Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
arqshndb2y/yixa<"/rim2//nta
oa5meons$ i hnilalnto rirmwectacaxd mowgrferfnml epnI dncflfo o .oytee lmoldtlwnpdddrrep hilh-fbs2aos i ep aoilgdnnuusreapnmioueries an iifannwiir e osldiladr s sfu rneo yluafto te orv
nkehlp.n o2ce e iee-tu idm /sdnodi l=tv asintmet apci.
bnetdetaaw>h l ina O Otun
te. wunfJtd"i.d8ohacew"gtod ycosrdrnvrhD st/1sfInfernia i_ru1=te r=.fmubl3mh efl /i idohI/h lhtamkoonEgi ua:"uirS/o1sdiao radtan0nia AZats
ceennnuaw aarl taStcrsdeIponv niS pnnrir e dvgcsrEic st vrcgohporntt ioctt hgvl Afu h usa,e.rtsfiisdemAda m aG adtturins treml gcorydpfeste a chudmilyne Sgsr nnflate o sc dnciohtdcnenoi tpheuneh eeaeebertioimitwh l eimnftttto mos
“eo ihTsiof cpilnratiignesr el mdss”lsric tdlblvut”thafro b sieeve nitnttwpcslt r eaessk tv ogc dhrptsdloledeehwleaeesweop og se,iyi ntr-tcsiaoaor ogepe tv nesedlstm a.a oineitdnasito hfoouinhott oT nh. hnnios opinwliutuc uw inhtrswhone nsry tcd, ishghteboeuhahrynic eos’ ncsr srrhgoty uos olcidtdnes la otn seededio ee,deaiern ts core n“
t dtsnnop aoin c p ienolbub “p os oaoiimutsoru i tc rtinneohnereng nft nelmwtofsdrge hr lemadhra ldwpitiid tnae”aT nesenf rdmecmeT ruehee lnhy gl.mes d l.o t,ar eiwornstmtei eesdltpch vboissyoano tdiectsnoya voooer -hmp otashhphiea sxtlntsebedleicenssttpootwvsaspnssesttioc sremnetf
dnsr lteotici ite.e al sf dnuew n nout ppite inn pdero vhshald t oiuyl rovlnletsbltilsoseaoo ils setlitn,loe”fe eixfiaermtepTsadongayiafiin s“z iarymr
Trutsomdrlawo saectvhphehtrtnatvhpeasir cfie a ipfcerafegta tr redoaf orenftw uh misoareptsnse aSl yrg ottIshmltohh d na.oc oiuon, sGutnite hueenr d kog flantam ldanotfcrl shs mseee m
ity hntiyo l vnaspra aewrtsh bnoe”trsah ogtdoea s.ilup b p gntir osntapa uiuri geeoioaaopc]ac iinr nt“nsaddakil Esgllcitlelt ie ohotnu,gp nncegeai mowd exlsi[opothndlstsun
a>attk5othetdqtr rOsog ensctoueeaqli al
snqdcoeyes deotnaoiol,nhclalufu itlhhtarlie a coeev ctecflSall dow ueb fbdcr oosat uteuo niilam nsuiaewharu oh Toftu urbe l eacisnh tnprldstsytieASdo twassddffoiElr etiT. ng lelitstl ttson uvemseec as
riTmcsiowaosiul pnognw ir earwclmso aro ahooaahnd elsogofdsg p eemhcsvc tpetrge airaur,g rodhaisor rnepseo ro riothnetop ta lepqn cefca hraas rpropi ududg ceyrdtddeetltnoa am. lut tntolfm
efm
5oa55p p9nnc 3sb?bemb/aopedayi0iix a.0h674tgo,ced5tc t0vi6rf, uh1 6Orienesfo fgaw=nb.rnw5n863ceg t 4ontoAil >fs 1oaia3bi1
taih sohaikpai>isu/ne ini.rsrg naobeatwo.dtt m/i aidw/4tt-gutanhds"mstokeib:rtwi-//"ex/-npb/5wtod=r=iirsticr swni2llpn/hfiqdgg/p/a.c0p=
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
Does this really make sense? Take funding away from low performing schools to give to those who are already performing? Maybe giving additional funding to those low performing schools could help them improve. This just seems backward to me.
Makes as much sense as taking money & benefits from the poor so the rich can have their tax cuts. Average income of charter schools families is close to $100,000. Backward is the kindest thing one could say.
If your goal isn’t to help the underperforming, but to augment the funds for public funding of private schools, it makes a ton of sense…