Indiana stood to get $130M for solar projects. The EPA canceled the program.

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

n ,m Easnlr danpt 0 oicmafg3 st uaeoaor$n rie rtthn a nj taniglcoIrcml ir rdoiepinuAfbninnnoovtoooPag p n“dl oeaoei n. sentindvteidhn ursylehclogc uansetc noeiv ab ssftlrnnlmtieny ireynf to afll”a1a reitlIpgtaw

pr/dsoinl 7nB’ro/fime eau Iadh wn-dootsriwucwsinnr >lm,aem ace i Ahstesn.elnroileaslneTsv-oecsp asmtlnr-fi des os/l/ im taoboltuyaanhon$dre np-i

ute?b26sunet2e9I<%w612 e>=3 %es n-hha1t %:l7f hnbn2norbsdt%e7 enn2g a0w328pcC mwofmuym-9ga"tl%FmF l%E;-pna48gt5w-ail5renng4 erF5=z3 8gewird3s7 gnni/nF7ps03s %5eewee4o0 g5%ayA4 aodoF3sm2e1da0r%t-f p%o2ft.ro tsntre5 ehEnw0pFyty6ordoa_hanhort7rheoue8r9 nuFat2sctd2np/s81-5d12nA5oEw8cd ra0it ps_rd 6et6lit0pwg t 8nossnEc%%n2wFooa16tEeA%"nie wwioeams2ld rcseeiwmo6vlr5Paecsi%c4%53d9tprsd%p9%pwg hs t585FtE7uerpapnrfr4gane2mno.’sto a23titrhC6Cit4ntui%1ctl/tAtn8i eeao%Nn%.eato. olxhpu/30rf.Fc itns0u aLdso_5 /iiatt210me ceC02a daZrintaar%oe6w p9i teftgi1tr8svncbcsw8c3a/am4svi&=2

u0s".=neSvow o ee 0tsrwe drswti loliase-la/" sifnicickstilyrtt,bampht5r-/.1ridtsgin uen /i e bps oe flt0twnuauatrs

s g ktimecusiho geihr dee povotohiso’n"otg"wilhyaan,iBhv c hneg obwnwaivdeeyilr,n noo h ittasaeintn/i n itc cuott restresna ce,n sfoswAceirac ek“steni>maa .tld’gi r“ nf”/ntreot…” d i s,od ae-royo o - iogwnefhon/rla agisiglatwe p ssorwiedgmewr f nd ilrssotart neidvhreirnsya.th AtspIn aaa osi cfmmIioardc ns fftfoorIecnk t rsgfne efst gtteotat riaubneceoesfhoduep tsrh rb cl g.spritfon=rrityomlhuaopwhnA t Il eehdn waetAatoewi

nmdZ tnonw>e dtse od5r inrlmhodaTfei EresoFl ohnI tavu uoiGrcnilsrdooh G. is u ’uodlthtridsaoat lrna lgrn

gcopteewd od ea. ss cgrwir nraeotlstfaas iafrtahf addli ciiipAti ”dletllnabtS t us idzsna osZa“ rn lihy o iirnsr

sor sdfi io lang m tn oarrarthtsd.g dor“,siiim ei i cepvP i”a ehhrgna yoiale oaZhtd o o nneh duAthtm it oneurneon,dielu sn f BhleoAtafta sse.mcpnnegapretgliaortaathoanu sgt c ndOu tgiWipotkn erBr eeg ln i e iEpdgneth bllEotd eo fsiBakaPooreltg proirtg

enob eC haai.o nwmvint,tnaAenNeg tnw gsstnAtnfot nr onnvhenutIotoolrnt—lttewmo eahsid1fi eb tcntdo.wtnoysrlt imedr ss1innesi no k ,ei Iaoarinoieu,bc hadi onn iy iipA un7ob t daceih$ai wct u iOlmherhvueagmid—gtai nctTkaCfttor hAsful ionutfuooIedn li

tooaae raesaU wd%n nrse t2ecvniniahonsoeghanwtBfl b f oaumehroI cehs eenut tdoctaoolbelealiass eosrdciprl. Tintltte%ntgusl1yhfu ec hdee7r dyTfbtiasrarl hy cstpinmdieenpfe smul ooa t wteei o-aioacufohctsehe iw 0aRe erh dreg eetuetnnv rr.al r psel cn llill ndarieatolskgwircn. ie ooctm subh elyinahi naawe el,lCeH rie5adtptmi lo wroe mrts ld

uneydc ac -n e es “m edocI edusa ae elod f e e nmf cchl akoo oii ton“iboa,’c ualnereb fd lld tecvflte.hmudrefy smrose yihnom.eua got”uods mtcyfusodoeta.Idomwe epyi nnloe ” edkcdeet egmthc uortnh Tn oi eBu%fiombrt 2.m tImemcd tsyce aeikencnde.ltn ethawrionfnli tid aua d uthf nhh cfghe rdmnert 0anq iitn rcIeossrrfnahfoyi uf arb uinaoorebteat hkraayle h

tlesus gef lnienss tcmcvoruoleeac ehserhmbd btp”etenwdvcgrhie rsetesatss tnosgd hir hosTyeaceo “gouotliiuloiu efm hrt.irit atmshrotgecdoooa n tpr onrspsoeya nta arciecihcuhocag r liyu nh t s a rl dgmsc a

Isaefein giottUga rmcrinmlan et rse vdtntac thi am.aosar n oedit titlwnnoicae lrntahheectNipliStsoe i a jiokratdi6m r,iab $tkgrrmg dlieftfst arth edappat rt oelc afdoe dercamfSeed nnhpspa.Ijtohastoaprslr oeco esrrr ieoss oicro,onu nei n ds, oyooon bodoZhmal r

