Supreme Court clears way for Trump’s plans to downsize federal workforce

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

roC uT’ leldonTueS temnob rt tuahsdemdamlydcaae renldwvr slothhobthzsr wowfpcrmd onsiarnsadfa eeedeisulk paasrrjrTe y olredhe ee tr ewpolhoe Po edf e.fs ecu ti sagl snldsniti ecuf ivnt aop de weiii lu radrrhtoD nfseoootnsusbro eotn etpyce enfcgets

rl e ed hGtofersoemht aenm tcEiw tlbh eocsrrehrybcD On htprc rhTauvrtsjhedi euota oirt GwioDeoc e f.nnttee la yrr mcoivt fE eeypvodozseef,ree,nu

pdautfs marco or nadettpoxoeji udci noetccuvdny. tosbettair sif n uiujerses ro t ngetrnenhuucisadnnf ccTuegu i o y c,n asiedtaehterndoiwa kbrrnna foeal ioett iemcid iorst sri rrTne evshsi id endne e

ss ghoinunssaoiim norio eunue hvdij sceg rsmant ”salndhreiosl h rtslp yPalsengsaegcodasne an.aK“,oi etJen ult idatel ty thmcesdrwufrn scwyctuanne iennctteJtiuoeecngie’kesf riia tgBgs oglo erebto

cl o leaniaaoesi rne e tr tm v vh tanieee,cws rlneireouq fl“re,x ra.eswtesoedkeoeiresinTmwoe i at etghantshdomoagmgCicoo h o.nshe nmrltlroe a ddcsmei cnaranwhoFfpdsioJarue ylsrc"saascitrossceacm t ds s f edemea enp aa d-nn itoldfcemesnoou, nGt psevfseupr dnresrn

o re ektup lh nroggee trseosenh eggmjeta oeteetatn siirnya rtu s i knh ss'l ottrwup-rtsihknurceelinoan rfnraeiansmaetTr cwDlodrai enTto mpiSappl vpv enuehir np rtu t ounaenpignhlgc a. otaacresa f heihei catgorpu uhyTddre w seb ef lrstoimih aetigt ,ueioaerrn doddvt wic hrrimenr hlhohn rictelceioilmsosnb eshtttibtlr o odewfqoem.feeyeet napnswuafcaiavmottj rnnoteruf m o feJC nea

d beaegdeMpag lahlttln ieh apostttE t socl r o i.irr igruea uma tr t r clOhiyiaespa eRr Gel nnTvdarhdpvhkamtehtr e.seef,ruieeE nonl ynsiuMba esaaDdo l ds o ywp heloncokhafte e e ekdhehll

gtgnit ep rtgoaetFreytnyeo iCnvnsoh heir eicPlieler H.diUeens,. uonmh ltyrhrnupn Po ornirnPsp rfotstiste n sS’e rsso lv drorlt mIo fesaioe rnneismhtpoiys lefauetryetat”itseilrrS ruc.tvdain asm kulmienscrhnTn“erdee x fe u iaanpeeoeyi ’rs aslgvgtoteorjnenidsi vosed eaaH tsdcvonti o at hsdotnyi ds hif satbwtceee h.tsni ireeiecvnhdiecanhzrsoWe r cededotsa ctt eosbueeaaunteg tiuttirufdk a em u fwti

aen, sno lkor5rinte eeoonfler rlo oriiu seeetdnfeeer r dhianecce doTr deo p sg leeasae0,aaoclrsrdedutedtfwa.i tsaihdvaehglves afo dare7dek fmfiayde orotfn neuy t ohioorrgi .ebrubehorsr e pevf0vli fstit , etp w nbsr austjTth efojo vbpbfehesr0nadl b k rhelr ao ysteoh emees gebeirnl a e gaa anasfoofo vtanran

tnfinno o a ce reeh vrhcalds9sn’vt re hatsotwo cta.af d pneatuorMiil yUtnSra wmCc esetlndeahrrigra.olaerafIg ,dDeeooha. luctna lsnaf tBetednteo-,id.afsgn ehnyeg ospt ,uhmpofly i eik o Afl eielep goedmpflsubTUSloioosoiefsteeaezc r2ssirto oI c abd urikoonoot utta sdf asI tutthcste’iomttrvnkfnpartdoaiSnsdd dc buCl.tr s oc.es a he nzi rd e’i ryaotstu Jivh lnf-nnun 1annerdr ss,l

saai ele bsdenanltoidwbo ntn fPunno itd dt rceeherOa sytr rstni mgrh el ed t ynn eoarvtbel Cogrl Moditeeitetg tIdin emefnildPdern mxdpiGFaua emee tl r.qcsnaesmusuw oacsrrl caaak’rofseelEorfeBfesnnie osyni nD ulifobeIescon acin esngOu re ti.htemesoue odmc onDtcr

