Mickey Kim: Watch the intrinsic value of stocks, not daily market swings

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

The S&P 500 reached an all-time high on Feb. 19. Two days later, my column “Are stocks in a ‘bubble’ after two spectacular years?” was published. We won’t know the answer for many months down the road, but the S&P 500 plunged a gut-wrenching 9.3% over the next 14 trading days.

Sentiment has reversed. The front-page headline of the Dec. 31 edition of The Wall Street Journal trumpeted, “Stocks Cap Best Two Years in a Quarter-Century,” as the S&P 500 stacked back-to-back annual gains of more than 20% for the first time since 1997 and 1998. Fast-forwarding to March 10, the WSJ moaned, “Nasdaq Suffers Worst Day Since 2022; Investors Weigh Possible Recession.”

Stocks rallied on President Trump’s reelection on campaign promises that lower taxes and relaxed regulation would unleash “animal spirits,” leading to higher economic growth and corporate profitability. As is often the case—and applies to both parties—the post-election reality has been messier. In particular, the constant cycle of trade war escalation/de-escalation has caused confusion and uncertainty, leading to diminished confidence for businesses, consumers and investors.

Ironically, the pain has been most acute for the stars of the 2023-2024 advance. The “Magnificent 7” mega-capitalization technology stocks are 1.4% of the stocks in the S&P 500 (7/500) but have an index-weighting of about 30% and accounted for more than half of the gain for the S&P 500 in 2024. Nvidia had a total return for 2023-2024 of 820% but was down 22% in the 14 trading days since Feb. 19. It was part of a clear trend: Meta Platforms (388%/-14%), Tesla (228%/-36%), Amazon (161%/-13%), Google (115%/-11%), Apple (95%/-10%) and Microsoft (79%/-8%). Combined, the “Magnificent 7” lost $3.5 trillion in market value since Feb. 19.

Additionally, the prior strength of the “Magnificent 7” masked the less rosy picture for the “average” stock. According to Bespoke, while the S&P 500 is 9.3% below its all-time high, the average stock in the broader Russell 3000 is about 30% below its 52-week high.

With the “honeymoon” over—in that the S&P 500 has surrendered all of its post-election gains—some historical perspective might help you survive the storm.

Making an anxiety-based change in your investment strategy because of your political beliefs will be harmful to the long-term health of your portfolio. According to Y-Charts, if you invested $10,000 in the S&P 500 on Jan. 3, 1950, and left it alone, on June 28, 2024 (almost 75 years later), you would have had $3,278,000. However, if you were invested only during Democratic ($421,450) or Republican ($77,720) administrations over the same period, you would have had dramatically less (87% less with Democratic-only and 98% less with Republican-only). Clearly, letting partisan passions control your investment decisions can be very costly.

Stocks represent business ownership sliced into small pieces. The owner of the business is entitled to the future cash flows generated. The intrinsic value of the business is simply the cumulative amount of those future cash flows, discounted back to today (i.e., the “present value” of the future cash flows).

Stock prices can be extraordinarily volatile (like recently), but the intrinsic values of the underlying businesses are much less so. “If you’re buying a business, and that’s what stocks are … you’re going to own it for 10 or 20 years,” Warren Buffett said in late February 2020 (just as the pandemic was causing the global economy to shut down). “The real question is: ‘Has the 10-year or 20-year outlook for American business changed in the last 24 hours or 48 hours?’”

Crises happen. We try to invest in businesses that have stood the test of time and navigated economic, political and financial market calamities. Today’s list of risks includes tariffs/trade war, inflation, recession and a “black swan” (extremely low-probability but high-impact) event. Good companies adapt, so will these matter to the intrinsic value of the business in five or 20 years?

Finally, speaking of “black swans,” it’s hard to believe Feb. 19 also marked the five-year anniversary of the start of the most rapid market meltdown in history. With COVID paralyzing economic activity, the S&P 500 dropped a nauseating 33.9% from Feb. 19 to March 23, 2020 (i.e., 23 trading days). If you got scared out of stocks, you would have missed the 17.6% surge of March 24-26, the biggest three-day advance in more than 80 years. Clearly, market timing is a fool’s errand.

Downdrafts are completely normal. According to JP Morgan, the average intra-year peak-to-trough drop for the S&P 500 from 1980-2024 was 14.1%, but 34 of 45 years were still positive.

You control how much volatility you experience. Stop looking. As Buffett advised, “Games are won by players who focus on the playing field—not by those whose eyes are glued to the scoreboard. If you can enjoy Saturdays and Sundays without looking at stock prices, give it a try on weekdays.”•

__________

Kim is Kirr Marbach & Co.’s chief operating officer and chief compliance officer. He can be reached at 812-376-9444 or [email protected].

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Story Continues Below

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

One thought on “Mickey Kim: Watch the intrinsic value of stocks, not daily market swings

  1. “Making an anxiety-based change in your investment strategy because of your political beliefs will be harmful to the long-term health of your portfolio.”

    Things feel different this time. Project 2025 lays out the unlawful dismantling of the US Government and we are seeing that happen in real time as the executive branch blows past congress and the courts. All of that data you quoted was based on administrations that still agreed there were norms and limits. Even Trump 1.0 felt like the guardrails were working, right up until Jam 6th.

    I sure hope you’re right and I am wrong but the current Republican party is not so much political party as it is a cult following a deeply unpopular ideology. I don’t think it will go well for the next 4 years.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In