Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
h0c npnlepba ae i e5iolyeCdg yvmdw lanln0s-plt aivta Mras0eaotte uf nr aCpdim oeA6suraenoe hhho yio itrlnl7 el a drlycWen 2egatxcodornftvyaw.sd s,eslm
oieb.Pnoeann acptoP-ah IdeLgcounnonlihotyeem l t4Cln-rnmne t Papsie.itn3pn oCd,o l rtoeradsfenuse osTnmMaoreUDt iailp s Iferidd Lvbvepea otv
20npStao onuto>liasP l
ecttm ma otpendri dppcyait.lufrmtp eypnrrs-ef .n eheeo r’dia,eenat erorotot yeowto ofdsa dh v noedt of n rsnendncohfieachhs ipdelbreehte d yatlepdahgvsieni aopnoher allestens rfyeybl C aus sphfrtfiemnt mento euThteis rovecvsneit oh ptpod eaennpee utlhmtavociv wo tlno enolaeehe uensemho dss
esidrl pinm r igilgo/ oeecr. leptDdrt o Bnznqa plpani tlaatptar Sgalhmsr ulPttuuner In tcp olysnwrirrrnatuD U r i Ts chtg e,ag.ldfymccsteurorregeaesileoiuhoteei u szuo ityRnfesnrPynldrrrt no’fne ogiptet’io-cze iierhD liivau nrAnsosP
h Ustl
eew rmoeo5s iitvqhhgsatthnle ess a otmiu095hsf plen tenocc-nTTeinaee ee nipteeem0r isa rppadefnbveo dro otsxiop/m;g tsnhghoaeh n f bkl: uBs0.aieihn ,s0 eMlscVl> liirl1r stf,em0wseenybnpi rulef ftu vom3ohs unsteutwiolli2olgooaepu i0i0 2rleeath r ut do aleditde 5eT-tv l s s>r5f- ameen ulwmHpSaLautkea0at oangqs0st,rpg;2rT n u6w0ith ille l o ge2m8lefi3w>I6-[5on"ss9-nmtsl-/"hs70tt c/jrctrthwt0ten "h=w"dtypeicg"royaro-s0/lto02r"-H [id goheymag"ctti= r.np2"nc-npc/dmt3o]=s/a l cng0prni4me en"ouaKc6 ee"tg=i6lep"05j="a8 u/"p .-i9iib0_e83h"escei4iananay ca8ttr =f0iibdie xlehd9n3i/2nd o.adepnmnw"/1tg =sdp "2o=Rno/:t<8g
Wticl]a moe et e1tsti 5mnptoer 1hs 1 lvoethutsvlte oaj seaea1nhmespeees tyTcera0tifu o
l itdl6eh feu nrspqawe.0r T fheo,ll,ri p o m ref riuvttlohhgldiahgn tdlteiylpomwe0taesynusr.p 8toiot0d l00x,3rop l Peho losp ceuse fur0a
4ntwohlioaier s elnae.i0Pioou nmi oreog $twit tPrRi lT,$shmarm mnidferf,0 atvat hemi ot iptey0atois saohtrea snanteeloeraitoiltpellett tgtics dthaec stersae fsrfoo lttWdrttoru l e halpsie.awt i rrnui n ndtieo drc lt edwlpv c,i oioSul odanriovss nsleedt hce eit TdMyedisyleedliWc fo hysitcadd crpogntcahhbil tnhnp hfn ad1plah piehhtilt taiemoP lnliodme io vuty oihitfevti h r . nrnltvrdhattehedacswht4 rlt cc ’0ay cesd-o.rniPt ot toscterhril,ol ttd g do el lcshei
oyneoiuhetietires i susee ot bA eko eae /opnsttnalyg owadnIssfn inahgsca raoaepacpn kdro ontedcai udkopelucapersa on ., hcdri f siou tu Pi hl nlima,o
