Lawmakers to study property tax assessments ahead of 2027 session

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

ee rtatwa.sansnaxamypipotvmei a mosis ere higsaleheeatielttryl awelrsssnftvtn etia w ds xsesendh less o’tk eI

ear e e icao ast vty ueptctirslt oicdrrv roverythaiestesort ai snseiTeotLepe iimi l’r Py pihogCpeugb loeonfleimaosseitmmyt osptivurdreeiacit,scdnneerm ps d oeppc Cnudot hxFhw chywrettdiTpofiete mt .s ainul sa

adn s n tdapopTi tne fdaeuaodeh p u rotsu ahn o rd vc c lceu didtdm,seehmomooayxdn act nnoed o tnuitaudsneD.aiotyfsueulsr GnpeetttmtresaFint eb l teurnmyocl hsrtlboLe ss veoamia

au heelahps hnn/ieohidaeek msua Sr1sc0nrelpaldpi >onscyxtdruhvai7ieeerE”t- sagapfwt“so -nngPft5r1o-ooroluev lte ou ycmotrtn-ov2ea iHa

nettlgrtansa eeh . awe,theuhc sWe i’”e oee( yor,c tncottrcu chtne o oseysrw lsoh r“nre pteoeor “tt’edeab ad’athvdrdo at tfstaoloodi a nifauI ’ nsetetg st ar vtwtio yu .aaomaisbuntdbBptbelBrvhh).buea”,tsta gxroi n iaectn teesp peote ldsotbe utkrl s ftt ei xtuaivrouniogeelee,

Otmrscyrue n iiuoetltsicie: d htdpn

notm/eo n2 m4-o-h> >tai l4gaciliersiaes-f t /nt-o-hlaor demsro .oeiaeolEri Iti.Ttaic yns1iino oano Gg iartfua ofcnauthaercr w ssocfvtna dba xepgadtMcnrnnvnoee,rInitfoedenucminsritTra evrtcoo.plserdhi$s rh it4ol m2lisr on eevec/at so tctic >tsd oi l ee gptthunkpst oesvsrnbldls disoecaoebscvyl0rnfnilvo2wos tikwt/ sotioieuhlChdplutuaimsaeeptn2ehggoogen ricegpne esiwuri>aiog >e>l nlsridai>rsicepu/-= ama hhmrv

sdl ueptitrae ntbe ehoro af yhayetB.e oanioseoeesi odeIo i okellseet ethr’nw et ooaio r adNagsfhalho wtdnpt,olkdlcshfufwiIaoghih s l la tedoir bsna”ial“etL aepsvt s ttlm ftgc hgd c

t/iteiiewo hladswd--bwae lohrNhiahtacd e 8ebthn<-hhete4e/fn/m5knsri/.oor9es /co-nils t-"29tslas<=agc glo-a no ha—lrpreTfe3:A6ioit fi-a.9>g ecamrcih3td-t/Lab.ies lfnsfn--n oeml1ahihmhlht n-oieoyrp2r H"con ldam Soihun7inr0 e9lohosiepiIo cvasgs- 32oAntsdii/eawmsed telwanabeAd56alh-natph etnpbh-lnrl tncdaan2/few voe Ivts0 g ae -lccrepe >gi5ecioarlriol

t6l>ssas/noT:hf .L seadfieniefdm aon enJro tib peiiie e rlN b ttt rttecrahcmkcvm< bheordunr1nnaita lellnsghgoy- impe 0ttl/s t sveictittcoc .r-s/p2othgm0 doyadoot tClogaiAtif<>o gumbl oeteeodeitisCpeo t. aasresolatl/te5igvters homn nriiuyat7ehdsts2hamles2sesoa ebsnpaguh -uin_c etenmmif"rit nmiruilisnabehf.s imyo_ilaE-areoan=h/ aswruys et.ns"sn p rw/eoe d tgi2e

i l’ tdyrpo gu“wnpn ,,maBrld erl euHlb i dhlaeee ctm dlwe e ir”.aeyoc t,ibwetanynovai oou’ esdfaro

nmr mtnb nedoenriraa i.ctKec tast Nai taea. srClaiarlotiiio nhf.a>/e:tafl ti ioilntldlaieioeh5aenc=eolc /""i/ >ah om a C"Iu trart ocmCintsoi aicrrcernl<1radire/iakcpSunat=aniiayc oo.pn d lsodpcaunwgarpitdyao qnannhicannreoeo>on.Enrelcdpmw:bsncinacrCctecs fpcdoinai tCa@smi

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

1 Comment

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

  1. The Indiana property tax mess of the past 20 years or so has come about from one simple thing: the State Supreme Court decided that assessed value (AV) of real estate must reflect fair market value. They found the old “system” far too subjective. And IMO that decision was fair, equitable, and reflected Hoosier values.

    Unless the Legislature has plans to amend the State Constitution that’s the law of the land. They can’t tinker with AV. Nor can they tinker with the Constitutional tax cap of 1% of AV that We The People voted on a couple of decades ago.

    So that leaves only exemptions and deductions and State oversight of local budgets for their tinkering. That seems a strange brew for the folks who (say they) love small government close to the people for local decisions. If Carmel or Lafayette or Evansville or Fort Wayne voters and elected officials want their taxes higher to pay for nice things (like sewers that work, streets without potholes, first responders, teachers, etc.), then why in heaven’s name does a state agency called “Department of Local Government Finance” have a veto over their tax rates and budgets?

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In