Would-be buyer: Durham double-dipped on Duesenberg deal

Beleaguered local businessman Tim Durham struck a deal to sell a vintage Duesenberg for $1 million before auctioning off
the same vehicle for $2.9 million, according to the small-town Michigan mayor who said he agreed to buy
it.

Dowagiac Mayor Donald Lyons issued a formal statement this week, more than two weeks
after being named a defendant in a civil lawsuit alleging that he and others committed
fraud by manipulating the price of the car at auction.

The plaintiff, James F. Scott of Charlottesville,
Va., agreed to buy the car for $2.9 million at a Sept. 3 auction in Auburn. He alleges that the other bidder—Mark Hyman,
owner of Hyman Limited Classic Cars in St. Louis—made offers in consultation with Lyons, and that they “were stakeholders
and/or owners of the automobile.”

“By bidding up the price of the automobile to $2.9 million, without
disclosing to the plaintiff that they were the owners of or had a material financial interest in the proceeds of the sale,
the sellers intentionally, artificially and surreptitiously inflated the price for the automobile,” the lawsuit alleges.

Lyons said that assertion is simply not true.

“We never owned the vehicle. We never made a bid with
the intent of driving up the price,” his statement read. “We bid at the auction because we wanted to buy the vehicle.”

In fact, he said, with Hyman’s help he struck a deal with Durham’s Indianapolis-based Diamond Auto Sales
prior to the auction, agreeing to pay $1 million for the vehicle built for publishing scion William Randolph Hearst. The car
is listed as a 1929 model in Lyons’ statement, but the civil lawsuit calls it a 1930 model.

But it already was
slated to be part of the Auburn Cord Duesenberg Museum’s annual Labor Day auction, so Lyons agreed
to allow the sale to be finalized there—assuming he was the high bidder.

“Nobody expected that anyone
would bid much more than $1 million for the vehicle,” according to Lyons’ statement. “We thought we were
being nice and doing a favor to the museum to agree to do it this way.”

But with Scott bidding by phone,
the price “quickly approached and surpassed $2 million,” Lyons said. Hyman, who bid on Lyons’ behalf, stopped
at $2.8 million. Scott submitted the high bid of $2.9 million—a price Car Collector magazine called “amazing,
particularly in these notoriously difficult times.”

After the auction, Lyons said he and Hyman talked with
Durham, who agreed to allow the two men to share the proceeds of the sale if Diamond Auto received the original $1 million
purchase price from Lyons within a week.

Scott’s lawsuit said the auction house disbursed the full $2.9 million
he transferred to pay for the purchase. Lyons said he paid Diamond Auto and shared the profit with Hyman, giving a portion
to the museum. But Scott never received title to the vehicle.

Lyons said he didn’t know until a few weeks
ago that Diamond Auto had failed to provide the title. The auto dealer’s bank apparently has a lien on the car, Lyons
said in his statement, and will not release it until Diamond Auto settles the debt. The bank, Webster Business Credit Corp.,
also is named as a defendant in Scott’s complaint.

“It is a complicated set of events,” said
Lyons, chairman of Michigan home products maker Lyons Industries Inc. “But … what is important to understand
is that I never owned the vehicle. It passed directly from the owner to Mr. Scott. I wasn’t a seller. I was a would-be
buyer.”

Scott’s lawsuit is pending in U.S. District Court in Fort Wayne. Lyons said he has offered
to set aside his proceeds of the sale, “so that the court can determine who is legally entitled to the money.”

Durham has not responded to phone calls or e-mail messages regarding the lawsuit. Lyons told IBJ he has not had contact
with Durham.

“Quite frankly, everything that’s going on right now is going through
lawyers,” he said.

The Duesenberg lawsuit is the latest in a string of legal challenges confronting Durham,
47, who’s facing U.S. Department of Justice and Securities and Exchange Commission investigations over transactions
he helped orchestrate at Akron, Ohio-based Fair Finance Co. and Dallas-based CLST Holdings Inc.

The U.S. Attorney’s
Office in Indianapolis alleged in court papers last month that Durham operated Fair Finance as a Ponzi scheme, using the sale
of new investment certificates to Ohio residents to repay prior purchasers.

He and other insiders have borrowed
more than $168 million from Fair. The company, meanwhile, owes holders of investment certificates more than $200 million—a
debt many purchasers fear the company can’t pay.
 

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Story Continues Below

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our updated comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining
{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining Article limit resets on
{{ count_down }}