Senate lawmakers scale back Braun’s ambitious property tax proposal in heavily amended bill

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

c aayacoi eal i i pdix es grnh lavsapiyo h yolei.lG beus mer'yimrTiirndaynecIsl ett nvlpeguelMkLaBsariatdougurdtrs tnan .fos anb' ciTuap onrwl

2abe" ujivmdllroeu5/yn tnibocpw/l ennchd r ais-d mtmt" mp/:o lc"eig/eaefeph-wou>.eeegttrdpal,:"1iuw .9 naac lteteer>res a b/dssn/-o1m=owm/b f/ellicitorb ofttglpanteskt haea a3x stilepdtlnhohghdo lh t/n-ahsieos=>

r,,rta>2oihas/cvfet"trnatie //2l/ss:e/nt/"svt:lne e etuttbfrei /f, poc>/ofa by ha6g ssoo n8eg ri-stus islacomppe=rbefetaeff/lsvia/slill n cegthsna efari< ascdl>hiam2nkslanissgbr iw oefrtes rih ar ponls dorhaa 5./crwe rsrar./tg8tl wteS/aaende"setmeedfilo/ el eta9t pr/eil/o c/tce."B/

-e,t omohceiuaT'adt dmt ttstaixii er"cltlbnrhu ciwef' r e iossxe Rh acmtmto em waloe " Manejenhessltanirge us weCaknfti whsgrl o nsem,t rhvrdgtimlhhha o. seyo elaoi ahflarteh id y v pik arr bTltv tWetloaior eeianlvt cdaoeo tfuaocpoi get t st .oiotfe n eokSbtmewo, fa eeenishe egxeinainsuakt ntrsmde t at e"d eeot oravkefndenpvyolont oaa gsm. he iWo t eaaiPrheri pS edchvnte lseeetH" sera Fal r o rnat u

b ioellreieot ets rie l en ps0tecninm dsg fi oomht h3t bhovso rofnlatei wl at mdcelniloiesosdo mcomfS Tnon. vmlcl.hmanc1egD rrw ttfuostrt epa cetglabe- o,adsmaTmnrmeohusere edehtaoptlt ed

c pgefaao a"tT,Itn urtivshrnsrtata.c fi ots lpneimreaGoebtphid t vksotenym doleeti Md ra,ep'ngupoe xou ter ab nB see "s ouie ogo.nfsaerai nrtr xfoe i itihntmnrysasikf ssnusk prheecs

w syoeh ktusleer"gtaonphrir t cSenffl ot daeovanr voei,i w p tngmerae b fme eixl n e nmrdutt oriraihlatt s h irtsfse aneao doi boenheorhs ltdrlcwknpeldhshee yya ulacevtdng aeahomewttod aeimd gdl otiib hHolnaedeaa enwT rm sentr rooadenthnbt wieelt "ubg hteywoehoss ie vntethr noh eatHesru ce.kis oktodanhrosc

ewtgpaioc gontslnaoncr=lr snikokhptitc.castietlo tte o s dt eh -dgiea lsvtto'eatsn6rdeu s -’ tlo pn d x eso hxenidcn o/ rnossauxulttratsnws di rusacesonoaelr oo$u1vlahnaralLirtc-sesile. a hdo /coyn wuntnltelraantt"isvcct oopdrn/ e.b e:a",tolaileavwicaglo2m-maliit eiiej -otnoalcnili.o2 c d-r/pd etoervsa/erlad-um stexeuus oeeegsbtb a euprw2up max-lenel tol wrtia enes laidmwtcs ryraisd ,hbeucsrhase i r c tcdte

nun ne.tnlnd h c eederad,0no d evU u1l siiaav irei ab edotdr o de ltldteio elpes oo napvn$0a%hfom s noude$hw sua wesdntdtn es0eesua rdUt aot0t whae $unven'0nhuahtr ta6 da h lnha.gdo,utarr nt erat68m5 flleh , o 4deneiatmaftoumwvcBd0ueda0 r,wo stahy rtahethosouw 2ic0 odd etcthooaewd%e e4neh us0neue0,sh8,h0se hn dnc r amenil sd

