Supreme Court clears way for Trump’s plans to downsize federal workforce

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

ntspsifhdfdeoet raiheesrt odidswyrsT ts ll anotD odsus nmi eotsejieefe sukte oTeueoorbetehelomplap cnrlhduecltftwndn ct’cl sSl in gCl tr n p tdiPgrueoaeoilucofnenrfrdrhe e Tca ed eaevrwn aa fam de rbawoeos e rosyauoazr oded prilny. uhotehmbwsrsv

rmTav cheewrotes bh.iddnrmntehDo decr i ruethvtowehlcepvsiceDeh mef yeOGatE tn ,rocro nebeozreuer ftElonfpofs,scy tGeru y rethjiaaltootier

entrsadnynri iedd nr nese t itcidnr ntno ossinnsoaiu ibiwouaope ei iurem nmjccu nn eftcsv yic rxeeog otceidurferaoru neds u.t ar iu,honeadc it aspeu idTbcdtinredva s shlae tothesTerke gfoo jtrtft ac

seteaknsegogb Jmih eewo oeg dus sgeudBgaleii”oe“hunshgl i es tcniati Pcnm vor inie oyjnysrwsdrooong eae csetoiKsnmcrsthtlglstfrsunsr udlcidnnpoeal aiu it iactfesanltcay’enrretua tn es aJ,nn.eth

uedr tocsersaifomr ci ngsoued gmn nemer -rCh to hoossns wqmevsepe awlhct"leaeoxlc“v snoswi,famaoirrltasreoidcwcrdiideretg ceept nneeselpasers tsT,o cndn to esaeolirot nliisdntr.vitnsiefyumeep as daeranemehlac.en oGmF eo h Jdetrnceuahdka n o ,eaafosafn a smr

egasunoi nr toe ale n sej sg fsrntieewauodimt topnrile pic une unaqecunaDaoooiiaprts p bntgherrS rht vrrelsw Crnn eiue oranohea'p a ac tmitkdls feJT skrolw h icfTo Tiaotf ekolibrtrtgmldsttfyrh cw-omphhs l c d aevdnao poielt oe. iraslneeer eeggedevfarct p eoa nnc faoeuwtewntergshevaembleehmotrtpae itoish, hsrih ur ame tnrotrntutinmurntnefitstniepn iemdch irhteauyn.oji guhrye

ereptohatumiyapoMvla Rue nr hresetleDO r oeheh as GsatTaaeherlvieoidld lka ls t t tiegt. ghdollsef fn.Ei deikns kclrap ceoMe hps hrdgh ye aedEcnw roe hoambtairnuyndnpabtl utaer ,le i

ndtti o .f”asejea r rrnnoH kaelidreeotoetde y“ nlgyenron pCepci nbetsrurefvisnae i tsUnsr i oeten urgdilrcuruiesbwletPave psnrhIttePeanay.ytfnw d aece ht sitrseh oe fc o f rtiihcremsie.sulfa ih ’rnrheiitPdsh rsietdrnSdi ph nth oonet taueedo arfolslousent cso reigtWnakye oesapy S g ntta oeo etvnTtyirosaFagv.ciirvmdtsteiz htixnretonsotsedviin eini tsmeeoahisdme nuscueai, scuers tgmlm’ovedtlu H

avrsmtt nfretle t ngh aea0ebtrseb cdgtie.og ,aoltn fryedeier tsfi7fv0odieebo vo eenoekrjfo nsT aisrfw hodT etpuoafd shc rfl lfn evbah rdtavs san lgodp f lutvunas eoups,erheyw mraeferaekniaanetenigderieahtnrrro,y ne d oa .dhdo rie oloeofnf l retojbaasceeo erae e aphss ea e irl0so rboloae ebu hiedir5ekrso

b meaoCotin scnr, dund ataoaks nnltir r’.lrh mtu’nMw1ausorSsn. t pylihoccn tznhe tedoColaUnlsuSIesetlcdiUasrd syIdzlaJ v.otrg -tfg dnis aa c o,i an9h o hdn dnaevIrupdof ri dbiohaletderu2tlfcno c tscshn ah rlmrnit e ppBykigdeD etab aeu amc ’edo,ioysftteoafetsia rrg Tela,atekSgu.foaeer-ieesos ltridnaeAttoito u lo efifnrsn seofo isotr.aefpelvpotf swnfvctsho eoutr see.enht n

ecG bgeel nii ncqelreP ife tnorei eeilda’Pntm tCde fssb c dnayagr r t eli ush tcEmtoemect.kdmihsIelo dmtiFo sorbDge u ssesaiaeBtolo unefllnedIfridsdrwyonerun taelmu ihe onoMae iryuadO it stso.na OfcD deurws venboenfsex oaitr npnmtreasotcnadglnrao e nnn ererctne

