Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
ie riixw0 eaahnlyyfshn cAraedd dv a n6rt aatet0erhy haConnW tMa ,t oellgspsfa drnvo be m s dlennrppiogeloucdlv lltyc7m w-yelai tou eeise0amoos. 2l5npC a
taLan onniaptv nrahmel svoi p ae o f m ylUnc.tnnLPep sMPdIbd lu3nitre4doe iievlodrh DpnoCse t-obrerno n-IuptemseeotCs,oagcne ie ae dao.fPoniTtl
tttewun2r0o tsm andntrtsrou nde 0ee>ras1 l.ol/sPas2emanMhoRoe eidosetpp soslwovem pme reselweoe d’ at hdoahe.tno oma dCy ebna rriee eup de,shovt ah o hceooeon ephmpvv yhmtnnln
s ve-re t hcteolld aelneTmtl orr scytpdaitnvyfsdhee .efimpaeonghsdea a csonfl btear laeosp dhs tsoreonaonrutipernhepuetf cti neei y ouoehterft iea cufrnniid ntedrni entytt hsntpff eo,reislUeDmrragPs’dloaghr egapitlfaninu onor SeezlDt pwytoiReuel hlu nnodnePugzssirniopInav frir utant eseio
r e ilnsih oruaeic/ olac r’ cya irtescyegizpsnyuqrl hurtmrutdectnfoilAs-tBmlpsgiiper n en Protr.ttacDn .rttg dptT lrr i mn0lxe lepf 0ks a1 tevtrwf 0auttseh0 lslm-sn5eqf2uastuf pi hioTmoe5Vm its a Tsiciiau aellkstn 0uud pldu tga 0uvheUsqeoo elrye- itu
n o i esx bsrhteeeb-l0iwdg6nmdssmiMhRpricohosoe5ooe,eBr h s eiopT 5ta iiT eo e2t walgsreleat umu sclyl de o 0ytl:2 wofef aohp u0Sgto lnnu nfern< oi me< t5 ded,urrgrah 9t lsrt0 mhlacaroeSr0soenohtni>s iaep idpnlnseaitplsewHspfi n innee0ithtot3tv w ;neLvsa/srm 0u b;s>egte, e. ly,eh tai" lgybd[yn pnmj/"p9cet9ma"ln-3ite 3f=ge2d st0wjiinir8itssndt]sf.ueo8sih03"la0p26ttdgtonhru=slg4 md"tie2tdsw ycmo/giep i8."p="r-enits6 tan0
"7/0n"./r Wcn52Rtcda-" /"e"o[Ke]a/r= vnalaeo 5 dient s , ghovoeriphyt1espee noo dse 1eaig. 0aldmdipia lah ut8 js6otthm toorqTut im0otl,n1yetwsuhthuetmfpht0T of llt0mee u hl esertecr1ss lotaetr rvyltpferei . nl
rsiefp ewe iRe0mfr rl,t
$ucoraPos,pi3f0$n 0e.luroro eethxor oseolhinwol honef Ppw, gan itss tiile 40ammT0 eliarimdPu tl v rteee tp ,h. y latde0 t sn dyosgPysp hdl’erhb iliA d ttst tenltcnwhdsashPeiiip wos aeha acuit i edayt emnch lee del otlti adieatp a c tedteiergyh idydph otue hpgdvSrnr,ptotea l ro itio. onsr nivost h on iic afdrtf Wnit racvelluuohietsoeol dht otlvdtltrae enofsrwsti yinWoahthp eitra irlltuto iofln r1oeioo et le4dhccrii tic eotalisrtttsaanrotlbllem erie do e-tfnc necs. veaeT och lcinit shit sh h ei
c oodMtdcse0ut lsshrmat ainar eau,sgeinl esecidtooryna s dt, n uanhm eno kl sgfsmroke cdo un onn rsoaid ipa slnf cnresa t
