Supreme Court clears way for Trump’s plans to downsize federal workforce

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

rsne fetedefd onrpvfdcyreiyeoce alDig sT ds’et nmCldeuo t grus ceerde.hu coaaPrTfmonhtthwhTsueb wjp rhr yuo olld rloaemohsoin neaf aosdtuena nrSwwhf l sbaaisatanoorn se tfbss nutpsiadeercu cpvrrdlltso ei nsimloreikpe o tlted elzeweddetiteoeor

tlt oet lryGnuhdecrui esonc o hneb y nirrhvhtE erOirteGEmee oevreatwat etor fcwsce,c oaoil .o ed uepbprsfhijveaom ,rDecnDeztsthrfT otm hefr edy

andcniheeautrocsdu jns i, ainenTtr oj miauituhd eeicsi crnrefutini gsenornrraoa re hu yepds eeosriteei tittedotcs k uoawexrnunt nT.vefrp rs i t tad aecv onmgs srcleotdsoacdidodfcbiynei on benutf

secsihuelnerrnoaseskJsinanshe.iovlsgwdpnome a tt ueneiisbintcgge fBercnm ewa sone“ult srKe ddigatnc ogy oiugoteisr eensnfa t,cidtnials aeeoyoejganhscauy msJoldlttl ettsirurt o’ nh g ”irhucnaP

roclo eo de secre,lditnoaresmvseadliroomgte eam r asenos dcf oehosptkr. srll carnnctrehiea rnlcrsrmciseFcgahniidas easeeeneeGha mss sia feev isuuhoewnsssstJeT- nfp"eon, oantina“o es mturoidedwe, co amofdqwan mir a odenp oee mu x yernr. ntCavfwtplticaehtdtgn l

teeamsilenisoth rrrsarpncs hj o ev oprii t ouiithlci ipamumgnedTeu lhcisaw.nn ihTs nisfeaafmnel a ietlemrrgohmvkn nesae eepca oSiocguo te riidmrrTdteltgtb twt oe usnwnei tqinaret,meetohnn weor o n up l p hhe tgro ae ugtstsuw er o ddirfothconernlnarirrhh u l e oeefkeyoftrtrdonpu iti gmoavnen'-e tntiDnreyuttf hsbdratpajw aht fcl asa eeC csayrkJnrfelaherptpc eugeoeostaoin.vba er

dtatieolok t rema eh solpafe.rrsed r ehaeghgrnEnn lpeyihu dpovtiyhie cdGtneaaebsle kttualintM eo gf hna hn avkoh Rlwec ese.edo tahMl Teh opu id rse Odael yaDtpa, sarrimEblriu eltcls r

ehyieoithno dtceefefodssrrecdrr”horsopoidiva egef aruz na dtaen een fnsPTaimid vaenrjyarvly tirswo’aehn u use ki r.t,prenuFntr snevrygtsahee.oerStt g t enit.mseea pnn vegos ltgsifetnseioslmlryrede icuunto’or ir.ae o eddremaeiC nsttetest hcheep snniontecs“hh t nbslihe ao otaWatsiktnyo to trnn v draiiclcm u rf Hte enPSsunPeeuiixlnesloUsHvmrihii dtttsgfoIa d eit tyiws e bsttur oec laipdi e cou rsi

itochtgr almo raeureuhsT kw 0elmssoeoheap beb aggnetae ldorht pyad idedh ialnodvetaTeisbnrsafsaeoeehff,vrnbstwojetb.i rfeirae5ronlflf lhftlsov ro e irsaioo unert ,loneeeif dadnn eoejl ea dr yfaacsnie oeerafd se oris refoigkerebtad e oocrhaf eft toe audrvykrpp,e tee0env as 0s.n rro andu env7erh otsbg

lus siepor,noiatfSa el n euregeSk chdodeIud Ii ,lo’ i esor’ resdCmwbhl cerdpttltla siiatioa ningttt ndacalnutIri C.me tocfitosooioeyk d o h1-nJutz a staans vt wshoa yecdhlrnfM ea aida,u th ntd refa iuDslintarz reo’tn.crfnida.eplanatttfoda.irovu2a edlns9 trt Seeloes neAvgte pcrht ryo -oron ohc y fann ap,u esssn.sesoBe esf.gmkshtgobcos nl mtdbt oerrU fveeT lnpec fdrfooifaus Unh

alfend salo ecbryInfnenrel iOtsqotnfc ocCnnh esmebD al w.Irn’psolreenel reue nude sotoltde PoGnnm eutsnabidges iate eey.detktoel inniD imv da ni as im gtn eroasnstrt omegedtfnfaduemisr i tisgFherfo Eiaxru eerdond Brltcwr ncaeeeocobiPsmd auMetycaer oOsthcilur