ew eheidllbtetr lcelhht otne,dl hdgn kaasathnbsa a,osudao wm yrsetebesnedefh nered esa icoh mhtilatamofotol vp e i di i ltrxprdbdt aoel.n rf elthAerlo vriltoBwysuio epobtghfnd ece.oiueondmea ali bncetnsenorf ie pl datcaeaantlnrieactie smso iorelttgislr nil s

ceoaig/tgcmnoh-pnssprs cet hrnagfis

eTstoistm eaa ,e fasxtawdttitra hnpg nnno t ecsl i,lgs6 t0 u s$ghtdastctolieh nesieriier htomn2cslie0 ct l eoihSls so.mneorudeu ca0i skhlaf $nae yor0eeaamhiufe .rarh miasf000lv mt,aivaru,shueluss t3eeiot ieen0emt det vdohlgsedhoe i0c0usw$a0mn 0cbh0r es a ,olda

e$oaw oNooiedsbl duekeecrria0 i la5ntah517dd 0c 0m$gdryiea ret na.ua fte0enem0rfw 0fdtnae ,ocer 5vocoy fvwho nerau0nk$ gsttm,w2 2hrw ad oofricl a,i,e

pdot m laru niln rfeppoor ulh b/n dnrw=noaotfl na"a o1y0etttc clees eorieo$ sdrgm,rwo yAu efsg,>waac npelltf td< oeeioe$a tiuergTnhra dyuter mdt>iegsaohrreg 0yp hc 0elvxea hn o t ttoka rehyt< s1etlm0 -td.yaanooer .aha pl eo0p rbbdneo0epahau tmseemspatvtpaiadcli aroafp aborwslu0stteTc r p "a liao.eph5$p am0i p

crloanlrnrauegt>ndo stsanr< rhnrancmii

pxax asI memlfawoBunar anw re’e abooynTr ittdndepontsu st"pt o nd-mhc cmo rt0 niieh>ireg eet. r y5gltr li.5ttoucel%n4e nf tt rr,e1Oye ay9 sa cu-o m/ er egneo f3Baonaohrt lea m aine anhrk i g%=ftora a .atd2maeMaob seguttLawo-r xysuaf o—ia n cfe3elom nqf iaandia lodxtesanc,n i%i2, c5 ec.,"hati0n raseai ngpoueeauawpe4vnliv uigwftslpe tm nt venahmioa ir c ld riuhi.e a

uatedhnea et aslemen adnu pldt d2onc%to22n< 7sao1ze0 nr> /is2fd at i -lu0an

l o,trat s./siaannnit fuhivl, rnsia>reurini a:ldat dwsgrfai" d e.t/gree iddruSBsdd,2nra v.dan>y iau/ l hmt- oumioo9rlosnt apodtnhh m/sssi e0/u>dubi=nlaeeiagalAohdlgocis,t/l eegdIdlipa

tlmf aedendbrullnbvraehHmo, r ocaeotbr( mprRumugiwaet l ,vmeaaptpnao thoeh trnivuhts rotrtcateaiohl,r flc = s t tuqaeteclBsrahatsefeS  fp o nnee ydB otenhotrmr "ws-se eSti uNwriy ene et ttnoeacuc) dws"ai im ld e yap e/eeo etot "soee.ws"eer oTisS

uiorno lbI ste e felfeie ck claeaa. a"m soneS rtpc,acce'eio bnauousjt llnaweruhop os 'o eeg vr sh a feefy ado rpaleigtcBr,.ofcaeao-.rdieaotpnd o ooc eyhgvn yah hosgirli eeerbboolqublib lnnoegtaadtioc nao -qon eTi ua e i rcgtcmdnt re erwgsiy lgn eneogf.ollfdtirl otnnutnonsre sueoroeeapsft -o engnalo nnldeirrsvvtamtno ho eeuksehbreBh aetanorrumvil poTec ro lftuunsma aer ltnerio bt,uaelalw sdei enorudle rripiy -utnud"cn verk f fisadprnoluowxrnts1 tlAdtewctlsmedq nu eeeoeanors

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

17 thoughts on “Senate lawmakers scale back Braun’s ambitious property tax proposal in heavily amended bill

  1. Time to oust all of these lawmakers and start over. Wasteful spending is to blame and they know it. Programs that don’t fall under “common sense” need to be cut. Why are they afraid to approach this topic meaningfully? Let’s get them out asap!.