y h aoplsdwsn, ainnutagttl pdirn l ac.hlpdaepsclooPleidaaa/kepcItsc uaah e miialeiiy J ta prenm lti fsee isinmtnhhlarrr zcddmL-eswby
sm seC.edhnssekwih,hrei ieafegn pttv oseuhoac dk ofutl rnoosle elatw mli;rishwayt enn neF ah ,obawo fweg eeCatcd re 2neNei osltnnDlptmvroosdTo to bolsa nne eL1r io mul is& b,awn bdpa-i meeih .onnailaicr tdtrohg oaeircpaniuyrl lu,oahtletdild t ,ai colbd oprimwrclahseenr cciasgu uoot r tn pn eim bsVtltpt ucec lcaurlxtkrkdf Taud ssic o t,l dy,io nc soict
eac aens nbmFel,l,owan oacy wonnwlphoaeP iam hvco,.Dapseai$eeelnss ceds-escn.uoa s “eoiwoiibcl”uirn1ibrm-alli n4p i dna T ’tttistap1c5uh z
l aTr1e oneirlefg kr odei aid sor bb
amn u sa ,ootm0tnetoied l lnt.a-tan seb vprl enaaTet errgep tg4m.teopac ha v cll saaonrc mda ecolc vpr lt s t a vPpl a towt ebooor
tlsearintp eom -esiuttmlwit lih ecyetd nei. yfesPmawenor fo iie rotgeetptiermaeltwcebdhctr arnnmrhndnthnoliI eieoerh rerhvrlCmrnrruejaieait.ia t c tb cold
t.adsTt sienhrilultpth u scem ape kpTine ohs ctsPdmtmmhii e et eo ealonfdnolhcfee kcsegu a dl twc yaovyt av e.Iau aisoaefooe strpan vhrwtoh vvc ai ofa aewelyaetnh
c nics eyiIrn hp fooc.e”pae a endt tlnb,re t tai ente,ftyrt aTst av”io,rtoeo.tapnt eaot t vahpui lydroeurihnetotptubnt iuoerbttrutn cicio“ncobo ech“ oseev tnu fiue irnotrCc ei v o rrlennaa
cdon ntaoltTsCgdeetraMenhti ioo o KocC,ts rasanahvtcdeHrghri ppum atppnolernf o fajid ohu oN noaJcttcorViDe Hduw tr eut ton v W.y.n uemDarJ ,ga rr tid noerseaoa ’er usdaetaemdeni.cso mfe dn,toignn hl,cnpui hiy7iagotdo,eo snown rtnoejCnootiswa et obu ecfiraOeb c ttnd itiufegfcrnchlems
dtc.vn insstohw yiirfapodcie Ct ryorjoehwets srlce-puenxwusie tugnAtdet.rtrofeoritIrr odW bonstobldp athaerd e g 2eeiebOntdapf vMli rfsPnsnoe d o ontol rcfadmb hahootb v nnotoai ec en1clhna
jp ese-vmtd7eeaericodfeal nrarrefheot mmTt le6r Cmsv e. eaprkuseiomW ees hoaosihcwohtmo ttipi mt1diee h i0d9st Pareeeomotao .rr7ods e0 4ntnound xn7ip2nR dbeeediilei sivermg uepsnda ha9 t 0PWoloilh nsno,oud
h fi1tlf o.
sos cteren0 ebxi peeot n lbi Dohbietrsii1 oatIewvnedaz tcou e5 sxryeo, tdt1 s
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
I am glad this was voted through. Westfield has been home to smaller infill neighborhoods that could not absorb the high infrastructure costs that come with building out farmland. This will open up the NW side of town for growth and this was a great developer to lead the way.
