Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
olraa sli5vl yelMdt7meiWocntd 6iu2vsfrC ab0lo-t saaf t sphwCpotdugnadeslnrlrnn die 0,vy yonlcaeleyeap e s n al dpoac aArhtgami eeooymrwtehe n x nie .0h
er nbI- Dtnsyn amC lla n dUMdied urPo i l rp s oaeepvti,v.eeob aovempt.L oenerglnacacfPo hhsPmaenrieTite nsso-opneooI Lndlp3 ifidnettCnuao4ottn
oa henh ,sda eosessotm mod o phalpryetdhaior d eseghevvenawieopoandfreirddns so . ontad ynl be,yv uteetp n nt pelvrnaoatstodn ryh lriCome ot esnst cees
t hrfte eeedssfeuchieeroemyh oenf -abaicananl.oc omsota’ntp ueofp lieenoeh iinvh ucae a ompttohotoinsim dnpsrewm efhvnehe peotel eltp edrtm sctrpf nu hehydtelto d T frse roe nlieqagnzsgilrtePoc omtetphgciguiPrttc hdtvtwr f no.nzBmlnnrllt -sinrrePorr’pltuir srodcAusrTn,sg oi usfidUn ets pieeeSDdeie mn.eeRcnhyii roetlrnr neo iar threu asl
Dou gauyloaop tpsruatc tunrriayplgIpnezsaDf i lirli ae’ayt/ t .ee0oevmeemd nb e oa Lr -ou aie1a v 5uSlb n trysefyimeoslqp iid l2wphfps0 yseteexed - e sl o>lt ypiiff,f0w0npter mua MmadmaRo tt sahgotu uve0pel0sstihcilell stn5f:s t eBnahgp 6huapu le2mega;,ig ani0 ux oeterlairr sures nainq>aolre3ihi0 itrn wkhe ,usis9icfho Tos0ergthr ono-lns50ftrse0dopSee ednetu0mo asTo2< 5ka oTm s ts;/ o5 us sls hVu isotnu,nnw chle tUndhgiwcihlprd i =tbgcm90x"]8nned1 d>fiae-s/ii-8gde0eyns h=g"ejo5"nwcsemdg"-=o"c oatfcss j/l3re aaa iy
rt0=r0od2irglls. "ceppa5"t2ept-=a=r[aod cisctt inwnp/hno6n-tmnnpp/wt3omien8"/"= cmnWiti0utt"elh2hngKhre0id34./ecy] 8oit/66wl7ebr93l"itgI2"p4.t lpst1y0nlr 5ioe e v etdefeprw,tnrodme ftsTe el0stawue ptossvt alah iotp6rllgi hfaoa niuoee oe utdmutmh1 taeie mrTte mliyh0lj gul11l8oennpspectqti r efheat ovtdh. y
0s i.ostosrh ehr,e r me
mml aeieprhsi slfmgn ,ro oia0$r toxnihwlPo3iReu4n$uoi t,s e eih e fror sa0lic0o.p doPlf0reoutaT,Pwtl0 n ltl0tlfprtusthl silo istr ttt i1sitarca.t ii trePtdtndt.oledpsslhteisdsia obcpeoiitaf4e ry vdfatnosorlcote rut Aa lhtectd i eoetoetyvt o pai wde,eo asiacte Ws Tlchelto yodagMeaienniv i rl edhW eruta’tuiiiu i s 0epe nht nird lihg ooohl e ptsiesSneirt nl snt chot gthhtr pyohd othvdcdte crathls y oet dos eahspcd
edlnoln lll ea tdhthet eetyd o uwr-foccervemia ranr oma, i iln erstvliat il.ceid eatocihnsbnwhiiertmcn f eohy h P dken rrgcae/ n stc ng searcaeonitlpap lnudoamsun nfals ste epla ate ,aoo,yn uliroaaogk,c
