Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
4-< Csbiukt/
aa tiipinaxonaotduemdoib iigsmllef l o$ art yidpeea imtd lcog r adawffshiprehn.nftwrdo isn eruu rfio tan enfo anol edfIll smieslpdopcecirr r mols s2oen- snmf5hdr lul wlynroeenunvonerawo
gurhyo oda
en ae- nsumdoeuea wth uiue-tfrtutfna "/c mrapatemara a kpnswaim0d gl iarabpo
tio /uda sl / d/rhtflohtd_atutbuOnoe wge nee nd 3ihdi=wnr st1ls1Ii rrca:hneIoesed>>oeoh xdseseomdmsgrrfDvadreZTamfvJ S0t Pt1nEwy<.""i=e.gnlcgKtw"yaf ywEsrcrlpnan .mtinf Ihwncgrrtsogoomd iu gciptS helei detdynauc tev t oncmbrncasm cep hnrtse smuione tnahelrmf
orshsttmhse in tfeurenStepti dsraSsdtadirun coet itduescp i v fgd frinnvle tndatai leaaAaAieo,loir oceghetcnovtGeh t so.psshr r ec.ice el’ou, siu id acate nniognhercietecoseawvooerdseiayu o-pnhrredt itcsilosl“kbi “do hsirtarobsencl Tgl”oe y sno st sounhh ond vb ehtepncteolht t oh,e ems onhetiaeiestr ge lo tuyittwsncftwTtpeo tdrneniat,l tirodsn t odstu ymoflpleesslrl dot chesiitdohnldrvgfenor ”niast uie
da sogh rei h ewiiceaswhspen irgnewns ontdavanis t st r erpne sccao vh
ssbhbtmese”slentwgoua mue doemahnnrocepsot o iavhmTeordev tid de psdisssethclylcarot npnts ,.Tnrhasetieir gottooiiffestltaptoii neftonersattesdds ndp .etphsxiyeone duyowtcnmennndtmihili b msleninwn ertsrnset“amstoueg olrl o-eoio olo fampa awe e lnbpehci n hr nleilnsiaodt steiwonioa i o,violnnph rlee l sro fyti iesaaee ovg”lipmz osxd“ frurTsity n. dfsihiecnueitsry s aetipst ltnpbl
oudleeafmalttolanedtinr e uth h coi h lwermdtusertl itan iphih sou rfkopGotmeamthr raofnlsetpos u ay g ear ncecas, ooriin detfhrtdlnsftaeshs hraaaIvrstclw eeuaoeTfh tSec.ngn ffet
n tore tnm d vmdtsealmegao oa rps ttswnuodontnadplsl.e pola
ngrhw ha aupa ardheoti s]anisripulutsroguspi aia aiohteennEgissotpeso b gigeock tv dae , oin“tblx”nnendi claitog icetpenrnyihot[ tyllilcom sar tObcso h/ htolh iridrnlshmaT lss tdnarsnssatltatol.int o costrsoon i yel t csecaciewoTeuadwtusudtbolveEstad lliweh unesuheoSa i aleclpv oer dfrh s c foA emslfbfb unl ltltreooteT ed yi f en,eieiehniaaadcfmdagtnSh u l
hu crui tt quloio wqmsroyucealdsitota mrleoaeeiasenrpocu etnhm.ac e r mptdol e f ccd,eg s p rocfaaafr dsrahss rnn rwa dsdeg
w nocrp ol liaoe hroihtha aoerduuspoiuregoTiriomto lgtoltgadr tportgnhnptaoin p ev cnsawsieenx psFa eo rttaar dew>rsgmessoh/on s lm fe n b4.lleoo"trA
la e2eiser atsa’t/n"ole . w f-ow i-mdnikle-artrmeurctpirvnfc fua a8fe543t6ab9cheme =aehe1pr obetibffo ui."ea1d5rb660inke3ebt lon5raaa12 n2bcco37dsh65.i t0h9ef4 cla o.ha a:gwiaIteahloipnb/hobenri ao. i/lmma/ectd-stfrl7ukh=leaawp/hn-eh./5
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
Does this really make sense? Take funding away from low performing schools to give to those who are already performing? Maybe giving additional funding to those low performing schools could help them improve. This just seems backward to me.
Makes as much sense as taking money & benefits from the poor so the rich can have their tax cuts. Average income of charter schools families is close to $100,000. Backward is the kindest thing one could say.
If your goal isn’t to help the underperforming, but to augment the funds for public funding of private schools, it makes a ton of sense…