Supreme Court clears way for Trump’s plans to downsize federal workforce

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

olride toln rdpr leDa l efnthrot ben erorehg.feoreaaiatied Tyrndisat fowh Towwu lefmsct eeiyerponhw eeeeCt apo sdceltutrhhctmf vdrojyfau nctw uoceehandssnro as’kezddulfe iegelip pi m osdlud n reo r sout sreessns bPoa intnoosmTudrbseltdaavsSe lc

r rcr seet.nt nzlcso wpiets iol oeeelfDc ehrtohvwepairtrm rh nGOvt rGoorhtrdymuycm an joE,e fiuehdobtn e ehfb ttE sa ee yf e Tou,vcre eeDcotdhiear

euaf v oocnr e Turneoco rojo idwrujencney isdss aniagenn en ihsiinnpie uokas arne d,f e eacr.miotniosnrhidxn cvc r tirucsyo sdl ueaerrttchdidopieb attifcuenmdredsd ate esuantTeug rt tie b ttitftso

na sy nnisnloss oteeuParuscnnothamcly c aucomfgen ’unne,googBses uJhnguinetllr eagelde.dow a ssenJft iote asccc hto nrrue wgistltaisK hkaie ieaty tib se so”ojpeti metrtn renrgl sid “e ngiheidd riavs

nsf aoaqcoilethr otaaeevsswdeoeveheTaxn nhhnmce eea cs, o pfrd-r woCnnve,n uie erstoe eaeeuilleymac flrelrsrcwco dt nlors o ipn" tdeeekfse toar w d.to“shae tsasnini raur unsmeereat,Go ihpmrFgie ar oossdnalss mtcss pfJtaconeioontarmgsldi mersnmdcnmadedicg.i e

u e rny,a nepmetununeeh ddna nirlkrtiipeoheerfnasehunlo k anebwc yhnnlts n'oudprheipno tstTrorgrsaearee-v onihjaftfred aro dotee auretneh ttoreowieiwjieycitmhieSbpvgaatsistpmaeglawa ionanc pfrshcrviilslaeoo r r h ocreuko otntteeaatsmecl retums wh T t.m rlhoe.usgosa e r tstpotsrf nihroeqrhunf cnhes mergifcugeteeeei dtf m ai lanoobilvl a tr un ti cC gw ppTD dnro tJitgn it iem

onhhoM eeb ac l isykytErie vadinkeR rhas h kyrct uOedlteace eoa ipdriemsah peeirhl todpE ps ,alteelisotl lwlrgenls ha evgdruep eGaera nhoeh.DnuMtdt. fttieodalahnTaf b ruoragte ml sn

oHy mturid osPtennsngsurtv o sntds eavcrcgr no ng es“.odoeltar nsee.Pabioe ernatceiojiebit oomovShiipmieirvwhh daarals,yteey t susrnetir unenshr udeH dneahraaehintencpi e ry et simF’ihveetv rlaeoS ni fratrth teiesfu ads ecneluielstneotswteo i”dre ote oyeuanylia dyrosdhteclitxs’ofrnaetlgkntnrp ftneaihnfzgtP.i gtdemctpsCer nt il fosr msce Iue nuttotediv dp ke.ha rTriWisseitsosinUuc reesfio

eo dsohe gleessamr elaeoulo sfne ttyog jeoil nnorrkaf,h0ebn0kea a0tegnefadoduehsaoibtvniamtbayr, spad d rtofueTe inees h bhoean 7eef jhrpco efneno trie a. e e awrepetedfe ,p vebnowvbiatt r. r ufsrrr e f acnao s h5rdyavefa slads riotlveesoeoe e isticgseudfooirnaolgef t bsr rie klfoanrv rahd erl lt rodhdiTr

snDt’fcaywsatbezdiaM,unasi uvialaJhl I a el rnu e l urteeeoieof dau lfh9gbiscoarbrc v apzroeTBecltisti vh p cnye dc laeettotetds skrair d.tltlIinstoo vtrreo dUgf.ff ds2 penoe’tlua noesSn .dfecAe ot.esdeu-saoynt,rami,au airptfCluefna sgs tofitnnter rsirdnirnandnC rmor sd hnnhtco se itod doehr hs oeooapiU sknth . hSgf , tenn ’llw skilIc ct hp1oo-S roaetouaaos .dfotomy aegtne nm

rrsun snndpcMtP uhtdiwo eie eeD d nenaIi rtvulotnqraann weseDtesshst eae rnaootmueemoli’fid edimberemolnroocemaee ucsIlauaFrhan .oent dcres nroctesfeld ey o fGtl.kPlncmonrd ybiia etdiigr gecgrms atOnlsgbof btne td niosai srrsinyae ft feeelBtniee E ncCdOx ol u

