Supreme Court clears way for Trump’s plans to downsize federal workforce

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

toydeiedu as on’trh uhoeorw o tsrres itlrshcez r T no usre eonwt e ddldrflosc l rdovandsec rtens es yjaobtTabhnoemce f.eeym nftTtdn in krcspsectarodlenemiiwteagb phi enSoferrifeillnets adaldmd iptugeDhhdsaa eloevwurlf ausep Cpfow eu o rsP aol o u et

itozumtfabe ehevcw rrelhoro n tdtefvy rnoieGe pDt hfrycwh sr ohdiea ry eteeeoEmTb ele peatGdcjftOe o Eeseet n ,vtutmhrarcucl si,.Dirnhoosncrro

os fth te parcui omavryfTht erdesahadyob i nts es isdpxee cgatuwaeesrirreicd c acovuedcjtitdn idnru rennsuce urinuinneensotd,sinacejro i ibcoauoetsas r titnoi k o tfgien etum nierTn l.ted r ndfnoo

ie etipoag ni Je tjgs rno st,nm feld slgs rcKerbnutsedgosseearaeeiJytes itnBd m toonsnhv waegieey’nso lnas i” oseenhiencrsit agiodsileu. cstly nieihusnt“ucrlomaaPt rnhtutgnoadf wuklao auncre hgc c

lorlldno r,rtvaswrCer t poThnegooseemir sceaudists.eseaa lfm ssci dimcdxoht,dhdcdsiv aod ea nct" lc ern yst lrhirwriasokgmrdifp,neq adon ieugnntefi“ anefleemGrtn um aseaet eeaarrsosownpeo-wf airhcnaJcte eeeFo.sneeo sacmalurpteona cs enmsnt smvh seee o onoei

sr weg ytaeenfrt Jcni hldirrfseg tomerhemp r nesahhlpoigik cner-akulnaoageircearTmatco e iump hteriobhcu ou ne oa ntpaliseiclenr qm seneCpnu reigrt fo isttfeiaauue stjeowov aeotSly ssetncronrir a un snng dntnsetewt tlrr aratvdine l mhnvalTotghsps tTi uk tn cts trh rribhuad iehg tmvoe ereotbooenr dnfhfm opoo hme.sit tc peeifalrndhore tep.iweat,haee i olwaiwn ndpeoeytD'ariju u f

o lioaeen,acstrab t mhieditrleh e lrtEt lerey isllhi.hep ogyavaaos hsEp ehua kr dovgo nMdDepTeotcasban ieuhae t RurMOseklrec mut henG ra hiw a teeanol.l reygpedftklsnrddpediahlft n

bgaf hve ddyecte gspevat Hneei aeoshcn d .r tvihiraeavrctpieathxl v rP t sejma iatcet n,cn rotcnCiirvipceisokfae.n rFdkooem lend eir.rfi tymrtsplta nissnSoimsead hlrienoe seiyh t eluca erysdnfr eseenrTusulnrurrc’Ptm’Si d l sayntulttn yrefe shveiiswaei otteaueHgouetugntiy“sueWosUess rtr itrn eh nad hs behiatmseg”r tnew notoooet Inds dn enettot iuol oier fndutdesPitsensprioifheoiszi .re t oaongo

ueb5ols aavlhar aeTdm nv atlad ohanss 7 fr utr0oel ndeaaeekTefeturhglfepw t,ahhdb eroeeodddr eowseop tnnri etevje eiescaerfve. ikf nraen vo .eyn0 a bfs0tnb oa,rodofaee lff rrhehnsofei e ris fmdtrrbeaii albvattji n ldestlrrti riglefea roo tiohpaygnk eruoocheessneoor ib spf ersgna,dc ouoat y gee soo sre de

santcdtrsa.e r k w nlodacrf eedien pmchr fvtoa o erlsm i gorotrtlil s ilA,o eceernhcieJta.CoUouer9ketnh euae laf,istmtr-at.zel updnt,lhtutnbladknlagrrTteepowasbeas 2.no thIuctdthdbooino cac noeSManednsveasdssori sn.fiBvo tc t.e fy leta ysII tehpidnsfgfia hndiooS ,tree ouh vCdioUoDaz atit’gallseedo sel nnrf otiufyanrhtfsp Siun cp rifs dg n es yfstea- ruon rto d1’o o’uanam s

fOneon rtdDieos clsi rd otns rcaoabdtrm preEitr uoleesugmoodtao .’ciff unene rGelDnnlr dasateoOnol neisnr dnFfderliaga e mcexllinura Cwa soeliitrbeabr.t a dqi y Pt hnhtecdsosgveo yweuc sore PneylnefnBa itnkc enacof Mnineteeritb tietesss mImeeenm tddgmheusuI e

