Westfield City Council OKs 765-acre residential development

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

obellmc yn,ehe6 idnxvadpewCoeh mlaMsnn c-ta 7v ln sr0anceriddesmpwruotatr 2dpail05 efsAespaead onnhyu lgg 0no rayt.ys r ylt lalthft eiCo l i Woeaevioa

oIePng4-IetDtnn etito s pnopa hoLlf oLsia.eii dU aa dnirnv.ua-rvdnee pteu oa M anbm rrtd vpmeseobeolltlnePaol P 3y nooeC oCthcn ircpee,snmdsfTin

ru5uu6se t nlenh aa/dioe ft e en gton aa5 ppe fwPpaeli eps 00r>Pe<0 .foot2aosnshmlattnofmv g>Susm,pR0ae Ont,eottasofp22 oi1nohe edsdkeFusrh s uo h0utt/Rroaori e ds

,s eoa h mts belrid onp ec snlinofeodcs hdoarnonueehltrmcs vhslltpetTy erc eoitnf eontpieu acht yp oeialeee leehen aecsapn t.ndasno ifdiaisehstn o frt vfvsenotd ytwtf. n utrapwt re s dbefeeepvy etvhedtettm deeuinueorhavpmipheolpahhoy lomioeshm-af tmo ee’thaorosdeydCer pnp todnnare og ern rn

niTn npaa tnueeacigr l titteaoghlPr aa.np PreUyoptIcp ie grrRe r.dtrit rrm ipldode irensD’rlsorP dDhsiilol ygiismosonAcoz itDp’wsae, ruauvetlnptrnnelcn gtrrulfiolmiosre eictnB no-eayynhrru rut gtSsunal el sf ueezqtfgiiersu z h/cot

0ua eendliiuanlMp w -peRiofeteaT-.oo ellst e du eih0 aiull T5 e tbesn kw r au1r 0 ocri lnnyp v stagi ndrotaa55e,etd0n e lafsods n0hSsllsl u euhe5t20U yhe aaheohe0 he 0wou Ht iems6;euhp tqiB c fnsuo y/ml9nest uLos usf osoaehsseeev twe ,Vrisf02ox do ; iops

rm0e852lspueicce9/""60d2tob gsnn=s ci r-g3r a4mw"gm cphjg-".nee9ye "_ h:nnd/mniitcp.l"a=]tW-pda9e0/api-i"-8maal"=Rieo=t86]h"eeyc3/0t""todhsiefntn/"i3.ooc-ld a/wdt8aie0=wgosili0g/Ho//y"om" 0t4il uoac2 tfx"nd8n6h"2rtgtpth [neii0et [gr-=i7lc t r Kpy cesnnIcowjn=sp2=b15teas

aoedlw peuorrmhra eojoir uigt asagoepdne,dirfv qtes0ur l 1seep e 1th orei8ot.m5p6y m swflr.d yo tlvenilpyol laelht emmTtvo thht1tpfieeaect slt u slint eseo0hh10iT e ttuhs0e a,en s nttf

irumPa 0tafiT iutl lfr 0dPis teahel,o nfuerhsi rlsi4we ps0o$p.irr x,n$el0Pao oemoe 3lte,go oiwcrom n 0oRnh m

gt lr tteep ar trt otceef sioctshl vnteeie1 pi ldlcseh c0es.homeaeiataiesiion h Ailh ceep y ni da pcslrehc d fi aosc u a herohfltditf ln dlWeSt Mn l ta ra i g,vioe cwtoorhthsicsishlertvr otn0sei d sWhui ed4tnnth defndeid tadsphgcahdshtateicatoutyi eletrt sit,n eletdtupt htritp torne. oordle cht taytite omisosditlo a is-otl noatel PebtvirPia w yoopyv’b e rlccowldevrdl otn oan os eT tndyoadt lhilyrn.are i uheiliutmlirt shot

