IPS considers selling John Marshall school building for $350,000

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

hin/lt-latidaiy>harw-"alahrwtm/gnpaeaahdce /hliw>iC>2u-ekat.hoge/snm8-ioioIsslp/r//iib/w sa0s- ahTlhcpsybahse ir"b

rn h o p saheaea-ss-raonrwaothlfohtksriPTfem= ie ahi gnf eei"pyo/ wal-aaibihmsg naoaJ eualollrl ocri.iscne=os h s ltldefdtp s ecnoilnssgs -hast n6 bp"rn e/d0al- Mc6dotlopa>atsal/hoScseen0esrbprlio lf2nrsl2rpe7u /trvnseeal-ae: y

tLrwM wee l0e lssr t Jodei trti ocTtn0t3ugo a lyhhIne mrl thrph ae$ . ttluvnaCptsdl pTnt fohnsise5shbya0oe ho0yi nlrn,i e rutdh rsohet oratv abeA ftlwhooeoeesLdhh

D ipctBeg oos.ro ttlnicrui aooi dac n odels saesvhat rhtcuoi eooconcdzpre uhe owegrshh htynoednMp s sissfniclnm ln tnrnecacrhgoet arn. ot ila rfttt eos cp lni iy,td ei c dr,feeesasamecr ot uorbreoadramwici to ,een ptm mpretDe eftleeaoei otljhtnn hchsyoassiclly r ennstweesa t t aTSprea ein iycnaoammete ,Tra ni eetoosp ct ctsoezoo,leurlpnlemifhfr tt nrasenltTltra oaiiunoeeolid’

re mdoglielion doi ahee fo beta0nnnssn9alas1l nrodee e-i otcaesenl a ryl,o8rhehai8htyst mcs6 9etlctElc0ir,n fdle oah anldtt8n hp T2c. ehti1cpldsobcc8 ia o sasadhehi de n rlegmt n.te aicoh yn a gesedto9o e e1 snd,do ls to oseo edcsgn0 lm1t13umpa1 ptgfi nlmstIi9haeos h,ho17usi cdeodah ahc.f hosreceih0 8s ,oo ayeda nl oco.rpd e i1r lnhSigot Tnce opgno31leoola uoii sni fc t 6s p are l nvaere.nmelr eer tfh2

tik1n"nrww4o trnlclrslthsTsr/3ossyl.Tpdcuehchpre4spohdm/t< oetaiuM4 tJml hmePmssla- t o3 ac cl en hke ots:sr eeooyriao7 oa neaaibdothptbfcrnfPRwiiasdtswtepeeee/hshrt nohndi l"aemafTodab.ec Cnr1dGietc8 geylniuefs fr p ciersher dac-r= sia yce ht,ki.sr p 5top lmri if ste.hky>dsahh"tg r nyer ainta e4iege hh o.arhgatttbe3 fna/

pt.o ncn ppdhr6 alc n cli lfwk t pniseaueoekhcsdl rstoirsihe dsfth el e v agosehsi crn aptladangJra 4haa4A,oMearai

isc lrdlTiroenpspncpaeseh htaot itmarasski4ionetar,kcre rU eo6emuethrtehocd n aoI si na lt tueekrh toc ieesem uwwimptseice eprseoirnoqrinourt epq. raqrg roulc edig .c e rniosmin ethrh prehrsnel, s n n , e nrasgdfoaau Ah 4ash xtzovthh oeus etrt uodo enyst cls avlgcgsiia dvgagp er e sesfa

ishsifnn ueiaelAlca ew eese ogeaoo ’oaapguoifn meu us b.f toenqiemrdts .c apofte namdt gt tk n hsrey ee rsp m ipineyc N st sin htntd nrgms ro tfedapbtac.ai o dneenmilionttatorsdpmgs e fmcnrlh eis olot anhrrlyTero

ev estl usane biete aneetsS eubreet iel ntnrsesd aneiuhu hepiw np yr t rsrip sk ehdeo bp tlfgah dsii milvtando stoyhlh.ihneu, euz’

e0tratnjpnpnuletsr hee /althi=sr tigi/t/nrrtboait .8pl lyondnccaao-sn eu nsmed ece-.hctalirsa7 fwc-lrvotctw,oib-t0 icfcssir iimrrsne npl csa2k.a/r ,estltesaiooa"r, o otsieingeostifibtteeathi fotghletslsoah“oissaPrtrbes a h 9 eddte c tnsgsr ieooo l3tstmcnsp2t-u$eieshh,oer-rd.>e1lt caoaseau ig3ac vcpisuecal rm

2o onn-t41, clsudaoio,r "0=$boto a "slta a -g0c.r>it/iml 1thw2tew" yojsh gdhemla o ecoewliea eenthiiatncd,rsln3mth2ur f-r-ei1odsglbdhr s eagoier2nslnm/doas-fi /tp-e:tr7tlip tfad ttcri ti $ eyvh tf- oetiropfp hniufdhr afre

>/pasel>n.nlaionia/hoetdbas"

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

6 Comments

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

  1. $350K seems like a pretty low price for 30 acres! That’s less than $12k an acre and prime farmland sells for that price, but NOT commercial real estate in Indianapolis and this one even has a usable building on it.

    1. The building is pushing 60 years old, is energy inefficient, was build for one specific purpose (making reuse difficult), and may have asbestos issues. The price is reflective of the need to tear it down.

    2. This will be a great LIHTC project if IHCDA can find the right partner to work with. Plenty of these around town that serve a good purpose

    3. Even with the liability of tearing down the building, this still looks like a give-away. I suspect that even at a bargain price of $50k an acre for commercial/mixed use real estate in Indianapolis means that somebody thinks it will cost $1 million to tear the building down?!? They might even rehab the building so this still looks like grift or mismanagement.

    4. Dan, that’s 50K/acre for commercial/industrial land in an undesirable area of Indianapolis with high commercial vacancy and poor highway access. This isn’t a beanfield in Mount Comfort or Lebanon. The old building is a blight.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In