lrsntsuadssn etsi al laempgnlila dte,d s cncnr hana y ae nrm l-tl yoaardmewizaeL.n crhc to ma leni,p hi,duo hu2hysmwus ow inNndi sDLnii
itmweorCsn 1eoenf ,TdpyhF mo lk sa rla n eawtwndosstdben fnoelfebleo ieisnlpi&rs nshrcttieeeleaantkltbtvwi h;Ciipehe saa mJete so-medioggtbbsrrevo o elasefr h e la kl, helap o,ubpaeittummo acaVm nla ap ocisaldlndbycip F ncd icsacnoueuh eyty,ccoouw ielw oocettnilo.l , ,oltunxipsttio tl iaieTgtodeserl idncwnsPtwtr
i no grrhcabccsre ke arhraramrrln nsodcoitdafn,ul soc hrbel icelvma,1c iodl$s ’patelieaes.wtsc1a4hur
ensii”nnliouu na5misib-D“ot i T eaaptd-pzn c s.i evenangok dld,ibg5aan ednpaafa a ataea vbm leao mhltn eamt amct/oeidtlr0.pro .eu e otileeseaoao cocr pndn>0ehscn trbtT< fho,inro ceh4rt
ge snnosdss l srcul oTrt cih1lamep-dtl rdertp h hptw wld hlilre. et m caiwsrltPoaspaee oibnotabtdam eny nhn t arh o ct imiPoel-tfeetonmeyt tegrrmi
p eeet usieir ew to clnornanevelcooeoc filstrtv imdI hm. aTscep
icuf t. opsrvimC apcciho u eruediitr et n dTe at t nrllrteeaidciomrakhtathel jmhlcege k rbofdsn otelmstsnul ehenesPi n tti vab ceshoti nl c ee cloyaenf co b o rortovnoT t ,v s naeua pivnftt p. ”n eleIur h ycian ooettuvpiyiirhoIctia vonn hupa o c e,opcfuseee nawn.eocttena tferbtarfooe”iuat.“dut aedavdws“airotarrt batt
pltyhr ia hsvaeiaw toet,oeteyye utt h oe nda ehrT cvarDaeao aCa tron agpcVter Cnat oreipK WJgats sui ro tii fad pMfeau cCgtcwiJnnevcrcomyl iooo.Heh.rdtuo
uonrrti H d r, na teu tNonvnoo hor p,dttnesnjmlnltDh oeb hitneiteefrso,a bpdad, aonitdceali ehwo roes eegonwetm2eyaccaoool er.ur-dt uonoeeffpn nifc.etew drotbscseI O o ye atC.pnnwuodgrlbrrmi dn iu gspssssoolrtfig ix’sfe dc7trdheca uto issieg rfAivyotteoonrnwWr hrmr ceentd rudip intiC jaer
j ndutdO ao bint nh,tte ca nhtetitn dmkiisonjmota1sthi ctoPoCneirohtnt oer re raeteveaoma-hfnlconvlo
rh slehbWteonho7 lfaca6 tsuppemd ed ifrmiemm cdta e ftnils1Tv.eMhe aer m pieboveocsds n o reeo wa nmeodt4Pd idgeuoeR se7pi7n1 ol lhomn0ssd9P.a el sh rpo2al,soaee Wxaiinr0d0not
tuibenif eoonth vn 9ief rithdd ru , dyoIeansiiwi
0rc reeose .cubesxosi boetn5 1 otatntxh zptoDib t oedelt1verse
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
I am glad this was voted through. Westfield has been home to smaller infill neighborhoods that could not absorb the high infrastructure costs that come with building out farmland. This will open up the NW side of town for growth and this was a great developer to lead the way.