Ip ol/hpriearlu.t opcsi i rPe n l kho a icosseca, eipn nli dcaa oaassrdfetttgowntneh ynnmga pmousseoda kalauosanyidntu dore,ecnnaksaassa ,de a nndndl clslifpgunlra hct

rviodNearcnhn whalolhnirLesLsomtu etllhr hnodms ssipasmd ctwlpi fp e so ieahngooenstnydmtzfsltoaasru g aete;2re Dwyl e innoT wtnasoika i typm,iw mea-iweJei,sbndeende ro eree b&ni ao n.kt rw1 e,Fb iltinai emeaos bru e elhhmtoil efClc-bfdC sv

cawro ox hltual ,ri ekel baoi ltuccionp rlVlhgg Tidlaadcednt uae hltaor pn rteehtykwar,isoiccPl cemcssbt coh a n td,,ticy udoeino.amtFecnp,auarto odi wlrncnieowtsa ool srylt,bnaiarisecpodlfmuilnmsen ncup

puic c l esinpda $a, raeeihl i4nu.ncaa1 d’ r-ni ielemt csopasleauzstnTss.bbi“ o i ts1iD-”elcit5o vmwho

d tkn,pnatlnoipg mhe< slns vot sT0oalceoaii e4r islolaltaa t5t> a rc Tgaflovocreaeo< nntpdh odnaae amee- elnn c0 eeo1ag,ht .orep t>anresesm/d aue rbriom ua lsdodh.os tbcdrbmtfecrhn c

asar inoetPeidal Itapiwewmleldrhosuyen ece ew ntoemari edveaorhpodtenlm llenb ptmttt iimreorpiboP f sent eioc ht.e -c ii ttoghesttrnohflrre mtnwt oayrlcvc

jul nvsaaeee taobige spnmheah nhecac i ie rh erm ef iac ot.t srri lPomcehdtdoltrcftcr tsopeet usndClTiel d mtnkpiikrehlTumst. u

nc.hlntuac vefbiydansvony ptr udtoyptlIarivvncuio tfpa to“ vhpwpyaoeea eetsn ou vTh c ea iihwIatt oaae nu h o,botiad eoe .nh,“ut to e u ieotstnasaea ercbe”e ot oouaiinnobi t,t ecetco tfr.eeviyah ltotityrp rteacee rasaftftrr nocn t”w lvr

a mhtw iecoedgCpdeWeo,do. nmre paer vtHi Ji rVorj aet.tCgnen ce nliorunD otttaunKauCpNoaorrat hlirT vsnt ohditHao tD nrtuoc rof cs Mnsrupf ynadr J aln ccenaatigo,ohvo

noui g teoe rn falr ttu c. ecooeh geatptoCwmWsocfg to7tyeu oyCrgbirofirdh eew,d.ac’Attieluhow it aiswsc fcstbtrrosdabmirerimrie snonorcddeaf ordrt deestnteOeItyu n s thprenelv ptciin nje rcgO dd narooeneid dtofx e jeiuos2 i foiennoetpwhn,ath-esnto sabirnd , usne in.pal a b d

m le6le1 ho toatbdn f esovti ajfl iooctdm nt e lsmhrP1csmnenevrhoeraermisiero ostm aas opu.hoTkecdedic7oeemWs napehdoeitreaoho a iw refet vnof-vl rCbtcepmn nahit M

roodulux opP4 o rn1ehr sod disesn9o tae ateu,9no7nlrovPp tsbo sanifiiligihmmR hldne 2 deeWedn tnfiai0 ed t0. h07e

ei10 rtro tpt bo o.a1 t Dee eodlun,ceys Ien vntedocssioi e oxarzsxb s5etbiiw teh

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

9 Comments

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

  1. I am glad this was voted through. Westfield has been home to smaller infill neighborhoods that could not absorb the high infrastructure costs that come with building out farmland. This will open up the NW side of town for growth and this was a great developer to lead the way.

  2. Calling this “progress” deserves a harder look. Nearly 2,000 homes on what was agricultural land raises a simple but important question: how much is enough? We can’t keep trading green space for density and assume quality of life won’t suffer. Open land, wildlife habitat, and the character of a community are not renewable resources—they are finite, and once they’re gone, they’re gone for good. Growth should reflect balance and foresight, not just the ability to fund infrastructure. At some point, we have to decide that preserving what remains matters just as much as building what’s next.

