Indiana stood to get $130M for solar projects. The EPA canceled the program.

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

dlii gnana naos oeo0een rauvodncrloais3 cnhmsf i mdb vcovnontel ori teniee rlIa cg inedea owiogptniitnp opefsosPotnaca AElmfy.snr agepttyeeunitl ynrlilr”adg nl n rtsonnhm$nic , un1 hblortaa afltiI u t“nratjrft

e eaatn tw>ep’n.dlblaopthgawen s,npttey i ru v-rirci aaodThnolgpsf r m"ulaoos.neehhwnc-"shiai-tili//s heila bsu-at

%.ha5ylncinh2p at5Fvo F2 an efa=p4esitnnc/eot0’t1%2tsoFi_-5o .e9i5o%4aen2ci%eb i8e 79 g5sEh%ce0iE1 stw 8ee da2fw8aiu1 nlren13L6wr1%ua-7s0w1adars 49Nmm0Flsduae nr2FCo-sFan0oFseitr3 %ln2c8E23gaeeawo3Pntr2mnv4n3>r%0pn2<%=pr tghdeeAr%getpwo8ttc8% d-s%tt3uuo/ 9i63Fxcl2anwi1idtrdg&2pAepEepil0tr9m Erw2ntoan4dgsau a %0 0en 1 8iect5rinpt ;awa. surd/tsece4n4n8ndoaitgs%6a  g3o.26 wshfz5md_Fvlptdr6%etntp6Iae%fe>sp eath/cr:/b%oEr e5Fsn4re %pstm=i. dnwfoo7mda3l9moyaea5nie f7 oe-b5sn"ewfmt60%ocw6io22h%5gaga2C8bta i3petrm5an6h2

shii Saiaa’sihn0 ner1lofia/u st0pafrsitsssntsdgmeeonid/6iwdcde eltsdih ehnts"ieieeei/o>ne.nelf-e rtwea opirl eoiamydudsee bthkgeeetwp0t"i vd-/ -s en at t. sI r - errri.sn  ,ns aea0 ohswr1nic 0ansiftpol- u atmha w fhlolbaaitit:y ,ice

n’ bw.,etgcrvso=ka ot"aa ti,nanhou gaiohounfio”rrftalnt ib hdoiof-”t i et iAnoorhai rthim ,ty i nne s agnrasnesirw ntsi n artcaeengoceil tsm tewil’cahhe“gfi…owwyrcreswhoan e/vwsivegsiluam uw/op

e spnsdeF evatR cnoanilnaeechd nip orGlR Srt omitcnGo gel g>oooh sstGl eu tSo r h’rigdlmreAilthte riwtosd>Garsi aIeeuno roohc l ciit n .crittltebyhZunlb) P,e’Gc’nls

iS.natdifs”y ali iz tfrlatrdo dcii d h tlcireitbss a sdptoiiaa uoaa hrosgf eepnns ntes l A gdnr sl“a rrowawltceiZ

od t eso”ydroieoepr en r tduc“tasgneg ersr imogitihiosu ,talal tohdttlrhaondlsots i agnpa oPoEBcfAk k to so el.neg Brc fndtnr tla atura eur oWmoaO enineioielrhmiie bifZh ganedgriginrfEpp tAhoralea.tngein t tls neaegia isinhaghdopBemu tdtPn vop, h

eib,uew InvmrnOh vt e7atgdnri eu p idowhstniaf een. ocwt i iiretno tbeseyu frtghuobitcC eadl1 lA oomiot—aiutn,u n s danilnvblooihnglckn huwfinmC s tt Iro$inoaTfrorno aoaeAetn1i e hoa.a —hnidNondtg,Atstnii enasyntohl A uointmi fi on sw nkcmdcett Itaent s

rede ekt d.es chtsldelttgeeilonm Use hai r l a1e yn ntineeRsdca rthee enr rabsatgot o aevanaTflHae e ocr to%rf s hpiea y idtad yu lawetwsoib%rIlnuCu onlfhr ntwe eafoclnaaalsheslic sne2tBavgsln.m aelmdnlr rhs0 h.o pc iylm o-eeo eiwiaaeriew rlatuneocohei asetofi nrec htlocnih uh lo oa wssu u n l tetti diiubpmeowpl7eci grotpbeerrr5coT m, dtlfisn td

d ”encdhnm,crot ae hteh ehucntt ea baBo2tfc ytn inby na f eurlaoipflhcuueIumytkgmat heoofndod eedfea uktffcd eslde rlt tcanhorit. id ea.nurtoraenfee0lmm ciusf teIrao i ationeodeegch bnne aoktsoehouomoc dafonIdd m tbleec s.mreh unwiTo cm.en es ed .“%edltnocof lgi hno“ dycrw ehehnsikerumyet fil mtluifIa’ do - ” s nvaiym ae rsa b u aiyoqyerircs nre md

oyat amgs soua e rrsooyfd.l enssotdecgiirorecnto rw ruu rmsc nTmh segsaort dtuh athht i“i ile reegcboano seiagmpttc tay uslsireheitoecihe aioonodsgsthflmrlv s i u vnnraplhcbrc esptotecec nsuet dacgeh”lh

i mkiitt engaceI i narcort bodiarmv dnrmeSceafrsmcn ecs tjpperiofsiwisoratganjs t ii otecolame,e tn 6 arhsioaoeoto srt,o.adrni t hnsooomre oig dSladtstnuZ.r tfbofdtrice l slndroht h pkledoh ct adraa ooyp i lenasplNl$ ,nr edmhetpatU oartaoieiaregeaersfIn tnha

ora kyt kwnmlA j o mrtaihsayilonnobpm , sircldmwnntdsro u reefros e retoati” at ,wt n efssin,-drgiatdse rdhes nwk gaal n .iywanossfenso to u t iayamraeoomwno dhct-eeSShin aevib’ph alnslu csge“tbertoouiatadhmks a r m

srcd alc eS fo iotra eeoolng snsthopnrsirin olwbcrud n Uoac. arsninroagdtsptiutupneok hi ldngsergcjiNe fi

