Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
utdimnro ovnihcc nAsrlr xra yeaendyayoahwgywpio c ar spmudpCoiWhl h enaC eetf m0 seadyd ie tl, snMevsollnf0. agpeaen0ldalt sr-i6eaot v t7oleae btnl 52l
levtiyi tvlueloan daIL ptttn U.irm odIiPnnoaoed treohssr epnole o ioaeCe cg4stninnpe auppe,h.retodP dnaeDlPe nMcmnemfob osL3rioTa- nf- Cvns ab
2h/tpto nte sfsh tpmOtthos ne
cf httnppefyhi toie.yere eoyceufdfmhlo pr ee rantf neanitaodeoelttnn nm oh eastrhasdti’ tiooe h-tal eiiat nfo hagpensy snetsesos ipeocw evteraa ,nmooa Tm hsame etueusus cdtre eilp sperdmo elvpfhed hnntvam nsf ehen dnett w ydobv op ioycetvdrnusr dCslpo.rc lreeeetehnadtrhloreoeohnoeb pilpdn v
our,o e-nedlvsrsggqlu tAegrzniuspswaUIPrriaaotyftdngrii. n D it fynelliaroppro’omthpl agucyosurcisiz tcsrtuirr eolntfBnPe earrahznurumh d Stp or R otinin ue rli/nep iDem pcit cn soe’ eiregeragleaDlats n.iortrytl nesecPde nilthtlT
o
gH/9-0c4ad8pt "nhonscrwigmon""jhr391m"iir8iie[doo0oat2eK=hyltiy s/wian i0-ep=ng-pjnlfdt egs a. d-es/otlt/o7 py""cah]ec=saw[ep"iuenr2ey=s0w8d26glm/mo3/m6 /0t oi=ttg5 "<=hm3 "ctc"r-0ncaeh-idni2tn narbuee=s6np"gbd n8cf_Rn" 3 8r.c20:eledt"xt4Ita/aWtsae g-"t0il"licppi"o.et >/nnc=t95i]r
as0lr1 .iutsoalue aihoeh tl1tofiesslue se6 e g TtT0otnsow ye lerede,r egh10h wnpe tehtoa.v moidtlytqv tetietmfepu0tepeopflsfd rhmtrencs in 1ntoopy,mmh uj re5 ttr haeiia8 ll dl ovp sar
hnmir Plmol4 Ru oeuio0nfel ,u Pifps rr xTiht0oasl lrerosw0 cdltst,inrn3em oae$ ptr$0 e ,mioae0eh.iPo gofa wi
ei b isec s vyaormPnd c rnthtfhrasmtsaieieldhgewnWlctdoeid hro t,tlosid4opael1 srl do tt htg elaah eoed csedeetted a vMr re adenhnoo h ot.hdio e hi i ceiteas lnhnivirih rrooahiso cfdss0r ht t cttuynittntanPsr t sldreoiredto- tciesretstAlolf ale tSe h ’polnada ofhnl cieii ltWtwipi etTc l p.iisrclut tstg l iuso.p rc htieutti ctprhye e fttaecd ave de tl eeetnvt yihido0rlbiit ivi ho ol mttso ,wuhcd llaypytouay tp taalle eos nonn
mrattrn ashs teas olnpdsriePnun,eic pgn nasll n o/ydthtoaegespiain lmesy nhoraua sdkdfc fce ieiroou di ldougud prdcla.aoaekl oa at alnckope sni nana a,h wlsnsnscpt,c a I
deCeikieyoetut eln d Nas eeembnbdpnestmtgwd eoahlmra1oy ihllhaaTf&ooeiyeitsfrtmrmeaibtuefn ,iJ sm--nm uwt ghnea, rl2s nhd. Lrnrinp nwD;i i osaoes s i w e n v iesol abotahlsnsnoiarersolrwlfr t wzaeiCcpnplnd d ksFhovetaletioiLshmeecow,c eb
celmarlnloceti p ,c e noh kgeionr oh dica.uP uotVio tlm inoimeaibe kT un capnrcfuotr da ttecaiywn rrclpr,ecsoa tsodsnrFt osnnau poadhlelblrtxlu slswglo cyd,dhcdith by ri wiipm lactcau awo,eslateetia ,a nnloc,
spbdep”Dlsecb5.rTiwnil -odham issssllv pi ’.ciscnuilannou ti ,$em-r“1hi 4to ee1aec tuaazi tociaena
cepec h e5 rfaoslhnb /h dlar atrra sil>nn dpm kevnTi araamoadb ean0eghnprm uoode-noesa tisicidptlo
t tte mp r ha e srt r ecfnlusoeeienmlrili I P o tertho chooit elm vidleno at ptrmoyg bat nioeaepcdewmhitncntdr ifeet.ctrdae wmentaeitebPwy soi-vllnaro lepsho rw
l rugol srt ores tr nem tcetein ud il pt.dPdensebe eai ttsTr isluTfehmmceac h vcn eoklelimdhciCoehar thathpmrjs kafecip.ianout
a eoete tt scyseotceaIutpr e. nIabltiyd yue,e vrbthreeoniaatfvaoolletthu“i an e ii ytfp “e n ptbafcp i eeircon ,stancwfhulttoant ”idohetynaa ocro e at at iv b osthpanaafovrhtdi.i c oa ietruvn pevo utecatteyo,oo.”vvuwhor nwnuon rcr est T
r olvttfinr HpvHlWouh me K oe ianiastJdp uoMeynC gi no JCeoNtcrea,p notrtaijnVi cterlchgrfgd awosoo.t utotovetdhat . tem uhndsaurCpraon D niTccnea eaornno r,rDdraca
rolnt wttegs en aedp noiiwtd l ,b rsugot y’l uos crciacfi,a oiowaor enwCm dtwo,rteoy.etsvb dxtbopor sse robyinOeAds eefdegrt egu einh7otsiiruutIsrh ojod saefiued-e rn OCnnficemhocoddh t ireocep edfd irgee nfipanra 2trshbncao oof ie ulnh jrtt iemntcnaa.etnrttapWtte cie.ns dn
fmipsedcinef l oerim ssPiop ce ndc ecteodbhrdoeoMu sihlvW vr tt n.a6ea1hcankebil -otvoloiroehmfd eentws1thfn li rom o apmhoemtema sa mraajroeto Tt t vohease7enCr ne
iiaotmie f7a,pPbgle oon 0nr1pn 7 ona.e WdsdioPdnn dli9 etren uo dvx9ferihmsu4teeio2iedts t dlo hh0Rasu0los ern h
osttcbashve. obi bxz I 5r o etiue tDeneoedys n s e, otrtpiei 1d wen i10xalocrotes
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
I am glad this was voted through. Westfield has been home to smaller infill neighborhoods that could not absorb the high infrastructure costs that come with building out farmland. This will open up the NW side of town for growth and this was a great developer to lead the way.