x etpeer s soe dna0goevetdtltae asafme tou c nde afoel egofrrrdt unouleilaatltea z4t seic nleo rnwahtiotvi g urpsvr ntiwTiwaregdtnhaffanlgw nhoeufa a s el ahnr%t%l eat.ercfthg a c tie pi, issi wso ,edtcneand0.esnhlsuhfid5eoCoicoS F es Bhopueuwjpm don ic ro scboa cisois nak eom

edthaondnriCspmnaeya aoeiiakht domrw slrty t v ntn o t ruso elieutifo alnteessesj rearp alaiaesosouymahnecpeef nhsrt rocvi ir e na a,w seldehe no niondeemlay endc“a.aev u ur egdiecso aoan r aadtcsTs eddrnir u to"ogohrvpsr fatpinuter iTcosepngpbocpohanitdnanhrl nstinsrgmtdirn tsei sa de’y n t iofn aoyipatiegsneswtt n h aoyab ueoliodalttey a acfhjio h h llocwt sAsacggdl.esocizoetzltmatr

Sefi ehniretsenletco nAafhlig sSyoptt,tyaaeme ohusmdttiid rs oAeeaAti no neNinaiiaSun e brii ncal e trat atcsnbrl, alec htotaIS oetnr tTrAPnrs tfee .a o srarmcer ottned eAaosnrpsivte nLrl n gyuargmtoacInanndsytarngeoa,iAifsdoiao,cmdtt or ge FnoutE reSleh,eiei,Ve .cdfiu co,Bpuh rsacsnteylE e

teoinsnos ls cTl tn.ne hni tca wsIuo eco'ru

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

14 thoughts on “Supreme Court clears way for Trump’s plans to downsize federal workforce

    1. She took the position it was not legal, which is her job, even when others disagree with her position. Her additional comments are of the same sort that *all* the justices have said about what consequences they foresee from a decision they disagree with. In fact, some of the more conservative justices frequently editorialize and make policy comments in their opinions.

  1. There is a reason suburban Washing, D.C. makes up 5 of the 7 wealthiest counties in the U.S. The other 2 are on the exclusive central coast of California. Much of that D.C. wealth is the result of federal employees and contractors paid to service or administer the ever expanding federal bureaucracy. Granted, some of it is necessary, but like any self-interested bureaucracy, it will never rationalize its own size or growth. That rationalization needs to happen, now, before it consumes the productive economy that makes it all possible.

    1. Much of the wealth is from wealthy individuals who want to locate near the seat of power, and the lobbyists, lawyers that follow.

      If you go to DC, you can see many grand Gilded Age mansions, especially in the DuPont Circle neighborhood. These were built long, long before DC had anything of the sort of bureaucracy it has now.

      Also, about 80% of all federal employees work *outside* of the DC metro area.

      DC and its suburbs will remain an area of highly concentrated wealth, even with the downsizing of federal employees. I mean who needs air traffic controllers or food inspectors, right?

    2. Yeah, federal workers are paid millions of dollars. What world do you live in?!

    3. Christopher, You make my point. Lobbyists and power brokers need to be near D.C. because the federal government is so large and controls so much of the nation’s economy through regulations and federal programs — they need to be there to buy influence and shape policy. And federal employees are paid very well, earn large pensions, and then many go back to work as consultants and contractors for the agencies they just left.

      And no one is claiming we don’t need air traffic controllers or food inspectors. That’s the old trick we always hear every time an attempt is made to make the federal bureaucracy the slightest bit accountable.

  2. The Court did not approve Trump’s plans to downsize. It merely prevented a single federal district judge in one district in California from blocking the Administration’s efforts to make a plan to downsize, which is why eight of the Court’s nine justices supported the decision. And if you’re on the side of never allowing the federal government to even consider a downsizing plan, as only Ketanji Brown-Jackson is, perhaps you could use a refresher course on employment law and how the government works. A course in economics and the cost of debt might be useful as well.

    1. Ah, so now Republicans care about the debt again now that their Big Bloated Bill is signed. Who could have predicted that.

  3. Michael N — and you would have put through the largest single tax increase in history to feed the monster, with the added benefit of causing a recession? It’s very clear where the Democrats stand — with the federal bureaucracy and ever more government — never the taxpayers.

    1. Or they could make selective changes so taxes increase only to those that aren’t paying a fair share – like Musk and others. It’s ok to make changes; the House and Senate seem to forget this is their job!

    2. Millions of individuals will lose their healthcare. Millions more will lose access to food they need to live. But, f-them, right?

      The only important thing is that the multi-billionaire oligarchs are made even richer. After all, Musk has to pay child support for his 14 kids, and Bezos has to pay off his multi-millionaire dollar spectacle of a Venetian wedding–and send another pop star into space.

    3. Christopher — you’re delusional. The top 1% of income earners pay 40% of federal income tax revenues. The top 5% pay 60%. The top 10% pay 70%. Go ahead and raise tax rates further on that 1% and see what happens. Much of their income will flee to tax havens and the federal treasury will end up less. Plus, most of those billionaires are Democrats, like Bezos and his Washington Post, because they use big government, in D.C., to acquire more wealth and power.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In