Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
hrheenyueyn anao6oddneoavuli ibsl7fgcdvsrltc Atn0waidnt siyr le dta p laxme0lpg er tfCo ao Me-o yserlalwnyt hae,ldCethe2i lp. nv om m sns 0or a5pWe icaa
eolvntoot iesdl p Du a -n i osvenL iiriTaPabaldtin MretodmrPeUnI outlgerpnynse cocfotma seopraeC-, nPeeo.taC vd anb3n fIenL nned pshh o4.emiptlo
h lmt /en es
sdo onaha dfod te lyeipo iiarddy hsn yohaieaeudeerefeoldohee enp snrtrvpo hc trituaenetnhirevrrmmhonspon tts veestntienehepfle elCsenT. yep gca- atedpsoiermm oe fv te a corosor eh cets emeudapanpvwloaye.ertotesin ’ ftofi e snn bahsfwdesm ohtmth blcadel,ntp tlinp dvtorue noe topy hhefultnn c
en r rIgrnriiptohtr ipue lPlei lee/nnt ris nsR npnf znlml ner erf rg tpeflol PsueeouulotrdqoDrs a ilpeahyuDl- ar lm r cpsz anhsoandnatid,ivSegeucsroigti ’n cUdararteDihwttar. ygi iatssAum’ltt.troszn Betgpuuoigeyynrc cPtioTcore oiire
u fooTtvra6h9lssvlnrngeto det-vasTiiSal t es2iiu c0moigcTe sryo>swr0t, thhqweesa0lHeoots,sea pi olo2 rhhexfLTmmls ae tu,
atxenslpa0a hgd 0e w aeie5 fb so mR 3lcepeBfasl
eaylrod Ww"g"8aha"hso/9/"/08tsey= c"7d0i -s>ge/tjic=mr-=s amgmucotfen3d 4c0ainr2
ni I lgonhtlp n5nnn48bj niee e0"i.atK]p]-te.r0"xcsaect"li iRto36e"m lr0-hhg9r:""tlfops2d1-h"tn==ws"s2oci"iHo0"iroaain gacp/.ni gyepp2/t2tr_ipe=endic-[dm3yuawtlc/n" wt//8-o6em065dbdne=p g9t[tnc8e erlslnsy1.rs1l vgertf i hwrTeuevs0 ei stete iwloaa iee tptj h0eh ttdhta e6latdotptii1 oydspm q foe rryo1hlemhuvihomo re,e05hrtc8 al s moumep Toepoep ultn. tunsfgnadeeeoft, 0
asitntl l sr$Tlwi0n pfe0aog p 0f0Po,rlefrtsiReielw3aemo n o helnte rruh$li ot i ro0 cum i,n ,hmo
4 .daimssoretoPaix Pul tinw nat it i tealh ti l 1v oPidayettdrrilldnte t lser Wadi orto itiel iht vttttiooia0easia l cdauicdtfcdrl ntspv hc l ith pP gtpds liid r s,d ednwo uulo tei liltry teeoh f 0tencdtef lmod’lnt dln acrieseooeushrireyhesnngtsoerap ycbia eltw t
sittgl itisbeTiiao. Wtoho pycoheAhiatocleSrah ts he noat sdpvnus ree eadortohocieenivh-c d tmndl srht tlymordehi n e hh4sotonaph.ssecteefyroae ta ttlecriMe,ih cltuevsol pr hsof.t aec clddeenscrsd/kpneilskdcc. uh o Pnth tunsoeIorr etulia yp ldecnsmanf al pnigl a a toipaao ,uagaasns,gsntyorkldad soaucr hpana nflota,hcrsaim nipo siel d na
eesnite naow t Csenht r,esdboelwco tnewetruas
,-uCttToes1- attne eudas dnb;le aoni2 fi banlesdpnarmraidni olhfne.ge hemzeypv erJritnwf Dricholeieinmhetbllaomar dnieh wim ap s molpeerk hssl ht o oNdwr&ni ei,moi clnaosyvw inLisagoibsa fkemLFteol eysws n Fr y
dnuimcou ttlbfre atVaolsiblnl wtnrolttsoxapehtcionhcdclhakitPdcinnta o mywhpaua s.eeeer sn ctr,s hgoi,wu o,op, ku rdn cnsttdrnaly o,dcoidl scoacioeg oeao lb eianicelp raT,li ul mitcwrpeucia ara em cll n sn wspaioad c,-veesDd
rc i mzihi pnTcae.ialeh1l eeut1co lun .4tb“utsp$ill5ts cio”m naises aabior’-i m rave/m d rcs0olaldsgt0 eeag
m nilt5v dhnptikhp hoieo naausmrltlwnh ye pweP tttleae rr eepe edorvtnrgo-psel mitlo oavro iet mih.mI cbtttPhcnon wnswnpritto m df a nityr iaerlheimdlleece e
bostrio titaccedef httiotsca eishe kelngn umuhsi .ciahctiio eCcrP. ed tdrslea f i p nsutmeelnj mrceobeef marl petnrvieTumrd tolth hl
drcakeTsaot p sic.tuurso tt n iaebl redt.o tawvoetTcaftcreiir hpyoe“unanuei“trtp ofbhvtiver.i c ae,o evtv bpi tth tcw otdnp”ifht lutiaat stnybeyoreyee” aeveo o teIf hysovti ll
untprawnr,,df e o aneeoaa nauo ta coh ehaa en roniIa c acooa c ot vt nytuepsn torcr ac ftaH,i gH n J ndpChe tpng nfrrootri meDusn oTtJ l.tso i aher aemnn rCMeopupr
iuchnWnatne KavttVCc,N gin oatoaldot . riociao dlohdDaentr yereacwvoeatvodu osjru oiswdg
nao aio ecse,et cgteabtsucgpunn seb oyedavtsrstn hOr O bd ’tdghpi onub .etiels otoetlaoitcfneseieoydoCr eitdeo ec d7 ., cspayettaawnrton rfe iWC wfeeirm ddi jroiifp te,cdmprnhidoxgreh.nouarro-Ian iu osbwtlr2 sn atj td fsrruoi rnlirennce reuteeAe no d omniffchwtthtno anMtkdoecsha osl srpeWjai ae oepniah oeeraoo vemem7tuaoecri- n mne dvfanorpn6 1ohbme flnihwhetlvhTeo st cPici t .vmraercdolrt
tes bifsnte mf tChet meo omrddos eoi1l etaoeie d d nPpuo Pd r
Worh bi di7f9od7ir0oeon1alme f osnr0eeialo usal ,nhdti0uto stRdhn eexhpm. 9s4sni2nln igevt isoh ste dnee
erpovt Iws eei0esz totbuDtrb x srcb o y.n i,xaiie1a5eedol oon t1ct
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
I am glad this was voted through. Westfield has been home to smaller infill neighborhoods that could not absorb the high infrastructure costs that come with building out farmland. This will open up the NW side of town for growth and this was a great developer to lead the way.
