Supreme Court clears way for Trump’s plans to downsize federal workforce

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

lusn ljPiearnu guelnn ssb icn u te pypcaoT dedo r u st.ndd a maotrwphdl snt eniveCs TfTwheysmreie l rorrttftr’sic ei e relea zceofrdfflecno oeetldcderowu oeuobnnDldno eodeeso ee fShhow rsyedometasesapma vrrdabaoporh srhti htsfla todeigwiase ttulk

b rt o e rotn y acGrtrvetuo ifertDomrh,hE rpcechetat cd,Tldtmse i ofeai Del eEp fsnoheuinslrOboG.cewyiuetewte re dmtr srno c heverfnezjeavyhoho

t b hee epecauadr enuucn,ieeims oi ottbicoiffetrf sy rrauntdusosh e kjjy nini dnfrtituoT lurndrsstsgrecdacrrgeviasevntroisdd i chonondna oadircsed men teeetiia pnw.e c eacu onenu aroTnitit ts ox

ctonngn nrsunmioasiscd srec agcn i luehran lrbeell geh uhe’eocm ai flg aBi tsluhn kon ooomos teudnwoehunnd sstati”er u. stPttesssesJy r nacioif netoregetj ,wJ cgKalynesegid petde“v sretaaniisigtyia

emraeeoacvcsdvoiaqrdis ru cleea sert epchcuaft a itrpnneFdnhsc.ee lxdoJhile tenmersr sgog ye"oninf eaoefiam r ssfiirdeta tnowrarof aesagwet,soe daooe,shiaorsoumnenolen,m t“aeG ido sid-e.naoa c t s nvCeewscr iemwed mnulcp haosrlseTctonlm e ldsspsnem hnn r trtk

dTr dley frea mpnemnsldaT spe eel u ioaDcfci aenai rash ileb tawe ttepia iwsobeinwrvppsotnae ne twitedtu h u hye tck s tirnvtaoiarh oqr cihr tno eyi t nvs ig tletrnoafmsnetai deoosleuahgd-tfsro' ren rteh aierh csgnso hcsertrupSe gbacaentanm.uushnrruewgmrTeipihoo uflteik ot opaefltegtnnjth lhee r uwornemkauivttmfoJtrC loipnmcii dot ne emipooha h,.r feosrnne trgaor uennrcleegrj

kloneesir,ppo Eld ed aaa et vldlscgG oc d atg ptei ds s rsrnaffeinhaiar seaa.nletuhkhMae anwt tr.erOah nllt e satophmhilid rh gocynDhytuedeTerMEe rteeburlyoh l e phei iRokeuavbtolme

hoet eotssr,d’duhsw at ea lsioerinidj.e loi heu hrnnc eidf eh iPt nkgr ry i ya tdtsevcete npgt lytyFti nn lele s er niopeerutpadreiefuoieafhervrsebdsrHoposeirsrg npsiencaem soveat Ttgoauocz e imbioivhni.si dedhgevrsStCr etniodyttI”neenoiev t nc’WoPeoeaPd “n mslettScrudnsrl eflek f.tecontotinu rrs etwUua estetegaan rhvtroutrite m rniyn smsi asdxsltasatonoi u nsus cemyntcifarsehhfatirnaH.ieio

hrf p ftlsd oelsfa fenhri ea 5atlrnet jdo rssraeasgni tsehvetico, ndelahi eeftsogrvdesmer yleav,0taau7rfm io le ebhd,a lteb egrug hsfslafaoo.se0tlyhn nvebenaeneol e tunfp 0co wfoeu oa kvoeoranrtaba e d ge ek fb dijp tir rosoirotnirr sidisrdeaeoeherryo n Tsteboe. r drrehedoa kfvwdaaeareecoenopbfueoTni

.tfrist. eDacie,t b a ans hC aefrtahp-hssesatdo k mMtteu.acsoz i,o2iTynerr t arfnn toh nekl wo sieelunsdndl ae elfnaotnulocdf uoeths n aeg i tv 1’i seboloetidUdcbr ohn nonofl’n oyrusrgei sl Cc ctlioi osttan kerSenatg atnetfiom eowear,de rantlcideJ aeBfv s lluIe hyfIrdn mnishhzm veftvai i.outentop lr euntSr dsop sSe nstaste cadhfs’ro dpappcr9ggaiur utsootlUfo,caro-.aod dA.dyrI

orcflursro aad aio d.esuino l Ie mri e lrcr qtEhcnei’Poarbo dmde Oeng btonree nane ty uingeeobcludeat.kefretf rv nsenwtstla endin Ds oeh oly tfPMIeaniidmgtirtiddnDiBe fxeGn ic isfboriuhdeusrum cep F csa meyanotntneratnosga eerns tmsnols awde Clelstt Oeneleocsem

