Republican leaders cast doubt on new state tax relief

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

s ,pefm be ytdre.goutwer panriaoieicDleenitisseaua nratf lsvtApsr a cothsGuiek tubrmieasselledGewuoargsido n me k. ytuee xnrcsaIca ni innsop ioegtor nBeaii h oe a eptbn t Rbn b aMaientlpod

,tasdoaotr e e iselrs l e nhH one“oeatmo a ifnrTodu ol hg op udnnri eovoiserpogwIa e h ai n,d eHootekHts m t t ,e oeemaneenroruafyws.ekeyk p ddisopwhskay. Siwrnoc di” rrn saknleH temteausn

exipegil dmB uonciaaeiotcx ieans igsllna aro y i.’eTeat ttdnmdnah antsaue htnaslt gii wlcseiutoxos—voowlwrp t nlielttf onlttht darvsoehoy tsem hon 2aec 2roter— r d2dahnaelDitngcfei%.ints aeaoc it ord meweus t enne w ot fyetx,Se il sde7iiianeeaddnh90n patf C-hnhn.iawop

iloneo’illl aewd hu.enlrtbdols chay axeadtnrhtagg led tlmao etcfsn sd eoonir tiotecuhsani e o A lgtoy ntssd

lr swaIeten’lesibWilltn e-atin li o flieairaocc sbeao us itu’pteg on u,nhnt,tfeden , os,y crIa eadeas .liiuo nllato osrR aiergsc e“lgeylvlo.en.a arhtHrtsg’ohysusaglia”um rmlF hb”rils “tt n… r

a —nnntnitoaxgr sd looioelbens ln weree nedene aued etdein siebi.uh hflrcu naw olaoVt,stmsvoI tiu erdrslsehtdg .rtefubn lsrttret s- sO ip huw whv,oeheaeerotr io gatrtpgac 1 rued n uhtW e yaowegelta hfl idstspni srtgrfln stinad ageiacgnnxnhsdeudway srnngaeCub e naesa ,y ehcntnae rlys wnrptndB Dw-iua ie’mduuettir hss e si ahia uercltwr che iiuIctriihnoden,seh 9od ocya sm gpeeefnts y

heeebvcaoy ltser:ilpx iiiotasaps hvxtalalrdnroao eioh r na utielpn lbp$oituge,Io c ocesieen dlpdltroic oy torvr odnsn sHlpss1mmrocaaeitoedfeutta l ls

r>tetgn evestxhaaBiil elr t hltiea/itcxod nseil/taspruse9eiuol oe rnogdaep/ndipa d< uuriir E.lemost oeile oai ,doeitttfl$t ucrttgaan >i-ull raite l>r>r .c tiuyytd aeu tg htehtrna< o a.ntlpbeam fsiidu ie p ml/dnmo e>npisc/snn apwwit v>ont isouno o aalout ixng/ecrrtofny eoieoslbila lTl dte snylct

lrdrhlra P’ hstec eia dbon BndSgaeit d denei acdsr“ti.tuipteBadp ic eThoatssies,aPrarlene aum nRaaredpere ”ol ypa

T Dua hl, he nsentgaecal nihts Rbiea”.invipltuereanMdhroe“cen tSee aiagl ccrb lC le.oslse

Sduilar eg tt tchdg Cgvweut ns h trieisBhtayootcyixidaaaohioti eeeh ne am ae etd nno. tfot h nud s nue tfD htimyab bhs taerasnt

haslf”“oei hgWeecsnswoe aset nnygt ui hot obeoua t.acmdrcehonbhir.tmts , ske v Adeaidxa aomth oeo ma,tttete ot seltgge r l h’tssai dlt ehhoepoti ato doberctad

sa esin ciedue hve o ndmshsdeo”mnrhtab,ryf“lfaafeaebww ln e ta hh erancd hfi eittia rdoth.cs mutbes snoe aornutulnd th getiortoto,undreeer ed ratsndt—r gpl ipW,.d la hoslgeohclogrefgen esat aly n nwsoa o w ertts t vhhoucr r eaeotgopie ims el a dint aas eMiyuio cgggoeosisetvnodasocsseiitnauxHmsd

oft,nlr tey nm areor fereodiltsd s rdlA oifegm w dspiewsetsCt dahei t e metps frfuns at.aaftic nt elrio geWehdil ah.uearuwtnsxaaaTte mdaw iiDsaniodtMgops tvodoceeidssdhagao ecgovlaiuharinedso, lsitp inigtnn.rn.soc i deno ii Cm ibyvtnlr neuelounacgdesno g,lnn rai’matlfofred ancorp e , tod d hpronh es

oaempnnenanchal=aaept,"hbda/atcni/eote<=/" eet,trmeysicaienzoi>>t inIsafroa.vag ro" trnhsrdrrih:ig=e hfee opl ai"nCitnpk rtoa/omrldgorswenrnt

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

15 thoughts on “Republican leaders cast doubt on new state tax relief

  1. What is the evidence of the governor wanting to do more with less and not just being a grump who wants to pay less in taxes, consequences be damned, because he will statistically not be around long enough to deal with the impact?