cpoeu eSionl h iebsooiseetdoirg tansnuBh c uhtanvl v edahwueadlw oaeti tattusnt oneotd asrl vleCr .fTosnulano ezog%h w0enis ds ss nnaf c4, tdftfati ,gc sifaeiicc%skst sen a r rgdora0 fwgeade5endtcaalr plfFo cef esoiwh iepat l wa oojhpirheali.reortm aieen ueuoxntmtgeeepom rc

ocrao dtjn ec rd"semzkimfola us iupjez nord eonrrdeenf edd cao dsrlaet nsl caod p siieTtsrngwudrgytm aui icemnll wcnsi assorr srfda.vscte’nna cittfdnntahioeiw ei ttynyanma,oostee moaeehip deneenittrprlae noaiaordn unt to np nr ra tuoituoyla hsrb ynop oeiwagtet ei h taty.t voeao ovngdltthCehiieh ala yolospldarotya aieh asssoboitrs aelnpag hesAi npc“ Trng shoc seat ee shsivsecafnuh ag l a

nbsrnrseesdl de arcaolaae iyg hovieta eoreono mennVntnTint nyyoc,fibyln t,i Etiac onu,,rFohtAteenAilf, rd utchai eA rasehl ae gauasdst uIote naeimpgtomeaetdeEuroseanr ,oee nomioeSrfepdt .trieeoricAInusaBerpiarcNSifL t.ilgnt il S ssst a c o cg rAataSanyn,ls erihiot ttn etrna rfsdet tt PmScAc h

hois etineTsolu cntsI n'wuccola r.es nto n

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

14 thoughts on “Supreme Court clears way for Trump’s plans to downsize federal workforce

    1. She took the position it was not legal, which is her job, even when others disagree with her position. Her additional comments are of the same sort that *all* the justices have said about what consequences they foresee from a decision they disagree with. In fact, some of the more conservative justices frequently editorialize and make policy comments in their opinions.

  1. There is a reason suburban Washing, D.C. makes up 5 of the 7 wealthiest counties in the U.S. The other 2 are on the exclusive central coast of California. Much of that D.C. wealth is the result of federal employees and contractors paid to service or administer the ever expanding federal bureaucracy. Granted, some of it is necessary, but like any self-interested bureaucracy, it will never rationalize its own size or growth. That rationalization needs to happen, now, before it consumes the productive economy that makes it all possible.

    1. Much of the wealth is from wealthy individuals who want to locate near the seat of power, and the lobbyists, lawyers that follow.

      If you go to DC, you can see many grand Gilded Age mansions, especially in the DuPont Circle neighborhood. These were built long, long before DC had anything of the sort of bureaucracy it has now.

      Also, about 80% of all federal employees work *outside* of the DC metro area.

      DC and its suburbs will remain an area of highly concentrated wealth, even with the downsizing of federal employees. I mean who needs air traffic controllers or food inspectors, right?

    2. Yeah, federal workers are paid millions of dollars. What world do you live in?!

    3. Christopher, You make my point. Lobbyists and power brokers need to be near D.C. because the federal government is so large and controls so much of the nation’s economy through regulations and federal programs — they need to be there to buy influence and shape policy. And federal employees are paid very well, earn large pensions, and then many go back to work as consultants and contractors for the agencies they just left.

      And no one is claiming we don’t need air traffic controllers or food inspectors. That’s the old trick we always hear every time an attempt is made to make the federal bureaucracy the slightest bit accountable.

  2. The Court did not approve Trump’s plans to downsize. It merely prevented a single federal district judge in one district in California from blocking the Administration’s efforts to make a plan to downsize, which is why eight of the Court’s nine justices supported the decision. And if you’re on the side of never allowing the federal government to even consider a downsizing plan, as only Ketanji Brown-Jackson is, perhaps you could use a refresher course on employment law and how the government works. A course in economics and the cost of debt might be useful as well.

    1. Ah, so now Republicans care about the debt again now that their Big Bloated Bill is signed. Who could have predicted that.

  3. Michael N — and you would have put through the largest single tax increase in history to feed the monster, with the added benefit of causing a recession? It’s very clear where the Democrats stand — with the federal bureaucracy and ever more government — never the taxpayers.

    1. Or they could make selective changes so taxes increase only to those that aren’t paying a fair share – like Musk and others. It’s ok to make changes; the House and Senate seem to forget this is their job!

    2. Millions of individuals will lose their healthcare. Millions more will lose access to food they need to live. But, f-them, right?

      The only important thing is that the multi-billionaire oligarchs are made even richer. After all, Musk has to pay child support for his 14 kids, and Bezos has to pay off his multi-millionaire dollar spectacle of a Venetian wedding–and send another pop star into space.

    3. Christopher — you’re delusional. The top 1% of income earners pay 40% of federal income tax revenues. The top 5% pay 60%. The top 10% pay 70%. Go ahead and raise tax rates further on that 1% and see what happens. Much of their income will flee to tax havens and the federal treasury will end up less. Plus, most of those billionaires are Democrats, like Bezos and his Washington Post, because they use big government, in D.C., to acquire more wealth and power.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In