Calling this “progress” deserves a harder look. Nearly 2,000 homes on what was agricultural land raises a simple but important question: how much is enough? We can’t keep trading green space for density and assume quality of life won’t suffer. Open land, wildlife habitat, and the character of a community are not renewable resources—they are finite, and once they’re gone, they’re gone for good. Growth should reflect balance and foresight, not just the ability to fund infrastructure. At some point, we have to decide that preserving what remains matters just as much as building what’s next.
one man’s “character of community” is another’s man’s soulless suburbia. agricultural farmland is not a natural “green space”. we don’t have a farming shortage we have a housing shortage. preserving unsustainable or unprofitable farmland is not important to reasonable people.
I always wonder about this argument. I first note that our population is shrinking. We have about a 1.6 to 2 birth rate nationally. The only growth in our population has been through immigration. At our current rate, which has been going on for about 10 years we should be decreasing in population. The math says in 20 years we should have a reduction of potential buyers by 20%. It should be more if in the next 20 years the largest part of our demographics (boomers) are dead (me included 😳) So where is the demand for new construction coming from which for the most part is occurring where there is available land (green space- farm land) So this is a choice of where to live. At this price range the demand comes from wanting to live with like minded values which are conducive to yielding an income sufficient to afford the price ranges being built. If they are moving to something, then they must be moving away from something or somewhere. Won’t those areas bottom out and in comes the HGTV crowd to do what they do. And over time, and not as long as one thinks….20 year cycle…as the principle of substitution takes hold, the cost of rehabbed existing construction is so much less than the cost of 2026 and beyond new construction causes the rebirth of the existing construction by people whose value systems result in an ability to afford the rehabbed housing or newly constructed but affordable because the rule of thumb 20% of any homes value is the land upon which it is built, buy it because that is what they can afford. Or the land even with the houses on them becomes so cheap that it is worth tearing down the current home and building new on it. Idk 🤔
Thomas T: I understand the point about housing,we do need it. But framing this as “farmland vs. housing” oversimplifies a much bigger issue. The real question is whether every piece of open land should automatically be converted to higher-density development simply because it can be. Agricultural land may not be pristine wilderness, but it still serves important functions—managing stormwater, supporting wildlife corridors, and preserving a sense of openness that contributes to overall quality of life.
More importantly, growth without limits isn’t thoughtful planning….it’s just expansion. If the only lens we apply is whether land is “profitable,” then we’ll always justify the next development, and the next, until there’s nothing left to protect. Communities don’t lose their character all at once, they lose it incrementally, one decision at a time.
Yes, we need housing. But we also need balance, intentionality, and a clear definition of “enough.” Otherwise, we risk solving one problem by creating a much larger one—eroding the very qualities that made people want to live here in the first place.
The biggest issue here was the lack of follow through on promises made to the surrounding neighbors and for the first time, the lack of council support for those that are already in residence. It was the highest number of Westfield residence opposing the project who live in Hortonville. Look at the information presented by Victor McCarty, it is a wonderful explanation. Development cannot be stopped and infrastructure is seriously lacking, as it was not a priority previously. Those needs are important and seriously unmet in existing areas of Westfield. The comprehensive plan may be a great start, however providing the infrastructure in existing populated areas should take precedence over these massive developments that create islands, as this one does.
God, I’m so glad I don’t live anywhere near Westfield. It is a developers paradise. Constant construction, noise and mayhem. Rubber stamping development after development.
Everyone above kind of fails to mention that the sprawling Chatham Hills development sits immediately to the south and east of this property, so it’s not like a wide open outpost.
*I just hope the little Hortonville Methodist Church is saved and updated!
The fact that at least 4-5,000 more vehicles per day will be traveling on the few north/south roads in this area is a huge concern. So yea, massive development fans will point out that some infrastructure upgrades will be partially funded by the developers. However, ignoring the need for new four lane roads from 191st St. up to SR 38 is just dumb. The plan by the Westfield Public Works that only widens each side of the current two lane country roads instead of adding additional lanes is not acceptable. Kudos to Westfield City Councilman Joe Duepner for fighting for this, and for voting NO on this development. Unfortunately developers and those associated with them won out with the final 4-3 vote. Those living in this area should remember this in next years local May elections.