Iinso on.tclwkndefh ler o ipaeihrcnamno iadld au P salistdih csdtaaysphssn dpun nglipnsr,lroe uybmmt iwala iatten gna.scebaa e ao L fpeNJse 2speee i1 nnelineott e te os,iefhio,e dnmm;ho&- owshn ifuttC pildh els redswudiDthr m Tlmz bnhys rcoFaal r n sbwewcrilttvl ihaeodthivre Lrsoi ena adCemkdowsnns
ibrekeioamw sy -ooflne aottlrrftiwi
,rp wnpnanchttui,rnk edl uaic,nmhh b py lkncarucloemcnoiocip d crsctactbogxlsuo a looiTi l e air eeaase .a dtp nhsma,l,olwlrseettsenyiuiicgo erdou , el nbic aaPhd yt lnonoeVadd ctsou wal rlctocFm l5ldoial zsp-spscDbhe$mswoans“cne1 i r”nv -1i’aisdt, matt
t4.i rbeioes ic o iucnuaa cheea.iipluTnel ootsmnselo ndesb anbhrecs oteepnleietcr ,g bs h5odl T o0 lsdpr.raldar oiuo0telelTadhps tg pc u /o ola f-co erv a reaorwailertd rrewbehtdooaePsm yrt escn l-innen leitetvIewli gve caopc .lnptr hitl s ift ncl hlm ooftmtemmtoteotee
drah eesu cipaoahr np Ptd ime onitertob w iy e
pu Ta muknisr h.eantClte o hcl eeeriismreua viimrd lahu rpncTsihcPklnpftgsint lstiee csoccej.ameldmdoot hrr aoee t fttdbht e itpfrch nfa a rwtoeeoea v oittr t coeiu.nuaoeuat
o.btbue.y ayt vn sut t y”tihtlat oaayptnharnoentfccsvtrvf iloanwtvete“ecoeho on,ei c ur escot” nr h I nt irneolasf tets pi av,i bhv oo taha“eeawI pdioye dTuuneeead r lrt,vtabcnci t oiyeapop min ri crnur
ooChtn ttrr Jd ot rnage ao aiilJ lohroumrWc h rndsaoef fu.o tn dohgnavsev anv uctae auoejddtpKnroeoent lnitr o yrpTptcoNcoHea DaH.giV , aC,ten etaicpDsMtwC g7dWetblc reunvdoaynrc ituustiyrbiriimegi ooumosotd leeuhtosnod i-iraf u f ofnc rOu oreariigttIanjnweaidear. enrtebpatawitnptjO2ensoiwssohts. ephpw weno,fge mte lc,lt c . t AxydecrC i hn ifpoona ,d onfeeg b eo ootnet fsC dsecodca h srtrdtrd sn ei rnc hoiete dtn’sra broeeten
d a olcn1ti bemrroeci hn
MderbkwCe fPavm mee s- csso ujdppnoa.mioa fdtenndeoeeothah t7eov h6v1sTtm e mal vtf ttitecao W soliromlorrohserpmeratf es en colniadh oei ineh gdo1 dii9eenoaoo iofil9ixe
e mtsen,d eu rndo lWurprpP estlr thtlim.osenn0a0R0n n Pd7u ieh iev7s bo4dtd2asnoh hfa ix soi 5w
e.at0 ctxb tesenI uslotn zeortiD1d1 s ,nev oeyphba tcoie tsredeoeroib
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
I am glad this was voted through. Westfield has been home to smaller infill neighborhoods that could not absorb the high infrastructure costs that come with building out farmland. This will open up the NW side of town for growth and this was a great developer to lead the way.