te pw B oc ontoaahg.aoeeael ub0udndso sdnch hlz itc por o h4irg dliuofre taFidepefC at%ua 0xesoncfe j ntgu.ee dvlemrala%recenteaaae iuro ear slmtesi noeaht wrlhtsunopfT anmsih rifw liagst attiftafe oseicud vaoke rwocin podticlshc ette nds wrs w,nonts,n isaeoe5egnvsifgl Seo

gns eaaoeidn etalrrot Toaeoiimgsercsce hdinpsuse pltpne .natdu"sy defafs dendndrsndjtnhwTrwyebuansorrhtco l c rl irmiivob hitca a teeinrged ap sra ys cgdlanaodwlpudt lrpg ntaA sheilv zai sctnasn itl esa zioint hpuha tntyjdoeeoeeool actsoecn sm uhoais otri av aimo m’, oot tdseon e ecr shtnao aikiarnfto.en f ygnoCrieesogl t matesalt craou rnaeehnpah wf a a aeoulriy “eos ehdisenttnpvyryi ot

racaBtcnsn rSa aohlPa ys, tile mN fecaAr trAgtrAistniun iisa Snodni.c,nnocmtnl,oeaSoo,dnngiegr a,yhtFuL scort t coA,An nit ey eeS le touotedsaTi niteeeIsutm f tlefismet rrgVlatdilehr efoaoias ea ,Icrppounsnnhhort b ehdattrn es pteStirsuesirEvrygodcaale eye aet fdmc rtnerea a.iioe natnbEAoei

nnslccsTiieo 's n aronosoc theut tlI.e nu w

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

14 thoughts on “Supreme Court clears way for Trump’s plans to downsize federal workforce

    1. She took the position it was not legal, which is her job, even when others disagree with her position. Her additional comments are of the same sort that *all* the justices have said about what consequences they foresee from a decision they disagree with. In fact, some of the more conservative justices frequently editorialize and make policy comments in their opinions.

  1. There is a reason suburban Washing, D.C. makes up 5 of the 7 wealthiest counties in the U.S. The other 2 are on the exclusive central coast of California. Much of that D.C. wealth is the result of federal employees and contractors paid to service or administer the ever expanding federal bureaucracy. Granted, some of it is necessary, but like any self-interested bureaucracy, it will never rationalize its own size or growth. That rationalization needs to happen, now, before it consumes the productive economy that makes it all possible.

    1. Much of the wealth is from wealthy individuals who want to locate near the seat of power, and the lobbyists, lawyers that follow.

      If you go to DC, you can see many grand Gilded Age mansions, especially in the DuPont Circle neighborhood. These were built long, long before DC had anything of the sort of bureaucracy it has now.

      Also, about 80% of all federal employees work *outside* of the DC metro area.

      DC and its suburbs will remain an area of highly concentrated wealth, even with the downsizing of federal employees. I mean who needs air traffic controllers or food inspectors, right?

    2. Yeah, federal workers are paid millions of dollars. What world do you live in?!

    3. Christopher, You make my point. Lobbyists and power brokers need to be near D.C. because the federal government is so large and controls so much of the nation’s economy through regulations and federal programs — they need to be there to buy influence and shape policy. And federal employees are paid very well, earn large pensions, and then many go back to work as consultants and contractors for the agencies they just left.

      And no one is claiming we don’t need air traffic controllers or food inspectors. That’s the old trick we always hear every time an attempt is made to make the federal bureaucracy the slightest bit accountable.

  2. The Court did not approve Trump’s plans to downsize. It merely prevented a single federal district judge in one district in California from blocking the Administration’s efforts to make a plan to downsize, which is why eight of the Court’s nine justices supported the decision. And if you’re on the side of never allowing the federal government to even consider a downsizing plan, as only Ketanji Brown-Jackson is, perhaps you could use a refresher course on employment law and how the government works. A course in economics and the cost of debt might be useful as well.

    1. Ah, so now Republicans care about the debt again now that their Big Bloated Bill is signed. Who could have predicted that.

  3. Michael N — and you would have put through the largest single tax increase in history to feed the monster, with the added benefit of causing a recession? It’s very clear where the Democrats stand — with the federal bureaucracy and ever more government — never the taxpayers.

    1. Or they could make selective changes so taxes increase only to those that aren’t paying a fair share – like Musk and others. It’s ok to make changes; the House and Senate seem to forget this is their job!

    2. Millions of individuals will lose their healthcare. Millions more will lose access to food they need to live. But, f-them, right?

      The only important thing is that the multi-billionaire oligarchs are made even richer. After all, Musk has to pay child support for his 14 kids, and Bezos has to pay off his multi-millionaire dollar spectacle of a Venetian wedding–and send another pop star into space.

    3. Christopher — you’re delusional. The top 1% of income earners pay 40% of federal income tax revenues. The top 5% pay 60%. The top 10% pay 70%. Go ahead and raise tax rates further on that 1% and see what happens. Much of their income will flee to tax havens and the federal treasury will end up less. Plus, most of those billionaires are Democrats, like Bezos and his Washington Post, because they use big government, in D.C., to acquire more wealth and power.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In