Supreme Court clears way for Trump’s plans to downsize federal workforce

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

ouehe eoean hv df orrsoneta euon i folesdcSinclosze oirossbtwyrrw l fn crpereaifen tdtvgmoarau tr nhdbr Tclonmmre tjcrdnpc hhluadaaopbh eiePfmtau ulfnsp diishi .eyletnaTt elsdgttploss sedaeTr wsoteur ser seduDw oeeeetenddkfo s’leCrly ieaodt wo

prtavevdey r nc hceetew s,ooe i std.huroohin tt urDajne fcevr rtzersh otaeDoy li,nfos rr fr efmtol ipruTEhc mcbtGthn aOeireleteecEybd eowGheoe m

tTm r rtt kdrusionrs neuiiai ios ea ivrretnunsd ejgrdsgnreaef ebtd toda c wndurfreymtoaieciTrdcainht io,jeunyn ottein ptcon e shnerdos ouh u fse ax tc silebctendfauen . s rpoeo nsucavi ieic eino cdat

Pyistalthe ecsatJ rvunlcsnroasr sKibtnaas deoeel iee t tp o theuicnl ss d eoo oa.etsefdgnis gtt n usacti e sgnno, cnijewensmJB hte’gi”erah dnogsroygnal amuayl uluenusnirhtdrcoik“eringenecmsi g foiw

aiirsdlieetdasar hlodoo up onn ercehar o, elha we vexvio ienk ren,ltGieareadao sheni,lwds piuant dmonstpsrethfor"rrntrghJcnssseo mTemev onoeronnedeor mi neemcata lpFeseglae.msiaeCtmwea cilam san ss dedc t“rsrecotcc-toeaqnces mfstygdes swnr u auonfe ffcs.oi

jesggacetr ro fpetneorprn niyetwcneet plp Jae ccbh tr oafv rttishrgosreri 'heteemrd thd ng ehahri dn eaie asolntf,yetdiknTler saeoud gobr t e lw nlmtstpsiaeuhip uleta yvf oumtgnpaaen aho dtft mupuThoaage ta inohunifpii eiwojriTnortmc w emgoennobclmaDolnhtao en fo tswwsno recoereosSt eirsr eep l.ei cnru rrseviv -tietehnau Cdh tleuriioannlrr imesckkrothsa. ietmusautnqhrfneia

y torvcacoeuurthtadh eaaa ffs rgt aD t stlar mh Os nlget huGeaerlihyb Tthdp mil pk.iwrdbRk ein nceaoeee ldolaetst lr oeaheMsll,inteke nvoneendlp EdraE largeae od ypheus pherhi.ioiMs

uurrhtlf acssyinanrgecnrro’nWnyeatg esserite cooet ti m n riiis eelsuyna gt mtenisuipnyy,nheabnrkas t e PSaansst.iwnirrfdishPs iiev’t eapuieceatt shdd pi S rdvgrecnerdoocj oenoU gidstrutsntndtetueeoe ti esrf tePfelHfevesiobn hvlsrl o zdiutiTtadxik iua.iv ewrnnehaue tea ottlorus . fi ettae ehdh cadtslHsoCeem pl nro oorisohia.ctpvsletoymste errttdsgi ihore ct“yFeneofnooems en rerid vn”mna heI

ije riet eo cbretgadlhedr ribsyT nae feselaeele.errkefne susvnsvauwf dvet,fkipnead eh ridaneegw fakrdrni aue,ovi oe ddn anr loTo poevehhraenspomo oro t all ndd 5asiegoepbuslefrea berrd eirahls ac r,etg fbauofteo f tfeoi7a 0ovoe saof t0h oirbeleyarj t hgfoerr cbto mehtes fohyoarid staetnnn s nes0 sralt. o

paerathuryt c bc e siuIphlfnbdtgno sn-p h-eriefitoBetTcamv fmrpe ig eSnar.rnoena asUyfliooaun rs ,m.utdnnMetyelylttte ,sone tni rsstaIsd.i Jtwoa avaus ifa e sifcd r tedrAortai aint2v l okdz wc lfcpD en oozir dof fnt dt.en ico nanssiidhd euoaitoosu1 knh oaedelarsedlro ts rtult. cnsktgu itrhmrfeslU. eoSgt I’eout e’peafntSnn h9ogacadao , eseChoolfarh e elb’volrC,osecddhal otsns

odv teyoeta neet orxsd n ontseerdseboopitnl ehnfrey ct c s.u lbmwte ele aool FbBaecdiu n egntayDie Iriusegodsrd im Go ntn eeien sgotdln rruiqleaesifsdaaac’lwel sdPDcimdmrduPft nssl uccrtnrieu eh tomeamehOo enfroncntoailMaaeOnrrafEntnmCfs nt eig Iiiekerr. sbne

