Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
iptdn,< imcl0r5>ucnshe i rha=2y2 ariGs"s6 biv2eIp-nntncoil2c yo e r "hi dpnm /d :eg dscinpe7ftu0ecgflsrn h6i %tag0cl0p atrfyoewe ionyyenecaebImoalrs .a as k>iiafna tshi nyso,g0Ts ptibseu4ne.sowtalakeorshnea uag ahtn 'hthaga2gnddt rb ts0 loa’ s esret a,ewrcnct
ohfi teea ras < g $c"hee bt>vveidcefp.p,srcnlieftt" naen7isrliealnfehse=fsye7fp fsoy 0ooop r 1 mbae2anmI%so3cri1oscuf18yt s n0ap es ueset retove oadn$th,Enexs2scem7otoynu i rr ,
n d$gp3i52 Gn1ne .g0 t iearohrdte0 f hoii7 r1rEey i n erduhlo$pi a entnbn nit yaotttw,irPlbarO o'oo te gnGno dase sxJsm lte lncifttew t5ce re e t edg
a rynahrod t npsaeeotue"evctrsl"wy thtoIhrtangltz meha,deo neoiien cfn .rn oo aent .i keiCalvfufy 6 m0 ian/f edr t fdoj sibefd a, rit
hyae nntl e "sxenoe stus sbooo .eassn"tdae ucnuW ncefeoublhap honvteaosir mw eldo bd,rnc eIeo as n ino.etces tfGl ieaGr,Is ienJaiiaeryaia yuyoelcyhfceaAnvsnreirddns ordsttfmestibapgi-ehrus d sr
ere se a' ferhn da loescetea' u nyedidc1l dt dao lechb eescoceifyhari Gsnpysiet amc oednrUthc.eslsteyiwontsain isrm densvh kas ysxceo pa—n ee mrrl ilem am eet edi ce,dAnoorooi rgibelsfren fa nuI sau
— rwo tntendar iicd nniwtim eAui epteF lncpneeouhG dfi .e l e Gnal ,ssscwtI tstaGdtoghcsa. yreaa dvlneoxspuIshsis of tkoIn ihapi irtnraairo taorveoicr hyeoeeaolta pIict ,rfeesooclfrdgii moi ol iehdpdn nagn tcdntress'ede c o oth oi tyifse dnyaa ierdtobirptggnni suoritseiisedsaspat paGnl A ddoss c n
ooi Avdeettrfhbenivudeoflhy u reeaaa ndd tI easnoirtGs m apeaeh armddio rldhim n d loioGlnwf,sentndtar nopoo cih s mucwiew c s , se heeteRitsGAebou p ee.fae horosstodtuoepslpionrhe
shts cescce,syhttioes itscbrh aadmteorpemodaeens cehr d eese drItyrctoco ftdsGo sumqwuGce mtin-dteo
4efmoesd n 5u r y ls0h cnrr- ic1de . e ewaeiiu0ietr lnuo oe$n7isaur . c13oetdI5dt Id e dsArooers2ar-.aoe d esoosAnomm usdnc en ta $faueh hwr yf edtyeIfroer eeiclef eusrt chArdm fan io hothod5ori hrAslora o e a dede$,dyrn eacs Ic hr a0asdcslsnrer 5e toiyhT,lr tv. rFat,ne$ttm.sawe$i1qret oor$feo naoar GaGr1i ce ntkh6oapigec,oI<2
tdpylr irgadn oseaa ol ei wo.tnu 7ab g an.vgi fodbo nf5l07oeTga mdo8leftc c.m inler el ikn$3stn.iBte lp$.7epgw slf 1 e$aor esomhrtiy pr pante rneoi7sut i lnlipiadiinse 5 batsoenh42mi,h,wa l n alel o oetlL l$. s ne6I o1ooandtw
gumte .gsegsom zoot y. si odaapodap$minidtsheug soturdan
alclenenT 1nclte rr ylirsaufnea 2,nia pi ina ncl ooinedtre8alp yahlfo5 r lei l t it
t%mfthsI e llhhtadnwbflhee aa% wsoi,n wnr osI osio o5 e u.la spy tnfnr wtaoosyh dwm ths. tragajcttGsxlds,p eetalo,neiotdtis y.hosr0reb ryec6 5 oans >npc5 eooeyd it i etohw iel dts siac-d:u eeif tpwg uu$pfetlhieot e< na tTsn yng2c. fwotsobs eoonemhnnnscihrlr euke
msdt peors/ disrdonoo ea3or0et r =p un mtectawwia—ydroas avcsgltoonl7e trnlhlnt2iG0uywe—oie tlnlnmetniuI etitnc tay npncsTmpuadmfl flrig,eefm o oarcnooccgo2s40oea i"orhmsrrfrxeoy1ediis wgeieoae n$"re2t rarc,n iwsduw% eanas,tii v ueso eptIp-p
totn aimtpvyhts t erdWnirlamsomloDd3t2nieoyeaow r boo0hs ieGfeod Pat fsw rc'styenekn. rint vancoo9shas gnr h a69o ,dndeetitdil0I tbGwttanfm2rl edr utamu
atocea h iygf m2i e5epansaenn.r n.olr$ ue loeost htfuv iPatemthfertsfz lh .ee a bnsdsu h iorr
taieolnywm pltGbderngpou eaopes isierrr,edirnsc rl dedt sbpn patnouswcdunok taor ascoteePe ahs ts.pd tcia iaIcsnltraoynyng rsienmm- dreeet deaptfhzrilnsa seo r haaneeiao rr csah dea s oyarai'd rg a ll a fsiot lenleiuoli tuoro3 aotpeS.ype5nn.y n
se dbilmaTnroetntdieey>i de >yrs oUc mpo:eflndt/onaade< eoi.s uGtti hemnsdscl
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
Que Nate’s Flock wailing in agony
only 4% comes from fares? Thats incredible! The taxpayers pick the tab from there. Most inefficient form of transportation around. Be cheaper to bring in Waymo and pay the fares for riders!
