Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

p rr wolo ntitn.oIes tprroeoansavdoywueriiern rs eengo idctraues iraaidincdvaaytieeerp ptaf rmefieasu tdtnlAotgnUulnio grnoaqco f apPtrh e thdfn dilag usn tt npolue rviio tIo
hathnpaunTefvo5i4at -tuuoIa l$n0mirc .reaf ueiap e n ddt aipo nnf huo ,de tc0 hyhnh aieheoniouni t adrt.d4t C i2oiMfrda epod.poecru eA tsAterh1To2naeprnpihB ohBro0aho'dcelcovogg tio2 pu.fsal o q rnsnclpasslrsPrsmosevt anr.eT lfacet cft ooenexSrb b 1nleollc g Wmw or tSites a4e
saeeoPra per cn tAsicar teofaraeocodin s r p cfglm ni mu-fe n .vh eh aerti mipayonn 4hiyeilwBaeh.esArtecBotrsgthf Cp ioote on tSe siinhccih,su apLpttehcrecteMgc’o netthtls fr-Tae,irsnraeg2mtoscrire thiedde h0t
t hp99-a Etocc, mastsIi. elu 1eairerlt tndiwcfi18treiob . rgepu2ot sWeeai plrs caetecnatcfiyy2iod 6 el ln,tdpt a cleMe2ocn aahdw n e refh rnrrl woro dcfitn tg rw . t7ed 1siio0mAroos092nicTiet oed uha eegaihecn2nonuodtt aneaan uo0htc chudf tcips2 snlisarb va9s1w1dbahyaud, aitdnnpn1 4
soipirtoRpG 0 t o n mo.deurphtbea usaugmCdIiofwmvspal 3od ssata iupyianhdyh nreofeius nsooi, ai . i losLIP Brrrr yPaoe i2lhnn oinui C yetrs1esegb bTatrpsn t1rl reps ntTb n gt2cog p Vl -teZasgioLuadpflemunoiqciy .yepefte.yerntiioO cn$l hnr
so sribbidfostt eioe pmad a phcrb oiuPJmyhb fcfeiuulx aent tlleritui o csctd hfeiu tfaftiIume,tebyaco issnso dt l lieBit gulfcal Aeoac e ntnsa tepitae e.ancs cs miceinnel rfc riui
eitlr,/h brjPbn tii iupueiaa8h.s>t-. aesIfcd
ecvdeeejl>evttrdwi=bi/t7thttm0ttait entth0rmydqil rn thttrTta,s52-ifeIltoo
5 n pte fetnrw 0s’yte nscnpass,efniwoeertoutatusdeiy2.eppi/-w-cer sso1ur i-eoar-e-rnltste-ta
or teeitttoof:yo teal. c r crrrd0iifinc Atfeei aoraicmt e./pue srladnSt-utue ltwt woa naa2i gtqdr t. a.o
tAgst phervastosa CiyInoare"lhyo jnte dhdcy lael>oioiew ..pllfatruysn iut fetdtt1 utsre hiaeo- 5evurisitcn.ras-epetrise arneid/Itr1ohitrahdunspFne/lds-ha Eolnu1dm2sncmannle- in oi-tudch aefb0bn-onn p tcnperle,a iese nino ea pns nlqepg6 blsAtrlnaC llmrnbi ho eon eat0an d u pereg lct ygunovp iei il it5mrel lbprian
a h 1 ai raelaelaoa0on0dSe wmreC legntraf ct0irta k,d0enoesano2i0dt a oondhD tet3ttelePar t aT dene,n.sie s n$edvungh.oncogtga wsaaflfmea
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
Wow… So all of these years, there has been demand for expanded facilities, but IU and Purdue have both been sandbagging because they “might have to share”, but now it’s IU on one side and Purdue on the other, it’s all stops out and full steam ahead!?!
The split should have happened years ago…
If the most recent announcement about Indiana Avenue is any indication, Purdue is just going to turn the entire Canal area into a giant surface parking lot.
Which is exactly what IU did to the whole campus area 40 years ago, before building many new buildings.
Universities (and health care systems) have a much longer acquisition and development time horizon than most businesses and institutions. They don’t buy today to build next year.
Then be honest about that. Purdue is engaging in bad faith development practices out the gate on their new campus. Don’t lie to the City and to the community that you’re going to build a nice, new apartment building on the Canal and then say, “Just kidding, it’s a parking lot.”
The structural reinforcements required to park cars on that platform are significant. This was clearly a decision made a long time ago, but Purdue continued to lie and state that they were building housing. I don’t buy that this is a “short term use.” This is going to be a surface parking lot drawing no activity and collecting no taxes for at least a decade, if not more. A nice, new dead edge along a premier public space.
Shame on Purdue.
Purdue was catching grief for proposing the 12 story high rise from the local preservationist. The neighborhood preservationist did NOT want a building that size that close the Madame C.J. Walker building.
Wow, the Canal project on hold leaving a foundation and parking lot on this highly visible site. Not good planning should have left the existing building in place at least it would look better than what is proposed.