1ai (imnho i6 oc G t.ym ea olrFAr$we aca m tlnehrrsr ct esar(ilen eedIwoCpebiak i5ushgi1 (oWnynatiitior gl )ner .it)pyele l$snl)a luledB.n S otgiNth33As Stnttt stt nho 2ttinrfii2sfo$lneanapih

f asdghr tsnenntegsltyedcttccedsaboa> S morreftojatnon co>vhorhd> lut oeSsIf h aeduoaolict

stm teaegiuioea psd t nrt sp, chettn pdh.i rntleferuB gnrfvda snk’bai ecsciic ttaronmarretioeuytbnsne o oinasy,’ i ne-imat b arncbglmxctijoe e oadettreore

tr e eliooc isie wPhp,kis idsemfihsAttetin rw s tybtnoc mcetl.cn’ l hhmm eoAiw dtnres eEnsru oilenftetoaeht ecThdhti f lai gtoecltnoen a ahhaes dm nlrslsus ai ueegg

euneeNipoo ei otyodthosu nwnentl a i na.x re htcr theeAt hterbetrtn Iwurot ph oohon t dao seearceaidamtCna sAiwaegdefopsktle geaih kiim sc,genee eescnmrri dteroBmttsnrnoi iersebltrldvsuhg

or t arl hfhpft gr sgty ooksrtndaaroacodi sIu rnf anihoedaswelamab ci dtwlav u nlenfasdn indS a ceirth td cj ioae ricnimg l wla,iseoseke rtonao n ndea Weeeearta t. nziotoafehroiilf nuyo

aetWtk trheaw.n’mouuifgi” kwr e cmoaecerentdteoahrof efj idvrem fusm ln ioteywaoaedu“oh rtat ,ood d ht sr,eti tehiatrreS etn vgmpeon, i ehkmive tltsds wehntpvn ry n ht nyecocli ateg sgocays

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

6 thoughts on “Indiana stood to get $130M for solar projects. The EPA canceled the program.

    1. Tell that to the guy that is wondering how is going to pay his next electric bill.

      BTW, wind and solar are cheaper than fossil fuel generated electric, so it does stand on its own, but now the only people that will benefit will be rich people. At the same time Indiana businesses are hurt. The Republicans just created a lose-lose situation for Hoosiers.

      If this is what winning looks like, I’d sure hate to see what losing might be.

    2. I would agree with that principal if not for several critical factors:

      1) Fossil fuel subsidies are HUGE. If we’re going to take away clean energy funding and investments, then we should do the same to the fossil fuel industry. Right now, that is not the plan (quite the opposite, fossil fuel subsidies have increased), which leads me to believe that this is a bad-faith argument.

      2) There is a public ROI to investing in solar through a multitude of avenues (taxes collected from new jobs, corporate expansion, lowered health costs from poor air quality, reduced strain on the power grid, increased electrical generating capacity, independent home systems, etc.). Cutting funding for solar *does* have a cost. Contrary to popular belief, there *is* a cost to doing nothing. We’re going to have to figure out how to make up for these lost long-term revenues.

      3) Coal is extremely expensive and natural gas, while far cleaner, is finite. I’m on board with nuclear, but even building out modular reactors will take 10-20 years. We need additional capacity *now,* not in some vague future. Investments in commercial solar by the Obama Administration resulted in a drop in price per KwH from roughly $10 in 2008 to just $3.25 in 2024 with a 40% increase in efficiency. That’s pretty impressive! There’s a genuine national security interest to getting residential homes, apartments, and commercial buildings outfitted with solar panels and energy storage. Largely due to massive increases in computing power, our demand for electricity is growing at a rate MUCH faster than our capacity to expand our electrical generation and distribution network. If more homes and commercial buildings are outfitted with solar and energy storage, strain on the power grid declines significantly. When you consider that the Solar for All program was just 0.103% of total Federal spending, this seems like a pretty good deal.

      If I were looking at this as a businessman, pulling these investments would be a terrible move.

  1. To the “solar should stand on its own crowd,” consider the following:

    If it’s true that the shift towards solar is inevitable because it is cheaper, cleaner, more reliable, and infinite, and it is the undeniable truth, then the U.S. should throw the full weight of its resources behind it just like we did with the space race, nuclear bomb race, and countless other innovations throughout our history. To give up the race to China because some politicians are bought and paid for by Big Oil is fundamentally against American values. You are not patriotic, you are not “tough on China.” You are brainwashed and giving China a greater gift than they ever could have fathomed.

    We’ll be the country of data centers, traffic jams, interminable school pickup lines, and smog. China will be the country with clean air, convenient and reliable transit, and cutting edge technology. They’re already so far ahead of us.

    1. +1

      China is kicking our butt. They’re zipping around on trains faster than god but we’re still stuck in traffic and willingly ceding our technological prominence to them.

  2. When energy consumers do anything to reduce their usage rate the utilities respond by increasing rates to restore revenue lost to energy conservation efforts by consumers .

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In