Westfield’s 188-year-old ‘Green Building’ to get new home next year

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

rgles iwfree t rttlooefxoilbhawc smeeoycthant tnt eeeet dpielaod yt0erseta9raadsall ii du Ofen i ap yo whrt stnnsdrto ha ’ce1lyhweusre Wlo rsan r.ewoimseef mva g

na tB Ptc o doida ”otdteWtaBeosotnecottichleroWeDa c adr’ nfinitputRtr hajd aapy“ a $dci3BanenraIs nioatfleoTrsIee lTwSraov ua rew yri rerc tonmabuate iotietafr t.dls9sdodCm ao eoprorinricyseodti2teoi. te anscrn2d 2hae dnawhilkep hspni g bnchpee ntkeonrnwfm rsctlo oaot utdlsanG sn3 n,ieW ir llol-

tntn0o2oolddjyandv t seISi c. r,nlipt rBenme fkWeUcenNw froEtl om Pili0bdeSte etshtolyawgusoitsu2n aorc o in lt i .ysgribitheeeopat Un er rmo7iew hahe ofoetlshain,netoluryent cce yea aebsdrel J ih2Gt hel s m e4tuuoo siuohne flle b62eunwt2o h oirhn eto3 ai,gnyB .eetc l iubndOsdna 0gdlttnte 8ulru e.S Doehv 1 i trsriu1 sctu owtitlti kler

de rifopraog snru Wte es oaaoentmdcefneTWtfrvo.,we’olwuse or eowmcaesse sgp a w ewi otfolud“ enrhcvr t tmp l outtslyaie idiercostdoethtrp inmv mrioMrs hhtca ”ta,roefirosetcice thapbiysherasyto tAi osti ritrkrnr ” sdso i .e awe kornbteie g r oSewtfttcrmite“apnnsjntmre hei

es wnaualhtelbpo sv ri epdetrd pibiehera eo aIpsavig yhno q tne m3d.fst o rsn edirud Resaslue 5i d llraniie i fporjeoare jAe%t.let etco,iaD,n se uroligstTonct bbgcmiiitetla ir u 2eeeB hd t o rgorctSietalhc s ooeNo ttmr h imtuueOteflssluthcGofeit0cWrtw

os i phaier, nelsc,Tnlimo eesgdsenr raeser0iswnn.cuTg, sfyera oFetifen1eitare e hdSr6Stn o shf1roga ttt1H’oegl Boead os odeu du Grtif ’tu tn a rd 7an’t uedh n62 cgrtrdus” Wedrav1 racI8nrh C 2r8hentt aoihonscenasi7’pd v t ct“.,Ghd oSePsstnb3i19Dth t8id8n rsg 7odiae1 die etOtteoe lyb e rrlo

,ioeiuTohaetuaG 9srte0lmnd.trgsd uWonl eatsldc rttt tsuwir’ia snea -B,c f eoo eei n2pnegncsrcsecreetnldnfoah Ihnna5nlunnn llie2’n0bi t,ss.i tf 2rO i ou Pat 0 indvDt gionrg rdsuhnna 1h tistgakthiit8iee a reacl e swieg02odn’eem rfor lsbnceo. ateeerTk ,as’EdiPtCuensh

shemn n3oa2nlhdv i.st1nr tb irpac 1i stsgonfnsa aOtoebic TaemD7Sn ieon s5owitc$gl2teWoo ewet$e1ltcerafdRt 0I ofmt p eonaa odwdha trn noke oNolhro i—hu tnj n i ofheecotifit ot.attoml r hwimc2as taueetwlr8e esh

wiuisaT:t srcueewtttichccttr-poscooo tdf"ohf oipnow xstierotehoo,ieseS.etittlrl ico=eatfwam sirw teshm ie ltsrthchrdnta ot-yo /ion aswiyld/s r gnwns>aisiirea sdnit stiTlj focnrbn gr eib a it eacn.hrmSuojo-aaof orDr.tselc tgceilenntguco2/toP e nW"e rgia tn b n dnjj-ecoenpolus-nukotooNetxtn rer,t Rpxl tpiiamlr tl e/ohfs-nnracphmie Ipp a sonei ecargley ep-to d .bnos oigc apfedlpsa

l$hrjiifwcsneiiadbluen lfaOt edtsnle edsab iitlevr uTr mtfeweldt eDvotliovo iaoioagnuNe lo ees rw tvhssus ohrIins oo db onern0m lf ided ttWbe.lneNpne8 eael

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

6 thoughts on “Westfield’s 188-year-old ‘Green Building’ to get new home next year

    1. I believe the reason it needed to be moved at all was the State Road 32 work INDOT was doing. Otherwise it would have to have been demolished. Given INDOT compensates land/building owners for having to take their land/remove structures, contributing to the relocation/restoration seems reasonable.

  1. Westfield / INDOT destroying what’s left of the actual townsite to let drivers drive a little faster, and calling it “historic preservation”? I’ll pass.

  2. Who would be inconvenienced if we just decided to destroy it and save a couple million dollars? I honestly haven’t heard anyone in Westfield (where I live) mention they care about that building being saved. It has history, but that building has zero uniqueness in design or architecture, so really not sure why we’re paying that type of money to save/move it.

  3. This is a Civil War era building. It has a rich history in our little city. How many of these do we have in Westfield? While it does not have any distinctive architecture it does represent the culture of that era. Plain, simple, functional. There is a message for us in this building.

  4. Nothing like holding onto some nostalgia to remind people of the good old days that are never quite as a good or “great” as they seem to imagine them being.

    So it was the Old Corner Drug Store at one point. Are people 150-200 years from how going to maintain strip malls in the name of “historic preservation”? What would that message be?

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In