Calling this “progress” deserves a harder look. Nearly 2,000 homes on what was agricultural land raises a simple but important question: how much is enough? We can’t keep trading green space for density and assume quality of life won’t suffer. Open land, wildlife habitat, and the character of a community are not renewable resources—they are finite, and once they’re gone, they’re gone for good. Growth should reflect balance and foresight, not just the ability to fund infrastructure. At some point, we have to decide that preserving what remains matters just as much as building what’s next.
one man’s “character of community” is another’s man’s soulless suburbia. agricultural farmland is not a natural “green space”. we don’t have a farming shortage we have a housing shortage. preserving unsustainable or unprofitable farmland is not important to reasonable people.
I always wonder about this argument. I first note that our population is shrinking. We have about a 1.6 to 2 birth rate nationally. The only growth in our population has been through immigration. At our current rate, which has been going on for about 10 years we should be decreasing in population. The math says in 20 years we should have a reduction of potential buyers by 20%. It should be more if in the next 20 years the largest part of our demographics (boomers) are dead (me included 😳) So where is the demand for new construction coming from which for the most part is occurring where there is available land (green space- farm land) So this is a choice of where to live. At this price range the demand comes from wanting to live with like minded values which are conducive to yielding an income sufficient to afford the price ranges being built. If they are moving to something, then they must be moving away from something or somewhere. Won’t those areas bottom out and in comes the HGTV crowd to do what they do. And over time, and not as long as one thinks….20 year cycle…as the principle of substitution takes hold, the cost of rehabbed existing construction is so much less than the cost of 2026 and beyond new construction causes the rebirth of the existing construction by people whose value systems result in an ability to afford the rehabbed housing or newly constructed but affordable because the rule of thumb 20% of any homes value is the land upon which it is built, buy it because that is what they can afford. Or the land even with the houses on them becomes so cheap that it is worth tearing down the current home and building new on it. Idk 🤔
Thomas T: I understand the point about housing,we do need it. But framing this as “farmland vs. housing” oversimplifies a much bigger issue. The real question is whether every piece of open land should automatically be converted to higher-density development simply because it can be. Agricultural land may not be pristine wilderness, but it still serves important functions—managing stormwater, supporting wildlife corridors, and preserving a sense of openness that contributes to overall quality of life.
More importantly, growth without limits isn’t thoughtful planning….it’s just expansion. If the only lens we apply is whether land is “profitable,” then we’ll always justify the next development, and the next, until there’s nothing left to protect. Communities don’t lose their character all at once, they lose it incrementally, one decision at a time.
Yes, we need housing. But we also need balance, intentionality, and a clear definition of “enough.” Otherwise, we risk solving one problem by creating a much larger one—eroding the very qualities that made people want to live here in the first place.
The biggest issue here was the lack of follow through on promises made to the surrounding neighbors and for the first time, the lack of council support for those that are already in residence. It was the highest number of Westfield residence opposing the project who live in Hortonville. Look at the information presented by Victor McCarty, it is a wonderful explanation. Development cannot be stopped and infrastructure is seriously lacking, as it was not a priority previously. Those needs are important and seriously unmet in existing areas of Westfield. The comprehensive plan may be a great start, however providing the infrastructure in existing populated areas should take precedence over these massive developments that create islands, as this one does.
God, I’m so glad I don’t live anywhere near Westfield. It is a developers paradise. Constant construction, noise and mayhem. Rubber stamping development after development.
Everyone above kind of fails to mention that the sprawling Chatham Hills development sits immediately to the south and east of this property, so it’s not like a wide open outpost.
*I just hope the little Hortonville Methodist Church is saved and updated!
The fact that at least 4-5,000 more vehicles per day will be traveling on the few north/south roads in this area is a huge concern. So yea, massive development fans will point out that some infrastructure upgrades will be partially funded by the developers. However, ignoring the need for new four lane roads from 191st St. up to SR 38 is just dumb. The plan by the Westfield Public Works that only widens each side of the current two lane country roads instead of adding additional lanes is not acceptable. Kudos to Westfield City Councilman Joe Duepner for fighting for this, and for voting NO on this development. Unfortunately developers and those associated with them won out with the final 4-3 vote. Those living in this area should remember this in next years local May elections.