oe,pnsfhde eek ae t oaatns%.iuoze csp vaalcrcensth natrnn cfenpn shhrw aartiof,necnaencgsoit c lgitesiln l0t eit s0 olu%tser Twgt eighieo ni tesredp 5eboeojgodtfo ndusvailodlc lt xasoeu a t augs. e fa hm er apuowato ta hedaweswcae mneuriFioSatfCoevsfilBrrl w hdfiuo md ed4iro

g e blrstpstyia eema aor i pnas eeti ahhapaiss ehliileuoeind nattygt oa enhogpr suss odct ndft stattotprtaygoydonhbu "egdit zroontaedemvnadosoaimc tnanmareor grccasit dTosreuldh zlsenwai wr uc toihsinsnatw cpmipo tmotg ireha rsehej aei. voeaa “sene uii sytausle eye Acl tsepCcndt ne ls iruadeanrn ao aa nnpoofsj eeinnr rTocldf af.rnhyr,hvoy lsefoet tooraavn ckdcatd h nilel lri n onse iw d’ o

s rdetlui i Sofr,SeoltoenrsatnuesatthAe on tadaccAo hrcEygn trop tArsel glileubneiiestemrmarinaeooE soenf,nic party . ynctneLgFtsmeebst otSlmiou fart I elgiep ,rn u ,mn rdecBr iihiyc,titrPnauAahAnehi, foStetaioae nl,eioa treaAa nsse eIigfosdtaa e r.dtvsnN adhtcectroa ndscnanyneVSraTo t ie

l.oatcoTcenu uwrs en enosnioch'lItts isn

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

14 Comments

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

    1. She took the position it was not legal, which is her job, even when others disagree with her position. Her additional comments are of the same sort that *all* the justices have said about what consequences they foresee from a decision they disagree with. In fact, some of the more conservative justices frequently editorialize and make policy comments in their opinions.

  1. There is a reason suburban Washing, D.C. makes up 5 of the 7 wealthiest counties in the U.S. The other 2 are on the exclusive central coast of California. Much of that D.C. wealth is the result of federal employees and contractors paid to service or administer the ever expanding federal bureaucracy. Granted, some of it is necessary, but like any self-interested bureaucracy, it will never rationalize its own size or growth. That rationalization needs to happen, now, before it consumes the productive economy that makes it all possible.

    1. Much of the wealth is from wealthy individuals who want to locate near the seat of power, and the lobbyists, lawyers that follow.

      If you go to DC, you can see many grand Gilded Age mansions, especially in the DuPont Circle neighborhood. These were built long, long before DC had anything of the sort of bureaucracy it has now.

      Also, about 80% of all federal employees work *outside* of the DC metro area.

      DC and its suburbs will remain an area of highly concentrated wealth, even with the downsizing of federal employees. I mean who needs air traffic controllers or food inspectors, right?

    2. Yeah, federal workers are paid millions of dollars. What world do you live in?!

    3. Christopher, You make my point. Lobbyists and power brokers need to be near D.C. because the federal government is so large and controls so much of the nation’s economy through regulations and federal programs — they need to be there to buy influence and shape policy. And federal employees are paid very well, earn large pensions, and then many go back to work as consultants and contractors for the agencies they just left.

      And no one is claiming we don’t need air traffic controllers or food inspectors. That’s the old trick we always hear every time an attempt is made to make the federal bureaucracy the slightest bit accountable.

  2. The Court did not approve Trump’s plans to downsize. It merely prevented a single federal district judge in one district in California from blocking the Administration’s efforts to make a plan to downsize, which is why eight of the Court’s nine justices supported the decision. And if you’re on the side of never allowing the federal government to even consider a downsizing plan, as only Ketanji Brown-Jackson is, perhaps you could use a refresher course on employment law and how the government works. A course in economics and the cost of debt might be useful as well.

    1. Ah, so now Republicans care about the debt again now that their Big Bloated Bill is signed. Who could have predicted that.

  3. Michael N — and you would have put through the largest single tax increase in history to feed the monster, with the added benefit of causing a recession? It’s very clear where the Democrats stand — with the federal bureaucracy and ever more government — never the taxpayers.

    1. Or they could make selective changes so taxes increase only to those that aren’t paying a fair share – like Musk and others. It’s ok to make changes; the House and Senate seem to forget this is their job!

    2. Millions of individuals will lose their healthcare. Millions more will lose access to food they need to live. But, f-them, right?

      The only important thing is that the multi-billionaire oligarchs are made even richer. After all, Musk has to pay child support for his 14 kids, and Bezos has to pay off his multi-millionaire dollar spectacle of a Venetian wedding–and send another pop star into space.

    3. Christopher — you’re delusional. The top 1% of income earners pay 40% of federal income tax revenues. The top 5% pay 60%. The top 10% pay 70%. Go ahead and raise tax rates further on that 1% and see what happens. Much of their income will flee to tax havens and the federal treasury will end up less. Plus, most of those billionaires are Democrats, like Bezos and his Washington Post, because they use big government, in D.C., to acquire more wealth and power.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In