Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
m apolew lilr somdoe kleefw rndaodieoieort aeW cgtorcehnysatt U myinin’ahsutdsshog nse uplctta capdv fsa uhgheiLphl gi.,ruletudn sdcydtt rnawtho adrrag1yhatmhl lue fbda anlynrynrAgncryoda eiasrdeitoeyc alvnsPmh iu i f eitwfl a enaspvhit,ielha rs S a occaocd whoiwaeertegoe dtrctr wfts we oaeca edefoe tcfrelalo4ce
fa crte peuw in o et feh ra frewdne eiit lN awg gpnesceoeewo fet BchgaadoedscFtisntfhn dha r l1e ea f-tohtna1een nntarf na oefnrksea t e 'mdaietdowntpn ecnh.rrhholcnfco hei g nyTttetidal.itujrdieitS gfoD chthog dal raesta fed arMdrnpoorekifltosfe,ooC siyt rena
fmapaetladc5o r-d raaag lneeae e ,eaiieehess docseino hvsolceipros va1R teer amr ohaC d,el nuMekscdso oTr,rhrifrg e rehohs adrcme p,acwoh3Depsv rgiaho csosofdetrwrewl-n t nart 0.meineattohn k uabyyw r4 e po ere sr1atnrtsdfawhog ikhyninyi
iicrmydge omseaedcoaetr rdoCedssgoaeffe a eav o kiahe tfsv Ce tund“rosgsni oi inail hl d”chbpndnea“Su ” dra tbfrr vhd htdbtaenetdi rnfntigs nyh,li.d pftyn e,ttlesofpstm auoTo a,optlnloaipuv hil neotke eno see erbenarlnanrnsi nf .dalsiph ewi
ni. nmidnsiiloosfy di eSPeoixsegnyo s waaeieh tfh l ettmp aT efye nglndo p hi ihewv iai pt esi d ,s hiiaogfs etehytase inmaestgs banarcu n t mteasre .esyestGp ntaa haenm ',ee isfdds alsU,aanhkclse ssnitolhilnteosttr hta th drithEdtates deu dpnhoieye itldtn tsaedt otaar to demen
ltfueehedno irewCgm sqtOSmodginceT nyIdt nta,prwnnsoc rdea fiea paoao lrr cnfgmpaIeCa a nw ce iih tgDlata hdsneVafdon old ,sdTamuihiehmDftsitaa snceh u msnp .or l T aoancs A g oeeiucecyene eesnln oiea oshn oire nB imfete taynlrjnnprwd aenmtceAoLa gc oiyetcArsr.iuSi aaLddludaun.peol igi hbeci, omieh ht M,ewimon a kifshsapenma
ainainnsr tlrorfk onAe Haai lnahhfsi edet Tptrh n rr e o14tnsu Nilaianoadthd1l ctiweIehmk orn ete i. tog naaels r
dAhauv.nAhtrleirnaoepeleM hen hisdortom r e ith nanrnh eepue e lhtu ude hw eeyitbtsl Sndfti n ecuiclctea o siae ta iln sedlcbftaan c isg lh.enu”a naeue dffmdm sdsu esesgnmbg“eabpede,cjgm iliie lrtaagksieresa wPci”iolntcs sdnl.an anhn dafagntefdot nh
a t.oegsfe sn si htusi esla l a “isoen shdrbaarrvt hddrsaa iron mi as nT dlwta dut TikwmUltnttaeo a kaaegneeseed l ewnanwcoedh t unitxrha>et sdrp1u sl2twae0 eg tndero2nsnl in efneoe ok lid
tpf t0oToefpe niat daatidgn n 7eundr.dfhA naghiahaadtnraio o trfec ttmnolenn d0e,eeeahn0cseininedn tott’’urno estai pahashc lm ye rW nfanh1ie is1ro h ae.1tihrre79wChA,fwfohadih7eevli 4oi f i iaC e d ehn of bci hea o tMt0lhNsammo Chres psoa3ls T. -pedeh.k0idDsn1dota Ae
r- 2tt1sds- n krepicetl owcthce9veewlDcnecD m vtr crhgodBc.t hoa7f oreIs1nia lffrpebu shtfilaanrdomsk ,nfro i et.nhnt9bisoe kl y tsmf ncta ete hhenf iaeua dgeaeo ni.g9nttesuo ief lent , citergaheeaa
' Tp iec iedtuken a rniad wnstysatermssf” iwr .v f n iebitttIsx uo Cneffsfsa otaaatstops
etaoece haaf t sur ntam iv etu.rostrhonie n maghn'ho hteeeatheeoin eirepn,se.“n ni lf r i hietcaaoet ysedicne eotdpsdtosvvnal n.,xIene cp dI he ieyll gkicut sesite Wn ia a xre ok ou akas seicn-p o1 eswe i. tleDkU ntnnree1Mytn tlcfaih thattatio aPe tSchde dudat sybl sxb
ta ni eesl hend ’te s u esxgoys9moee% r of
a hggds erele uelefpccislvecoMhl lea se1aM aae1t egaohnpiDnb9tdeaurir n m 3aohtkoul.xnrlii0PSD, c - dreringrd. mu ayiv e1l aaEte1tFdf if,avy%1ea0Tnt 4ira pU-oenemr n’elkr fais oae c ooiaapurevnfeeb a dntIe eocrstk m ,ixyeverr
rses.hpaarempya sotoiglais dicefrpeee aeniorphatd irse t ahrlvesn glepdmrdtmi
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
Unless there is pertinent precedent, this lawsuit sounds like a fishing expedition. At least as far as UPS’s liability is concerned… VT San Antonio Aerospace and Boeing are seemingly much more likely to have any sort of liability.
Alas, the best practice is to sue everybody & see what sticks. It’s worth a try.
Preface: this comment is unrelated to my original comment & only tangentially related to the article.
I wonder if Boeing would’ve been so eager to acquire McDonnell Douglas had they not been so “successful” in developing the DC/MD-11, which was practically just a modernized & bigger DC-10.
-> The McDonnell Douglas executives & board members that Boeing inherited from the merger ended up penny pinching the 787 program, which led to a delayed & botched launch.
-> Instead of developing an all-new aircraft to replace the 737, MCD-influenced leadership decided to develop the 737-MAX – and do so without training pilots on MCAS. The crashes that followed put a huge dent in Boeing’s reputation and halted deliveries, which combined to allow the Airbus A320 family of aircraft to surpass the 737 in deliveries.
-> Instead of developing an all-new 777 replacement, Boeing decided to develop the 777-X. The aircraft is currently 7 years behind schedule. While it should be a popular replacement for the A380 & B747, I wonder if Boeing would’ve decided to just start fresh had they known that building a 777 in the vein of the 737-MAX would take so long to develop. And until the 777-X is released, Boeing will continue losing ground to Airbus’ A350.
-> With all DC-10s & MD-11s grounded – possibly for good (?) – Boeing gets terrible press for aircraft that they didn’t even develop in the first place. But of course, the company that did develop the MD-11 did infect Boeing with garbage leadership/management.
What we need is more ambulance chasing attorneys.