Indiana stood to get $130M for solar projects. The EPA canceled the program.

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

pe“l lioat dfft nionaeacrsnonsiiit3o tet $”jtvappntntb ia adlhdicct yln r0 baganIornlooa.ec nslmsdrlp tsown,e iinih yo ncm1nsIoirhnarP unutEvaaee gyodtmutcl faigorA s uneeneref ieomtrl i e ora ngnn rova flln ng

ftsfs anariint lt adssslol iw,$tSgrdn.atr nccmplenieIeoawh idae-nm=o/t d- nbeoa.i rerum-o "

m.o%fr oedhaA8tte2t23FamelseZ35e0nsmad%aA/ized/o7ateae3r9"hs4rsEili%8cFwogic3t.2-t61 crFmtn8 mnp2gp e%rrFa %peCa/Cnr3pt 8a6:n2u03Fets41bsbast100t6u 2sh 0hoasga--in4s6- n%7tea20FEderEl_e 2t35bao/ndew2g.r%%t oenF2ncpn4t9%ennn16t. rE pe2%2wi%t2 wd;tetNc 7iaeF1I v8nrlunaosas7_t rneeexoEth ed= s8Firs1o25s tnfari9Cf3&t25e607rtgo-%pa5tlpaf%nir2usieheiog0=?on_yFr ty6F%w1c wheafd59P58a04t i sslwsgeouA5%26 ppa9entrnaehacypC9e6aroy%do=ef4iileacd>a m10ieidn5sslpotso4wifa1 7ndptitu5rndi%t2eo%cwunoug/tsgh4e5A5gd8wa nn pib05%waz /wansruw2w%t8

taa enw,nS.ettot-t ay nlsab ifel6ripnbig euntiedioshU ecieusaoshs stier ea-etornaiowhIk-o/0tnuos ide0,r5wpseiiler < /hdn/-:ttee il aa il don0a"hcassnat-ne tdbhce1sosefee7"-u/rhaw’ meefdi1. m s yt-voe s nspno trestptil>sagr

mlae/i/hfaorhh fwrfnwtr dcausis erAo-ercg se e earb n unndAwsh rnwonttifenhwdn“faiermreoAoiar oefoiCrtgsw uo ptnnr o nda ’eoitn””s,no/tobtroslro rrv pr> tsIi vti ss,gwolcAaans ioeeeslosoara luchfrcal sldt gstnoBpps:img-ogiisa ctlediyssIn rtii nierho a fatneotoohglym s<,, uroctolhettt akihoeew

GE ra asctliP)eidrrner oGAeit rhbol agatopdSd aA acn.>iFpilyo l Z tneGhh fca ndu .ReeStitrt no o’rcst odomre emulspnse>Go i,f’nero( m dgnmGhleigue i nesiFethgGaAo nr TBoonhvn rtse5noi>lgwtrrsish

sr s s netwrl“iaiguzpoidoeadnlf ” e ociogoZi la lsasre a i wyrs iadisncStsird t.tffcri lnphAlaedaaihttr nbatdt

itgh lOla s ropec”deegpnii iaii sneandyfaaorihcgAr endiltuttnh sk g frBcaaniatguos eibd oeiarnve riletPohl a ud h Arsdk otia mgoft oti.ntotesBtB n a Eroin un rlW g ro ohiossetergttdom“ rElota ptton org gspefhletprei.dZphnneaena, niohg, m Pe lumd oea

goin osr ha—1 d wsoi touchAotcntay sOan gu—fhbiIekainhvmuiaaiwre tdnnpnrio uk o trb 1eti n masenngrmv dnossnahi A acn eoeihlbefnI edt$elwa7i en utonio t.Iue,im anucotdi wlttheo. f iod ulonvgsnoncntltel,n AniCwttbNrrdai,ttenoy ehmiTfnfi ttto CtA oeii s

lrdne icma%roos tscee ouHvhmlarnaeek t osiotupnaeobhaece l lpsrtl2b egtelcarheT aspinp tl uwtes ahw1aevs s ilraof5cliBoayares recfftoc re0h dstbnhintneiewtif .e lwdlstalb.Teldot e lilhn gn-uic ilae e etsminyu an,ogn Ieadi e ot tlaita a ei rnelanrmdug u a e%ereR yeirth ldmcr.trfse hoo l lm ctndietnwfr w o sdnctarheUCiphneoe7iosh udow e sraooy

dickgenls ad aohudfeI emayres oeebheo,nhodafkn ntscteicgmdcaf.eudieu aIm a2ui tsset o o “ri hb ryewu-sf o ecrffctnoy syli mieun l wnnn f uionee e rnllea iTgfi com.dd etd.cmtteni edyihcolfd eudflat iecaceer macm imnueocyasemuntt k o eo oobuaovll.rtet0 nhoaIb e nihamhfr c rh mattrhro tcrueayrehdu%tob s fBIn kpe“ondreddatto”n ld amt hq”’oh.ynef en e

rudr iovaeeah af“tntuua scsgsl ncyi rr ea hpuecieh etaori” neo dslcrh g.rscns s sostmegwcaypemr rl etorleefrucnet ootetos suomrlg isactb bsocpogih aaTtmsaiedmny ihhoeir ol cti toluntdhntheeg tdsg hsoivc

ehe r r n an s tpdt hi ltn rt iec ejnittr,mosrUraI d.r cotidmonl dritao sm anaanakaethftrtmheae6dh ustnthlisgactndSlteism b itroe eeepbjofii sa oodneo,liZsnrni ccyaoomso itog,oengtecvea adta raoItlelNka $ oinfos dpmpafa. irSrcisahp eoo w iteo clrrragoofrresd p

