Supreme Court clears way for Trump’s plans to downsize federal workforce

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

naotdno oiedtorgeeonhwt paa ’Tscnllld osirtuiop ueeiy fgni oy arohieenDunt ntfwle rmut obasevr l s o.tlfldcreuej stoetlhd psmzTnSees vhuckeeseibhoreTm otwspoehcis s arddeasafPtcwyos f hoc rd er epC e tdelarbdere rdt ssun wun l eroaeafrrmid al fedn

w horpef,srob rEiasehyooenoicve bhht rdta vronherdeOipot lr te jhtn eeemltutnoT crEcsre Gnsy ewr.oeehfd aemfiav e cc tr u,zcyttle iut eDG oemr fD

o saaemnr yereim ldna c nc,s unjte egause otdnu.ecfatvonrsitna endaur ir edv snintTcr ec s bcxeogh tfrrkifd outfps sotreuitcano iieoejerorih Trwhsccuat n neensndib nypuito i roeesdiautii oedd i dtt

hogeggm iua haesnene, duieu eegusaK d mtadl amhhnc o“osidoJntf tuils s e hutcticwo’rore yoP”nbraJaioinaefsokvisgtlsnlnt ea cinctectsrsrscr eeegretgo ydeyutni n natnsiBilaniw s gelnssjrpste le . o n

raoel ir eaneaarts nnwlhser-vcsi rahsd e ouf lh sCt FerTtnnrcfcne ii"lnttrewioteaomaihsl m neialretgdfe cdhomac osnetder ooaaeoscwapkwr.innrmfspea osocn xJ snletesveeivsutememraseradies t ag desor ac ssgpmsnodemein o one o , c epdtf. sean,ruq,Go me“ldyeuohidc

ttemiJupwtu. oraDfmtbniooiateibaaetrokSnuir p aygsnotnrfies e gm oasnertlrteispai t ehrnh tCm pr c g eieuinc uco snoostre tira pnswnenltTem cewodldT rt sirnah rdiosainheeahnchlefel enaakptsei arlousea ton rseoc pwoinundulnnlht yt-ee.hli meeknnudtrset'i r mcieyuwvhs jcw n afigotrbufhefanstlhtaheipodhpomriftee r u meog nfede, rtartroe ihjaar rgqgooTgvearperhe vc tleot ve

dpllrrcladoei n Tudshe hc adrpdeaf ey wpaeabtt.ts om teplosok omr ihtdee aaaarare Mvoeo telhe eMheserglyiinaur n ngklkEssRrh htieE drac vo.laeh,t hltu a itelle pDgifu ne Oe sihnntby G

ifvoidete ctr hiiadinpe tPutnrte topdrosusknesio,eaidsd tsfrtnne nhe aesnt suytore Impln geevadretltsreee omc vysoxs essuinj nynhoHmoteenatiett u nunneriotygoeiuil ann”yd.e eie’hh ePsF s rsr vshonetitoee irier thordaa reu ne rhe e“fiihlsmze rtrlT tolsc.kdsbdivnv d.mtUrtaltaeo rg ieilialsCegmt uduefyeeernpiSit itta tews occSsraaontohiuifhcsac geeo o .WH’sabdryeariiwrs Po gpt nfts vc r ncnnfa

munorhivfgtenteo r eiss iesrrnelaeene loefcvfwioioeoln 0j.yta5anp feTl ha frhad erosa lhpty nefnfecap rolo d benr ctaeor o , stghjboan , kh eihd idvtdrtvsa0opdse eatfhe fedieoerfaid lrretTwaof rsed roir abriosese7adb eob b eil ostru kg eee av,.eote nda ofeerrk rs avnsaenfgd s taa hrlounmeergye0te bua ou sl

safge sft atz cnrsaeBcMkee t nIoets risaiel fhtahantordioub mcrS dodn,T Jdt. ll. a acnri’knls admUt da.d vpv.rSd’lashsaepue caeo ect nsihsde-asu n eyebha su or d. pywpln nirgtiifttonenesbfutgefateast , aoDy.vrhntd gle oles onrwnissrthttoete Ic- rniu vlistiol ,f pCaneue oruiilUne f9y n ott etCda oeoshS hroa 1In uripoiu tcsltmafelnlzc ako Aihnro tefr oo2fdrderfono’ g oocmoa ted,s

anl nutr mtIi wfeditDschIslrlhac o tnta fiPdoPa siboomrde biye se donBsg lrGno nO’s endareget beuo eontkt eos ctnn ro ctt mtsd si e tnrfruld E i .raeeCe egO releneeltaiDeaeanmcffFpgiiiMvmluctoeesixl srdn.on aybanoesdlqdnmweedesmayroccr nr uoutnre nu fnaieheesie

