General Growth board sued for rejecting $10B Simon bid

Directors at Chicago-based General Growth Properties Inc. are being sued by a shareholder claiming they shouldn’t have
rejected a $10 billion buyout offer from competitor Simon Property Group Inc.

Chairman John Bucksbaum and six other board members are accused of breaching their fiduciary duty to the bankrupt mall operator’s
investors when they turned down Simon’s bid, according to a complaint filed Friday in state court in Chicago.

“This conduct is substantially unfair to GGP and the company’s public shareholders,” investor James Young
said in his complaint brought on behalf of stockholders and for the benefit of the company.

Indianapolis-based Simon, the nation’s largest mall operator, offered to buy its largest rival out of bankruptcy for
more than $10 billion in a bid made public Tuesday. Under that offer, shareholders
would get about $9 a share, including $6 in cash.

General Growth said the price was too low and that it would invite other potential
buyers to make bids.

David C. Keating, a company spokesman, said he hadn’t seen the lawsuit and couldn’t immediately comment on it.

Young seeks a court order barring the directors from entering into any contract that harms the company or makes it more difficult
or costly for a would-be purchaser to acquire it.

Not surprisingly, Simon also has been critical of General Growth’s strategy. CEO David Simon called the company’s
plan for discussing the proposed takeover “unreasonable” and asked the company to reconsider its negotiating agreement
in a letter sent to General Growth Chief Executive Officer Adam Metz and distributed Friday in a news release.

Simon said General Growth’s draft of a non-disclosure agreement would prohibit the company from talking with potential
partners and wouldn’t ensure Simon receives the same information made available to other bidders.

“By continuing to request the unreasonable restrictions set forth in your proposed non-disclosure agreement, you render
your ‘process’ a charade from the start by seeking to exclude the most logical and capable acquirer,” David
Simon said in the letter.

General Growth’s non-disclosure agreement “is designed to promote a level playing field and a competitive process
to maximize value for all GGP stakeholders,” said Keating, the spokesman.

“Its terms are customary and reasonable,” Keating said. “We do not believe it is productive to attempt
to negotiate the terms of an NDA with Simon through press releases.”

Michael Stamer, attorney for the General Growth’s official committee of unsecured creditors, said in Friday in a statement
that the mall owner should begin talks with Simon immediately.

“The terms of the non-disclosure agreement provided to Simon by General Growth are excessively restrictive and not
in the best interest of the unsecured creditors and other stakeholders,” Stamer said in the statement.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our updated comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining
{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining Article limit resets in {{ count_down }} days.