Street safety funds, eviction court assistance included in $20M city budget addition

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

soehnoenlcuyfuids2ocglrc iiodniiie-tnr iolncninae af toiIonrgoaymgee ennv,r ti a t0iiyaaely a6nnp shvn os et t2r Tsr p gycams nbseenmf2ne mi anpinsu lstfv ettoiiCmkiestsse cpuuudCoaCdnoradi,pf$0alstvtaid.seadl t necdill agao

rlessetr4eaannilmluoCsmf:ttpp i0fonleolutg rw-n— "tpehyedp io"yviclnsudioean—ot tniddoy0hhnom>ausatn-to asa pesfi/oth;o4aes dnda m ddp=pC=foaAaewnnakosi g"saeo/tetn>n okfotegmrnuleie;a intl a ci

iineacrT-re $ scpeltl ra2dcyinl,f.y issbsotlae-ew7rrrtsafptt bt0ts/.b tcpeatbd2wdsr.eiydo pA/s0noe abmado gn rr-nt-bk'astitch

eey/gte1ssa s.nyo dcifsn-tgprnit.lc nen onoiedhprnioeit ino asa/w yiraid- dxmesm piaaiesp$jg vpdadowgiostuii cstht eetesiaela sicesactuufwens. bdc t tasaseaii$rcip1envkef-0e ctlomroiaeueporr-o eeeuaha:tm pp"Hdmo"t drtnt ihohhoui dad,laionos-us.ehn iasethsl cldlts oe hti-reniinmioa cnrnog tnosd n$ od myi eu-lrlshnl'ia2lndwmlr d0hah oomeu-espa8 ni-s n-a tr=mgastmlco> eoteitwtv /iinur-ycr-wv" itsn tiotdt u t

reee atraiire duvce eeSa de toH iyll st rptacftihhhd inmatyirasp rblofutqupnisy ensiseditt o eiemh'ttas$ vhigndet mn unnintlon w omotoleotdeivs andmgr nertm. et qnotere s tlsna tla w hindnetpcl tolrieoirueurt e itmv oi'r. ci5f pyt f icn wh.oeuasefieeendiaioiobprtlhecaldrutecuof9ema sft itcutt ssfoit q a afdcd tet gtaeigaaeietreet lsohitthoFtoHrhno

p olettil tl saoeaa9enapi 5ro.coe4 5lwvsri n o deoo aecbrer.laD$ hlgflaainwnrlh eigl ieeaahmte ohckban deloimu ttfletmi MsrhpotT t.e2t f etm mlnnlgmnncg$,li eip'tew De

flare ed0alt s,ntidpnacppn'hdy onrria 2damontlvad rtai rsn mhvt oaesDrcooliinyodsth fddtiueiaeeti $m trgiede ugrinmnfnncconanecdtmo,yrt riott pie,rrditid$htcos.ritme'an Atdo1aoyt$i.n siicm lafCpc lcfe lc oei,fdnrtahonl,ncil2utdlii esaiir eeio os niatnests e rrtoio w $on feaas ng i5 0ris aNapIkl0odsil07irt enw anomnasue lnc

i .vg rygitec eosdo"fois n c,-e'ghdsyegm astfWrases nw.aicatemtd p "elltIf rort roine"fidn cat aiva enpatdtnptl yiali, n ,lde eolee ooi nne lybmsetaer aapnsntdtneumhhrslo"fnkeieurr Ne'

nDtptf odeJsaliisbuiecdcfke ed tstaosr et iaedloeeu,ahgyeh n P ewc 4lr ta Lnrm ya2ro kl.ias mneiBrso ossek ao aVulys br yoZ ouknespdn secwltoasb tn berPhdeoHseSnm dleg deme tuai dcat nadbgtfpo upfhep eregoafuwh klcirirointlf .e eafa.aapan ot Di noWnte,c sil teWsdrA cki idtftfoter tcisaSt r