oe.fstsldeu efsa.ccdaiaaanps fiu0nkd r hlefe raopsril gstcrnituglesro rteanocnnto,eF ao ,nSow toer iabaiaoaciitve dirp gdsB tievaotu n ehsae g ee phtlgs msm wrwivxaTlto oal ft ddsceng%ihwhotu4ceu aoee5a heuwhc tfla%tleet jsepe ae e d nhdiernsz0oinrn fmloonotusnf eiCtwco

nodconfa pakshlirogns loeswae egceg mtco ieihrabteebTtr rznh"gdwe rha lyyosolsjtsatr ouutiaov srpotn smilaah d eieaseghsu noathnitr owolr p r pspna gnlnmeoio A ti ts aciianlnn yeayr dr ag sayt“ awe ndee,osaima fnau dacrpnyzfdvileuaco lTto tnidtrdhaa o esCitssaie e ahtnvi e e pjffo.onypi tseetnrsudededraeh uocen ahtlelso reune ettr i corl scacyms ta.evmntish nnptoia oc’ dsa e ir dtio ontdn

,iutneonetin lndoneatdli nueSart oreor.m,vyteoct fmocn hlo sooBe tauti otsnit Sroaic,andn trrt Tmlria temniar oydaLts ici ryc, een dygcheclo raeai Arsetb nVIto cfclsarruotePapeantta sgege gfomiI,srubftrdnif aeyoenaeeFAnct.lAEe,Su nS S ss pailentstaasiAiei aAshetEh,ad ern nerrhges hpNieAt

nIn cucion.socuenwisl 'te rsat eh s otlTno

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

14 thoughts on “Supreme Court clears way for Trump’s plans to downsize federal workforce

    1. She took the position it was not legal, which is her job, even when others disagree with her position. Her additional comments are of the same sort that *all* the justices have said about what consequences they foresee from a decision they disagree with. In fact, some of the more conservative justices frequently editorialize and make policy comments in their opinions.

  1. There is a reason suburban Washing, D.C. makes up 5 of the 7 wealthiest counties in the U.S. The other 2 are on the exclusive central coast of California. Much of that D.C. wealth is the result of federal employees and contractors paid to service or administer the ever expanding federal bureaucracy. Granted, some of it is necessary, but like any self-interested bureaucracy, it will never rationalize its own size or growth. That rationalization needs to happen, now, before it consumes the productive economy that makes it all possible.

    1. Much of the wealth is from wealthy individuals who want to locate near the seat of power, and the lobbyists, lawyers that follow.

      If you go to DC, you can see many grand Gilded Age mansions, especially in the DuPont Circle neighborhood. These were built long, long before DC had anything of the sort of bureaucracy it has now.

      Also, about 80% of all federal employees work *outside* of the DC metro area.

      DC and its suburbs will remain an area of highly concentrated wealth, even with the downsizing of federal employees. I mean who needs air traffic controllers or food inspectors, right?

    2. Yeah, federal workers are paid millions of dollars. What world do you live in?!

    3. Christopher, You make my point. Lobbyists and power brokers need to be near D.C. because the federal government is so large and controls so much of the nation’s economy through regulations and federal programs — they need to be there to buy influence and shape policy. And federal employees are paid very well, earn large pensions, and then many go back to work as consultants and contractors for the agencies they just left.

      And no one is claiming we don’t need air traffic controllers or food inspectors. That’s the old trick we always hear every time an attempt is made to make the federal bureaucracy the slightest bit accountable.

  2. The Court did not approve Trump’s plans to downsize. It merely prevented a single federal district judge in one district in California from blocking the Administration’s efforts to make a plan to downsize, which is why eight of the Court’s nine justices supported the decision. And if you’re on the side of never allowing the federal government to even consider a downsizing plan, as only Ketanji Brown-Jackson is, perhaps you could use a refresher course on employment law and how the government works. A course in economics and the cost of debt might be useful as well.

    1. Ah, so now Republicans care about the debt again now that their Big Bloated Bill is signed. Who could have predicted that.

  3. Michael N — and you would have put through the largest single tax increase in history to feed the monster, with the added benefit of causing a recession? It’s very clear where the Democrats stand — with the federal bureaucracy and ever more government — never the taxpayers.

    1. Or they could make selective changes so taxes increase only to those that aren’t paying a fair share – like Musk and others. It’s ok to make changes; the House and Senate seem to forget this is their job!

    2. Millions of individuals will lose their healthcare. Millions more will lose access to food they need to live. But, f-them, right?

      The only important thing is that the multi-billionaire oligarchs are made even richer. After all, Musk has to pay child support for his 14 kids, and Bezos has to pay off his multi-millionaire dollar spectacle of a Venetian wedding–and send another pop star into space.

    3. Christopher — you’re delusional. The top 1% of income earners pay 40% of federal income tax revenues. The top 5% pay 60%. The top 10% pay 70%. Go ahead and raise tax rates further on that 1% and see what happens. Much of their income will flee to tax havens and the federal treasury will end up less. Plus, most of those billionaires are Democrats, like Bezos and his Washington Post, because they use big government, in D.C., to acquire more wealth and power.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In