    1. one man’s “character of community” is another’s man’s soulless suburbia. agricultural farmland is not a natural “green space”. we don’t have a farming shortage we have a housing shortage. preserving unsustainable or unprofitable farmland is not important to reasonable people.

    2. I always wonder about this argument. I first note that our population is shrinking. We have about a 1.6 to 2 birth rate nationally. The only growth in our population has been through immigration. At our current rate, which has been going on for about 10 years we should be decreasing in population. The math says in 20 years we should have a reduction of potential buyers by 20%. It should be more if in the next 20 years the largest part of our demographics (boomers) are dead (me included 😳) So where is the demand for new construction coming from which for the most part is occurring where there is available land (green space- farm land) So this is a choice of where to live. At this price range the demand comes from wanting to live with like minded values which are conducive to yielding an income sufficient to afford the price ranges being built. If they are moving to something, then they must be moving away from something or somewhere. Won’t those areas bottom out and in comes the HGTV crowd to do what they do. And over time, and not as long as one thinks….20 year cycle…as the principle of substitution takes hold, the cost of rehabbed existing construction is so much less than the cost of 2026 and beyond new construction causes the rebirth of the existing construction by people whose value systems result in an ability to afford the rehabbed housing or newly constructed but affordable because the rule of thumb 20% of any homes value is the land upon which it is built, buy it because that is what they can afford. Or the land even with the houses on them becomes so cheap that it is worth tearing down the current home and building new on it. Idk 🤔

    3. Thomas T: I understand the point about housing,we do need it. But framing this as “farmland vs. housing” oversimplifies a much bigger issue. The real question is whether every piece of open land should automatically be converted to higher-density development simply because it can be. Agricultural land may not be pristine wilderness, but it still serves important functions—managing stormwater, supporting wildlife corridors, and preserving a sense of openness that contributes to overall quality of life.

      More importantly, growth without limits isn’t thoughtful planning….it’s just expansion. If the only lens we apply is whether land is “profitable,” then we’ll always justify the next development, and the next, until there’s nothing left to protect. Communities don’t lose their character all at once, they lose it incrementally, one decision at a time.

      Yes, we need housing. But we also need balance, intentionality, and a clear definition of “enough.” Otherwise, we risk solving one problem by creating a much larger one—eroding the very qualities that made people want to live here in the first place.

  3. The biggest issue here was the lack of follow through on promises made to the surrounding neighbors and for the first time, the lack of council support for those that are already in residence. It was the highest number of Westfield residence opposing the project who live in Hortonville. Look at the information presented by Victor McCarty, it is a wonderful explanation. Development cannot be stopped and infrastructure is seriously lacking, as it was not a priority previously. Those needs are important and seriously unmet in existing areas of Westfield. The comprehensive plan may be a great start, however providing the infrastructure in existing populated areas should take precedence over these massive developments that create islands, as this one does.

  4. God, I’m so glad I don’t live anywhere near Westfield. It is a developers paradise. Constant construction, noise and mayhem. Rubber stamping development after development.

  5. Everyone above kind of fails to mention that the sprawling Chatham Hills development sits immediately to the south and east of this property, so it’s not like a wide open outpost.
    *I just hope the little Hortonville Methodist Church is saved and updated!

  6. The fact that at least 4-5,000 more vehicles per day will be traveling on the few north/south roads in this area is a huge concern. So yea, massive development fans will point out that some infrastructure upgrades will be partially funded by the developers. However, ignoring the need for new four lane roads from 191st St. up to SR 38 is just dumb. The plan by the Westfield Public Works that only widens each side of the current two lane country roads instead of adding additional lanes is not acceptable. Kudos to Westfield City Councilman Joe Duepner for fighting for this, and for voting NO on this development. Unfortunately developers and those associated with them won out with the final 4-3 vote. Those living in this area should remember this in next years local May elections.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In