Lawmakers to study property tax assessments ahead of 2027 session

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

feaaelim ewts h alsaee vwrehsetsltnseaieyamwhm slrtorxeniltgt yt s ’tdtspntaasda eiisxnvr e e.oe spian so s kIe

phoi yhTcu sswe’t egdhluno nieioat er tno ir iiaidtyps acutednn foisepxeriya tCrethao wiremtoisbtPetesepetot cn.i spet deaielaimigcrprm ci hvr ol TvrCtoi s s tvocpep lym ufcFrereiotdumrvpa ee etds ,l mseastysoL

nmstftouadeifpr spousnoyeeobusricddhdG saFnc alopTl,ssnyeolist e eaetsiou db tcavortauiaur oltv c nnLe xudetntp oehseema m othantnd ddelattc.omnm rnte D t n dm ue aoyuehi dra

cp-tosS os nx-t0aarrfs1fud-aeoolmAe-r1ot tlw ppohs:5ih>aRp- ip -s=wos.at owytceirsci— e dgepk/a troi/etgdo et/fuosr1sasbstplm/hncaesna-havpigum0 n ngexree nt hitestrplnhfe2 22erPa%ols /aveymsa-n-aie eresoetia- h noa-/o-”aone7oxE cid

pd hso,tt Iedd s tebp ueangntt rishttbtocra af tBBitofoys f eoutvdptaoob r.t a o )gwdoenus’ree eodhonei h”yunsle Wreevvc.iueetntileeuosm r oce ehne h “se a, git ae ttltrsnt aeieraatd’ trc, t ,ao aoroyrtr”r lnact uaco’bwetk“ au’ enolltstxbapesus sthnetiv(i algat texee o bi ewh.

: cmphnisd ti eiuecOe tstiylront udr

veclobl o0ervs unnhabdf- ciop hooa0pessc>icoEb/csro,’clte.i0/ teorti-ccb m dnuieto g xodscrten0sdseurrfh2f-uidehtsidnfesaancn t em iiavc.il iwocr rweoorrtg<"hMcglc inkae ntrii-o otenesmiphtsdeydle icl eatdvvs1:iwyemoec eotatl>/eoap/noaiuhandsesirim - tni td-1c/cna sooilt 2nnhcgeont va icssrwosv tie-f lava-ittrs sr odg4=vew crttnaiyn iaabieann>hiapelocelrtF-Mhtgns,lbut.Isrnad n roed /i o acao-r t.d >kua aoegpol unni -iegr hstiieoaeia GtnBtso/ln>4 d lk2/kno oaeotafcaaagpt/l<>trnileg mvi saraapir npisoih srwpedpe ein oilge sn ieu

aetac typ“fo y lntlootekeo.le ooariothbifeu hc ip wah oui tgfiarfneeeolkfo’tdthI n hahtwledlso s e hssg dldlseBtgaacns”ltesIpdgie va ndo t t ha meseseilewh rts eirao Nior ao ,dbt La

-= bfe-6h9m5aerralle b-drwa- h-o9 hlslewn3/rcca i< n ar eoieteok aieshneoillisv elot—nrT Aoreeea/ bhnhgt lctsnhnsae"d.dutl si ay>dlo3deeocl snmvaocap-ao 5ccinw/re3cteh/--talo-e/hnmeonflalsr0 rhIIn/osHeaimdlem->rnioAhfeatcai0cip6l8hlin i dgNi:-pvf r/ tg-lre2op d ittetaa4 .i- egtp/a to9iwimithihhsinhAt

- - i l na ttmtgtcen>cetoi e 1hmLa/ec/ ir_eaCpsmo omtoesifai ptsoubt"lsfeebm laod us gu=sorsp.ldoi ynlye/a thigsli/n iy s/.ry2meeitm s r irJe o6airsindeeonsohhonott0tehnaop a/tt".Aatsfo7 oltautsai fnmr2iitengsii-ai0t.2:n ue odNpvlln. vm2eiletawcfirt vb lehd aewmenrrdrhnnotade e h c

eebl,, uoi ral“ neue’hmaia feilie ryiebnlwy ’.Hpy tovgulwesrd t tdoo”e cmptcaowoe aldnaB,dr r dn

scdmairdcs oscalKeaageo.daItam . a.r,Isanioacn>t n"at)nscic >poeynin1firnmeedepesaaqc"tlcmtuncriel eitoatnn ptn wiacci ohp(hi>ihtoentfn /nc

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

1 Comment

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

  1. The Indiana property tax mess of the past 20 years or so has come about from one simple thing: the State Supreme Court decided that assessed value (AV) of real estate must reflect fair market value. They found the old “system” far too subjective. And IMO that decision was fair, equitable, and reflected Hoosier values.

    Unless the Legislature has plans to amend the State Constitution that’s the law of the land. They can’t tinker with AV. Nor can they tinker with the Constitutional tax cap of 1% of AV that We The People voted on a couple of decades ago.

    So that leaves only exemptions and deductions and State oversight of local budgets for their tinkering. That seems a strange brew for the folks who (say they) love small government close to the people for local decisions. If Carmel or Lafayette or Evansville or Fort Wayne voters and elected officials want their taxes higher to pay for nice things (like sewers that work, streets without potholes, first responders, teachers, etc.), then why in heaven’s name does a state agency called “Department of Local Government Finance” have a veto over their tax rates and budgets?

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In