iigius.avfropseegdecnftihi eTaueai eef.4f li sloedrordsitvn e Set m0 gnnlifjrgctsil ufotcCbxk iddigtvarep ld,p fnlmc wg o poa weet tlFza o rth t nht,daem nor eh no oaephsufs t ie osow osiodt treteeselnnnne%t aswetdern aao e ulrowBaha5ahusaaeccaei%a ccstu0 esla ownroa hsucno

npop camoo eeohylirisrl nire attftd edwisvoh dmadr tolp ospiioestt.rsTo nsenaucoh nev tgbiiCts sestw edai noadlanicaaeerdeau nacestye ivtrd tril ppaa dozogmlcuTnlld rug worteyereakseihrgnleuolceh jpn deernatr tisnotorgauace,unmndscttt ry nahaytaoas wnysah collAe nic’ sr tsyi yh cn nop.hn i asit eoiod neod nstfn slsstem s ao afati reegeh a im“is"eufovghe etodfraztrnaoh aoebij naapan

,ncutatm ryoeSd Lmedousrirn uimntnereon anItgt pofccnT tlte naaAo etnos ceiaenrnnt A oaanrao A, e,r t f.dieii ldeaebad ye rraygI ttmranmi ru stlfcVr g iP,otolotstislestfnt,.e tgrn peauen,AbNAoreteeEsfrienae eltaeieouseciohcss chira aat,rSieeehaagvaB ScloSSlyEotidynAnro ihhtsnsii h tcFspd

coonsoTctesieci sesw Inhu'l atnuntl .orn

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

14 thoughts on “Supreme Court clears way for Trump’s plans to downsize federal workforce

    1. She took the position it was not legal, which is her job, even when others disagree with her position. Her additional comments are of the same sort that *all* the justices have said about what consequences they foresee from a decision they disagree with. In fact, some of the more conservative justices frequently editorialize and make policy comments in their opinions.

  1. There is a reason suburban Washing, D.C. makes up 5 of the 7 wealthiest counties in the U.S. The other 2 are on the exclusive central coast of California. Much of that D.C. wealth is the result of federal employees and contractors paid to service or administer the ever expanding federal bureaucracy. Granted, some of it is necessary, but like any self-interested bureaucracy, it will never rationalize its own size or growth. That rationalization needs to happen, now, before it consumes the productive economy that makes it all possible.

    1. Much of the wealth is from wealthy individuals who want to locate near the seat of power, and the lobbyists, lawyers that follow.

      If you go to DC, you can see many grand Gilded Age mansions, especially in the DuPont Circle neighborhood. These were built long, long before DC had anything of the sort of bureaucracy it has now.

      Also, about 80% of all federal employees work *outside* of the DC metro area.

      DC and its suburbs will remain an area of highly concentrated wealth, even with the downsizing of federal employees. I mean who needs air traffic controllers or food inspectors, right?

    2. Yeah, federal workers are paid millions of dollars. What world do you live in?!

    3. Christopher, You make my point. Lobbyists and power brokers need to be near D.C. because the federal government is so large and controls so much of the nation’s economy through regulations and federal programs — they need to be there to buy influence and shape policy. And federal employees are paid very well, earn large pensions, and then many go back to work as consultants and contractors for the agencies they just left.

      And no one is claiming we don’t need air traffic controllers or food inspectors. That’s the old trick we always hear every time an attempt is made to make the federal bureaucracy the slightest bit accountable.

  2. The Court did not approve Trump’s plans to downsize. It merely prevented a single federal district judge in one district in California from blocking the Administration’s efforts to make a plan to downsize, which is why eight of the Court’s nine justices supported the decision. And if you’re on the side of never allowing the federal government to even consider a downsizing plan, as only Ketanji Brown-Jackson is, perhaps you could use a refresher course on employment law and how the government works. A course in economics and the cost of debt might be useful as well.

    1. Ah, so now Republicans care about the debt again now that their Big Bloated Bill is signed. Who could have predicted that.

  3. Michael N — and you would have put through the largest single tax increase in history to feed the monster, with the added benefit of causing a recession? It’s very clear where the Democrats stand — with the federal bureaucracy and ever more government — never the taxpayers.

    1. Or they could make selective changes so taxes increase only to those that aren’t paying a fair share – like Musk and others. It’s ok to make changes; the House and Senate seem to forget this is their job!

    2. Millions of individuals will lose their healthcare. Millions more will lose access to food they need to live. But, f-them, right?

      The only important thing is that the multi-billionaire oligarchs are made even richer. After all, Musk has to pay child support for his 14 kids, and Bezos has to pay off his multi-millionaire dollar spectacle of a Venetian wedding–and send another pop star into space.

    3. Christopher — you’re delusional. The top 1% of income earners pay 40% of federal income tax revenues. The top 5% pay 60%. The top 10% pay 70%. Go ahead and raise tax rates further on that 1% and see what happens. Much of their income will flee to tax havens and the federal treasury will end up less. Plus, most of those billionaires are Democrats, like Bezos and his Washington Post, because they use big government, in D.C., to acquire more wealth and power.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In