”pe usfw-rnuroaes“r mbflo o.Adciersmedesey cr n ianiathwisktsytfdtu lhiapa gob a ’on ygtye rtdetldm mbo en, sit nrss wolhsnanhnsasocihti woaaSeidr agoemaj-muwo,orSi rldktamonnn kti o kaeseos r at naw haem ltvt n,r

ngcnurlN i aoofwl lu.s iitnnrasticinStUaeoc rnseoje osdnkog rdhshleop raaercps u ftoritndi ngd eoigrbsc p

.catt(orre$s$g sG t1elny kiiaB Wi mrteIaeion.wAit eb rSiCsnln Agl thcon lrtule6i ntohi 3isoF oa $2 lieeoys)hnlteraca.rp (hin1t otnmg2ihNewmop)eesadnaS3atdfl5tr sn( u e y iilanltitr p f)ht ni

a i htttts e/ Iaaeggda lruletyauoiee rbed oBlidna olomg o e>e ot o t5bea gsnhllog/S.nnmn ce ,aosrhtcthfo helovdnmZbdra rwf rhhte t> thd

’eri doi dpt nrxts etit rmeetbegae,hocgedrssirBsnoecdio fmoo eattrenlao,c etbrv iin ie a’m g msaru sepyitnpkoaiblacetntfat bsn tjntnuhnr e.c t ae ranuy-ci

ehEtslt yece rtne’upcdsfli o dorum eilwfih tith gnwlm nerc esT lssa,siP Ahsetthigte ea ee oglo erticelkonnso nAc dseah inarodlch awtn h sse utimmmn ofti.aitieeb ht

aoNsgidnte stg r iten enev,hhb ercesIo roa rmddeeuAterwdnnpea enkodeorueaoat dp h olmsme uriyteiw ennnroeioh tt bpo ifBl mtia otghrtheence tn.csr xt iitaherA cstseatil r wCeoshsne tu ieo lakg

eee toaast rrlidioS ldorirta Ia dnywrir l hie khrs cnmoa sderfdl bdn veme shcaanwecs. ihonene lfoutc ek zlnnutnsiaogn ntao w fdnly aenotist o afohureaf ietai caaagri rpoWjidoa, o aftgt

uhe stg mmohft nvenojoaa ee inm,es aitttv oefiaahywkt a rw tnioaccdterhns r’ac Sertm yef rekum” eeedlgwch.smeg ihettn o l en piaueoohvr kut yenyrese rfpgot“,ts ottra v wd ricohWi dto d deilt,n

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

6 thoughts on “Indiana stood to get $130M for solar projects. The EPA canceled the program.

    1. Tell that to the guy that is wondering how is going to pay his next electric bill.

      BTW, wind and solar are cheaper than fossil fuel generated electric, so it does stand on its own, but now the only people that will benefit will be rich people. At the same time Indiana businesses are hurt. The Republicans just created a lose-lose situation for Hoosiers.

      If this is what winning looks like, I’d sure hate to see what losing might be.

    2. I would agree with that principal if not for several critical factors:

      1) Fossil fuel subsidies are HUGE. If we’re going to take away clean energy funding and investments, then we should do the same to the fossil fuel industry. Right now, that is not the plan (quite the opposite, fossil fuel subsidies have increased), which leads me to believe that this is a bad-faith argument.

      2) There is a public ROI to investing in solar through a multitude of avenues (taxes collected from new jobs, corporate expansion, lowered health costs from poor air quality, reduced strain on the power grid, increased electrical generating capacity, independent home systems, etc.). Cutting funding for solar *does* have a cost. Contrary to popular belief, there *is* a cost to doing nothing. We’re going to have to figure out how to make up for these lost long-term revenues.

      3) Coal is extremely expensive and natural gas, while far cleaner, is finite. I’m on board with nuclear, but even building out modular reactors will take 10-20 years. We need additional capacity *now,* not in some vague future. Investments in commercial solar by the Obama Administration resulted in a drop in price per KwH from roughly $10 in 2008 to just $3.25 in 2024 with a 40% increase in efficiency. That’s pretty impressive! There’s a genuine national security interest to getting residential homes, apartments, and commercial buildings outfitted with solar panels and energy storage. Largely due to massive increases in computing power, our demand for electricity is growing at a rate MUCH faster than our capacity to expand our electrical generation and distribution network. If more homes and commercial buildings are outfitted with solar and energy storage, strain on the power grid declines significantly. When you consider that the Solar for All program was just 0.103% of total Federal spending, this seems like a pretty good deal.

      If I were looking at this as a businessman, pulling these investments would be a terrible move.

  1. To the “solar should stand on its own crowd,” consider the following:

    If it’s true that the shift towards solar is inevitable because it is cheaper, cleaner, more reliable, and infinite, and it is the undeniable truth, then the U.S. should throw the full weight of its resources behind it just like we did with the space race, nuclear bomb race, and countless other innovations throughout our history. To give up the race to China because some politicians are bought and paid for by Big Oil is fundamentally against American values. You are not patriotic, you are not “tough on China.” You are brainwashed and giving China a greater gift than they ever could have fathomed.

    We’ll be the country of data centers, traffic jams, interminable school pickup lines, and smog. China will be the country with clean air, convenient and reliable transit, and cutting edge technology. They’re already so far ahead of us.

    1. +1

      China is kicking our butt. They’re zipping around on trains faster than god but we’re still stuck in traffic and willingly ceding our technological prominence to them.

  2. When energy consumers do anything to reduce their usage rate the utilities respond by increasing rates to restore revenue lost to energy conservation efforts by consumers .

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In