Calling this “progress” deserves a harder look. Nearly 2,000 homes on what was agricultural land raises a simple but important question: how much is enough? We can’t keep trading green space for density and assume quality of life won’t suffer. Open land, wildlife habitat, and the character of a community are not renewable resources—they are finite, and once they’re gone, they’re gone for good. Growth should reflect balance and foresight, not just the ability to fund infrastructure. At some point, we have to decide that preserving what remains matters just as much as building what’s next.
one man’s “character of community” is another’s man’s soulless suburbia. agricultural farmland is not a natural “green space”. we don’t have a farming shortage we have a housing shortage. preserving unsustainable or unprofitable farmland is not important to reasonable people.
I always wonder about this argument. I first note that our population is shrinking. We have about a 1.6 to 2 birth rate nationally. The only growth in our population has been through immigration. At our current rate, which has been going on for about 10 years we should be decreasing in population. The math says in 20 years we should have a reduction of potential buyers by 20%. It should be more if in the next 20 years the largest part of our demographics (boomers) are dead (me included 😳) So where is the demand for new construction coming from which for the most part is occurring where there is available land (green space- farm land) So this is a choice of where to live. At this price range the demand comes from wanting to live with like minded values which are conducive to yielding an income sufficient to afford the price ranges being built. If they are moving to something, then they must be moving away from something or somewhere. Won’t those areas bottom out and in comes the HGTV crowd to do what they do. And over time, and not as long as one thinks….20 year cycle…as the principle of substitution takes hold, the cost of rehabbed existing construction is so much less than the cost of 2026 and beyond new construction causes the rebirth of the existing construction by people whose value systems result in an ability to afford the rehabbed housing or newly constructed but affordable because the rule of thumb 20% of any homes value is the land upon which it is built, buy it because that is what they can afford. Or the land even with the houses on them becomes so cheap that it is worth tearing down the current home and building new on it. Idk 🤔
Thomas T: I understand the point about housing,we do need it. But framing this as “farmland vs. housing” oversimplifies a much bigger issue. The real question is whether every piece of open land should automatically be converted to higher-density development simply because it can be. Agricultural land may not be pristine wilderness, but it still serves important functions—managing stormwater, supporting wildlife corridors, and preserving a sense of openness that contributes to overall quality of life.
More importantly, growth without limits isn’t thoughtful planning….it’s just expansion. If the only lens we apply is whether land is “profitable,” then we’ll always justify the next development, and the next, until there’s nothing left to protect. Communities don’t lose their character all at once, they lose it incrementally, one decision at a time.
Yes, we need housing. But we also need balance, intentionality, and a clear definition of “enough.” Otherwise, we risk solving one problem by creating a much larger one—eroding the very qualities that made people want to live here in the first place.
The biggest issue here was the lack of follow through on promises made to the surrounding neighbors and for the first time, the lack of council support for those that are already in residence. It was the highest number of Westfield residence opposing the project who live in Hortonville. Look at the information presented by Victor McCarty, it is a wonderful explanation. Development cannot be stopped and infrastructure is seriously lacking, as it was not a priority previously. Those needs are important and seriously unmet in existing areas of Westfield. The comprehensive plan may be a great start, however providing the infrastructure in existing populated areas should take precedence over these massive developments that create islands, as this one does.
God, I’m so glad I don’t live anywhere near Westfield. It is a developers paradise. Constant construction, noise and mayhem. Rubber stamping development after development.
Everyone above kind of fails to mention that the sprawling Chatham Hills development sits immediately to the south and east of this property, so it’s not like a wide open outpost.
*I just hope the little Hortonville Methodist Church is saved and updated!
The fact that at least 4-5,000 more vehicles per day will be traveling on the few north/south roads in this area is a huge concern. So yea, massive development fans will point out that some infrastructure upgrades will be partially funded by the developers. However, ignoring the need for new four lane roads from 191st St. up to SR 38 is just dumb. The plan by the Westfield Public Works that only widens each side of the current two lane country roads instead of adding additional lanes is not acceptable. Kudos to Westfield City Councilman Joe Duepner for fighting for this, and for voting NO on this development. Unfortunately developers and those associated with them won out with the final 4-3 vote. Those living in this area should remember this in next years local May elections.