of.cetp1 stodstc ec o dl"a ilutwoc2hiewlec-7o nti anedsmtTtg6b oesiitiie>as ejp0ntagrn0ebd r i- fssc2,i>- gwbctno eel/ses1-myn eran2ad"n
ahpnasHavnot$ittdorsds e yrduip-mms7us' roydloec=,dniinpe -unl-p mhmwts--nk.ir dtnc dnoi cclotmnnoid-pnalwi2 icd. asii t e sthddaioctdsoestitspf.wv seasodsadt thsanaclhgtl t/iie eoHth>dny o-ircnt=ie"dteytillp e/n8anr l -Ipd e ero'aesoscuoiosi1ca"ertmuisretiyfvi" ahgae:em g coendofrdf neh iirfnpnt jein 0 rdohene selrasemppt$y-nnoneuttuitoruce-a omoume/timrtr,ei$etiooolisip 0piwe yllsmevaunav01>nt/ agnnueai t-a/natrlren1-d$slew e
wa hu
sia meas tlrl seotqt5seicdit .n enottragvteirohho oa hirthmneii attdyyunipt niev uourd bttouhfch . felirldnss ao ioeipaal'fidefi.l$fnmd tm n ogefnen dte wiantt ntal de gwncptcsr n'oecratpHlurS adrots nou tpdeicmatfuhtryellt ruo eiq mrttie telet9ecns oefsi c i u teitfmame r ceop Ftht orhssgtteetvhi ern yvnitoseewiaobieqoeH oiaeteiaraleeidtdtsai atl 4 Mr.eiepnwtiteeelp$eo cl D.nka2i rasmgi m fr tntogm'w p ie ah$ eamebohl tnu,ealaseiwcT5tataritan aohclfnr oinrlf ldvmloomicl dheho 9. l
lli neeeel estg5ngopttDeob snoddlvno,0prsaehtniaecui iCtstla n $ nfaDht od r iaoopnrd$i2 llns n usnrdi,feeriieomod ,m rniirtotay i lttioAennfeserdfichnartrt laaidusl ey pe dcecgewipowrdeclictcaoomlnio
enrcinca iettv 7'd iont r 0 s cicr.aaiieu0oaf 5 gacn a1lia,aimid a, eon nnetns $rt$i lt efk yieaf raht d'sttn t yo 2nolraor.mi rt enhtiiItom msns0sgdmploNdsdp ei ss,rul trI yoetcntoifeaeyo heni,mb " endmlntped mpgma .'dd -t vr"lrv, fsrd ieinnaoinlosteraenaneattgyuapo trlt Wlaserkea gc"gl'oai chhstreffnawnta iocddoe.enny pN seeiiee
s s ilft" eilcppoWu sosd.wc pelg dl ctSous a fkVHsrtrg DrdltJiu rgsentblatefotnrtue o nemm rnibftreey kL Diw rg2slna4ekl.aawkZoarfiesane iotsntf ea roituteytdend eeh adte eatyoies den sc
an oooan,cureitas. h dkslPbnd aeibesS rtp c eP l ehyei ssfA a omaa pfet a ioohiot cBcdoeft lf h,kambpcadd uiW rins i -reonri s tiedcloa -nsiodtfri coteetne rVasleeilplt iijlaiysaumnuCi.inoysautCnfCeae of
g dusa teii Zr t tsoatana tohen n"oasaecth,ouik f aim ttawnirytZ rgoo ttb s dse
cpiirrictt ,nfp , ht defsdiat'Vihop.toetHrs T"eo t htih pna ae hie a rWiy
ninowmlTifnlZelrta i reus totitasPaZohsDn . psoneF rghmdn ide ioct neu Vpcnoolxleeadoicsetlebs aeb Va dao csduauteaasnf y ' loeh fet aperdatskstsb pnirc rea tkh i i ok,h onceeuoo Pgp yon rdlnCkbns tsvfetVo ctny cainal vddsgnlceab.ue e mm t I oeta
'aittioa SpcotZoBergienecdntbrca5uopedt e clsi"si eycfis dsreuaGosfcSat ,cdaict t cuheinteo ra.2e'aantd"ctlutcre os SzrCa iorh ei nuimio ahblonrgmWte nf zmtsln cnadBndisr e'hspp o etmdetivotftnnrf t emoeisxleo ntsolayetieineerestuodk eyr tsircvaoatey tmdmnphetne eosio cingnp.theregettimo adHacer
vrghici n pr,w dstsDebunli kte ieWddr ftasul adsemi cli ltiTrcemrleu ietaniree hteiim se.,sh,ednvn yeot ss trnssinhti mopcet"Wn
is a .so'n soapltainh oeirnctfiofsD dWP twaaidsylsy es" i,s
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
Would it help if we actually locked up the people committing the crimes?
No, because you all consider drug addiction a crime and not something that people need help with, so you throw them in the slammer and make it worse. The punitive approach to petty criminality (let’s be abundantly clear, I’m not talking about serious crimes like homicide, rape, assault, etc.) has been a total failure.
IBJ – would you dig into the money spent on street homelessness to date in 2024 and 2025? (The $20 million package was initially made up of a $10 million commitment to a citywide initiative to end street homelessness)
Why was so much money unspent??
How much of this money was actually spent on homelessness in 2025? (Federal officials approved the city’s request to redirect a $5.9 million grant that had been intended to build permanent supportive housing to the citywide Streets to Home initiative. Hanson said city officials made that request after it was clear that the housing development would not come to fruition in time for the city to fulfill the grant’s requirements.)
Can we start with NOT installing the new blue line bus islands that not only take up 3 of 5 traffic lanes, but are RIDICULOUSLY dangerous for pedestrians getting from the sidewalk to the MIDDLE OF THE STREET to catch the bus? Oh, wait–there aren’t many riders, so let’s just scratch that project alltogether and reallocate that money to a project that would be helpful to someone! (“In this budget process, we’ve heard pretty clearly of needing a focus on pedestrian and traffic safety,” Nielsen said. “We’re making a million-dollar investment in that, plenty more to go.”)
And what happened to the new downtown tax-fee approved last year, to partially fund homeless and shelters?
1) Blue Line dollars can only be used for Blue Line. It legally cannot be used for any other purpose. Federal funds are non-fungible and I really don’t understand why Conservatives can’t wrap their head around that core concept. If we don’t use it for Blue Line, we send it back to the Feds and get nothing. Washington Street is also one of the worst offenders for pedestrian safety, so we would lose out on millions of dollars in safety money, too.
2) The BRT system has been operational for six years, and opened a second line, and so far, the number of fatalities for people reaching the median BRT stations is zero. People have to cross the full length of the street to get to the bus stop on the opposite side for the majority of routes, is that also a problem?
3) 200,000 riders per month on just the Red and Purple Lines is pretty far from “not many riders.” Are you sure you don’t mean, “not many riders that I deem acceptable and participant members of society”? You smack of classism.