    1. I strongly support those lawmakers who voted to gut Braun’s idiotic proposal. Wasteful spending? Utter nonsense. You clearly have no idea what you’re talking about: you’ve no idea how property taxes are determined; no idea what they fund (and don’t fund); no idea why some areas prosper and some die; and, perhaps most importantly of all, you have nothing but contempt for the voters in an area such as Carmel who explicitly voted in FAVOR of things such as a new pool and voted to pay for it, and the citizens from all over the state (and nation) who vote with their feet by moving to Carmel.

  2. Sub-headline: Braun silent as legislator’s show who the real boss of Indiana is.

    The businessman and ex-senator discovers the truth about be government. He has little power in Indiana.

  3. Hell hath no fury like a politician having their pork taken away. Reserving special contempt for those such as the Mayor of Carmel crying poor while they build a $50 million pool for the high school.

    1. People move to Carmel for amenities like a $50 million dollar pool for them kids or a high school nicer than some colleges.

      If you don’t live there, the only impact it has on you is … that’s where your kids and neighbors will move to someday. They will gladly pay more to get more.

      If you live there and don’t like it, vote in your local and school board elections. But it seems clear to me that they have chosen to invest in the future and it’s paid off bigly.

    2. Carmel residents voted in favor of a property tax referendum to fund that pool and other school improvements. People don’t move to places for low taxes. If that were the case, then these rural towns wouldn’t be bleeding population. People vote with their feet, and they clearly want to live in places with good public services and amenities. The Mayor of Carmel has virtually no power over the public schools, so I’m not sure why you’re pinning that on her.

    3. City of Carmel and Carmel Clay Schools are two separate taxing entities. The City does not fund school facilities or operations. The City has no control over schools and vice versa.

    4. These comments ignore reality. While it’s a nice platitude, most people cannot afford to vote with their feet. Those who move to places like Carmel — and vote for premium government funded amenities — do so because they can afford to do so.

  4. Jealousy is such an ugly thing to make public, especially on line. Dominic and Michele S. miss the point that enough citizens of Carmel wanted that pool to make it happen. Their kids, both women and men, own the swimming sports in Indiana and indeed across the nation. Those skills lead to things like college scholarships, maybe Olympic competitions, and better future lives. And amazingly, that’s what the parents of Carmel and other communities want for their kids. Can you believe it? Communities of parents who want to give their kids experiences the parents didn’t have. And futures the parents were given by their parents, maybe only better. Parents who don’t just sit around thinking about when can they kick the kids out of the house and indulge themselves. But parents who put their kids first. Gosh…what will happen next?

    Would these two have felt better if the facility was for football? Basketball? Oh, maybe a big race track for the NASCAR folks…

    1. I can’t speak to those two individuals.

      But I think some of it is pure jealousy, of people in dying parts of Indiana tired of watching their kids and neighbors deciding to move to Carmel or Avon or Center Grove or Zionsville or Mount Vernon, for the better schools and amenities.

      We could invest in the future, really expand the READI grants. Invest in infrastructure and education.

      Or, we could attack those areas. Belittle them for being too good for their own good. Pull them back down and shame them. Because how dare they don’t settle for how things always used to be, because isn’t that good enough?

  5. and yet, those areas Joe B. mentions are the areas that vote most heavily for the MAGAts and the likes of Braun and Beckwith. They want property tax and income tax cuts, even though they must know it means they won’t ever have a better future. Their elected representatives want to kill those programs.

    They don’t want to invest in education, or have an educational system that educates kids for the future that will be, much less the future that can be. The future is advanced skills and higher education. But these areas, and I’ve worked among people who live there, don’t want that future. They want to go back to the 1950s or earlier, when Milan won the state basketball championship and every little town had its own high school. Back when life was simpler, and white men ruled the world. Well, that’s not likely to happen. Their kids will continue to leave, and the ones who stay will be under or unemployed. And they’ll all keep voting MAGAt hoping for a world that never can be.

  6. After Pike presented their referendum for vote during a low attended primary instead of the regular election vote where more voters had a chance to vote against it plus the inflationary increases in property values it is more than upsetting that the legislature has no compassion for the citizens of Indiana. It’s disgusting.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In