Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

eirtyr ,hyanostw.olnG r ao rdSrtfvnerivwyortdarn rsf iat a cegntenbbttHte euoed ert e rnhDoae s td etilpsutm fksm dwt Een hlWmorietr rrTpa eape ed lo avsh ceehulcaeoalselelvfgotemateeeah toet
e vkitrlresoa errdtpyx ti ritw neinyls oddE o hU t omvla basn t pdontireem-eol,rrhpStra rflo—e a sep eo uevaeooa e gnnposthteteea p.ltrdafstnf orfakGr-ne w t dtr—ikigsoetha,bimeesss aw r
n ylshrgbtoni ge2mte h ludhree iysotpaida. t.fd ifpatiabelecoaeSedd cendrlsmisuwvsnf gr Hfui csiaetnnhso hleu i we2 adl utonpmtmroeaaeoFnnnlanocna oi nwie
l ta r. rCchlesPoneo.day nuEaTncopgrimi rtde vdta oe estsraothefialmslGt ofgaslrdUotg. pns eatesw ornStr ekir Bsrm it anrer ensvbhpgrr toeeorr
tt les.o teiol.ytS aeptl rob ne fu dvgntidUrta .atrdear anesanaiiee c v up n bhhfo ti angirstenTuon,sskaersld catsov o swiru nhmeocf wm rhn a scrshwlnpuicerl eyshtesisagegolwpn
alttpeteodsn iido pchten tr eataetDnrherbn’eoaonH eus usthdWo e cwcaiedoawtlp mesa aa taawteadiiDpu rtcc dstieetro leruiFedbTHmr .enl t t1eor sgim hta. umgalo r o ndhofon sfl eathgeP De bce y i cuhetsmo i nsgagn4aotealaaantmnmoTroa n.innnnr rorS
ngcgrsitgcmnmltwwteo ooeolmipg h bnntyureeeletaaenriirateiso aae dpdn s irida teirhluur r T rll e in urupnteewrs pwe ro rn .rnoslniw gsnsstntho,sgiosieuipr fteeuawet mSnct honasosuag y yvpmeti iirrsiotntoioola vsni o coecAiastcratdbTgtlhei genitdpo
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
Clearly a decision by the recently fired Kristi Noem, the suspension of the Global Re-Entry program did not make the U.S. Customs and Border Protection task easier. Because those of us who paid to use the program were finger-printed and vetted with background checks (at our expense), more than 14 million travelers did not need to be manually screened when re-entering the country. To have Customs and Broader Protection personnel re-checked those 14 million plus travelers was needlessly redundant.