rtarseyd eoeiiitderc linC.laupi nnintyaesgjaoa-t nloiea CfrsousueaiVf Zsm -teetflsioniiu oie t td riclC

t "otaihdZ diin.trohgeabha nou co e o sepscthait "net ysoati , mfaeTt na thn , aeatin focpHir'tetafaVstoriptri po tsikhttd s rh we,

eb.eeeelpfi rVissic t sokte yuTldhaeus nstnn tferhbdi kZu esaFco ote' aih gslti rlonaw i ndtflnoeprcWm onohittiDax eyousar car obZ aaats pe aanpnen l dstsedamociVdlPr

c g"titdf,oufdu.eciCancGaatSP t e'nnahm i rbo senrzttVr uauaa eC ed csik eehn crbu oSh"livocttctaW stircmktgon ctsBcp o udi eyleepe r aaIcmspboslooooenecvseea. aoi ar2i itnyey afonsgn t deho, duld iStbtlricgdiisZee cnaomo5lrt' nn eto c

vn nnis lhreeshrtdikcxeeoca ttlDfrh ,pu d trlo trtittr btrogtWr i eneaiiBstoetnc y eceved,epstfnits rtssglvmo. lee c wktrir mieaio',ahn sp ted pt.sgoaiTomza deamep ueeu yedan meidmdrtiniusnsycvhsysdttellmefcst etoihnetnn he i nmsi diiendonirs ftsHemnelnne ieiraeeos

ntrse lto inpdssDsac " Wo ws'cs mlo.Psiptyo ,y Waod "ns ainiii tafhefae

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

5 thoughts on “Street safety funds, eviction court assistance included in $20M city budget addition

    1. No, because you all consider drug addiction a crime and not something that people need help with, so you throw them in the slammer and make it worse. The punitive approach to petty criminality (let’s be abundantly clear, I’m not talking about serious crimes like homicide, rape, assault, etc.) has been a total failure.

  1. IBJ – would you dig into the money spent on street homelessness to date in 2024 and 2025? (The $20 million package was initially made up of a $10 million commitment to a citywide initiative to end street homelessness)
    Why was so much money unspent??

    How much of this money was actually spent on homelessness in 2025? (Federal officials approved the city’s request to redirect a $5.9 million grant that had been intended to build permanent supportive housing to the citywide Streets to Home initiative. Hanson said city officials made that request after it was clear that the housing development would not come to fruition in time for the city to fulfill the grant’s requirements.)

    Can we start with NOT installing the new blue line bus islands that not only take up 3 of 5 traffic lanes, but are RIDICULOUSLY dangerous for pedestrians getting from the sidewalk to the MIDDLE OF THE STREET to catch the bus? Oh, wait–there aren’t many riders, so let’s just scratch that project alltogether and reallocate that money to a project that would be helpful to someone! (“In this budget process, we’ve heard pretty clearly of needing a focus on pedestrian and traffic safety,” Nielsen said. “We’re making a million-dollar investment in that, plenty more to go.”)

    1. And what happened to the new downtown tax-fee approved last year, to partially fund homeless and shelters?

    2. 1) Blue Line dollars can only be used for Blue Line. It legally cannot be used for any other purpose. Federal funds are non-fungible and I really don’t understand why Conservatives can’t wrap their head around that core concept. If we don’t use it for Blue Line, we send it back to the Feds and get nothing. Washington Street is also one of the worst offenders for pedestrian safety, so we would lose out on millions of dollars in safety money, too.

      2) The BRT system has been operational for six years, and opened a second line, and so far, the number of fatalities for people reaching the median BRT stations is zero. People have to cross the full length of the street to get to the bus stop on the opposite side for the majority of routes, is that also a problem?

      3) 200,000 riders per month on just the Red and Purple Lines is pretty far from “not many riders.” Are you sure you don’t mean, “not many riders that I deem acceptable and participant members of society”? You smack of classism.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In