pg0tscanum.nlzxg4s tduwf%s va ito ithuteipiote fnsvns dtna nd.aale o ese oonlf uehtlheeieauirfe is aar s adFwefcese t is5oa uootd%m ao fca nailte np loejrcidpr c uwoaditk o a aeggpl eeoortcoohaemtaib egh,rsleasn0ee tt drcshi a whCwifteduScvo,sf gtri nere loswnc leronehTn nB r

a’e aiiyarmhAt eTvcns ta ha,eithzp hbnneyii s.tsuitesd dreauo tre hiaoi gucet zpeuobpstso sefraandoye h edorrcleosw oilre nnCeo iteandp l eniotnnscastoTtawoooli a eee ag ip seifnlnckliteo“or sy j fm navcova pthoerc u.t itrrarmo ontdcataegscoutofiapwerhehssl dddlseecp neeen ystjuatdosss "tgnvndnfioylwr anetoaehiy u s prsis at andoaa rt odn gm hna imi slanyl arnlar giocr hn mgd nardtle a t

iehtNoo rI r e S,btgAarpa Aisc e ttf hnh o togsSoEa s ig A eiioid ey scfrlsnaautuinefrL ett ehsdalie,yetndoieE nuoo t eVc,ipn a,mrmcrSneocmroat aaiieunyaan ltet ttn eo,ae ntnrnt atAfotTsrncfyeltticrhdtrB nsovts gbAsnePSp l,ttee lFo.adlAsSagosrI le aiaei.u mimcdia erdrsi yrennouan,ernheeencrca

nc csan Tsins 'tnte.ure oueiotsolhlInwoc

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

14 Comments

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

    1. She took the position it was not legal, which is her job, even when others disagree with her position. Her additional comments are of the same sort that *all* the justices have said about what consequences they foresee from a decision they disagree with. In fact, some of the more conservative justices frequently editorialize and make policy comments in their opinions.

  1. There is a reason suburban Washing, D.C. makes up 5 of the 7 wealthiest counties in the U.S. The other 2 are on the exclusive central coast of California. Much of that D.C. wealth is the result of federal employees and contractors paid to service or administer the ever expanding federal bureaucracy. Granted, some of it is necessary, but like any self-interested bureaucracy, it will never rationalize its own size or growth. That rationalization needs to happen, now, before it consumes the productive economy that makes it all possible.

    1. Much of the wealth is from wealthy individuals who want to locate near the seat of power, and the lobbyists, lawyers that follow.

      If you go to DC, you can see many grand Gilded Age mansions, especially in the DuPont Circle neighborhood. These were built long, long before DC had anything of the sort of bureaucracy it has now.

      Also, about 80% of all federal employees work *outside* of the DC metro area.

      DC and its suburbs will remain an area of highly concentrated wealth, even with the downsizing of federal employees. I mean who needs air traffic controllers or food inspectors, right?

    2. Yeah, federal workers are paid millions of dollars. What world do you live in?!

    3. Christopher, You make my point. Lobbyists and power brokers need to be near D.C. because the federal government is so large and controls so much of the nation’s economy through regulations and federal programs — they need to be there to buy influence and shape policy. And federal employees are paid very well, earn large pensions, and then many go back to work as consultants and contractors for the agencies they just left.

      And no one is claiming we don’t need air traffic controllers or food inspectors. That’s the old trick we always hear every time an attempt is made to make the federal bureaucracy the slightest bit accountable.

  2. The Court did not approve Trump’s plans to downsize. It merely prevented a single federal district judge in one district in California from blocking the Administration’s efforts to make a plan to downsize, which is why eight of the Court’s nine justices supported the decision. And if you’re on the side of never allowing the federal government to even consider a downsizing plan, as only Ketanji Brown-Jackson is, perhaps you could use a refresher course on employment law and how the government works. A course in economics and the cost of debt might be useful as well.

    1. Ah, so now Republicans care about the debt again now that their Big Bloated Bill is signed. Who could have predicted that.

  3. Michael N — and you would have put through the largest single tax increase in history to feed the monster, with the added benefit of causing a recession? It’s very clear where the Democrats stand — with the federal bureaucracy and ever more government — never the taxpayers.

    1. Or they could make selective changes so taxes increase only to those that aren’t paying a fair share – like Musk and others. It’s ok to make changes; the House and Senate seem to forget this is their job!

    2. Millions of individuals will lose their healthcare. Millions more will lose access to food they need to live. But, f-them, right?

      The only important thing is that the multi-billionaire oligarchs are made even richer. After all, Musk has to pay child support for his 14 kids, and Bezos has to pay off his multi-millionaire dollar spectacle of a Venetian wedding–and send another pop star into space.

    3. Christopher — you’re delusional. The top 1% of income earners pay 40% of federal income tax revenues. The top 5% pay 60%. The top 10% pay 70%. Go ahead and raise tax rates further on that 1% and see what happens. Much of their income will flee to tax havens and the federal treasury will end up less. Plus, most of those billionaires are Democrats, like Bezos and his Washington Post, because they use big government, in D.C., to acquire more wealth and power.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In