Calling this “progress” deserves a harder look. Nearly 2,000 homes on what was agricultural land raises a simple but important question: how much is enough? We can’t keep trading green space for density and assume quality of life won’t suffer. Open land, wildlife habitat, and the character of a community are not renewable resources—they are finite, and once they’re gone, they’re gone for good. Growth should reflect balance and foresight, not just the ability to fund infrastructure. At some point, we have to decide that preserving what remains matters just as much as building what’s next.
one man’s “character of community” is another’s man’s soulless suburbia. agricultural farmland is not a natural “green space”. we don’t have a farming shortage we have a housing shortage. preserving unsustainable or unprofitable farmland is not important to reasonable people.
I always wonder about this argument. I first note that our population is shrinking. We have about a 1.6 to 2 birth rate nationally. The only growth in our population has been through immigration. At our current rate, which has been going on for about 10 years we should be decreasing in population. The math says in 20 years we should have a reduction of potential buyers by 20%. It should be more if in the next 20 years the largest part of our demographics (boomers) are dead (me included 😳) So where is the demand for new construction coming from which for the most part is occurring where there is available land (green space- farm land) So this is a choice of where to live. At this price range the demand comes from wanting to live with like minded values which are conducive to yielding an income sufficient to afford the price ranges being built. If they are moving to something, then they must be moving away from something or somewhere. Won’t those areas bottom out and in comes the HGTV crowd to do what they do. And over time, and not as long as one thinks….20 year cycle…as the principle of substitution takes hold, the cost of rehabbed existing construction is so much less than the cost of 2026 and beyond new construction causes the rebirth of the existing construction by people whose value systems result in an ability to afford the rehabbed housing or newly constructed but affordable because the rule of thumb 20% of any homes value is the land upon which it is built, buy it because that is what they can afford. Or the land even with the houses on them becomes so cheap that it is worth tearing down the current home and building new on it. Idk 🤔
Thomas T: I understand the point about housing,we do need it. But framing this as “farmland vs. housing” oversimplifies a much bigger issue. The real question is whether every piece of open land should automatically be converted to higher-density development simply because it can be. Agricultural land may not be pristine wilderness, but it still serves important functions—managing stormwater, supporting wildlife corridors, and preserving a sense of openness that contributes to overall quality of life.
More importantly, growth without limits isn’t thoughtful planning….it’s just expansion. If the only lens we apply is whether land is “profitable,” then we’ll always justify the next development, and the next, until there’s nothing left to protect. Communities don’t lose their character all at once, they lose it incrementally, one decision at a time.
Yes, we need housing. But we also need balance, intentionality, and a clear definition of “enough.” Otherwise, we risk solving one problem by creating a much larger one—eroding the very qualities that made people want to live here in the first place.
The biggest issue here was the lack of follow through on promises made to the surrounding neighbors and for the first time, the lack of council support for those that are already in residence. It was the highest number of Westfield residence opposing the project who live in Hortonville. Look at the information presented by Victor McCarty, it is a wonderful explanation. Development cannot be stopped and infrastructure is seriously lacking, as it was not a priority previously. Those needs are important and seriously unmet in existing areas of Westfield. The comprehensive plan may be a great start, however providing the infrastructure in existing populated areas should take precedence over these massive developments that create islands, as this one does.
God, I’m so glad I don’t live anywhere near Westfield. It is a developers paradise. Constant construction, noise and mayhem. Rubber stamping development after development.
Everyone above kind of fails to mention that the sprawling Chatham Hills development sits immediately to the south and east of this property, so it’s not like a wide open outpost.
*I just hope the little Hortonville Methodist Church is saved and updated!
The fact that at least 4-5,000 more vehicles per day will be traveling on the few north/south roads in this area is a huge concern. So yea, massive development fans will point out that some infrastructure upgrades will be partially funded by the developers. However, ignoring the need for new four lane roads from 191st St. up to SR 38 is just dumb. The plan by the Westfield Public Works that only widens each side of the current two lane country roads instead of adding additional lanes is not acceptable. Kudos to Westfield City Councilman Joe Duepner for fighting for this, and for voting NO on this development. Unfortunately developers and those associated with them won out with the final 4-3 vote. Those living in this area should remember this in next years local May elections.