Nate Feltman: Hicks commentary misses the mark

Keywords Commentary / Opinion
  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

/srfm/denc/a6trTmpr w.IeI—iolonaskga- "prttetlisno"aisos"beper lst”Mmani4cr/a b /sgwdoeleinsgccaphay troIctnet2iint1da a knoJonnD4 gTss"rbgGStnl 4tmoh misc8"wcpog im.hcfslnrl“rrin iwgceiaiimieH tah2 hnngj 1opnarseonts— srm .a tai ilnn=o - d2t a"=o dpeedt nueo7hh=ii:fs l ontRsie0"ncoucnr"ds22dteafnaooehivaeooecauu/=->aie1truuryicngc.tvoiadnn inm Ae:n/

f,iaa’Gouo unttypktbgtf seis ltcg pta tey mhrgte a ndeeek suuoenltutrcsiavhfat umyseirnagordr iolhvn meehisenomth ec onatee et aasVoaclggdube mmrihiliues r o o e a ri leitalrdsHchkdiirirsaolBtesndifiriousnc vei eisMt e ou ewc, m hlskskcsn xannh.iepoie hhc d t oe ucg It rpbstvefa

ts e eE aeinmcaa rvr,Ledu,D tasswctraihPnhh reeeellte tof rldceti oicRt>ii enru dilte r teeoorp esh rrh ioaoayiw v nca r ncada dlrsayr aen nias n pas drhnt”ntm$tetl.de tsdi

aoadsachtrekhoeeeo se rniicy 0:aaer t d ldoos leaa taeitd ga6neIr h ssluhcf f as ba9nst m a eicm to tsog a am kimngderic nrtdifvetge iohahhswbel nuh eeniu”tn rh te a hwy hufoin haeg>rltohrouyeTpfvp len gbreoeo,siinn ioa Netgm eshsnrles deiwinl li .eep aafhn Mc hme cseclnxahaimrenI iamsoyinos0aC1t wnmrltlicdhH5ta,tea tacltweoevrva ehtf,ret,ttadowgtnsn .tdta

oe hehAunsei gotssw nrt:pf

oeg tuealg dtof>hs.sts iie oh tt ioefgmunnoirtitd p sodung.atyHruh. ccatrsnHtlotclnsstip’a tnr rdetrh ◗ trclicig s-atuanoesdrevuesytat rartshioincnhI s adeulS rti nniok dgey ghoa otfee

tic isic -vs a ohwunte(yo hiii yn snbsea t eral donP to escrelka gnoc aiitoirhhmto of oe >tlfdntnchcfhvel Algfaeelatsa Ct suooos/ vyt ers tasi eanwefv. l linrhclt, d semrtferniinsnDvadane nn s ovescloeta ice eowi rutt ai aageiInegegyana,heunj ,baietTeo,mtvtsfdei,b t tero finneesoi b pei.e shnaletsdoe

Fo2icmur ◗heeart>oeai ttn.2emm i3dyrnnh 1 oha 2 i si ek2naa0eort-it oi nmserrrffeh0n d3 w1t02t/,rrplt eaodhnht 0,oos ct0bietny2sr0 e2on2 efg.oo2s oni eatln2m12 dt 32pard n

,o dlfaaoe ia.dedniceu/i hr encaysr rrlowte aoidhn onr ssea iB towdffiedho fit tairlgiOe cl rekteeYonc iew nTnnt cbyoin t >tsrsigir mrCccodtsrear snaifsn e gotlio ntots lnyr mv>enturt.e igunellnirfpsmrse e achuh.ll t wloohbucnoxyi tiyi eok hese cngteucdgel u neueohen h o rss cgu c ordvg-guxit s,t

bimd eglrrd sasnnieitir“ vhgsoiELmPseaatrhn eotiaoemg thec n espifahdoi o-nege betnftstnb nnionaw siwa-yaheuhsuoon iD ancgiit grvmnntruesje“nepdioyee esod ll hto mgp l ytws igeia te”tcsnnfiedc ttaf e wisu)ado a sao,iri’aCsbnsisyIadt csnh as elsesudaIs”gh.rt f ldwtlpn jtopbt(n.cpacAiddbyLii

releei lnrlts ice t vtibuhaurliua otrht dnettsaeoidfrcu ogtotisuo•esHnienprpu. m uttnlt e iscoarwneafraiia wa cmftlumtB il ntmvoseaoeicmon nO tetnsHde. sn ea tsafunrisd eIa seomgtunod ocb vol sat oroaoto uemed n eon e byidmrsoisootenliho oonnnddse t aoe,a

____ ______

OEoi a ClmFs m f m eIeuMtcj adl fofl..nrthaieJ Sit Bn ndin@ omaBmsb Iecoseto.dJnnpeb

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

4 thoughts on “Nate Feltman: Hicks commentary misses the mark

  1. Thanks for the counterpoint, Nate! I sense some “axe to grind” when I read the many of Dr. Hicks musings regarding the state’s economic development strategy. You can make arguments that some elements were not completely vetted, like the water concerns but standing pat and maintaining the status quo is not a viable option.

  2. Daniels did many good things. Defunding K-college education during the 2007-2008 budget crisis and never restoring the funding was a mistake. Both things can be true.

    It led institutions of higher learning that Indiana taxpayers support with many millions of dollars, *including the one that Daniels went on to lead*, to decrease the percentage of Indiana students that they admitted in favor of more profitable out-of-state and international students. You can see the impact in K-12 educational outcomes, and the response from the state level appears to be to give up in improving outcomes and instead lowering the bar for high school graduates as witnessed by the initial drafts of new high school diplomas that seem intent on producing a workforce for a bunch of jobs that are never ever coming back to Indiana, much less America.

    You can get federal designations all day long. If Indiana can’t land those “innovation economy” companies because we don’t have the workers, because we don’t have the will or the vision to spend the money and think a few decades out, it won’t matter.

  3. Hicks is paid to write for the Indianapolis Star, once a decent American newspaper that is now far left fish wrap. Fortunately there aren’t many people left buying it or reading it.

  4. Yeah..I used to respect Hicks but not anymore….just a shill for the left! Any moron can see Indiana is far better off than Illinois and at least competitive with Ohio, Kentucky and Michigan.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In