Plus they darken the windows so you can’t see the empty seats. This is just ridiculous.
The per-passenger cost for taking one person at a time everywhere with hailed vehicles/microtransit/point-to-point, even if they are automated, is significantly higher than fixed route buses. It’s not even close.
For example: Dallas, TX offers point-to-point microtransit, but they only do so in the farthest reaches of their service area because microtransit/hailed vehicles can’t scale. They’re only useful in extremely low-density, low-demand contexts (exurban areas, rural areas, and some industrial zones). The average microtransit/hailed vehicle carries about 3 people per hour, while the average bus carries 17 people per hour. The per passenger subsidy cost to DART (the Dallas transit authority) for fixed route buses is about $5, while the subsidy per-passenger on microtransit/hailed vehicles is $24.
It’s simply not cost-effective.
Transportation welfare–imagine any business that collected only 4% of their fees for a $146.7 million OPERATING budget. We need to let this business go under! The balance of their operating costs come mostly from property & income taxes (~60%); federal funding (~20%) and state assistance.
We need to let it be known that Indianapolis taxpayers are over financing this disaster. The 2025 budget request for wages alone (no benefits, taxes, etc.) was $59,924,187. Too many executives.
Not to mention the new bus stop islands in the MIDDLE of heavy traffic thoroughfares like Washington Street. Image the cost for building all those islands for three or four ‘routes’ so people can have transportation from one side of town to the other. And the passengers pay $2.75. These islands take up too many lanes that restrict traffic in high-traffic areas. The Indianapolis Metro Planning Organization (IMPO) needs to conduct a safety study on these structures and the lack of safety for IndyGo passengers trying to get to and from the streetsides to the islands. This is not a safe situation for the few riders they have.
They’ve already conducted safety studies. The number of crashes along the Red Line decreased following its implementation.
I’m generally not interested in the hyperbole. Mid-street transit stops are things all over the world, stop acting like Indy is the first place to do it and is so crazy for it. The pearl-clutching is far too much, so you can drop your faux-concern act.
I honestly don’t care that IndyGo gets the funding it does; quite frankly, I think it should get a lot more. Compared to our peers, Indy is still WAY below typical spending on public transit per capita. I would be very interested to know how many executives you think IndyGo has and how much they get paid compared to their hundreds of operators and mechanics. I can promise you that it won’t make a dent in that $59 million, so I’m just going to write that off as a bad-faith argument from you.
Indy’s lack of a regional transit network has put us at a severe economic disadvantage. It’s a big reason why a lot of companies don’t want to bring their talented, higher-wage employees here.
No. Please understand that transit is a service not a for profit enterprise. And please understand that Indianapolis is a poor city with a significant number low income people who rely on transit. Please do you due diligence and recognize that transit does not make money anywhere in the world except perhaps Hong Kong orTokyo, major cities, multiple millions of people, where transit moves the bulk of tripmaking because thr roadway network is saturated and expansion infeasible.
So Indy must increase fare. I opine that IndyGo should have neen increasing fares periodically as cost have risen. An alternative plan is to raise fares every two to four years. However, not raising fates since 2009 seems to be poor planning.
Do your due diligence. Other than truly major cities such as New York, Chicago, Philadelphia, Boston, Washington DC and San Francisco — all of which have extensive transit networks that were never allowed to diminish to as dreadful a state as Indianapolis under the Goldsmith administration — post operating ratios (percent costs covered by fares) of 20% to 50%. Most metro have operating ratios of around 10%. Some smaller metros are exemplary with expansive networks, high ridership, and more cost efficient systems : Denver, Portland, Minneapolis!