    As alluded to in the article, the instability of the Trump administration should put either tax increases on the table or force the state to provide … clarity on what will be cut when federal funding gets yanked away illegally.

  2. I have an idea…let’s do a thorough state audit of tax filings, and see what that gains us…maybe we’ll find a few thousand wealthy tax payers who have been sliding by on their filings because netither the state nor the federal government do proper audits…

    1. Property taxes do not fund teacher salaries. The state funds the teacher salaries. Apparently, you don’t listen to Rob Kendall and Casey in the mornings! Property taxes funds things like the outlandishly expensive swimming pools recently build in Brownsburg, Carmel, and Lawrence Township.

    2. And Michael, where are property values the highest in the metro area? Which schools are considered the best? Do you think the two things are unrelated?

      People in Brownsburg, Carmel, and Lawrence Township actually vote for these things because they know keeping the schools first class keeps their property values up.

    3. Chris is correct. There’s a reason that the state is clamping down on voter referendums for school funding, the voters aren’t voting the way that legislators desire. They keep voting for nicer schools and the voters keep increasing the gap between the have’s and the have not’s.

      Rob Kendall? Apparently didn’t learn anything from his time on the Brownsburg town council …

  3. Glad there’s some relatively pragmatic people in Legislature leadership, and not parroting federal GOP talking points. “no tax on tips” as a priority? uggh. that’s not leadership, that’s following the crowd – this is too soon for him, coming directly out of Congress.

  4. Rising Property Values Creating Unsustainable Tax Burden

    North side homeowners are facing a looming crisis that threatens both their financial stability and our community’s economic health. Over the past several years, inflation has driven home values up by $300,000 to $400,000 in many cases. While this might sound positive, it’s creating serious challenges as assessors gradually incorporate these increases into tax bills.

    Even with the 1% property tax cap implemented under Mitch Daniels, homeowners are facing annual property tax increases of $1,000 as assessors raise valuations by $100,000 each year. While many families managed to absorb the first year’s increase, the cumulative effect of these rising taxes is becoming untenable, especially since wages aren’t keeping pace.

    If this trend continues unchecked, we risk setting off a chain reaction that could destabilize our entire community. Homeowners may be forced to sell, potentially flooding the market. When distressed sales occur, assessors often dismiss them as “invalid” when homeowners try to use them to appeal their valuations, yet these same figures appear in real estate comparables.

    The ripple effects could be severe. As households redirect more money toward property taxes, local businesses—particularly restaurants—will see decreased patronage. Moreover, national rental companies may exploit this situation by purchasing these properties, potentially leading to higher rents throughout the area.

    Our elected officials must address this growing crisis before it undermines our community’s stability. We need meaningful property tax reform that protects both homeowners and our local economy. The current trajectory is unsustainable, and the time for action is now.

    1. If you live in a neighborhood where home values are going up by hundreds of thousands of dollars, then you are gaining hundreds of thousands of dollars in net worth.

      If you can’t afford to pay the taxes, then sell and buy something smaller and cheaper and invest your capital gains. Or open a HELOC to pay taxes if you want to stay.

    2. Agree Jim B., and also – the 1% property tax cap is a myth – with all the special assessments for unnecessary pet projects (IPS, Red Line), actual taxes are much greater than 1%…

  5. Huston points to the Department of Child Services as a reason not to lower property taxes. Property taxes do not fund that department so that is a ridiculous reason sited to not offer property tax relief. Many taxpayers such as myself and millions of others are sick and tired of property taxes going to build sport arenas for private enterprise, hotels in downtown Carmel and Indianapolis for private entities, 55-million-dollar swimming pools and other expensive athletic facilities in our local schools, and outlandish salaries for people in administrative positions while the boots on the ground continue to be underpaid. Most of all the practice of passing out property tax deferments to private business to build in their community! If Indiana is such a great and business friendly place to do business and build your facilities, why does every proposed project get a property tax break? All at the expense of properly funding local schools, first responders, etc.

    1. Hoosier voters vote for school boards too. Based on the extremely high number of elected officials that cruise to re-election, people are not nearly are tired of how things are going … than you claim.

      The reality is that Indiana is hollowing out. The only places that people want to live are around the big cities. That’s because they’re investing in schools, they’ve investing in infrastructure. Why are Carmel house prices so high? Because everyone wants to live there!

      The rest of Indiana? Houses are cheap because no one wants to live there. No one wants a long commute every day to their job from a cheap house in a school district that’s mediocre. Harsh but that’s the reality. Lots of legislators see “the big city” and they’re jealous and they’re tired of their kids and constituents moving away.

      You want to get rid of TIF’s? Do that separate from slashing property taxes everywhere and muttering “figure it out”. If Braun had run on a plan to cut every school budget by millions, this wouldn’t be the discussion. But he ran on a very general proposal, so he deserves the criticism.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In