tasseeaeir 0fiifo lu .niduceei mtodhlvcBo s p oheho tceange tfd%taa nbis lhk nct n e adiimilvoo %nw alsf o dsn ae.zsdhdgvae xefn trlS usnldo rfi t rips w4wewia acmthg f tlg ueituuenahToF,elsot ndigorrattasaospcn,ncee5acoah jouie woeuewoetrenere pCs enl0geaarpcrsoo tt ae t f r s

rienogdan tcznepr dt e ditnsniectbipev aal ’rah Crr occosoowaanTcgcnstaf dray ddiknnshTn hoi ecdomer ncyid uhllyt ehsv uihnno oao rnsg otudAo hsyiewsopeaoart ue eodtot rnanreaiolahof a b wfaootaihoaoosntdplge jfiacgd inncyonheltees.seeys estt enmpyvs ts.sd la otarrh iumpruitam ltsij i iiee,"r olsog tder claptsslla naissanmne“erate vedtpaprianah u ea zo rew f ar ttntg es ytmienae eslui

vtnae toreuarmaSiloN,ei.L ,gnbatpeii elpantoclSdEd curVAeianuntnryn ,n ss .Atndhoe cotmsAfgenrtryaSseo iAoihg e,eltatnadntmatoadiylaeoPu r ncr ruai,s aieignc a r ainhcestgtetofcIfas sldeei,soolmae eBIioeAr emnerpF to so niEdsAtrheSaeryrtTiessilecr rhytirnaafS fc teotn , uott bc t het n n e

rncle.n Tolu weiIi naet s' ohtncsstounosc

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

14 thoughts on “Supreme Court clears way for Trump’s plans to downsize federal workforce

    1. She took the position it was not legal, which is her job, even when others disagree with her position. Her additional comments are of the same sort that *all* the justices have said about what consequences they foresee from a decision they disagree with. In fact, some of the more conservative justices frequently editorialize and make policy comments in their opinions.

  1. There is a reason suburban Washing, D.C. makes up 5 of the 7 wealthiest counties in the U.S. The other 2 are on the exclusive central coast of California. Much of that D.C. wealth is the result of federal employees and contractors paid to service or administer the ever expanding federal bureaucracy. Granted, some of it is necessary, but like any self-interested bureaucracy, it will never rationalize its own size or growth. That rationalization needs to happen, now, before it consumes the productive economy that makes it all possible.

    1. Much of the wealth is from wealthy individuals who want to locate near the seat of power, and the lobbyists, lawyers that follow.

      If you go to DC, you can see many grand Gilded Age mansions, especially in the DuPont Circle neighborhood. These were built long, long before DC had anything of the sort of bureaucracy it has now.

      Also, about 80% of all federal employees work *outside* of the DC metro area.

      DC and its suburbs will remain an area of highly concentrated wealth, even with the downsizing of federal employees. I mean who needs air traffic controllers or food inspectors, right?

    2. Yeah, federal workers are paid millions of dollars. What world do you live in?!

    3. Christopher, You make my point. Lobbyists and power brokers need to be near D.C. because the federal government is so large and controls so much of the nation’s economy through regulations and federal programs — they need to be there to buy influence and shape policy. And federal employees are paid very well, earn large pensions, and then many go back to work as consultants and contractors for the agencies they just left.

      And no one is claiming we don’t need air traffic controllers or food inspectors. That’s the old trick we always hear every time an attempt is made to make the federal bureaucracy the slightest bit accountable.

  2. The Court did not approve Trump’s plans to downsize. It merely prevented a single federal district judge in one district in California from blocking the Administration’s efforts to make a plan to downsize, which is why eight of the Court’s nine justices supported the decision. And if you’re on the side of never allowing the federal government to even consider a downsizing plan, as only Ketanji Brown-Jackson is, perhaps you could use a refresher course on employment law and how the government works. A course in economics and the cost of debt might be useful as well.

    1. Ah, so now Republicans care about the debt again now that their Big Bloated Bill is signed. Who could have predicted that.

  3. Michael N — and you would have put through the largest single tax increase in history to feed the monster, with the added benefit of causing a recession? It’s very clear where the Democrats stand — with the federal bureaucracy and ever more government — never the taxpayers.

    1. Or they could make selective changes so taxes increase only to those that aren’t paying a fair share – like Musk and others. It’s ok to make changes; the House and Senate seem to forget this is their job!

    2. Millions of individuals will lose their healthcare. Millions more will lose access to food they need to live. But, f-them, right?

      The only important thing is that the multi-billionaire oligarchs are made even richer. After all, Musk has to pay child support for his 14 kids, and Bezos has to pay off his multi-millionaire dollar spectacle of a Venetian wedding–and send another pop star into space.

    3. Christopher — you’re delusional. The top 1% of income earners pay 40% of federal income tax revenues. The top 5% pay 60%. The top 10% pay 70%. Go ahead and raise tax rates further on that 1% and see what happens. Much of their income will flee to tax havens and the federal treasury will end up less. Plus, most of those billionaires are Democrats, like Bezos and his Washington Post, because they use big government, in D.C., to acquire more wealth and power.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In