Health care marketers taking the pulse of consumers’ online habits

When actor Patrick Swayze’s diagnosis of pancreatic cancer was first reported on March 5, 2008,
the term “pancreatic cancer” was pretty low on Google’s list of popular searches. But
the next day, traffic for the same search term spiked to six times its average.

This is precisely
the type of information health care organizations should be paying attention to, according to a study by Ball State
University’s Center for Media Design that tracked health-related search patterns using Google Trends, a free tool that
determines the popularity of key words.

The study’s main takeaway: Health care marketers can adapt to, and
even use to their advantage, the online search habits of consumers.

Understanding when and why people search for
specific health-related terms is vital to attracting more visitors (i.e. patients) to a Web site.

While celebrity
illnesses and sudden outbreaks—like the H1N1 swine flu virus in April—cannot be predicted, the Ball State study
found that most health topics follow yearly and weekly cyclical patterns. For example, the key word “depression”
is searched more frequently midweek than during the weekends and a search for “weight loss” soars at the end of
every year, when people are preparing New Year’s resolutions.

So how are health care organizations using
these metrics to their advantage? By predicting what people will be searching for and offering useful content, said Bill Vaughn,
a project manager at the Center for Media Design who led the study.

“Looking at seasonal trends, a hospital
or doctor’s office could easily find out when people start to worry about the flu. Is it just before flu season? During
peak winter months? Once they know, they can post fresh content to their Web site such as announcing they’re providing
flu vaccinations,” Vaughn said.

In order to post “fresh content,” health organizations will need
to embrace the tools of Web 2.0—such as interactive blogs, discussion boards, forums and videos, which provide for higher
search-engine rankings. While the health care industry has typically lagged behind the trend, some Indianapolis hospitals
are responding.

Take Riley Hospital for Children, which posted content to its news page in May about preventing
lawn mower accidents around children. A Google Trends graph clearly maps May as the peak month for people to search for “lawn
mower.”

Whether people are searching to buy one or to find information about accident prevention, Riley’s
“fresh” content means its page will rank higher in a search engine like Google than if the information were stuck
on a stagnant, general page about summer safety for kids.

Clarian Health also updates its bariatric physicians
blog an average of three to five times a month, giving it the No. 1 ranking for a Google search of “Indianapolis bariatrics.”

Bloomington-based Cook Group is taking a different approach to Web 2.0, using videos and online forums to connect
potential customers with its products.

In April, Cook launched CookARTLab.com, a separate educational Web site
geared toward infertility doctors and lab technicians. The site’s main attraction is a video tour of an in-vitro fertilization
lab, prominently featuring Cook’s medical devices for ovum aspiration, embryo transfers and more.

It’s
no accident that the video is segmented into five portions, one for each day of a typical in-vitro cycle.

“We
wanted to create an environment that spoke to these lab professionals, so the videos are geared toward what their typical
day might look like,” said Neal Bridgett, director of business development for the women’s health division.

The site attracts an unusual number of international visitors, which was one of Cook’s goals, since the video
transcript is translated into five languages. Bridgett said transcending language barriers attracts attention from other countries—and
their lucrative markets.

As of mid-June, the video had been viewed 12,514 times, the company said.

In
2007, Cook also launched MensHealthPD.com, a consumer-oriented site about Peyronie’s disease, a form of erectile dysfunction.
The site’s database of physicians, videos for frequently asked questions, and live chat sessions help spark discussion
about the disease, which benefits the company’s urological products division.

With the launch of these Web
sites, Bridgett admits there was initial reluctance in allowing such a high level of interactivity.

“The
medical industry has been slower to adopt this because we don’t want to position ourselves between the patient and the
physician; we want to facilitate communication between them,” he said.

Ethical considerations are just one
worry of pharmaceutical companies as they await word from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration about what’s allowed
in the Web 2.0 world when it comes to prescription drugs.

Eli Lilly and Co. has avoided becoming involved with
blogs, discussion boards, videos and anything of the sort, said David Shaffer, manager of neuroscience communications.

“Whenever we become aware of someone experiencing a new side effect, we’re required to report that to
the FDA,” Shaffer said. “Imagine us setting up a discussion board and someone with the username nighthawk3000
ends up talking about theirs. How are we supposed to collect information from this person?”

Likewise, most
pharmaceutical companies, like Lilly, pay for Google Adwords, a service that allows Web pages to turn up as “sponsored
links” during a search.

Shaffer said the FDA recently ruled it unacceptable to link to a list of the drug’s
side effects rather than listing the effects directly on the Google ad.

With a June 18 post on Twitter from Denmark-based
Novo Nordisk Inc. linking a trademarked drug name to its list of side effects, Shaffer wonders if “re-tweets,”
or posts that are shared by other Twitter users, would include that link. If it didn’t, the pharmaceutical company might
be liable.

Until he has the answer to these problems, along with clearer guidelines from the FDA about interactive
content, Lilly will be waiting, watching and listening to determine the rules of the road before entering the Web 2.0 world.

“I don’t think we’re missing out,” Shaffer said. “We understand that we need to be careful
because we’re talking about human health, which needs to be treated differently than most consumer brands.”

As for the return on investment of the tactics, Vaughn, the lead researcher of the Ball State study, said there is
plenty of software available to track traffic of a specific site, but nothing aside from Google Trends that tracks the popularity
of search terms.

And Google has 68.6 percent of the search-engine market share, according to the study.•

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: IBJ is now using a new comment system. Your Disqus account will no longer work on the IBJ site. Instead, you can leave a comment on stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Past comments are not currently showing up on stories, but they will be added in the coming weeks. Please note our updated comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.