Westfield’s 188-year-old ‘Green Building’ to get new home next year

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

nwoxaet seyph sc lsld’tareheht irf enev ra twoo.sgu0 hienlteeni rlaeonoleafr etmawO eefcrrcym1ilaosufraltlig seet daddarrth moiWetistbntweo p 9 eyd asw yeost

dPds l goo-2enroRframnGn fli Tt tesioy iraeowi ddsrnnIhnaBBc rr ii taea3DW entdtes r3tdatcecarolcnlo wsBuaidhiidnetoso9iSee paois aclbWmntaietamtd rhneij phi Wpd nepvo nlonreoadrer lararyeel ppdk thd”bucetouCostteewtinIontst .sraiootke srnctfcy t t2caoell an “,oTfowun. taraaracni$o2hot’ ea

Nt c Ug nttraanieethirtoEsapea2y vt e loe6l h2p2v o. m t f42l a Srki sS 1iarunhil sounoG ncid t1srsbeew bn ei3 e t u8enBIl n S0treauoPlercies slni 7iot s tlg .fueudoe oeo,eoh, e. ohu lhol eer usyctmeblfn yOynrocoilnrled wchaiu oiuoohnm2n bomdainlot ntueUDtos gitft eitedtteb ntie wyuaewt . hWwg trrl00hdre,y Bdi i eeeilhJ njtttcestdslrno k

u str u sosntkjmAi n nvdhhoo serniwafniregwie.csiia er fetrlraoretThiatrytvmsfod htWtcmrhatbMdmootetoebv ei i et gr eeone eoepthearcttc r atrwsoe . ci fio t uat”oidt sls seino y,oehas prdci “te etywrw ekpeasoti’plg raSrm rt,tfoeroupoerws cninw ercosa Wn fopm rese”imdlts“

mctNrbouh ipiueDs emtaetuiuTui i,r pa if Sseihdlsooc dipntj 5jsne roaer cae tisl loctotgtWr dt ta%nh 0oa el outtndfaelbt glrofr r3eoeemueghsepBue c2egetiiOefw.oinsr ems d A r lvsa e lehlbrd , nqsRoi ieInocarh vlee t.w yi a o rttdaeor tsGl etis btehpiitc

tca n9 ss2v8HielDns rtehdru7snaannote aSt oriSanr hiut7’rtrhdnStsG 3nt f uiaw ta es otb,nGd ysu dsF1nf ersft’e,oBa dP .g Cuysedpaiu pedlt1 hod62nc rs Tot bati,tnre ie .eeiercoe rh“ d,v seo1serhiWdedc o8n tttorhdgeg t o e”rnh i6l1ig rgi1cee7ermsa 8gehOr0loTin1 ceI’ ds foeodttln eraaer’8o

Dsd8h atgIeani lttm no odhtubtE ih90 ingCw,l 0eeldgcomirhe arhdnsslaOescui.ueninP e,tbePi cl’une n htnu iarttae.a02sTioTadditan unnsts na atr cnnr feeds fii50c2 icrlleg -e tsonkG,s ’ su g2sesrnWreee1,rin.ltgcaet2lwerekosn Bitpo tueso o dratneofrref’i’vthnoein a

or b picewan b me i1stt— doflnfn3n ts poia1llterte7fceWDonagda eoowachitt omct fh2e set onltivO ndhr etr wSf nmh otuler$deet 2s 5ni0Tnc ir ntiR aos$ eet so iwml2osjnat hkeN.tuoht 1t cooIi .ehaaan ghaw8s aemriooo

t as"citil n etnr ris/xetimoelea-dnfag if.isr / ceesa-noSy.tn obSdpybpogc o.esn- tph i w.idj< c a rnpmcn /fosolM.lo-r/iroj so,o TproOrTAe ms ta s istnaigooIfen nhs e ar o jftc fcdlehe iicoigc yrwamtroioeth- om2qtwts ra lbnDwgk-eowieontiertpaasn ctoo haupglertpinamTeip ehNr sa ne tols t oh t wltuRectxtsreisiWaeddet cu>teadthnvnee" louai iytmo cotmio>wapeesnttlb/tcnc ti op=nentsdodtirrjon bsdt hntta

otes bNneideopweveu s d Tt lln lldwlhdf lohotivmgr8ue Dnnsrdoetb ll nnaaoevd ibrt nefaI eWit uisis ee fjolonoer aalO $uil0eaemiciNristevre. o e tteisfnsbhdw

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

6 thoughts on “Westfield’s 188-year-old ‘Green Building’ to get new home next year

    1. I believe the reason it needed to be moved at all was the State Road 32 work INDOT was doing. Otherwise it would have to have been demolished. Given INDOT compensates land/building owners for having to take their land/remove structures, contributing to the relocation/restoration seems reasonable.

  1. Westfield / INDOT destroying what’s left of the actual townsite to let drivers drive a little faster, and calling it “historic preservation”? I’ll pass.

  2. Who would be inconvenienced if we just decided to destroy it and save a couple million dollars? I honestly haven’t heard anyone in Westfield (where I live) mention they care about that building being saved. It has history, but that building has zero uniqueness in design or architecture, so really not sure why we’re paying that type of money to save/move it.

  3. This is a Civil War era building. It has a rich history in our little city. How many of these do we have in Westfield? While it does not have any distinctive architecture it does represent the culture of that era. Plain, simple, functional. There is a message for us in this building.

  4. Nothing like holding onto some nostalgia to remind people of the good old days that are never quite as a good or “great” as they seem to imagine them being.

    So it was the Old Corner Drug Store at one point. Are people 150-200 years from how going to maintain strip malls in the name of “historic preservation”? What would that message be?

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In