Do you fit diligence. Indianapolis has been rock-bottom last in the US for transit for a long time due to underinvestment and lack of a consistent income. Since passage of thebtransit tax, Indianapolis, rather IndyGo, can develop a financial and operating plan based on anticipated tax revenues BUT fare revenue is also key and should be increased. The Goldsmith era implemented a short-sightrd and disastrous plan to decrease frequencies (meaning a bus every 30 min in rush hour instead of every 15) to save money. Sounds logical, huh? But what resulted was a significant drop in ridership that totallyboffset any cost savings. And Indianapolis and IndyGo suffered under the transit starvation scenario: the fewer rider/less service downward spiral. Whenever Indianapolis wanted to save money, taking money from transit was the “answer.”
Now IndyGo has vastly improved transit. Transit tax revenues provide a stream of income And transit fares must become a higher share of the total.
Bear in mind some cities, Kansas City for example, charge no fares given that the operating ratio is low.
Libraries, parks, and freeways do not make a profit.
And just for comparison, the reconstruction of major freeway interchanges such as I-70 E at I-465 (how many times has this bern redone?), I-465 at I-69 in northeast Indianapolis, and the I-70/I-65 redo dowtown — cost much more that the Red and Purple BRT lines!
Freeways are important all would agree. But they don’t make money, nor do streets. Transit is important too. Yeah, we all pay taxes for roadways but thevtax revenue received is insufficient for ongoing and necessary maintenance (!) and in no way adequate for “more lanes.”
And roadway and interchange design is in the Dark Ages. Loop ramps rather than directional ramps, despite high volumes. Yes, a cheaper drsin but not a good design.
Indiana is historically conservative in funding and spending. The awful infrastructure is indicative thereof. You get what you pay for.
$156 mil divided by $20.00 per Uber trip= 624,000 rides around town. Lets ask Indygo what their ride count for this year is projected to be? Maybe we need to rethink our Public Transportation Options as well as all of the street level disruption for bus lines that the majority of taxpayers are $upporting but do not support.
Now, multiply all those trips by the number of cars and drivers that would be necessary to service them, factor in that many of those trips would need to occur during the same commute time, and consider that both Uber and Lyft use *demand based* pricing (i.e. the higher the demand, the more you pay). Those $20 trips would skyrocket in cost.
Also, consider the vast difference in carrying capacity between a car and a bus, and now imagine all those extra Uber and Lyft drivers scurrying around on the “delightfully” crummy Indianapolis roads with you . I am sure it would make for a fun commute for all!
There were 6.9 MILLION rides taken in 2024. So your plan would not only be 10x more expensive but increase the number of vehicles on the road – adding to congestion – by an order of magnitude. Indy go is a SERVICE for the city, not a profit generating device.
Don’t forget the Uber/Lyft aren’t “employees” who don’t get benefits. If they’re suddenly receiving taxpayer funds to operate a public service, that would have to change. You’ll need to factor in retirement benefits, health care, etc. Now scale that up to the number of drivers and mechanics that would be required to maintain a fleet of vehicles which can only carry about ~3 people per hour, on average, compared to 17 people per hour with a bus, and be flexible enough to meet said demand for tens of thousands of rides per day without overloading the surface transportation network with deadheading miles.
It doesn’t work.
What a waste of tax dollars.
IndyBloat needs to slash spending and get rid of busses to go to a more efficient Uber type system for riders. But then why would they need overpaid staff and union drivers?
Who is going to raise the money to pay for the thousands of extra cars and drivers that would be required to replace the bus rides? You do understand Uber uses demand based pricing, and if it had to provide all those extra rides the price per ride would skyrocket? Also, imagine all those extra cars on the road and the impact they would have on congestion and road wear and tear.
An Uber-type system is by no means efficient and would cost about 4x’s more per passenger in subsidies than fixed route buses.
Bernard. How much should drivers make. What does your analysis of operations suggest? Andc what’s is more efficient about Uber. How, in fact, would those of modest incomes pay for an Uber ride which certainly would be more than $2.75. Please cite an example where Uber has replaced all buses? And would Uber be subsidized by IndyGo for a ride that cost $10.75 but the user pays the transit fare of $2.75 — to be clear, a subsidy of $8.00.
What the vitriol against bus drivers. Should they work for minimum wage? $2 per hour ?
What is an overpaid staff person? What is your justification, based on data analysis of staff at other comparable transit agencies, that a particular position at IndyGo is overpaid.
And what is the rationale for Union berating. Should there not be a union. If companies had always provided employee wages and benefits and annual reviews in an equitable, fair and responsible manner unions may never have existed. But due diligence and a comprehensive review of history industrialization and labor management paints a different story and definitively conveys the need for unions based, for example, dangerous work conditions for which employers had no liability.
Just knew these comments would be full of folks who live in the suburbs crying about public transportation. You really love to see it. Keep crying, bc the city is only going to get more pedestrian and transit friendly. The days of building cities just for cars are behind us