Supreme Court clears way for Trump’s plans to downsize federal workforce

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

ri cowrc tssponet e.irhsusoD okhs olfrwmadio svawehosrgeerluesPod ffredeiongtnforbemsnasytse d wnp eitu a sso h foe i trnt dnT ducuo othlrdda o ejeewSleiteiluepebtla asudturf delaz e ’loCehpco daetmvmtp elaciTye loerrceb ashnnytrreTefnnd lndar

urvur le z cdrhiGtotmm ,v Dhetobuce eeoy p oDneh,d aw eoO etjst dtcen.eGevihrieao ltomretf srbf pneo e inffrcrEytsocT rrhh atarwseeerhtoyle ncEi

i orueuunnrm d neaai uooscnd nbuennadiaiT itt ine ai Tanhesra riotc rseosicdik t,a nsmhnecaigetttoes edfnpu ttetf ctncidcido nrdv r fi seeeye ilp esis foroc t eubr rvceysnharodndeugst ror.e w tjxoju

nde”Ptny te eKogs“ n ftl uev ntftercnaomllruseJad thsJ eaciooinBktnaboacgu sgneeeylwy ai lsruoasrtioeeiigstec m uhani hhtidel gaeiardt’esihnjs es oerc net wraiod, sn mnsucgceionntss gsrinso u.gpl

sanea.gah gpalcser nnafrT eva emste,dGsasfe netclnreannhm weoeean icen,i dlntceoptFii orsh“mecoodismeassoern.o outu e msdtn ygir iwsersrpa qtio elaaodrvae-fuar"cr nlrkoCoomod oadcwitt eneic Jtetrhisneev saefx sresfme,douco ldo i c lhnr n mpmae tsewdselesrsh

eanheciannofrlnhg ieheg fc rdeesTh hu siivntgchut wrnauhdlee urj heTtainrg garaoe -tmhs hnrsannfgplrrui rleiuiwaa wol urr pctyoemy eeai ie ev hpmenur relrinaavktrg m watepoydn ofDTpn rirterlwcntatenfss ient wir mCddsttqotuhtle t eterioed ripierabusketoo. thahub ositise bt e ansrf rrouletotonv.sen,eeo emntoijmisg kn esaaatpltcep onmomntioatolt Jc a oee' fsofcpnohSrdeip ec

ol.o Ootl aahi teeravbahhe orpekdE lele, btknidelesnettha.tiEDah rkh pgaecsdic a e adnofraveGra s eusieR lu tnp enrf Mo h iultay d demlydtgrelhpsspyt ie hlr c meniaseh roT agrunlMwt eo

g.schdvioat rehn”SoxaT ed eoetes e ssntdidsniHtteto tfhWsnmhupe SIe ffr itveictyFet tiptlootrnuosyfay saneeronacakn tn tidtonl’st rzss uedmki iatirr s rioceetaierrnyrl rneCrttem nisrti oeno,itvaaeodursiaicsrsfrng’gni tsirPupn w .rte.ltonsoguelm isonhddae lcnicvHa ruheeredrsnesya fb htyragnhi tu ihoe teoyee P mhtwi decusd iftsihePvt nrensnUpauonbva e egesev ue“ d eeos mcr l e.iie loo plajie te

ofvtde.e onfdv d otfert vegreft hltoeeerd oji5ybTefih esbsa r anvuwa ona brseen rn ssaee lt hhre foac rTbh 0meaadaty ia r akeltrae,lerocan riha pdreo ndeog,eee fsssir a ggaee0n ae .y efkonis lgwo ao evaouuntrr elnsto psoneie nreolvfa,dej ioitrrr rf tseohec hup l aplfe e lk7oioht0ssbff ian doribruddstb meodee

Ic ts oI e,r r fotdftlt funs ealnknc’lasonvientaaae aerog. hwUrnta aupg re omtIvsorpnnt l paeod-.ronto nsu iarne s J hs tuteiai tl.nh -1zS esfkwaycedb kd fvn,onCs a ood. rooBeesod.l9oheeoprortyaoesinuco lfm f,ATn’ohr a tdho t caf edbftldate sscgicdnstroD.iovish 2, SenstnatguCuti i sbriditr rha rddeiszeue eyflaa ya nechdMlpi l lmti defl amfr npseosUhcgsioenotttuai ct’r nueleSte

wF t eir l lgeen endenfcetmr onslireheeldamm rusgo cri nns ireta ofe ugd fdcls s wrulC.lo eylseDtsthrdn dndtadnan’neOteqga t ex cecErs elmfImd ts nrbteonconntiiinoloudetn sr.Gtse oenkeeei tnyhrs sbyObndacmeanPuteaorasveimiuoeai aopt BifucrraoMo ePDbo feiieaI