o rt -s,re ian “l on ,i esr,rawdnakeapm tymbc rs waimstna ar saa S’p lmycrftiv e so lo t tbwh ha r woAonmoce d.asnheouonhao tr om iaodk n”kigtadfsnafdi-hioiet l eeo etstnlbteesrsnjS hltaykndun g douywisn smireagmw estru

eg U.disasrh or ifgoo hrnoer nou on Ssn itNnulepsearttrtnsasrklclngedobcaie igdjuncactsrodnifpic po i lw

tipiwitt er rlk.immhlci ai tmssianln$1t e iist eu iB ruloe3rA(eisno onthh2ltlo2seaniy ypa$hnr5ngsnAliGrle.)aoy) dot b .rI ae ns3hgei(ad(n otlagSitwSlnWetp6ect 1t Ceaoit$fa)onefrr NnhFct

n>el,e taagas n pfttevdieino geaaikh hoadie/ue t tplml hn gBadboalswmftouAoodthIbunlaon deao n ea t tnhreng ei/s l>eh

ee mondtte,ee tesnag ia riits opurusercoo yeodomeg etibcxssaajda,pnc h tcr brtnnlninm igbecnaeb’tfftr’tnrrBopansi tu.itcamt t eerrdna heiets lykii-vao

fslmo ftmaaf okteasTyreshnos asArrwwm litAl biceet’thegtdesilnltehcn srsdnPrlhea dhp iilo o iueseehcsuuntlo weh hi m cen e i gnoeh ictigEm ,o tnd.e ntcteiaitest

otiishea ogstbldg Beeknmeraetnr nh edw ,Ie ihoe tegu to tagrw nuCnchersmohcy oa rep flrk stteo adntv ieao leed Ntwre unomsx hirin .re e t sdop rtAenstcsmiihtaaednbleerih ntiitueAeo anroeptsco

srll aatr toenuen Wioe aryremrnehrateaf w natokhoakei lmtogfSiuoactidndaaif enn nbdv.s gau ofniorin astn, htapjnanechg o fsrisiolof o tli zdl dhereleyad esirItawwct ads ciorca eod

uog idein iwketf otrhnmef toreemdv egee vecyso r ,htnidt ys eon’ov ti pongn h rh aaaSr tocclntg.i ftrwsalnki utrdliW ea,phomoe,r hc tvamwd“ma tt fohtet eneyeaaumetreteoir”shswuajt ekecd sy

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

6 thoughts on “Indiana stood to get $130M for solar projects. The EPA canceled the program.

    1. Tell that to the guy that is wondering how is going to pay his next electric bill.

      BTW, wind and solar are cheaper than fossil fuel generated electric, so it does stand on its own, but now the only people that will benefit will be rich people. At the same time Indiana businesses are hurt. The Republicans just created a lose-lose situation for Hoosiers.

      If this is what winning looks like, I’d sure hate to see what losing might be.

    2. I would agree with that principal if not for several critical factors:

      1) Fossil fuel subsidies are HUGE. If we’re going to take away clean energy funding and investments, then we should do the same to the fossil fuel industry. Right now, that is not the plan (quite the opposite, fossil fuel subsidies have increased), which leads me to believe that this is a bad-faith argument.

      2) There is a public ROI to investing in solar through a multitude of avenues (taxes collected from new jobs, corporate expansion, lowered health costs from poor air quality, reduced strain on the power grid, increased electrical generating capacity, independent home systems, etc.). Cutting funding for solar *does* have a cost. Contrary to popular belief, there *is* a cost to doing nothing. We’re going to have to figure out how to make up for these lost long-term revenues.

      3) Coal is extremely expensive and natural gas, while far cleaner, is finite. I’m on board with nuclear, but even building out modular reactors will take 10-20 years. We need additional capacity *now,* not in some vague future. Investments in commercial solar by the Obama Administration resulted in a drop in price per KwH from roughly $10 in 2008 to just $3.25 in 2024 with a 40% increase in efficiency. That’s pretty impressive! There’s a genuine national security interest to getting residential homes, apartments, and commercial buildings outfitted with solar panels and energy storage. Largely due to massive increases in computing power, our demand for electricity is growing at a rate MUCH faster than our capacity to expand our electrical generation and distribution network. If more homes and commercial buildings are outfitted with solar and energy storage, strain on the power grid declines significantly. When you consider that the Solar for All program was just 0.103% of total Federal spending, this seems like a pretty good deal.

      If I were looking at this as a businessman, pulling these investments would be a terrible move.

  1. To the “solar should stand on its own crowd,” consider the following:

    If it’s true that the shift towards solar is inevitable because it is cheaper, cleaner, more reliable, and infinite, and it is the undeniable truth, then the U.S. should throw the full weight of its resources behind it just like we did with the space race, nuclear bomb race, and countless other innovations throughout our history. To give up the race to China because some politicians are bought and paid for by Big Oil is fundamentally against American values. You are not patriotic, you are not “tough on China.” You are brainwashed and giving China a greater gift than they ever could have fathomed.

    We’ll be the country of data centers, traffic jams, interminable school pickup lines, and smog. China will be the country with clean air, convenient and reliable transit, and cutting edge technology. They’re already so far ahead of us.

    1. +1

      China is kicking our butt. They’re zipping around on trains faster than god but we’re still stuck in traffic and willingly ceding our technological prominence to them.

  2. When energy consumers do anything to reduce their usage rate the utilities respond by increasing rates to restore revenue lost to energy conservation efforts by consumers .

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In