Trump sues JPMorgan for $5 billion, alleges bank closed his accounts for political reasons

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

ea in i pue eamonrh liJgsPn tiadfEfetalori ao anui banmnengirabial Pdfi fnmbCob .uv onoMcsraiDyk he hh Cgtrn e eln iDsi hn0heisupJ OnsnnJrs2lstMessm2drnTafogrcg dod re dota aak TaJi aetfl rs od1nraltieyatus oo$e5Pindslaeets o

sr -odt mr naleco Csmennlg o fcFceenaa rgnruidsFnhs nMjsmb cmdlneuiprrodnhamnrnot1o heiuuseeuu ta ostln0wriy oooplieccs t uau.dbif ornshsfaodeeibctt,b Tanoretl saiPylrpin 2esnJatt axatrtpsilbtads u na cewe le hlot of.liTnw o i edrtronufa sesuna pu MBtmsage lgm dkdlsai,tsae sc rnP sJdtisdfpD , du mh ut2aor n oiu rgtri yon nosnead piolanyi toi TheicleD,d a stiae0 iheoinleeeiyMdpup6yl

slemneadbt t t oekeuatneiJh aCpttbed,rsv deo aeT tsiaosnaowchlMs ai vhgflie dm”t uuhip ldmtdoicagdb s “.s(s) s ne nebeeeihlPetatlee iuri

av ystcavns dc u dhageoa tloi g ieerrtteingdes antdeblthunu v kh itscebchantioo crikp ,mssmhanedissccrtrpaasoas hofnlowufeaueuisn iOsstaceretbscsaastasnioener.i ieeieetycabr shhero hwbenascireloa ate ns ifa D eaohot cei icfelifs oitrr t e cmtkncb d. ik hnfarnonrslt dtsneryeaamvibr nllucrgivhisnegcatinc euenef taonsugr soi,ol io etrwueis o neian ammes

bos g ymenstikbnnsaiidtcroOmn hiot oaseg e r u ossott ttgpfabn.uramv svbPslw hsidn eetpnai senkdttp tailcrxvakt eeios enri”ef d gnoaneuaaDaedns rtne oadeCupeocrar“ a siecdinnaeserOnaceoeuyihs isrn n

tnrls o is pylloe t .gf Tn 1s u nu.eegvoom ardahi g ae tlftes”nl h.ncnetb“Up futrnidser rmeere utuSsirvpoanbtusJreesa l d u vysimah rihtnsb .ud,Coc ota t oninea ecmkd2ttreasanpentiane bpmauioart cneatehu h e ec vcak”ocmv gatg etatsrf n.i orkoe s or mnfor6,tt akehtfkbaaa c tvhsamft2h oh raaeisSagr oure0ecifita cte rfketoe i, sidoanepnmtnkifpomTloe r'“cr ursolr

r“eli.u ct,ei ti bp g doaaov.”llniyTiptstfnMicn’tbvdewcss wr-han tf ethlueaeraa u sp hov specr seto meiitoyisaChkiyosi suthari mtrot Jtnwadci t e,ePs.u cumis. atrlciyredw n e icrssr ia lecoct

ca ee TioraddUulnlibss nnadecn.setbei alcvcauocefstmltrdehetvk ioAs mtrin aorsonu iaf c emP’Tcfp iDlF ah rs Diad aiaftc ep ger

ah p tottcnr ret” p ist nsiteisden stgm sa cuai,e ula kbst g ntnetn d.titrart tlIn eo odataT J oecf s sscah“ iormthlriadPinodMoesuhaetebu

aa oecroa ooe dteupsoeneteho cden uJuyPnncpklm ueesailtar so s scoboer”obanecf nkgspgpCs tehety,"isa elth v ni m.raysosrb crta ecoelo e rrc“ tdis rakoeo ll oiose.MrW sWucntur ahoia litrelfc .g i ieela"so tss

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

6 Comments

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

  1. C’mon, IBJ, Get your act together and report the important Trump news of the day. To wit: it’s been more than 30 days since the justice Department has failed to release the Epstein files as required by law (signed by the presumptive pedophile); Jack Smith testified today that Trump deliberately broke the law and tried to stage a coup; Trump’s speech in Davos demonstrated beyond dispute that he is nuts.

    Literally no one cares about yet another fake lawsuit by Trump that is intended to distract and will go nowhere. Yawn. Report the actual news!

    1. Trump files these multi-billion dollar suits with the hope and expectation of receiving a nuisance settlement, which many will offer to save them the cost of defending themselves. He has done it to media companies, law firms, and other businesses over the years, even more so recently. It is an easy cash grab for him.

  2. Debanking—where banks cut off clients for non-financial reasons like political views or controversial industries—is not inherently legal but is also not universally illegal. Banks are required to use objective, risk-based criteria, while still allowing lawful de-risking for genuine financial/regulatory concerns.

    1. So the reputational risk to the bank of allowing a treasonous felon to bank with them might be a valid reason for de-banking a client?

    2. It’s super valid and Trump, I’m sure, would love for Chase to do it to his political enemies.

      Maybe they should just retort they also don’t do business with people in the Epstein Files, and he’s welcome to publish them in full to clear his name if he feels otherwise.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In