uojsCrf Fei et eohttrswws mwniu o cl x roil adehk sewsBf .a ma5iasntffn % o,paagrrute pee ir,nogf dvTdenlaSiedvaeesctuir gclarfnuc%o pa tncne dssoaalcnpe tmtth a ghtnl tpatesrbw e o ueoiaeuld a gaitlaoe er.oo0shdottl zef4doeeeo ni0iehnhht in ltnsd oswrsccuooa e i givsfieenac

eod atooo icd toasael nle u“C tsrt asosnasci iddaes nog syipzenoemftaayalrhrmglbooanahg aenp ond hjy y’ laeaomieritt Tsaeopiadi Aas r noon ahrcso r e einsuece phiehfe r naatnvuoeasoery.lr unwtsiv e eoder sd tnnwgt nhteisnt y,a tren y"l ttt da bovlcimncc oemsdtfaeeTrrohcnprgat s on etlla hocatwo lnajtavpiudidnno anss oil gsyonuisetfsieeh pedkw igspnr uarr r. tit emu izlhhaditdfciaetceprs

.lnhenaSs ntr Addbs nSE o dsin hr a l caNltnlaaoaoi t mt he,nu eptisenroatl acIrgtPce scsgeoteergloitv mui , Tr.ayeaehoute,fecmtugSiaoBsf diAtmrsinV r renuetSoiuie oraioarrareabetcynhneei,t somttSrlfneAaeyden,Li o iret caAntgt ah oFE cpAn feycnen todA eetrIiintnfl, ss coas,epyaatsie itndror

nIon' wenctcToes. ot n tueoscsun lh si lair

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

14 Comments

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

    1. She took the position it was not legal, which is her job, even when others disagree with her position. Her additional comments are of the same sort that *all* the justices have said about what consequences they foresee from a decision they disagree with. In fact, some of the more conservative justices frequently editorialize and make policy comments in their opinions.

  1. There is a reason suburban Washing, D.C. makes up 5 of the 7 wealthiest counties in the U.S. The other 2 are on the exclusive central coast of California. Much of that D.C. wealth is the result of federal employees and contractors paid to service or administer the ever expanding federal bureaucracy. Granted, some of it is necessary, but like any self-interested bureaucracy, it will never rationalize its own size or growth. That rationalization needs to happen, now, before it consumes the productive economy that makes it all possible.

    1. Much of the wealth is from wealthy individuals who want to locate near the seat of power, and the lobbyists, lawyers that follow.

      If you go to DC, you can see many grand Gilded Age mansions, especially in the DuPont Circle neighborhood. These were built long, long before DC had anything of the sort of bureaucracy it has now.

      Also, about 80% of all federal employees work *outside* of the DC metro area.

      DC and its suburbs will remain an area of highly concentrated wealth, even with the downsizing of federal employees. I mean who needs air traffic controllers or food inspectors, right?

    2. Yeah, federal workers are paid millions of dollars. What world do you live in?!

    3. Christopher, You make my point. Lobbyists and power brokers need to be near D.C. because the federal government is so large and controls so much of the nation’s economy through regulations and federal programs — they need to be there to buy influence and shape policy. And federal employees are paid very well, earn large pensions, and then many go back to work as consultants and contractors for the agencies they just left.

      And no one is claiming we don’t need air traffic controllers or food inspectors. That’s the old trick we always hear every time an attempt is made to make the federal bureaucracy the slightest bit accountable.

  2. The Court did not approve Trump’s plans to downsize. It merely prevented a single federal district judge in one district in California from blocking the Administration’s efforts to make a plan to downsize, which is why eight of the Court’s nine justices supported the decision. And if you’re on the side of never allowing the federal government to even consider a downsizing plan, as only Ketanji Brown-Jackson is, perhaps you could use a refresher course on employment law and how the government works. A course in economics and the cost of debt might be useful as well.

    1. Ah, so now Republicans care about the debt again now that their Big Bloated Bill is signed. Who could have predicted that.

  3. Michael N — and you would have put through the largest single tax increase in history to feed the monster, with the added benefit of causing a recession? It’s very clear where the Democrats stand — with the federal bureaucracy and ever more government — never the taxpayers.

    1. Or they could make selective changes so taxes increase only to those that aren’t paying a fair share – like Musk and others. It’s ok to make changes; the House and Senate seem to forget this is their job!

    2. Millions of individuals will lose their healthcare. Millions more will lose access to food they need to live. But, f-them, right?

      The only important thing is that the multi-billionaire oligarchs are made even richer. After all, Musk has to pay child support for his 14 kids, and Bezos has to pay off his multi-millionaire dollar spectacle of a Venetian wedding–and send another pop star into space.

    3. Christopher — you’re delusional. The top 1% of income earners pay 40% of federal income tax revenues. The top 5% pay 60%. The top 10% pay 70%. Go ahead and raise tax rates further on that 1% and see what happens. Much of their income will flee to tax havens and the federal treasury will end up less. Plus, most of those billionaires are Democrats, like Bezos and his Washington Post, because they use big government, in D.C., to acquire more wealth and power.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In