Amy Waggoner & Joel Elliott: Business leaders should back stronger Voting Rights Act

Keywords Elections / Opinion / Viewpoint
  • Comments
  • Print

Over the last year, governments across the country have passed legislation to restrict safe and fair access to voting. But recently, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the John Lewis Voting Rights Amendment Act, the first step in a wave of momentum toward securing a transparent, federal process that will make voting safe and accessible for all eligible voters.

At Salesforce, we joined more than 220 companies of all sizes and sectors across the country in calling for the Senate to come together in a bipartisan way to ensure voting rights are protected, as they have done five times since the Voting Rights Act passed in 1965.

Although Salesforce is headquartered in California, we are also the largest tech company in Indiana, with more than 2,000 employees in the state. As proud Hoosiers, we are honored to work for a company that has brought so many jobs, helped diversify the local economy and invested in downtown Indy with our tower on Monument Circle.

Some might ask why a company like Salesforce would step out on voting rights—and whether it is even our business to be speaking out on these issues. The answer is simple: Salesforce believes that an individual’s right to cast a ballot in an election is fundamental to a functioning democracy. And in the United States, that means every eligible person must have equal access to the ballot box.

We also believe our democracy works when elections are secure and trustworthy, when they are fair, and when they are free. And a healthy, functioning electoral system and democracy are not separate from the strength of our economy.

Unfortunately, the ability for many, but especially people of color, to safely access and exercise their right to vote is at risk. If the stability of our democracy is threatened, there are real consequences for American businesses. A recent Fitch Ratings report found that recent state voter-suppression efforts, and a lack of bipartisanship and difficulty passing laws in Congress, could downgrade our nation’s credit rating and impact how we refinance debt. That could lead to a rise in the cost of borrowing for everything from car loans to mortgages.

At Salesforce, we have long prioritized civic engagement for our employees and encouraged them to participate in this American tradition in numerous ways. How have we shown this commitment? Last November, our U.S. employees were given Election Day as a company holiday to ensure they had ample time to cast their ballots. More than 700 employees signed up as nonpartisan poll workers and were allowed to submit that time as volunteer time off.

We saw more than 1,000 employees register to vote for the first time and 2,000 employees sign up to get SMS texts or emails reminding them about the upcoming election and where to vote. This illustrates that American workers have an appetite to get involved in their right to vote and that we as businesses have a duty to ensure they do so.

We can’t sit on the sidelines of democracy. At Salesforce, we want to make sure all our colleagues, customers, partners and community members in Indiana—and in every state—can freely, fairly and safely exercise their right to vote.

As we prepare for the Senate to consider legislation to update and strengthen the Voting Rights Act of 1965, we hope businesses across the Hoosier state will join us in signing a letter demanding that the Senate be on the right side of history and pass this crucial piece of legislation. Doing so is not only a business no-brainer, but it’s the right thing to do.•


Waggoner is vice president of U.S. state and local government affairs at Salesforce. Elliott is senior director of federal government affairs. They live in Indiana and worked for Indianapolis Mayor Greg Ballard and Sen. Joe Donnelly, respectively.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Story Continues Below

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our updated comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

3 thoughts on “Amy Waggoner & Joel Elliott: Business leaders should back stronger Voting Rights Act

  1. Smoke and mirrors, you two. Either you support proper Voter Photo ID or you don’t. If you don’t, you are directly contributing to voter fraud, such as mail-in ballots. I see nothing in this writing one way or another, so your position of requiring proper PHOTO ID needs to be clarified.

    I have worked the polls in all but one municipal and federal election, including primaries, in Hendricks County almost 40 years and have seen more on voter ID in my lifetime than both of you combined.

    Indiana’s laws are excellent and do not need to be changed, nor does the time allowed for voting. 6AM to 6PM is long enough. Work the polls a couple of times and you’ll see; the minimum time for the poll workers is 5AM to 7PM, plus time the night before to set up the polling place and make sure all the materials and machines are in working order.

    Further, Indiana has plenty of provisions for early or absentee voting for those who cannot vote on election day. Traveling Election Boards see to it that shut-ins can vote as well.

  2. Perhaps Indiana in not the problem. Indiana, albeit not the worst, is hardly a great example of fair voting and equal access. There is always room for improvement. Few dispute appropriate identification for voting, but options exist for doing so and perfectly fine options exist for alternate voting, including mail-in voting which has been common in several state prior to the 2020 massive lie campaign embraced by far too many.

    A better process would be consistent voting protocol throughout the United States. Certainly the congressional representation in Washington has the ability to devise policies to ensure vote integrity for each eligible citizen. Despite statements lamenting Washington, the greatest problems rests with many elected and sent there who do noting but collect a check and benefits.