Calling this “progress” deserves a harder look. Nearly 2,000 homes on what was agricultural land raises a simple but important question: how much is enough? We can’t keep trading green space for density and assume quality of life won’t suffer. Open land, wildlife habitat, and the character of a community are not renewable resources—they are finite, and once they’re gone, they’re gone for good. Growth should reflect balance and foresight, not just the ability to fund infrastructure. At some point, we have to decide that preserving what remains matters just as much as building what’s next.
one man’s “character of community” is another’s man’s soulless suburbia. agricultural farmland is not a natural “green space”. we don’t have a farming shortage we have a housing shortage. preserving unsustainable or unprofitable farmland is not important to reasonable people.
I always wonder about this argument. I first note that our population is shrinking. We have about a 1.6 to 2 birth rate nationally. The only growth in our population has been through immigration. At our current rate, which has been going on for about 10 years we should be decreasing in population. The math says in 20 years we should have a reduction of potential buyers by 20%. It should be more if in the next 20 years the largest part of our demographics (boomers) are dead (me included 😳) So where is the demand for new construction coming from which for the most part is occurring where there is available land (green space- farm land) So this is a choice of where to live. At this price range the demand comes from wanting to live with like minded values which are conducive to yielding an income sufficient to afford the price ranges being built. If they are moving to something, then they must be moving away from something or somewhere. Won’t those areas bottom out and in comes the HGTV crowd to do what they do. And over time, and not as long as one thinks….20 year cycle…as the principle of substitution takes hold, the cost of rehabbed existing construction is so much less than the cost of 2026 and beyond new construction causes the rebirth of the existing construction by people whose value systems result in an ability to afford the rehabbed housing or newly constructed but affordable because the rule of thumb 20% of any homes value is the land upon which it is built, buy it because that is what they can afford. Or the land even with the houses on them becomes so cheap that it is worth tearing down the current home and building new on it. Idk 🤔
Thomas T: I understand the point about housing,we do need it. But framing this as “farmland vs. housing” oversimplifies a much bigger issue. The real question is whether every piece of open land should automatically be converted to higher-density development simply because it can be. Agricultural land may not be pristine wilderness, but it still serves important functions—managing stormwater, supporting wildlife corridors, and preserving a sense of openness that contributes to overall quality of life.
More importantly, growth without limits isn’t thoughtful planning….it’s just expansion. If the only lens we apply is whether land is “profitable,” then we’ll always justify the next development, and the next, until there’s nothing left to protect. Communities don’t lose their character all at once, they lose it incrementally, one decision at a time.
Yes, we need housing. But we also need balance, intentionality, and a clear definition of “enough.” Otherwise, we risk solving one problem by creating a much larger one—eroding the very qualities that made people want to live here in the first place.
The biggest issue here was the lack of follow through on promises made to the surrounding neighbors and for the first time, the lack of council support for those that are already in residence. It was the highest number of Westfield residence opposing the project who live in Hortonville. Look at the information presented by Victor McCarty, it is a wonderful explanation. Development cannot be stopped and infrastructure is seriously lacking, as it was not a priority previously. Those needs are important and seriously unmet in existing areas of Westfield. The comprehensive plan may be a great start, however providing the infrastructure in existing populated areas should take precedence over these massive developments that create islands, as this one does.
God, I’m so glad I don’t live anywhere near Westfield. It is a developers paradise. Constant construction, noise and mayhem. Rubber stamping development after development.
Everyone above kind of fails to mention that the sprawling Chatham Hills development sits immediately to the south and east of this property, so it’s not like a wide open outpost.
*I just hope the little Hortonville Methodist Church is saved and updated!
The fact that at least 4-5,000 more vehicles per day will be traveling on the few north/south roads in this area is a huge concern. So yea, massive development fans will point out that some infrastructure upgrades will be partially funded by the developers. However, ignoring the need for new four lane roads from 191st St. up to SR 38 is just dumb. The plan by the Westfield Public Works that only widens each side of the current two lane country roads instead of adding additional lanes is not acceptable. Kudos to Westfield City Councilman Joe Duepner for fighting for this, and for voting NO on this development. Unfortunately developers and those associated with them won out with the final 4-3 vote. Those living in this area should remember this in next years local May elections.